Did you read the title? I wrote it that way because I am the person who got detailed information about those attacks as far back as 1997. From 1997 and right up through the night of September 10, 2001 I forewarned about 120 persons about those attacks, telling most exactly where they would be carried out, how they would be brought about, approximately when, and more. I was precisely right on every count.
I have written a ninety-page, 54,000 word document detailing twenty-eight events in which I told others about the coming attacks. It tells where and when and how I got the information to begin with, who I told, what I told them, about when I told them, where we were when I told them, what they said and what their reactions were.
Full Version: Attacks of 9-11-01 Well Known Since 1997.
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Conspiracies & Secret Societies
Over the years we have had several members make claims that they knew 9/11 was going to happen before the fact; some by paranormal means, some by "inside connections"... One of the issues that comes up is that of those folks, no one has adequately backed up their claims with the slightest evidence of knowing anything before 9/11.
What kind of verifiable information can you offer in regards to your claim?
What kind of verifiable information can you offer in regards to your claim?
QUOTE(Fluffybunny @ Dec 13 2006, 04:32 AM) [snapback]1460059[/snapback]
What kind of verifiable information can you offer in regards to your claim?
I was about to ask the same. An answer would be nice.
Every notice how the more extreme a claim is the more likely that it was made by a new member of the UM? Usually less than ten posts. "Help, Ghosts are eating my cat!", UFO's are whale farts!", "I think that I'm possessed!", and let's not forget the ever popular "I knew about 9/11 before it happened!".
On the other hand, most of the people who make the most extraordinary claims are gone after a few posts.
Oh well, variety is the spice of life.
On the other hand, most of the people who make the most extraordinary claims are gone after a few posts.
Oh well, variety is the spice of life.
regaurdless of how this claim progresses it should be common knowledge by now that alex jones made a solid prediction on july 25,01-- he called it "operation expose government terror" and claimed it would be the m.i.c and that they would use their cia asset osama bin laden --
google video
google video
QUOTE(PaloAlto @ Dec 12 2006, 09:23 PM) [snapback]1460049[/snapback]
Did you read the title? I wrote it that way because I am the person who got detailed information about those attacks as far back as 1997. From 1997 and right up through the night of September 10, 2001 I forewarned about 120 persons about those attacks, telling most exactly where they would be carried out, how they would be brought about, approximately when, and more. I was precisely right on every count.
I have written a ninety-page, 54,000 word document detailing twenty-eight events in which I told others about the coming attacks. It tells where and when and how I got the information to begin with, who I told, what I told them, about when I told them, where we were when I told them, what they said and what their reactions were.
I have written a ninety-page, 54,000 word document detailing twenty-eight events in which I told others about the coming attacks. It tells where and when and how I got the information to begin with, who I told, what I told them, about when I told them, where we were when I told them, what they said and what their reactions were.
Why didn't you do anything to stop it? Directly I mean...you could have sabbotaged the planes before they took off, went to the airport and pointed the hijackers out to the cops(and they would check them). You could have went to the towers and pulled the fire alarm to get everyone out of the building before the planes hit.
Great power, greater responsibility.
People who can predict the future are idiots...they will predict bad things but do nothing to prevent them...besides talking about it.
Of course I really don't believe in such a thing....or this poster.
Well the age old theory i knew it was going to happen thing, yes you might of seen a vision as some people do do supposedly. And IF you did as ^ said perfectly you should of done something about it, and personally IF you did in 1997 know something was going to happen and you did do nothing to try and help prevent it then how can you sleep at night knowinbg you could of done something even if it was just to get people out of the towers or get the planes grounded by ringing up or telling them theres a bomb on the plane.
But in reality there has been some claims to the fact that the 911 attacks could of been stopped and were known about but well there conspiracies and truth or lies can be hard to detect.
But in reality there has been some claims to the fact that the 911 attacks could of been stopped and were known about but well there conspiracies and truth or lies can be hard to detect.
agreed alex jones did give warnings of a impending false flag terror attack, not a specific target - but details enough.
Mr. Rick who died that day. Also predicted it, after the 93 attack. He made his company do fire drials daily if anything happened to the towers. Mr. Rick & two or three others didn't make it.
QUOTE(Fluffybunny @ Dec 12 2006, 10:32 PM) [snapback]1460059[/snapback]
Over the years we have had several members make claims that they knew 9/11 was going to happen before the fact; some by paranormal means, some by "inside connections"... One of the issues that comes up is that of those folks, no one has adequately backed up their claims with the slightest evidence of knowing anything before 9/11.
What kind of verifiable information can you offer in regards to your claim?
What kind of verifiable information can you offer in regards to your claim?
Over the years several persons have told me that others claimed foreknowledge of 9-11 but gave no proof of that foreknowledge. The issue is that nobody has ever proven that so many others claimed to have known about 9-11 before it happened, but were unable to give proof they knew. Can you verify that so many others came on this or any other forum with such information as you claim they did?
What do you call proof? The same kind of proof Bush / Chaney / Powell gave for invading Iraq? The same kind of proof the US used for bombing a completely innocent pharmaceutical factory in Sudan leading to the deaths of over 150,000 Sudanese? Or would it be the same kind of proof used by the US media to bolster their claims they made for years that nobody could possibly have known that the attacks of 9-11-01 were set to happen? In fact they had no proof whatsoever and I do not remember anybody asking them for proof either.
So, exactly what do you call proof? An officer of the state who has made himself unavailable for interview. A deputy sheriff who claims to have forgotten all about the detailed information given him in 1998? A 911 operator who neglected to do her job right? A police station that refuses to answer seven letters of enquiry regarding a warning they received the night of 9-10-01? A school that refuses to release any information? A college that refuses to answer any letters whatsoever pertraining to 9-11? A government investigator who refuses to discuss it?
