Full Version: The Hutchison Effect
Anyone familiar with this ????
John Hutchison's life changed drastically in 1979 when, upon starting up an array of high-voltage equipment, he felt something hit his shoulder. He threw the piece of metal back to where it seemed to have originated, and it flew up and hit him again. This was how he originally discovered fundamental frequencies can sheild gravity. When his Tesla coils, electrostatic generator, and other equipment created a complex electromagnetic field, heavy pieces of metal levitated and shot toward the ceiling, and some pieces shredded. Upon analysis and thorough investigation, the Canadian government dubbed this phenomenon the Hutchison Effect.
What is the Hutchison effect? As with much of the new-energy field, no one can say for sure. Some theorists think the effect is the result of opposing electromagnetic fields cancelling each other out, creating a powerful flow of space energy. The Canadian government also reported invisible samples phasing in and out of existence.
A Vancouver businessman, George Liscazis, heard about the Hutchison Effect in 1987, contacted Hutchison, and brought in a consulting engineer from Boeing Aerospace, and the Canadian government to form a company that would promote technology developed from the effect. Many different political factors ensured Hutchison would not be allowed to continue in his research unless he signed agreements with either the Canadian government or the U.S. military. He refused. During one of John's overseas trips to Germany, the Canadian government seized the opportunity to aquire all of John's priceless replacations of Nikola Tesla's equipment by paying off his "partner" George Liscazis upwards of 70 million dollars and creating a false PCB scandal so they could use the local press to justify their actions and hide the true nature of what the government was actually removing from John's Lab located at 13th and Kingsway, Vancouver B.C.
After many more years of experiments, demonstrations and lectures in other countries such as U.S.A. Germany and Japan, Hutchison returned to Vancouver in 1991. Piece by piece, he built out of surplus Navy equipment what now has become something of a landmark in New Westminster, British Colombia. John has built himself an apartment laboratory second to none. It took several years before he could reestablish his collection, however despite many obsticals, most political, John now has his apartment lab equiped to perform for all types of media and still demonstrates the Hutchison Effect to this day.
Scalar Mechanics - Much of Tom Bearden's research in the 1980's related to scalar mechanics and Tesla-technology that might be related to the Hutchison-Effect.
http://www.americanantigravity.com/hutchison.html
...then later>>>>>.
John Hutchison Raided At Gunpoint
By Canadian Police -- CLICK HERE FOR UPDATE
Reporting From Shreveport, Louisiana
UNITED STATES
Word has been received this morning, Saturday, 18 March 2000, that John Hutchison
has been raided at gunpoint by Canadian Police.
John's apartment in New Westminster, British Columbia, was raided at 2 PM Friday,
17 March 2000, by gun-wielding police searching for firearms. An antique gun collection
owned by Hutchison was confiscated in its entireity.
According to Hutchison, a phone call was received at about 2 PM Friday, stating that
it was the police, and asking John to answer his door. Hutchison states that there were
8 to 10 individuals pointing weapons at him, only two or three of whom were in uniform.
The rest were dressed in dark clothing.
Hutchison was handcuffed and placed on the outside steps while police searched the
apartment. No warrant was claimed or shown at any time. Police stated only that there
had been an anonymous complaint that firearms were being brought into the apartment.
Police also called in an "electrical inspector" to examine John's lab equipment. This
is the famous "Hutchison apparatus" with which John produces the renowned "Hutchison
Effect."
Additional individuals dressed in suits were brought in who took extensive photographs
of the Hutchison apparatus. Hutchison indicates that these persons had an "official air"
about them, and that they might be Government agents, especially given the confiscation
of the original Hutchison lab, which took place while John was out of the country in 1990.
None of these persons showed any identification.
Those who have followed John's career of invention and innovation will recall that his
first laboratory was forcibly seized by the Canadian Government on 24 February 1990 by
the direct order of former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. The Government
has retained the lab in spite of a court order by Judge Paris of the Supreme Court of
British Columbia to return it.
A previous raid on John Hutchison's apartment involving his collection of antique
firearms occured in 1978, and processing took two years. The confiscated antiques were
returned at the order of Judge Cronin. These events occured under the administration of
former PM Pierre Trudeau. Former PM Joe Clark, who took over in the 1980s following
the Trudeau administration, wrote to Hutchison offering help and support.
The present raid follows close on the heels of a recent successful levitation performed
11 October 1999 which was videotaped by John. The effect was achieved after six days
worth of attempts.
However, neighbors called local police to complain about Hutchison's experiment. It
is unclear whether something in their apartment levitated, although there is no other way
known at this time that they could have been aware of the levitation experiment that was
in progress. The neighbors in question live across the street from Hutchison.
The sound of approaching sirens was recorded on the video soundtrack of Hutchison's
camcorder during the experiment, and video of some emergency vehicles and personnel
was obtained.
Further updates on the situation will be posted promptly on this website.
Mark A. Solis
Shreveport, LA USA
Webmaster for John Hutchison
http://www.geocities.com/researchtriangle/...8863/index.html
Support For John
Continues To Grow
E-mail expressing support for John Hutchison and concern for his welfare has
continued to pour in since this affair began. People from all walks of life, and many
with great resources, have asked what they can do. Everyone wants to be kept posted
as to what is happening.
Other inventors, and promoters of frontier scientific research like John's, have
expressed outrage at what has been done by the authorities. Newsgroups and list
servers have been alive with talk of what has happened.
Concerned people span the globe, from the US and Canada, to new Zealand,
England, Australia, and Japan. John Hutchison has made numerous national television
appearances in Japan, and is virtually a household name in that country.
FOX TV and The Learning Channel continue to carry video reports of the work of
John Hutchison in the US, Canada and New Zealand.
While John Hutchison was well known before, this incident has only increased his
fame among frontier researchers around the world, as well as having brought renewed
attention to the question of private firearm ownership in Canada, and especially the
ownership of antique weaponry such as flintlocks and other black powder firearms.
There is also renewed concern over the way Government views private frontier
physics research.
http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/...863/Flash2.html
Continues To Grow
E-mail expressing support for John Hutchison and concern for his welfare has
continued to pour in since this affair began. People from all walks of life, and many
with great resources, have asked what they can do. Everyone wants to be kept posted
as to what is happening.
Other inventors, and promoters of frontier scientific research like John's, have
expressed outrage at what has been done by the authorities. Newsgroups and list
servers have been alive with talk of what has happened.
Concerned people span the globe, from the US and Canada, to new Zealand,
England, Australia, and Japan. John Hutchison has made numerous national television
appearances in Japan, and is virtually a household name in that country.
FOX TV and The Learning Channel continue to carry video reports of the work of
John Hutchison in the US, Canada and New Zealand.
While John Hutchison was well known before, this incident has only increased his
fame among frontier researchers around the world, as well as having brought renewed
attention to the question of private firearm ownership in Canada, and especially the
ownership of antique weaponry such as flintlocks and other black powder firearms.
There is also renewed concern over the way Government views private frontier
physics research.
http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/...863/Flash2.html
Honestly, I wouldn't waste my time with this. It is not for real. Nobody has ever been able to replicate what he can do in a make shift lab at home and even physics doesn't back it up. He had his 15 minutes of fame based on a hoax and so be it.
