QUOTE(Cryptoman @ Nov 22 2006, 07:33 AM) [snapback]1435218[/snapback]
It is quite strange that it just lost transmission, I think the government is hiding something
What government would that be?
It was ESA, not NASA, that was resposible for the Beagle 2. And, this was not an expensive lander. It was, by space exploration standards, cheap and was simply considered an add on experiment. The real aim of the mission was the Mars Express orbiter which is still working perfectly. Beagle 2 would just have been a bonus if it had worked.
QUOTE
New measurements from the spacecraft's mothership, Mars Express, suggest the upper atmosphere can be far less dense than anyone thought. This could have been fatal for the lander because it relied on the atmosphere's braking effect to trigger the release of its parachute.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn4752