What exactly do you call proof?
Way to dance around the question. ^ _ ^;;
QUOTE(Ashigaru @ Dec 19 2006, 12:28 PM) [snapback]1467382[/snapback]
Way to dance around the question. ^ _ ^;;
what is the question?
QUOTE
What kind of verifiable information can you offer in regards to your claim?
That's the question.
Paloalto,
Your cheeky little comments just blew any chance you had at having credibility here.
Let me help you out:
Proof would be something along the lines of verifiable phone calls to authorities, letters to government leaders or airlines regarding the upcoming attacks, letters to the local paper...there are a million ways to prove your point.
The fact that you avoid the question and dance around it shows that you are as full of it as the rest of the people that come through here claiming to have known beforehand about the attacks of 9/11. What a joke.
Your cheeky little comments just blew any chance you had at having credibility here.
Let me help you out:
QUOTE
proof /pruf/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[proof]Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun 1. evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth.
2. anything serving as such evidence: What proof do you have?
3. the act of testing or making trial of anything; test; trial: to put a thing to the proof.
4. the establishment of the truth of anything; demonstration.
5. Law. (in judicial proceedings) evidence having probative weight.
6. the effect of evidence in convincing the mind.
–noun 1. evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth.
2. anything serving as such evidence: What proof do you have?
3. the act of testing or making trial of anything; test; trial: to put a thing to the proof.
4. the establishment of the truth of anything; demonstration.
5. Law. (in judicial proceedings) evidence having probative weight.
6. the effect of evidence in convincing the mind.
Proof would be something along the lines of verifiable phone calls to authorities, letters to government leaders or airlines regarding the upcoming attacks, letters to the local paper...there are a million ways to prove your point.
The fact that you avoid the question and dance around it shows that you are as full of it as the rest of the people that come through here claiming to have known beforehand about the attacks of 9/11. What a joke.
QUOTE(Fluffybunny @ Dec 19 2006, 12:03 PM) [snapback]1467653[/snapback]
Paloalto,
Your cheeky little comments just blew any chance you had at having credibility here.
Let me help you out:
Proof would be something along the lines of verifiable phone calls to authorities, letters to government leaders or airlines regarding the upcoming attacks, letters to the local paper...there are a million ways to prove your point.
The fact that you avoid the question and dance around it shows that you are as full of it as the rest of the people that come through here claiming to have known beforehand about the attacks of 9/11. What a joke.
Your cheeky little comments just blew any chance you had at having credibility here.
Let me help you out:
Proof would be something along the lines of verifiable phone calls to authorities, letters to government leaders or airlines regarding the upcoming attacks, letters to the local paper...there are a million ways to prove your point.
The fact that you avoid the question and dance around it shows that you are as full of it as the rest of the people that come through here claiming to have known beforehand about the attacks of 9/11. What a joke.
You say there are a million ways to prove my point and then you give two---letters and phone calls. I do have tetters from persons I told---yes.
Wait. What the hell am I doing wasting my time with a bunch of loser forum misfits?
You people are a waste of cyber space.
QUOTE(PaloAlto @ Dec 19 2006, 10:00 PM) [snapback]1468263[/snapback]
You say there are a million ways to prove my point and then you give two---letters and phone calls. I do have tetters from persons I told---yes.
Wait. What the hell am I doing wasting my time with a bunch of loser forum misfits?
You people are a waste of cyber space.
Wait. What the hell am I doing wasting my time with a bunch of loser forum misfits?
You people are a waste of cyber space.
rofl 
QUOTE
What do you call proof? The same kind of proof Bush / Chaney / Powell gave for invading Iraq? The same kind of proof the US used for bombing a completely innocent pharmaceutical factory in Sudan leading to the deaths of over 150,000 Sudanese? Or would it be the same kind of proof used by the US media to bolster their claims they made for years that nobody could possibly have known that the attacks of 9-11-01 were set to happen? In fact they had no proof whatsoever and I do not remember anybody asking them for proof either.
So, exactly what do you call proof? An officer of the state who has made himself unavailable for interview. A deputy sheriff who claims to have forgotten all about the detailed information given him in 1998? A 911 operator who neglected to do her job right? A police station that refuses to answer seven letters of enquiry regarding a warning they received the night of 9-10-01? A school that refuses to release any information? A college that refuses to answer any letters whatsoever pertraining to 9-11? A government investigator who refuses to discuss it?
What exactly do you call proof?
So, exactly what do you call proof? An officer of the state who has made himself unavailable for interview. A deputy sheriff who claims to have forgotten all about the detailed information given him in 1998? A 911 operator who neglected to do her job right? A police station that refuses to answer seven letters of enquiry regarding a warning they received the night of 9-10-01? A school that refuses to release any information? A college that refuses to answer any letters whatsoever pertraining to 9-11? A government investigator who refuses to discuss it?
What exactly do you call proof?
You know very well what is considered proof and what isnt... so why not provide some?
QUOTE(PaloAlto @ Dec 20 2006, 02:00 AM) [snapback]1468263[/snapback]
You say there are a million ways to prove my point and then you give two---letters and phone calls. I do have tetters from persons I told---yes.
Wait. What the hell am I doing wasting my time with a bunch of loser forum misfits?
You people are a waste of cyber space.
Wait. What the hell am I doing wasting my time with a bunch of loser forum misfits?
You people are a waste of cyber space.
As the O.P. has shown no intention of presenting any evidence, and has responded to requests for such mainly with insults and evasion, this thread is closed for being pointless. The O.P. may contact the moderators directly if he feels he has a good enough reason to re-open the thread.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.