Best,
Badeskov
Best,
Badeskov
crystal sage, do you actually read the stuff you cut and paste? Those articles are more than 6 years old.
I found his latest ...but can't view it as my computer is playing up,,,,
..I can't even get the smilies to work !!!!!!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3486217070984951349
http://youtube.com/watch?v=y8jHEJVEunE
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/search_resul...query=hutchison
http://www.hutchisoneffectonline.com/forum/
..I can't even get the smilies to work !!!!!!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3486217070984951349
http://youtube.com/watch?v=y8jHEJVEunE
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/search_resul...query=hutchison
http://www.hutchisoneffectonline.com/forum/
I've seen programs on tv about him off and on over the last few years, although interesting they always seem to come to the same conclusion that the effect is either unexplained or not repeatable.
In most of the programs i've watched he merely plays with the equipment, randomly flipping switches and turning dials.
Now if he would keep records of his experiments then maybe things would be different, but it appears that he dosen't.
In most of the programs i've watched he merely plays with the equipment, randomly flipping switches and turning dials.
Now if he would keep records of his experiments then maybe things would be different, but it appears that he dosen't.
Crystal Sage, read this thread that discusses the same thing in the Mysteries of Mind, Space and Time section 
Cheers
Cheers
QUOTE(ai_guardian @ Nov 26 2006, 12:39 PM) [snapback]1439033[/snapback]
Crystal Sage, read this thread that discusses the same thing in the Mysteries of Mind, Space and Time section
Cheers
Thanks!!! You're right Hutchinson is for real!!!
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/gravity.htm
http://www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.co...n/hutchison.htm
QUOTE(crystal sage @ Nov 27 2006, 06:39 AM) [snapback]1439694[/snapback]
Thanks!!! You're right Hutchinson is for real!!!
Cheers
John Hutchison is a fraud, a compulsive liar and a con-man.
Hutchison has never been able to duplicate his results in a controled environment.
http://socialtech.ca/ade/index.php/2005/05...nnel-is-bogus2/
http://www.skywise711.com/Skeptic/Hutchison/hutchison.html
http://actionskeptics.blogspot.com/2007/01...-in-canada.html
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103565
These people can do the "Hutchison Effect" too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8Z1eLnfIRg
http://www.trailerparkscience.com/#Experiments
http://youtube.com/watch?v=SKZo4SoPjjw&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=KywkBdLqaDU
Hutchison has never been able to duplicate his results in a controled environment.
http://socialtech.ca/ade/index.php/2005/05...nnel-is-bogus2/
http://www.skywise711.com/Skeptic/Hutchison/hutchison.html
http://actionskeptics.blogspot.com/2007/01...-in-canada.html
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103565
These people can do the "Hutchison Effect" too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8Z1eLnfIRg
http://www.trailerparkscience.com/#Experiments
http://youtube.com/watch?v=SKZo4SoPjjw&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=KywkBdLqaDU
I can remember when he first cam on the scene. My first instinct was that he was a conman of some sort(just a gut feeling), I just flat out didnt trust him and I felt that his videos looked like cheap hoaxes that were made to swindel someone out of money. He had a lot of people believing in him, but I looked at other established physicist who were pretty open minded folks (A physicist I am not, by any stretch of the imagination), and it was pretty clear that this guy was not just out of left field, he wasnt even in the park (He was down the street hawking stolen tickets to the game)...
While I am open to people outside the normal scientific community making breakthroughs, they have to be held to the same standards as the guys in the universities do, it has to be reproduceable...and not just when you are alone and running the camera by yourself in your apartment...If you have someone making claims that they can do something repeatedly that breaks known laws of physics, people are going to be interested and need to see it to study the effect for themselves. Somehow magically the effect couldnt be produced when other people were around, which makes me think of all the preteen "psions" that made every claim in the book on the forum, but could never seem to back up the claim with anything but excuses when the time came to reproduce that given power...
While I am open to people outside the normal scientific community making breakthroughs, they have to be held to the same standards as the guys in the universities do, it has to be reproduceable...and not just when you are alone and running the camera by yourself in your apartment...If you have someone making claims that they can do something repeatedly that breaks known laws of physics, people are going to be interested and need to see it to study the effect for themselves. Somehow magically the effect couldnt be produced when other people were around, which makes me think of all the preteen "psions" that made every claim in the book on the forum, but could never seem to back up the claim with anything but excuses when the time came to reproduce that given power...
It is when too much energy has gone into debunking someone that you begin to wonder???Are they really on to something??? This must be for real...
Why are they sooo trying to discredit this fellow???
What other information does he have that others don't want released yet...???
QUOTE
http://www.americanantigravity.com/hutchison.html
Debunking Armchair Skeptics
As mentioned in Wikipedia, many armchair skeptics have presented explanations for how the footage of the Hutchison-Effect might be faked. Often cited as an example is a piece of video shot by Peter Von Puttkamer in 2003 showing what appears to be a toy UFO suspended on a string as evidence. The video, which aired in a Canadian television broadcast, includes a narrative that describes a single-wire transmission system that John was experimenting with on a particular day. It is not considered to be part of the "classic" Hutchison-Effect, and has no bearing on the veracity of experimental footage shot during the 1980's. The experiment and its intent has been often misinterpreted due to early streaming-video of the footage, which excluded the explanatory narrative.
Another common skeptical accusation is that Hutchison is "tilting the room" (presumably an enclosure that can be rotated on it's axis without changing the camera orientation). This is provided as evidence that simple camera trickery is used to provide the antigravity & levitation effects shown in a variety of Hutchison Effect videoclips. Close examination of the original "lost footage" clearly shows, however, that Hutchison's footage is shot in a variety of areas in concrete-floored rooms, and full-length footage often shows floor-to-ceiling camera-pans that would be impossible for a mounted camera to achieve.
To clarify for the record, the burden of proof appears to demonstrate that the Hutchison Effect is a real and demonstrable natural effect, and that Hutchison is not faking the effect for publicity, money, or other motives.
Interviews with Dr. George Hathaway, Col. John Alexander, and television crews from Japan, Europe, and several networks in North America all verify that documented effects have been witnessed by many people at once, caught on multiple cameras (both amateur and professional), and do not involve simple trickery.
Debunking Armchair Skeptics
As mentioned in Wikipedia, many armchair skeptics have presented explanations for how the footage of the Hutchison-Effect might be faked. Often cited as an example is a piece of video shot by Peter Von Puttkamer in 2003 showing what appears to be a toy UFO suspended on a string as evidence. The video, which aired in a Canadian television broadcast, includes a narrative that describes a single-wire transmission system that John was experimenting with on a particular day. It is not considered to be part of the "classic" Hutchison-Effect, and has no bearing on the veracity of experimental footage shot during the 1980's. The experiment and its intent has been often misinterpreted due to early streaming-video of the footage, which excluded the explanatory narrative.
Another common skeptical accusation is that Hutchison is "tilting the room" (presumably an enclosure that can be rotated on it's axis without changing the camera orientation). This is provided as evidence that simple camera trickery is used to provide the antigravity & levitation effects shown in a variety of Hutchison Effect videoclips. Close examination of the original "lost footage" clearly shows, however, that Hutchison's footage is shot in a variety of areas in concrete-floored rooms, and full-length footage often shows floor-to-ceiling camera-pans that would be impossible for a mounted camera to achieve.
