Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: How Long Is Too Long?
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Spirituality vs Skepticism
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4
IamsSon
QUOTE(GoddessWhispers @ Dec 16 2006, 10:27 PM) [snapback]1465067[/snapback]
Omnipresent - Present everywhere simultaneously

simultaneous-
Happening, existing, or done at the same time

That is still not the same as BEING everything.
Tangerine Sheri
QUOTE(IamsSon @ Dec 16 2006, 08:11 PM) [snapback]1465054[/snapback]
It's only frightening because you choose to be frightened by it, Supra. How are you frightened by a God you don't believe in? That's what I want to know.

Supra, here is something to scare you even more. I can choose to do whatever I want just like you can. I choose to obey my God. My God tells me to share His love with everyone. Isn't that incredibly frightening!? Will you sleep calmly tonight knowing that I intend to share love with every single person I meet because that is what the frightening non-existent God you deny is TELLING me to do?
You are right! Humanity who chooses to ignore the opportunity for unity with God does some incredibly destructive and evil things. Some of that humanity chooses to hide from itself under the false cloak of Christianity. How incredibly horrible, especially because if everyone just chose to accept God's gift of Salvation through Christ, they would KNOW what He wants them to do, and then instead of hatred, discrimination, and pure evil, we could all share God's love with each other.
Really!?!? Tolerance? Supra, your own words show the lie of this message! There is no tolerance in your beliefs! None at all. There is only a false, frightened sense of superiority and a false sense that everything is really all right and everything would be so much better if we could only get rid of the people who still cling to their stupid false beliefs in a non-existent god.

Supra, it is obvious that you do not accept me. Oh I know you'll say, "Iams, I do accept you, you are just a poor deluded man, but I accept you." But the truth is that the only way you would accept me is if I were to renounce my beliefs in God.

I, on the other hand, do accept you, just as you are because I know you and I are the same. We are both sinners! I only wish that you may someday see that the only difference between us is that you fear a god you don't believe in and I serve God, who loves you and me exactly as we are and exactly because of who we are.



Son if you are advocating the bible calling this 'god's word , gods' plan you arent spreading love , not the love I am speaking of, unconditonal and i have read for many of you this is jsts to lofty and hard to beleive a god that actually loves has no limitations no rules no requirements..


i know this is hard to understand son you don't have to be no a certain way to be excepted by me, i see you are giving what you have been taught is your best. and true for you... there is vvalue in every person and opinion even the ones i disagree with... possibly standing up to me is good for you, sometimes those we dislike the most help us the most. look for that son loook to the value in this dialogue..... most of my freinds i disagree with that is a place you get too when you are comfortable in your beleifs you in turn are comfortable with all others beleifs.....


you can live how you want and I intend to live how i want, there is no right or wrong just what works and what doesn't as we decide based on our life experinces......

No I i'm sorry to disaapoint you but son i would want you to be who you are i'd insist on it, i could never profess to know what is best for you nor would i be so arrogant as to try to tell you, i except you as is and if i didn't I'd tell you to put me on ignore..... i see past the dogma son.........its not the end of the world....

we are on a forum that discusses important issues ones that i find valuable and interesting, its not personal to me,its exciting and inspirational...In my everyday life i use my life to embrace the things i find important i am to busy worrying about me to be worriing about what another is doing, i am the change I wish to see not you....i am clear on that ....

now for the hundredth time this is not personal stop trying to turn yourself into a victum/martyr, you are too beautiful of a person to be self effacing.... so discuss your beliefs, i'm listening , i'm interested i don't need to agree don't expect me too okay.. or need me too........


i bet we define tolerance very diffenrtly, it means I understand you not agree with you... i have been you????
GoddessWhispers
The bible is the word of god, in your faith Son?


Acts 17:28

Psalm 139:5-15

Ephesians 4:6

Romans 11:36

Jeremiah 23:24


II Chronicles 2:6

I Kings 8:27
IamsSon
Here are the passages you posted. I am using "The Message" translation because it does such a good job of providing the verses that provide context around the verse and is written in a more contemporary grammar.