To clarify for the record, the burden of proof appears to demonstrate that the Hutchison Effect is a real and demonstrable natural effect, and that Hutchison is not faking the effect for publicity, money, or other motives.
Interviews with Dr. George Hathaway, Col. John Alexander, and television crews from Japan, Europe, and several networks in North America all verify that documented effects have been witnessed by many people at once, caught on multiple cameras (both amateur and professional), and do not involve simple trickery.
QUOTE
http://www.americanantigravity.com/article...otos/Page1.html
http://www.prlog.org/10048184-scientists-s...t-parallel.html
Scientists See WTC - Hutchison Effect Parallel
On a Washington DC local radio station, WPFW, Scientists discuss true nature of destruction of WTC Complex on 9/11 and conclude it was related to a known effect.
Source: Double-Click Services Ltd
Jan 30, 2008 05:40:05 Click to see PDF Version of this Press Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(PRLog.Org) – Jan 30, 2008 – Washington DC, USA - In two appearances on a Washington DC Pacifica Radio Station (14th and 18th January 2008), WPFW, on a show hosted by Author and Political Commentator Ambrose I. Lane, Sr., Dr. Judy Wood, a former Professor of Mechanical Engineering, and John Hutchison, experimental scientist, discussed how photographic and video evidence suggest that the World Trade Centre (WTC) towers were destroyed using Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). Many of the observed effects resemble those seen in John Hutchison’s experiments.
In early January 2008, Wood posted a new study on her website (http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ), which relates effects seen in photographs taken before, during and after the destruction of the WTC complex, to effects seen in Hutchison’s ongoing experiments. Wood and Hutchison co-authored the study.
http://www.prlog.org/10048184-scientists-s...t-parallel.html
Scientists See WTC - Hutchison Effect Parallel
On a Washington DC local radio station, WPFW, Scientists discuss true nature of destruction of WTC Complex on 9/11 and conclude it was related to a known effect.
Source: Double-Click Services Ltd
Jan 30, 2008 05:40:05 Click to see PDF Version of this Press Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(PRLog.Org) – Jan 30, 2008 – Washington DC, USA - In two appearances on a Washington DC Pacifica Radio Station (14th and 18th January 2008), WPFW, on a show hosted by Author and Political Commentator Ambrose I. Lane, Sr., Dr. Judy Wood, a former Professor of Mechanical Engineering, and John Hutchison, experimental scientist, discussed how photographic and video evidence suggest that the World Trade Centre (WTC) towers were destroyed using Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). Many of the observed effects resemble those seen in John Hutchison’s experiments.
In early January 2008, Wood posted a new study on her website (http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ), which relates effects seen in photographs taken before, during and after the destruction of the WTC complex, to effects seen in Hutchison’s ongoing experiments. Wood and Hutchison co-authored the study.
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/
QUOTE
http://www.mediaforfreedom.com/ReadArticle...?ArticleID=9368
Hutchison has reproduced his experiments many times and the results are recorded on video and have been included in a number of TV documentaries that focus on unusual scientific experiments. Hutchison's metal samples have been repeatedly tested by scientists, including a group at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, confirming Hutchison Effects.
The article by Wood and Hutchison (http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ) documents effects and events seen in the vicinity of the World Trade Centre and compares these with observed characteristics of the Hutchison Effect.
The observed effects include:
"Weird Fires" - The fires seen near the badly damaged cars do not seem to ignite nearby office paper. Some photos show firefighters walking very close to or even through the fires. A video by John Hutchison shows similar looking "fires" on a model metal boat.
Bent Beams and "Jellification" - Samples that Hutchison produced show very unusual effects on metal. Sometimes the metal "jellifies," turning soft and losing form, leading to severe bending or fracturing of the sample. Sometimes samples erupt from the centre and sometimes they turn to dust, similar to what happened to the WTC on 9/11.
Ongoing reactions - Hutchison's samples often show an ongoing reaction, even after the energy field is removed. This "non-self-quenching" reaction seems to occur at the nuclear level. This also appears to be happening at Ground Zero (GZ). Dr. Wood's study suggests that the WTC site is still being "decontaminated," with trucks moving dirt into and out of the site, while "hosing down operations" continue, which Dr. Wood and Andrew Johnson photographed and recorded on video in January 2008.
Transmutation - Sometimes materials subjected to the Hutchison Effect seem to change at a molecular or even atomic level. This could be the explanation for the apparent rapid rusting at GZ, where steel rusts like iron. Also, some photographs show unusual effects on the aluminium cladding used on the twin towers that look similar to effects produced on Hutchison's aluminum samples.
Wood, Hutchison, and Johnson appeared on two Ambrose Lane shows, "We Ourselves," and discussed the similarities between the WTC event and the experimental evidence produced by the Hutchison Effect. "I have been collecting data over the last year and a half or so and I have found these distinct and unusual characteristics, which I have given names such as 'fuming' and 'toasted' cars – I have even noticed flipped cars in some pictures," said Wood. "In some cases, the flipped cars are sitting next to trees that are fully covered with leaves."
"If the flipping of the cars was caused by big explosions or 'wind' from the towers coming down," asked Johnson, "how did the leaves stay on the trees?" Material scientist George Hathaway observes that the Hutchison Effect causes either lift or disruption of the material itself. Lift explains the flipped cars. (http://drjudywood.com/pdf/HutchisonEffectReport_txt.pdf )
In some of his experiments, Hutchison observed "spontaneous combustion" where "fires appeared out of nowhere." He also confirmed that Col. John Alexander and others from the U.S. military visited him in 1983 and filmed his experiments with a team from Los Alamos National Laboratories (LANL). (http://www.weourselves.org/mp3/wpfw_011808_judy-andrew2.mp3 ) Canadian MP Chuck Cook and Dr Lorn A Kuehne of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) contacted him in 1986 and told him his work was "a matter of National Security." (http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ8.html) Hutchison says he's been told that defense contractor, S.A.I.C., has his technology and has been developing it. (http://drjudywood.com/media/071212_JohnHutchison-TruthH.mp3 )
Asked about ongoing dirt removal and hosing down at the WTC complex, Hutchison commented, "I think there is an ongoing reaction or 'infection.'" Wood noted that the damage done to the Bankers Trust (Deutsche Bank) building was repaired, but then they decided to take the building down. This evidence indicates there is a continuing reaction there. Rusting beams in the Bankers Trust building and in the temporary PATH train station also suggest ongoing reactions too.
At the end of the first show, a caller said, "This is a revelation beyond revelations…this trumps everything…If this story ever gets out, it will change the course of the United States' and the whole world's history."
Another caller said during the second show, "I am thinking that these revelations we are hearing this morning should have the people so excited and so outraged that they should be flooding the lines to their congressmen and news people to get this message out as the number one story of the year."
For more information please see:
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/
http://www.hutchisoneffect.ca/
WPFW Related:
http://www.weourselves.org/
http://www.wpfw.org/
Audio of interviews:
We Ourselves Dr Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson 14 Jan 2007.mp3
We Ourselves Dr J Wood J Hutchison and A Johnson 18 Jan 2007.mp3
Hutchison has reproduced his experiments many times and the results are recorded on video and have been included in a number of TV documentaries that focus on unusual scientific experiments. Hutchison's metal samples have been repeatedly tested by scientists, including a group at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, confirming Hutchison Effects.
The article by Wood and Hutchison (http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ) documents effects and events seen in the vicinity of the World Trade Centre and compares these with observed characteristics of the Hutchison Effect.
The observed effects include:
"Weird Fires" - The fires seen near the badly damaged cars do not seem to ignite nearby office paper. Some photos show firefighters walking very close to or even through the fires. A video by John Hutchison shows similar looking "fires" on a model metal boat.
Bent Beams and "Jellification" - Samples that Hutchison produced show very unusual effects on metal. Sometimes the metal "jellifies," turning soft and losing form, leading to severe bending or fracturing of the sample. Sometimes samples erupt from the centre and sometimes they turn to dust, similar to what happened to the WTC on 9/11.
Ongoing reactions - Hutchison's samples often show an ongoing reaction, even after the energy field is removed. This "non-self-quenching" reaction seems to occur at the nuclear level. This also appears to be happening at Ground Zero (GZ). Dr. Wood's study suggests that the WTC site is still being "decontaminated," with trucks moving dirt into and out of the site, while "hosing down operations" continue, which Dr. Wood and Andrew Johnson photographed and recorded on video in January 2008.
Transmutation - Sometimes materials subjected to the Hutchison Effect seem to change at a molecular or even atomic level. This could be the explanation for the apparent rapid rusting at GZ, where steel rusts like iron. Also, some photographs show unusual effects on the aluminium cladding used on the twin towers that look similar to effects produced on Hutchison's aluminum samples.
Wood, Hutchison, and Johnson appeared on two Ambrose Lane shows, "We Ourselves," and discussed the similarities between the WTC event and the experimental evidence produced by the Hutchison Effect. "I have been collecting data over the last year and a half or so and I have found these distinct and unusual characteristics, which I have given names such as 'fuming' and 'toasted' cars – I have even noticed flipped cars in some pictures," said Wood. "In some cases, the flipped cars are sitting next to trees that are fully covered with leaves."
"If the flipping of the cars was caused by big explosions or 'wind' from the towers coming down," asked Johnson, "how did the leaves stay on the trees?" Material scientist George Hathaway observes that the Hutchison Effect causes either lift or disruption of the material itself. Lift explains the flipped cars. (http://drjudywood.com/pdf/HutchisonEffectReport_txt.pdf )
In some of his experiments, Hutchison observed "spontaneous combustion" where "fires appeared out of nowhere." He also confirmed that Col. John Alexander and others from the U.S. military visited him in 1983 and filmed his experiments with a team from Los Alamos National Laboratories (LANL). (http://www.weourselves.org/mp3/wpfw_011808_judy-andrew2.mp3 ) Canadian MP Chuck Cook and Dr Lorn A Kuehne of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) contacted him in 1986 and told him his work was "a matter of National Security." (http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ8.html) Hutchison says he's been told that defense contractor, S.A.I.C., has his technology and has been developing it. (http://drjudywood.com/media/071212_JohnHutchison-TruthH.mp3 )
Asked about ongoing dirt removal and hosing down at the WTC complex, Hutchison commented, "I think there is an ongoing reaction or 'infection.'" Wood noted that the damage done to the Bankers Trust (Deutsche Bank) building was repaired, but then they decided to take the building down. This evidence indicates there is a continuing reaction there. Rusting beams in the Bankers Trust building and in the temporary PATH train station also suggest ongoing reactions too.
At the end of the first show, a caller said, "This is a revelation beyond revelations…this trumps everything…If this story ever gets out, it will change the course of the United States' and the whole world's history."
Another caller said during the second show, "I am thinking that these revelations we are hearing this morning should have the people so excited and so outraged that they should be flooding the lines to their congressmen and news people to get this message out as the number one story of the year."
For more information please see:
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/
http://www.hutchisoneffect.ca/
WPFW Related:
http://www.weourselves.org/
http://www.wpfw.org/
Audio of interviews:
We Ourselves Dr Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson 14 Jan 2007.mp3
We Ourselves Dr J Wood J Hutchison and A Johnson 18 Jan 2007.mp3
similar experiments done by others...
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread331108/pg1
http://www.americanantigravity.com/gravitywaves.shtml
http://www.scansite.org/scan.php?pid=157
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1784833525509845733
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread331108/pg1
QUOTE
Taming Gravity
BY JIM WILSON
Photo by Philip Gentry
Published in the October 1999 issue.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/re...ch/1281736.html
recently, and not without some reluctance, they have begun to consider another possibility. Several highly respected physicists say it might be possible to construct a force-field machine that acts on all matter in a way that is similar to gravity. Strictly speaking, it wouldn't be an antigravity machine. But by exerting an attractive or repulsive force on all matter, it would be the functional equivalent of the impossible machine.
While an operational device is at least five years in the future, developers of what can be loosely termed a force-field machine say it has cleared major theoretical hurdles. To demonstrate their claim, they invited POPULAR MECHANICS to visit their Huntsville, Ala., laboratory to see the most important component of their proof-of-concept demonstrator. It is a 12-in.-dia. high-temperature superconducting disc (HTSD). When the force-field machine is complete, a bowling ball placed anywhere above this disc, which resembles a clutch plate, will stay exactly where you left it.
The Einstein Connection
Prospects for the Alabama HTSD are attracting serious attention because this particular disc was fabricated by Ning Li, one of the world's leading scientists. In the 1980s, Li predicted that if a time-varying magnetic field were applied to superconductor ions trapped in a lattice structure, the ions would absorb enormous amounts of energy. Confined in the lattice, the ions would begin to rapidly spin, causing each to create a minuscule gravitational field.
In an HTSD, the tiny gravitational effect of each individual atom is multiplied by the billions of atoms in the disc. Using about one kilowatt of electricity, Li says, her device could potentially produce a force field that would effectively neutralize gravity above a 1-ft.-dia. region extending from the surface of the planet to outer space.
AC Gravity
"The first thing to understand about Li's device is that it is neither an antigravity machine nor a gravitational shield," says Jonathan Campbell, a scientist at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center who has worked with Li. "It does not modify gravity, rather it produces a gravity-like field that may be either attractive or repulsive." Li describes her device as a method of generating a never-before-seen force field that acts on matter in a way that is similar to gravity. Since it may be either repulsive or attractive she calls it "AC gravity." "It adds to, or counteracts, or re-directs gravity," explains Larry Smalley, the former chairman of the University of Alabama at Huntsville (UAH) physics department. "Basically, you are adding a couple of vectors to zero it [gravity] out or enhance it."
BY JIM WILSON
Photo by Philip Gentry
Published in the October 1999 issue.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/re...ch/1281736.html
recently, and not without some reluctance, they have begun to consider another possibility. Several highly respected physicists say it might be possible to construct a force-field machine that acts on all matter in a way that is similar to gravity. Strictly speaking, it wouldn't be an antigravity machine. But by exerting an attractive or repulsive force on all matter, it would be the functional equivalent of the impossible machine.