Acts 17:28
24-29"The God who made the world and everything in it, this Master of sky and land, doesn't live in custom-made shrines or need the human race to run errands for him, as if he couldn't take care of himself. He makes the creatures; the creatures don't make him. Starting from scratch, he made the entire human race and made the earth hospitable, with plenty of time and space for living so we could seek after God, and not just grope around in the dark but actually find him. He doesn't play hide-and-seek with us. He's not remote; he's near. We live and move in him, can't get away from him! One of your poets said it well: 'We're the God-created.' Well, if we are the God-created, it doesn't make a lot of sense to think we could hire a sculptor to chisel a god out of stone for us, does it?

I don't see how this passage is an issue.

Psalm 139:5-15
1-6 God, investigate my life; get all the facts firsthand.
I'm an open book to you;
even from a distance, you know what I'm thinking.
You know when I leave and when I get back;
I'm never out of your sight.
You know everything I'm going to say
before I start the first sentence.
I look behind me and you're there,
then up ahead and you're there, too—
your reassuring presence, coming and going.
This is too much, too wonderful—
I can't take it all in!

7-12 Is there anyplace I can go to avoid your Spirit?
to be out of your sight?
If I climb to the sky, you're there!
If I go underground, you're there!
If I flew on morning's wings
to the far western horizon,
You'd find me in a minute—
you're already there waiting!
Then I said to myself, "Oh, he even sees me in the dark!
At night I'm immersed in the light!"
It's a fact: darkness isn't dark to you;
night and day, darkness and light, they're all the same to you.

13-16 Oh yes, you shaped me first inside, then out;
you formed me in my mother's womb.
I thank you, High God—you're breathtaking!
Body and soul, I am marvelously made!
I worship in adoration—what a creation!
You know me inside and out,
you know every bone in my body;
You know exactly how I was made, bit by bit,
how I was sculpted from nothing into something.
Like an open book, you watched me grow from conception to birth;
all the stages of my life were spread out before you,
The days of my life all prepared
before I'd even lived one day.

Ephesians 4:6
4-6You were all called to travel on the same road and in the same direction, so stay together, both outwardly and inwardly. You have one Master, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who rules over all, works through all, and is present in all. Everything you are and think and do is permeated with Oneness.

Romans 11:36
33-36Have you ever come on anything quite like this extravagant generosity of God, this deep, deep wisdom? It's way over our heads. We'll never figure it out.

Is there anyone around who can explain God?
Anyone smart enough to tell him what to do?
Anyone who has done him such a huge favor
that God has to ask his advice?

Everything comes from him;
Everything happens through him;
Everything ends up in him.
Always glory! Always praise!
Yes. Yes. Yes.

Jeremiah 23:24
23-24"Am I not a God near at hand"—God's Decree—
"and not a God far off?
Can anyone hide out in a corner
where I can't see him?"
God's Decree.
"Am I not present everywhere,
whether seen or unseen?"
God's Decree.

II Chronicles 2:6
5-10 "The house I am building has to be the best, for our God is the best, far better than competing gods. But who is capable of building such a structure? Why, the skies—the entire cosmos!—can't begin to contain him. And me, who am I to think I can build a house adequate for God—burning incense to him is about all I'm good for! I need your help: Send me a master artisan in gold, silver, bronze, iron, textiles of purple, crimson, and violet, and who knows the craft of engraving; he will supervise the trained craftsmen in Judah and Jerusalem that my father provided. Also send cedar, cypress, and algum logs from Lebanon; I know you have lumberjacks experienced in the Lebanon forests. I'll send workers to join your crews to cut plenty of timber—I'm going to need a lot, for this house I'm building is going to be absolutely stunning—a showcase temple! I'll provide all the food necessary for your crew of lumberjacks and loggers: 130,000 bushels of wheat, 120,000 gallons of wine, and 120,000 gallons of olive oil."