While an operational device is at least five years in the future, developers of what can be loosely termed a force-field machine say it has cleared major theoretical hurdles. To demonstrate their claim, they invited POPULAR MECHANICS to visit their Huntsville, Ala., laboratory to see the most important component of their proof-of-concept demonstrator. It is a 12-in.-dia. high-temperature superconducting disc (HTSD). When the force-field machine is complete, a bowling ball placed anywhere above this disc, which resembles a clutch plate, will stay exactly where you left it.
The Einstein Connection
Prospects for the Alabama HTSD are attracting serious attention because this particular disc was fabricated by Ning Li, one of the world's leading scientists. In the 1980s, Li predicted that if a time-varying magnetic field were applied to superconductor ions trapped in a lattice structure, the ions would absorb enormous amounts of energy. Confined in the lattice, the ions would begin to rapidly spin, causing each to create a minuscule gravitational field.
In an HTSD, the tiny gravitational effect of each individual atom is multiplied by the billions of atoms in the disc. Using about one kilowatt of electricity, Li says, her device could potentially produce a force field that would effectively neutralize gravity above a 1-ft.-dia. region extending from the surface of the planet to outer space.
AC Gravity
"The first thing to understand about Li's device is that it is neither an antigravity machine nor a gravitational shield," says Jonathan Campbell, a scientist at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center who has worked with Li. "It does not modify gravity, rather it produces a gravity-like field that may be either attractive or repulsive." Li describes her device as a method of generating a never-before-seen force field that acts on matter in a way that is similar to gravity. Since it may be either repulsive or attractive she calls it "AC gravity." "It adds to, or counteracts, or re-directs gravity," explains Larry Smalley, the former chairman of the University of Alabama at Huntsville (UAH) physics department. "Basically, you are adding a couple of vectors to zero it [gravity] out or enhance it."
http://www.americanantigravity.com/gravitywaves.shtml
http://www.scansite.org/scan.php?pid=157
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1784833525509845733
People need to know that John Hutchison is a fraud. I used to believe but unfortunately everything Hutchison does or has done is BS. Of course that won't matter to you if you're a "true believer".
QUOTE (Rey T Fox @ Mar 3 2008, 04:16 PM) 
People need to know that John Hutchison is a fraud. I used to believe as well until I got to know him and his cohorts. Unfortunately everything Hutchison does or has done is BS. Of course that won't matter to you if you're a "true believer".
Ya ya, but what about this new info?
QUOTE (The Silver Thong @ Mar 4 2008, 12:28 AM)
Ya ya, but what about this new info?
What new info? Those articles are old news.
QUOTE (Rey T Fox @ Mar 4 2008, 10:16 AM)
People need to know that John Hutchison is a fraud. I used to believe as well until I got to know him and his cohorts. Unfortunately everything Hutchison does or has done is BS. Of course that won't matter to you if you're a "true believer".
You mean you actually met him... and got to know him??? What was it that made you distrust him????
even if none of it was or is real, i find it interesting. as for free energy, ever seen a magnet, they hold their pull for a very long time, possibly forever? in japan they are building magnetic motors, last test i saw was a small motorcycle. how about geothermal energy where you harness the heat from deep in the earth. wonder why some of these types of things aren't being done everywhere, there is a lot of money in oil.
Well, the guy was gutsy. Too bad he couldn't reproduce the results.
QUOTE (crystal sage @ Mar 3 2008, 03:17 PM)
It is when too much energy has gone into debunking someone that you begin to wonder???Are they really on to something??? This must be for real...
Why are they sooo trying to discredit this fellow???
I dont see anymore "energy" being put into discrediting this guy than any other kook who has tried to take advantage of people, so it isnt as if there is some wild conspiricy going on. No one is trying to discredit this fellow, he discredited himself, time and time again with wild claims, an a bogus video that (not a surprise) couldnt be backed up when actual scientist stepped in to watch him reproduce his own work. There may have been a time when he was on to something, that is possible, but he went to far with his claims and that rediculous video and he got caught like a snake oil salesman not able to back up his amazing claims after rather ample time and support to do so.
The scientific method works very well to weed out liars. Kind of like the kids that can only produce telekinesis videos locked in a dark room by themselves with odd camera angles, but can only produce excuses when another person is in the room to oversee the experiment.
Sometimes it isnt a conspiricy...sometimes it is just a con artist who has been caught.
All this is a real shame because a few years ago I thought I had found a non-spiritual cause for poltergeist phenomena. I was less skeptical in the past than I am now and poltergeists frightened the hell out of me.
It is now obvious Hutchison is a total fraud and that he gave answers to nothing, only fraud.
Shame.
In the meantime I wait for a different natural explanation for poltergeist phenomena.
It is now obvious Hutchison is a total fraud and that he gave answers to nothing, only fraud.
Shame.
In the meantime I wait for a different natural explanation for poltergeist phenomena.
QUOTE (Papaver @ Mar , 06:25 AM)
All this is a real shame because a few years ago I thought I had found a non-spiritual cause for poltergeist phenomena. I was less skeptical in the past than I am now and poltergeists frightened the hell out of me.
It is now obvious Hutchison is a total fraud and that he gave answers to nothing, only fraud.
Shame.
In the meantime I wait for a different natural explanation for poltergeist phenomena.
It is now obvious Hutchison is a total fraud and that he gave answers to nothing, only fraud.
Shame.
In the meantime I wait for a different natural explanation for poltergeist phenomena.
What did you think this non-spiritual cause was???
As about 10 years ago I lived in this real haunted house where the toys used to all go off at 2.30 every morning.. as well as randomly.. the kids bottles would disappear then days later would all be found lined up on one of the kid's cots.
that the milk in the bottles would curdle within an hour.. toys would work without batteries.. we could hear feet pattering down the hall when no one was there..things would move or fall randomly...
We lived there for 3 years with almost daily hauntings..... since the house has been sold at least 3 times ( spoke to the old next door neighbor ) as the owners found it haunted... ( used to be an old gold mining site!!!)
This guy's a hell of a good magician. If he was for real he would have attained a lot more recognision than he has now.
odie
odie
This is soooo REAL!!skeptics you will also know it`s real in a few years or maybe even earlier.antigrav,free energy has been known by the Elite 4 at least a century and they will do anything 2 keep this a secret.they will loose all their power if free energy gets out to the public.it`s all about Money,power and controlling by creating fear.skeptics need 2 WAKE UP!!Click to view attachment
Just WHO is Rey T Fox? Insults and empty accusations are cheap. The statement, "He's a fraud," reveals something about the person saying it.
Perhaps this new article will explain the lengths some people go to:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...1&Itemid=60
John Hutchison's work, knowledge, and expertise have been refined over a period of decades.
How many folks have physical phenomena named after them?
Perhaps this new article will explain the lengths some people go to:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...1&Itemid=60
John Hutchison's work, knowledge, and expertise have been refined over a period of decades.
How many folks have physical phenomena named after them?
QUOTE (CB_Brooklyn @ Mar 15 2008, 05:29 PM)
John Hutchison's work, knowledge, and expertise have been refined over a period of decades.
I hope that was a joke! The man is pretty obviously a quack, and he has proven that himself - nobody else actually were required to make an effort. If you could point me in the direction of a single, reproducible result the poor fellow has contributed, I would be impressed.
QUOTE
How many folks have physical phenomena named after them?
Quite a few, but he is not one of them. He has a fraudulent theatrical effect called after him!
Cheers,
Badeskov
QUOTE (badeskov @ Mar 15 2008, 11:44 PM)
I hope that was a joke! The man is pretty obviously a quack, and he has proven that himself - nobody else actually were required to make an effort. If you could point me in the direction of a single, reproducible result the poor fellow has contributed, I would be impressed.
Quite a few, but he is not one of them. He has a fraudulent theatrical effect called after him!
Cheers,
Badeskov
Quite a few, but he is not one of them. He has a fraudulent theatrical effect called after him!
Cheers,
Badeskov
Try here:
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/a/AJ/ch...#HutchisonLinks
QUOTE
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...1&Itemid=60
E-mail 11
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Johnson [mailto: ad.johnson@ntlworld.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it ]
Sent: 28 February 2008 19:30
To: Ace Baker
Subject: RE: Hutch Effect Program etc
Ace,
Thanks for your answers - I think you have given me the information I needed.
Your answers do not address all of the evidence. As John pointed out to you, many of the videos weren't even made by him. I never mentioned a knife in what I wrote - maybe I should've made it clear I was referring to Aluminium bars and steel etc - the bigger stuff.
What you are basically saying that, correct me if I am wrong:
1) Everything JH says regarding his experiments is fake.
2) Los Alamos have helped him promote fakery of one kind or another.
3) All the metal samples he has are fake or not what he says they are.
4) You have no idea what caused the documented effects at the World Trade Centre.
5) Even though I have been helping Judy with the Hutch stuff and candidly spoken about it in public and on air etc, this didn't warrant including me in the discussion.
As a kind of related extra point:
6) Wikipedia is unreliable for 9/11 stuff, but reliable when it comes to John Hutchison and his experiments.
Is this a fair summary of what you are saying? can you give me "yes" or "no" or short refinements to the above summary, so I can get this straight as to what you are actually saying?
If you are I'm "100% certain that Hutchison's videos were made exactly as I describe" would you be willing to contact the TV companies that have filmed his experiments and verify that ALL their videos are fakes too?
As for the other information you asked for, it's easy enough to find, so I'll leave you to investigate for yourself. We haven't claimed there are peer reviewed papers about Hutch - basically because there aren't any in the public domain that I know of, but there are people George Hathaway, Boyd Bushman and others who have written reports about the experiments - which was mentioned in our press release. I've known of John Hutchison since either 1997 or 1999 and it's been a real pleasure to speak with him.
I look forward to getting clarification and, if possible, answers or a response to the other comments I made to the group message.
Andrew
E-mail 11
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Johnson [mailto: ad.johnson@ntlworld.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it ]
Sent: 28 February 2008 19:30
To: Ace Baker
Subject: RE: Hutch Effect Program etc
Ace,
Thanks for your answers - I think you have given me the information I needed.
Your answers do not address all of the evidence. As John pointed out to you, many of the videos weren't even made by him. I never mentioned a knife in what I wrote - maybe I should've made it clear I was referring to Aluminium bars and steel etc - the bigger stuff.
What you are basically saying that, correct me if I am wrong:
1) Everything JH says regarding his experiments is fake.
2) Los Alamos have helped him promote fakery of one kind or another.
3) All the metal samples he has are fake or not what he says they are.
4) You have no idea what caused the documented effects at the World Trade Centre.
5) Even though I have been helping Judy with the Hutch stuff and candidly spoken about it in public and on air etc, this didn't warrant including me in the discussion.
As a kind of related extra point:
6) Wikipedia is unreliable for 9/11 stuff, but reliable when it comes to John Hutchison and his experiments.
Is this a fair summary of what you are saying? can you give me "yes" or "no" or short refinements to the above summary, so I can get this straight as to what you are actually saying?
If you are I'm "100% certain that Hutchison's videos were made exactly as I describe" would you be willing to contact the TV companies that have filmed his experiments and verify that ALL their videos are fakes too?
As for the other information you asked for, it's easy enough to find, so I'll leave you to investigate for yourself. We haven't claimed there are peer reviewed papers about Hutch - basically because there aren't any in the public domain that I know of, but there are people George Hathaway, Boyd Bushman and others who have written reports about the experiments - which was mentioned in our press release. I've known of John Hutchison since either 1997 or 1999 and it's been a real pleasure to speak with him.
I look forward to getting clarification and, if possible, answers or a response to the other comments I made to the group message.
Andrew
http://www.untoldmysteries.com/xmenu/Agend...ohn_Kuhles.html
Actually I thought the 911 disaster was a controlled demoliton...
http://www.rense.com/general67/9118.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX9gdRST6zM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3249714675910247150
http://www.tribalmessenger.org/t-civil-rights/911.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/septe...n_countdown.htm
QUOTE (CB_Brooklyn @ Mar 16 2008, 01:29 AM)
Just WHO is Rey T Fox? Insults and empty accusations are cheap. The statement, "He's a fraud," reveals something about the person saying it.
Perhaps this new article will explain the lengths some people go to:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...1&Itemid=60
John Hutchison's work, knowledge, and expertise have been refined over a period of decades.
How many folks have physical phenomena named after them?
Perhaps this new article will explain the lengths some people go to:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...1&Itemid=60
John Hutchison's work, knowledge, and expertise have been refined over a period of decades.
How many folks have physical phenomena named after them?
I am the thrice great Rey T Fox!
Once again:
John Hutchison is a fraud, a compulsive liar and a con artist.
Hutchison has never been able to duplicate his results in a controled environment.
http://acebaker.blogspot.com/2008/03/judy-...-her-sword.html
http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/index...howtopic=124923
http://socialtech.ca/ade/index.php/2005/05...nnel-is-bogus2/
http://www.skywise711.com/Skeptic/Hutchison/hutchison.html
http://actionskeptics.blogspot.com/2007/01...-in-canada.html
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103565
These people can do the "Hutchison Effect" too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8Z1eLnfIRg
http://www.trailerparkscience.com/#Experiments
http://youtube.com/watch?v=SKZo4SoPjjw&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=KywkBdLqaDU
QUOTE (Rey T Fox @ Mar 16 2008, 10:21 PM)
I am the thrice great Rey T Fox!
Once again:
John Hutchison is a fraud, a compulsive liar and a con artist.
Hutchison has never been able to duplicate his results in a controled environment.
http://acebaker.blogspot.com/2008/03/judy-...-her-sword.html
http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/index...howtopic=124923
http://socialtech.ca/ade/index.php/2005/05...nnel-is-bogus2/
http://www.skywise711.com/Skeptic/Hutchison/hutchison.html
http://actionskeptics.blogspot.com/2007/01...-in-canada.html
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103565
These people can do the "Hutchison Effect" too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8Z1eLnfIRg
http://www.trailerparkscience.com/#Experiments
http://youtube.com/watch?v=SKZo4SoPjjw&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=KywkBdLqaDU
Once again:
John Hutchison is a fraud, a compulsive liar and a con artist.