I Kings 8:27
27-32 Can it be that God will actually move into our neighborhood? Why, the cosmos itself isn't large enough to give you breathing room, let alone this Temple I've built. Even so, I'm bold to ask: Pay attention to these my prayers, both intercessory and personal, O God, my God. Listen to my prayers, energetic and devout, that I'm setting before you right now. Keep your eyes open to this Temple night and day, this place of which you said, "My Name will be honored there," and listen to the prayers that I pray at this place.
Listen from your home in heaven and when you hear, forgive.

When someone hurts a neighbor and promises to make things right, and then comes and repeats the promise before your Altar in this Temple, listen from heaven and act accordingly: Judge your servants, making the offender pay for his offense and setting the offended free of any charges.


I expect that you were trying to say that these verses show that God is everything, but I don't see it. He is everywhere, He is NOT everything.

And to answer your question, Yes, in my personal spiritual belief, the Bible is God's Word.
JMPD1
An interesting interpretation of the scriptures Iams. Especially the way it is worded.

QUOTE
The house I am building has to be the best, for our God is the best, far better than competing gods.
competing gods?

QUOTE
Acts 17:28
24-29"The God who made the world and everything in it, this Master of sky and land,


"The God", implying that there may be other gods?


The use and placement of the words changes the meaning of the original in this paraphrase of the generally accepted version.

Its as if I quoted MLK as saying "I have an idea....." as opposed to "I have a dream...."


QUOTE
I expect that you were trying to say that these verses show that God is everything, but I don't see it. He is everywhere, He is NOT everything.


What did god use to create everything? If there was nothing NOTHING but god, where did the material to create EVERYTHING come from?
GoddessWhispers
Ephesians 4:5-6 (English standard version)
5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism, 6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all.

Tangerine Sheri
QUOTE(GoddessWhispers @ Dec 16 2006, 09:28 PM) [snapback]1465123[/snapback]
Ephesians 4:5-6 (English standard version)
5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism, 6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all.

Gw we are on the same page ....WE ARE ALL ONE....
GoddessWhispers
True Sheri. The one thing we all hold in common, faiths aside, is human beingness. We all come from the same unknown source, some choose to name god. However, as I see it, that would not serve most believers because then they could not invest themselves in denominational bias. Because to believe god is everywhere (omniscient), which means in all things created, one would have to face the fact, as a believer, that when they apply prejudice against anyone for being who they are, they're hating god that is within.

The kingdom of god is within, so says the "word". So if god resides in the kingdom, then god lives within. Did jesus not "say" this?!
I think he did, according to the bible that is said to be gods "word". And as prejudice is rampant in the bible, under the ordinance of god, what a quandary it is to find this within the word: I John 4:20 If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?

Makes one wonder, especially one of the atheist persuasion, if this is the new testament, what that hate by god in the old, when he exercised that prerogative according to plan, was thinking. When he is the one and only god, as he killed all others that worshiped other gods, when those god's must be the one and only god. And is it not hate that compels one to enslave their brother, because they see them as unequal and as such un-entitled to freedom as one would want for themselves?! Is it not hate when one rapes women, that but by the "grace of god" would be one's sister , daughter or mother!? Is it not hate that exercises oppression, racism, class-ism, and all other isms that plagued the world then and now. And what is hate but ignorance, that we are all one!? And what is it, that calls itself god, that claims it is : the father god of all, who is over all and through all and in all, when it exercises it's prerogative according to plan and kills by proxy any one(s) of the all, it chooses, because it can?!

All things considered, I thank "god" I'm an atheist.
Tangerine Sheri
"how can he love God whom he hath not seen?"


i particularly am drawn tot his scrip...

how does one know of anothers divinity or their own if they deny any aspect of it in their brother... they do not......intolerance, bigotry, racism, calling another wrong and unworthy is not 'godly' it is of man born of mans ego...


I'm often reminded of the teenager who 'knows it all' yet in its all knowing knows nothing, the very fact that they 'know it all' closes off all further learning and growth....


the last attempt to bring credibility to a false doctrine is to say i have a personal relationship with 'god' the I'm special , i'm chosen , the folly and play ground of the ego....


We are all one no part of life is more viable or important than another all of life exists side by side in congruency with the all, albiet it isn't decorated in visions of granduer and accolades wrapped in greatness and superiority and noone is called special, no I'm afraid tehr is not names in lights jsut akowing htat it all flows as one ...for this many will shun their brother call him the evil one, exalt thereselves adn call this 'gods plan '.....and so the relgious regime lives on.....If one does not go within one goes without.....



GW i loved your post it was beautiful....
antiaging
QUOTE(Eleleth 4/4 @ Dec 13 2006, 01:38 PM) [snapback]1460975[/snapback]
OK I'm thinking even if every prophet was inpired by God and expressing the will of God, Jesus was the Son of God and its all true, what does that say about them? Its been like two thousand years since Jesus supposedly walked the earth and what has he accomplished? God's word supposedly goes back even farther with the Jews what has that gotten them? They're still fighting, popping kids in the head 13 times to be sure they arent a threat while God's newest children try and blow the crap out of some buses full of God's other children.

If these people were enlightened prophets speaking for God, they are failures in my opinion, all of them.


They are not failures. Peter was used by God to accurately predict the coming of people like you in the last times:
Look at this.

2 Peter 3:3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,

2 Peter 3:4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as [they were] from the beginning of the creation.

2 Peter 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:

2 Peter 3:6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:

2 Peter 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

2 Peter 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.




UniversalOverride
I love how when people make sense discussing their own ideas all of sudden someone throws in five pages of quoted scriptures. God bless free thinkers...
Isis-69
QUOTE(IamsSon @ Dec 17 2006, 02:28 AM) [snapback]1464918[/snapback]
Yes, I do.

Actually, if you read what I wrote I said I'm willing to believe it is at most a genetic predisposition in the same vein as alcoholism seems to be a genetic predisposition for some, I did not say I believe that's what it is, I said I'm willing to believe THAT much. However, I believe that a predisposition to anything does not make it a certainty, there are people who are born with a predisposition to heart problems but yet never actually suffer from them, and there are also people who are not born predisposed to heart problems and yet end up having heart attacks. So genetics are not, in my view the "be all, end all" answer to all problems.
Sorry, Goddess, I have not shied away from anything that I have been able to verify myself. That I have not taken your word for everything you have said is something altogether different.

Did God command the death of many? Yes, He did. Did He destroy mankind with a Flood? Yes, He did. Did He order Israel to do some violent things? Yes, He did. Guess what? He's God! This... everything around us, including us, is His to do with as He pleases. It's His creation. That He has chosen to do things this way is His prerogative. If you don't like it, that's too bad.

That God ordered Israel to do the things it did, does not in any way take away from the fact that people have used what is written in the Bible or their version of what is written in the Bible to support their own personal or cultural biases or discriminative acts. The Bible is divided into two Testaments because there was a new covenant established between God and man with Jesus's birth.

Hi son
I just came back to the forum. interesting conversation. I like to refer to your statement that you believe in the bible albite we have discovered that sometimes you read it liturally and other times you take it symbolic or have your own translation for what is standing ther. No reason to feel bad; most people do that...according to what they REALLY believe!
Now her I want to send you averb or what ever you may call it and I like your oppinion if that was written or inspried by God? Because this is what our mAN were made to believe for as long as woman were not allowed to read. Then it was taken out the bible;for obvious reason...
..AND I QUOTE...
ECCLESIASTICUS 42/12
DO NOT STARE AT ANY MAN FOR HIS GOOD LOOKS,
DO NOT SIT DOWN WITH WOMAN.
FOR MOTH COMES OUT OF CLOTHES,
AND WOMANS SPITE OF WOMAN
BETTER MAN'S SPITE THAN AWOMANS KINDNESS:
WOMAN GIVE RISE TO SHAME AND REPROACH.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.............??????????????????????????????????????/
Isis-69
QUOTE(UniversalOverride @ Dec 17 2006, 06:05 PM) [snapback]1465465[/snapback]
I love how when people make sense discussing their own ideas all of sudden someone throws in five pages of quoted scriptures. God bless free thinkers...