Hutchison has never been able to duplicate his results in a controled environment.
http://acebaker.blogspot.com/2008/03/judy-...-her-sword.html
http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/index...howtopic=124923
http://socialtech.ca/ade/index.php/2005/05...nnel-is-bogus2/
http://www.skywise711.com/Skeptic/Hutchison/hutchison.html
http://actionskeptics.blogspot.com/2007/01...-in-canada.html
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103565
These people can do the "Hutchison Effect" too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8Z1eLnfIRg
http://www.trailerparkscience.com/#Experiments
http://youtube.com/watch?v=SKZo4SoPjjw&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=KywkBdLqaDU
heh heh heh... I'm afraid not. Posting a bunch of ad hominem links only reveals ones own ignorance. Especially that first one by Ace Baker, someone I used to respect but turned out to be a real looser. That character makes some fake videos mimicking a few Hutchison Effect videos and claims it proves Hutchison is a fraud. But it's Baker who's the fraud! A look through this page demonstrates this:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ_troll_challenge.html
Be sure to check the qualifications at the bottom:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ_troll...#qualifications
Here's a few (check link for complete list):
John Hutchison
1968 Production of three small free energy units with no input and resulting output of 10 volts at 500 milliAmps.
1979 Breakthrough with anti-gravity Field and disruption in metals ~ lévitation of objects, transmutation in metals. First material testing results of metal samples indicate that In the disruption process, the energy required to produce effects was at least one billion times greater than the 4,000 Watt input used. The results are known as the Hutchison Effect by the scientific community.
1983 Start of U.S. Government interest. Demonstration of Hutchison Effect to U.S. Army Intelligence, and the Los Alamos Laboratory. Demonstration videotaped by these and other U.S. scientists. Metal samples taken for laboratory analysis.
1985 Demonstration to McDonnell Douglas Corporation's Jack Houck, in cooperation with Los Alamos laboratories and U.S. Army Intelligence.
1986 Canadian Scientific and Technical Intelligence Agency investigates Hutchison Effect.
1991 also around 1991, an article on the Hutchison Effect was published in several places - Raum und Zeit [Space and Time], the Newsletter of the Planetary Association for Clean Energy, the Electric Spacecraft Journal, "Extraordinary Science", and a publication called "Space Power".
1992 Hutchison Effect published in Raum und Zeit [Space and Time], Newsletter of the Planetary Association for Clean Energy, Electric Spacecraft Journal, Extraordinary Science, and Space Power
2006 In 2006 a group from National Geographic TV filmed odd vibrations and fires during Hutchison's experiments.
Judy Wood
*B.S. Civil Engineering, 1981 (Structural Engineering), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
*M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
*Ph.D. Materials Engineering Science, 1992, from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
Former Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering
Taught courses including:
- Experimental Stress Analysis,
- Engineering Mechanics,
- Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials)
- Strength of Materials Testing
Dissertation: "Determination of thermal strains in the neighborhood of a bimaterial interface"
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available...6072006-124140/
Ace Baker
plays keyboard
plays guitar
juggles
QUOTE (CB_Brooklyn @ Mar 17 2008, 07:23 PM)
heh heh heh... I'm afraid not. Posting a bunch of ad hominem links only reveals ones own ignorance. Especially that first one by Ace Baker, someone I used to respect but turned out to be a real looser. That character makes some fake videos mimicking a few Hutchison Effect videos and claims it proves Hutchison is a fraud. But it's Baker who's the fraud! A look through this page demonstrates this:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ_troll_challenge.html
Be sure to check the qualifications at the bottom:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ_troll...#qualifications
Here's a few (check link for complete list):
John Hutchison
1968 Production of three small free energy units with no input and resulting output of 10 volts at 500 milliAmps.
1979 Breakthrough with anti-gravity Field and disruption in metals ~ lévitation of objects, transmutation in metals. First material testing results of metal samples indicate that In the disruption process, the energy required to produce effects was at least one billion times greater than the 4,000 Watt input used. The results are known as the Hutchison Effect by the scientific community.
1983 Start of U.S. Government interest. Demonstration of Hutchison Effect to U.S. Army Intelligence, and the Los Alamos Laboratory. Demonstration videotaped by these and other U.S. scientists. Metal samples taken for laboratory analysis.
1985 Demonstration to McDonnell Douglas Corporation's Jack Houck, in cooperation with Los Alamos laboratories and U.S. Army Intelligence.
1986 Canadian Scientific and Technical Intelligence Agency investigates Hutchison Effect.
1991 also around 1991, an article on the Hutchison Effect was published in several places - Raum und Zeit [Space and Time], the Newsletter of the Planetary Association for Clean Energy, the Electric Spacecraft Journal, "Extraordinary Science", and a publication called "Space Power".
1992 Hutchison Effect published in Raum und Zeit [Space and Time], Newsletter of the Planetary Association for Clean Energy, Electric Spacecraft Journal, Extraordinary Science, and Space Power
2006 In 2006 a group from National Geographic TV filmed odd vibrations and fires during Hutchison's experiments.
Judy Wood
*B.S. Civil Engineering, 1981 (Structural Engineering), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
*M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
*Ph.D. Materials Engineering Science, 1992, from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
Former Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering
Taught courses including:
- Experimental Stress Analysis,
- Engineering Mechanics,
- Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials)
- Strength of Materials Testing
Dissertation: "Determination of thermal strains in the neighborhood of a bimaterial interface"
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available...6072006-124140/
Ace Baker
plays keyboard
plays guitar
juggles
http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ_troll_challenge.html
Be sure to check the qualifications at the bottom:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ_troll...#qualifications
Here's a few (check link for complete list):
John Hutchison
1968 Production of three small free energy units with no input and resulting output of 10 volts at 500 milliAmps.
1979 Breakthrough with anti-gravity Field and disruption in metals ~ lévitation of objects, transmutation in metals. First material testing results of metal samples indicate that In the disruption process, the energy required to produce effects was at least one billion times greater than the 4,000 Watt input used. The results are known as the Hutchison Effect by the scientific community.
1983 Start of U.S. Government interest. Demonstration of Hutchison Effect to U.S. Army Intelligence, and the Los Alamos Laboratory. Demonstration videotaped by these and other U.S. scientists. Metal samples taken for laboratory analysis.
1985 Demonstration to McDonnell Douglas Corporation's Jack Houck, in cooperation with Los Alamos laboratories and U.S. Army Intelligence.
1986 Canadian Scientific and Technical Intelligence Agency investigates Hutchison Effect.
1991 also around 1991, an article on the Hutchison Effect was published in several places - Raum und Zeit [Space and Time], the Newsletter of the Planetary Association for Clean Energy, the Electric Spacecraft Journal, "Extraordinary Science", and a publication called "Space Power".