hI uNIVERSAL OVERRIDE.
i HAVE BEEN GOING TROUGH A FEW PAGES AND i MUST ADMID i DONT READ ALL THE QUOTATIONS OF BIBLE VERSE ECT WHEN THEY ARE SO LONG. i JUMP THEM AND READ TE SHORTEN NOTES. I JUST WATED TO SAY THAT i LIKE YOUR STYLE; SHORT AND SWEET. I THINK I HAVE TO LEARN THAT TOO, SINCE MY ENDLISH IS NOT SO GOOD, AND SOMETIMES PEOPLE MISUNDERSTAND ME FOR THAT REASON. I ALSO WANT TO TELL YOU THAT YOU ARE THINKING ALONG MY LINES. kEEPIT UP AND SPARE ME TO SPEAK SO THAT I DONT OFFEND ANYBODY BY MISTAKE...
IamsSon
QUOTE(Isis-69 @ Dec 17 2006, 12:23 PM) [snapback]1465480[/snapback]
Hi son
I just came back to the forum. interesting conversation. I like to refer to your statement that you believe in the bible albite we have discovered that sometimes you read it liturally and other times you take it symbolic or have your own translation for what is standing ther. No reason to feel bad; most people do that...according to what they REALLY believe!


Isis, I love it when people try to tell me what I believe or pretend to know why I do or say something. There are ways in which theologians can decide if a passage is literal, or symbolic, or poetic, or narrative. Most of those methods have to do with the context of the passage. It is unfortunate that people seem to think that if you say you believe the Bible is God's Word then you believe it is all literal, failing to take into account the various literary styles that are obvious especially when you read it in Greek or Hebrew (I don't read it in these languages but my best friend does along with reading it in Latin and German). I do not just rely on my interpretation of the Scriptures, I'm intelligent enough to know that I'm better off using resources and experts.

Context is immensely important when studying the Bible because God intended the Scriptures to be clearly understood by the people of the culture it was written in, and so, in order for us to have a clear understanding of its message we need to understand the verse in relation to the passage it is a part of, the book it is a part of (remember, originally these books/letters were not separated into chapters and verses), the original audience for the book/letter, the language including grammar, syntax, sentence structure, correct meaning of words, implication of particular words/phrases in the language, what covenant existed between God and His people at the time of the writing, and quite a few other requirements. As you can see, there is an incredible depth of study required to correctly place Scripture in context, not something to be taken on lightly which is why I like to rely on resources and experts.

It is because of the importance of truly knowing the context of Scripture and the dangers of not doing it correctly that James admonishes "Not many of you should presume to be teachers, my brothers, because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly." (James 3:1)


QUOTE
Now her I want to send you averb or what ever you may call it and I like your oppinion if that was written or inspried by God? Because this is what our mAN were made to believe for as long as woman were not allowed to read. Then it was taken out the bible;for obvious reason...
..AND I QUOTE...
ECCLESIASTICUS 42/12
DO NOT STARE AT ANY MAN FOR HIS GOOD LOOKS,
DO NOT SIT DOWN WITH WOMAN.
FOR MOTH COMES OUT OF CLOTHES,
AND WOMANS SPITE OF WOMAN
BETTER MAN'S SPITE THAN AWOMANS KINDNESS:
WOMAN GIVE RISE TO SHAME AND REPROACH.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.............??????????????????????????????????????/

You may want to look at the citation again. There is no book of Ecclesiasticus in the Bible, there is no Chapter 42 in the Book of Ecclesiastes (which is the closest named book to what you wrote) and there is no verse 42 in Chapter 12 of Ecclesiastes, so I have no idea what you are quoting. If it isn't in the Bible then it really has no bearing on what I believe about the Bible. If you cited this wrong please post the correct citation.
GoddessWhispers
QUOTE
Isis, I love it when people try to tell me what I believe or pretend to know why I do or say something....
I would dare say you do. Because you certainly presuppose yourself to do the same unto others, when you tell them what you believe and impart an attitude that that is somehow superior to that which all others hold as truth.