1992 Hutchison Effect published in Raum und Zeit [Space and Time], Newsletter of the Planetary Association for Clean Energy, Electric Spacecraft Journal, Extraordinary Science, and Space Power
2006 In 2006 a group from National Geographic TV filmed odd vibrations and fires during Hutchison's experiments.
Judy Wood
*B.S. Civil Engineering, 1981 (Structural Engineering), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
*M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
*Ph.D. Materials Engineering Science, 1992, from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
Former Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering
Taught courses including:
- Experimental Stress Analysis,
- Engineering Mechanics,
- Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials)
- Strength of Materials Testing
Dissertation: "Determination of thermal strains in the neighborhood of a bimaterial interface"
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available...6072006-124140/
Ace Baker
plays keyboard
plays guitar
juggles
Your appeal to authority is pathetic and irrelevant. What would make one want to believe and attempt to defend such obvious nonsense? Perhaps your name is Judy Wood or maybe you're employed by a government agency. Seems you've been duped either way. People who know Hutchison personally have admitted that the man is a fraud. Of course that doesn't matter to you if you're a True Believer™.
QUOTE (Rey T Fox @ Mar 17 2008, 05:32 PM)
Your appeal to authority is pathetic and irrelevant. What would make one want to believe and attempt to defend such obvious nonsense? Perhaps your name is Judy Wood or maybe you're employed by a government agency. Seems you've been duped either way. People who know Hutchison personally have admitted that the man is a fraud. Of course that doesn't matter to you if you're a True Believer™.
Actually, I am not Judy Wood. Although there are numerous no-planers (such as Ace Baker) who make insinuations that I am, fact is I am not. But that has absolutely nothing to do with the evidence, so why bring it up? Sounds like you're trying to distract people from the real issue: the Hutchison Effect. Lots of accusations on your part, no substance.
Kindly cite the testimonies from people who know Hutchison personally who claim he is a fraud.
btw, your support of Ace Baker is pathetic. He's a silly guitar playing juggler who knows nothing about unconventional technologies. Try finding someone who knows the difference between his a$$ and an Ace in the Hole.
QUOTE (CB_Brooklyn @ Mar 18 2008, 12:13 AM)
Actually, I am not Judy Wood. Although there are numerous no-planers (such as Ace Baker) who make insinuations that I am, fact is I am not. But that has absolutely nothing to do with the evidence, so why bring it up? Sounds like you're trying to distract people from the real issue: the Hutchison Effect. Lots of accusations on your part, no substance.
Kindly cite the testimonies from people who know Hutchison personally who claim he is a fraud.
btw, your support of Ace Baker is pathetic. He's a silly guitar playing juggler who knows nothing about unconventional technologies. Try finding someone who knows the difference between his a$$ and an Ace in the Hole.
Kindly cite the testimonies from people who know Hutchison personally who claim he is a fraud.
btw, your support of Ace Baker is pathetic. He's a silly guitar playing juggler who knows nothing about unconventional technologies. Try finding someone who knows the difference between his a$$ and an Ace in the Hole.
I don't need to prove anything to you. I sincerely doubt that you would believe me anyways. It should be quite obvious to anyone who has the least bit of common sense or intelligence that Hutchison is a fraud.
If you're daft enough to believe in the fake-a$$ Hutchison Effect, nutcase Judy Wood or the moronic and (easily debunked) 9/11 paranoid conspiracy theories,
you need your head examined. Perhaps you are off your meds?
QUOTE (Rey T Fox @ Mar 17 2008, 07:57 PM)
I don't need to prove anything to you. I sincerely doubt that you would believe me anyways. It should be quite obvious to anyone who has the least bit of common sense or intelligence that Hutchison is a fraud.
If you're daft enough to believe in the fake-a$$ Hutchison Effect, nutcase Judy Wood or the moronic and (easily debunked) 9/11 paranoid conspiracy theories,
you need your head examined. Perhaps you are off your meds?
If you're daft enough to believe in the fake-a$$ Hutchison Effect, nutcase Judy Wood or the moronic and (easily debunked) 9/11 paranoid conspiracy theories,
you need your head examined. Perhaps you are off your meds?
Wow - that post speaks for itself! (Thanks!) At least I know now the types of people who support Ace Baker!
QUOTE (CB_Brooklyn @ Mar 18 2008, 01:02 AM)
Wow - that post speaks for itself! (Thanks!) At least I know now the types of people who support Ace Baker!
Where did I say that I support Ace Baker? Probably the voices in your head told you.
All I did was provide a link where he easily debunked Hutchison's stupidly fake footage.
QUOTE (Rey T Fox @ Mar 17 2008, 08:10 PM)
Where did I say that I support Ace Baker? Probably the voices in your head told you.
All I did was provide a link where he easily debunked Hutchison's stupidly fake footage.
All I did was provide a link where he easily debunked Hutchison's stupidly fake footage.
You obviously support that Ace fraud! You link to his junk numerous times.
I counter, and you refuse to answer! Heh!
You can't even answer my questions in previous comments. You think anyone is going to believe your nonsense? All you do is call people names. You sound very foolish.
QUOTE (CB_Brooklyn @ Mar 18 2008, 01:26 AM)
You obviously support that Ace fraud! You link to his junk numerous times.
I counter, and you refuse to answer! Heh!
You can't even answer my questions in previous comments. You think anyone is going to believe your nonsense? All you do is call people names. You sound very foolish.
I counter, and you refuse to answer! Heh!
You can't even answer my questions in previous comments. You think anyone is going to believe your nonsense? All you do is call people names. You sound very foolish.
You're saying I support Ace (whoever that is) by linking to video's and articles where that person debunks Hutchison? WTF?
I don't need to answer your questions. Why should I waste my time? The evidence that Hutchison is a fraud speakes for itself.
Perhaps you should take a closer look before calling me foolish. I seriously doubt you have the ability to think rationally
anyways.
QUOTE (Rey T Fox @ Mar 17 2008, 09:04 PM)
You're saying I support Ace (whoever that is) by linking to video's and articles where that person debunks Hutchison? WTF?
I don't need to answer your questions. Why should I waste my time? The evidence that Hutchison is a fraud speakes for itself.
Perhaps you should take a closer look before calling me foolish. I seriously doubt you have the ability to think rationally
anyways.
I don't need to answer your questions. Why should I waste my time? The evidence that Hutchison is a fraud speakes for itself.
Perhaps you should take a closer look before calling me foolish. I seriously doubt you have the ability to think rationally
anyways.
You sound like a professional con artist. Nothing but insults in your posts, no substance, no analysis.
Here is John Hutchison's affidavit, valuable to Dr Wood's Qui Tam case.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ8.html
Obviously Ace Baker was not asked for an affidavit as no one thought he had anything useful to add to the case.
If it gets too stinky in here we may need to release the"hyperbranched aminosilica" that will suck some of the air outta here lol DONTEATUS 
QUOTE (CB_Brooklyn @ Mar 18 2008, 02:14 AM)
You sound like a professional con artist. Nothing but insults in your posts, no substance, no analysis.
Here is John Hutchison's affidavit, valuable to Dr Wood's Qui Tam case.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ8.html
Obviously Ace Baker was not asked for an affidavit as no one thought he had anything useful to add to the case.
Here is John Hutchison's affidavit, valuable to Dr Wood's Qui Tam case.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ8.html
Obviously Ace Baker was not asked for an affidavit as no one thought he had anything useful to add to the case.
I sound like a professional con artist. I write nothing but insults in my posts that have no substance and no analysis.
Unleash the Magical Pixie Dust!
PS Thanks for Mr Leaphart's email address.
lol someone reads in here
QUOTE (DONTEATUS @ Mar 18 2008, 03:17 AM)
lol someone reads in here
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.