Certainly you have claimed to like to learn what others think about matters of faith and spirit. And yet, reading you, it is my belief that you do this, not to glean an understanding of others belief (or lack there of) but rather so as to bolster your own resolve in believing your faith is superior to theirs. And then you take that self-assurance and attempt to prove it by using it's articles and scriptures to impart others are wrong in the faith they hold as personal and to themselves. And when your scripture are proven not to be as that which you understand, and impart as your sense of god righteousness, you refuse to face it. Case in point the "Omniscience" issue, earlier.

I think you imagine this site is a platform, by which you might bring some to your god. However, this is first and foremost a community forum, not a church or environment that ascribes conversion. And given you are here exampling your faith/belief and what it means, through those articles by which you attempt to imply others are wrong, for not believing as you do, it provides evidence of the kind of god you think to speak of and for, in your hopes of bringing others to "him".

And I'll tell you that if a god , creator of all that exists, wise unto all things, present in every place, imparts to it's faithful it's intolerance of others for who they are and how they feel about the intangible inspiration some call god, and as such inspires the same of it's faithful, it is no god example for anyone that omniscience accredits prejudice and intolerance as requisite to it's ideal of righteousness.

One would then be better served to believe in nothing, than to believe in anything that inspires separatism as holy.
IamsSon
QUOTE(GoddessWhispers @ Dec 17 2006, 06:24 PM) [snapback]1465779[/snapback]
I would dare say you do. Because you certainly presuppose yourself to do the same unto others, when you tell them what you believe and impart an attitude that that is somehow superior to that which all others hold as truth.

So, when I tell others what I believe I'm being presumptuous? So, are you presumptuous when you tell others what you believe? When have I ever told anyone that what they believe is wrong without pointing out where their error is (and I only do this if someone is quoting Scripture or saying what they think Christians believe)

QUOTE

Certainly you have claimed to like to learn what others think about matters of faith and spirit. And yet, reading you, it is my belief that you do this, not to glean an understanding of others belief (or lack there of) but rather so as to bolster your own resolve in believing your faith is superior to theirs. And then you take that self-assurance and attempt to prove it by using it's articles and scriptures to impart others are wrong in the faith they hold as personal and to themselves. And when your scripture are proven not to be as that which you understand, and impart as your sense of god righteousness, you refuse to face it. Case in point the "Omniscience" issue, earlier.
First, I do like learning from others, but that doesn't mean I'm going to adopt their beliefs, and it certainly doesn't mean I'm just going to learn without questioning.

Second, the omniscience issue has still not been resolved. I have yet to see any Scripture quoted that, when looked at in context doesn't deny the idea that God is everything and everything is God. I'm not going to simply accept something which I know to be wrong. I'm still learning from people.

QUOTE

I think you imagine this site is a platform, by which you might bring some to your god. However, this is first and foremost a community forum, not a church or environment that ascribes conversion. And given you are here exampling your faith/belief and what it means, through those articles by which you attempt to imply others are wrong, for not believing as you do, it provides evidence of the kind of god you think to speak of and for, in your hopes of bringing others to "him".

How is my talking about what I believe and correcting misconceptions about Christianity any different than what anyone else posting on these forums does? I'm sure that if a Wiccan noticed someone misquoting or misstating their beliefs they would try to correct the error, just like a Buddhist would or an atheist would. If you don't want me correcting your errors then stop posting or do some research.

QUOTE
And I'll tell you that if a god , creator of all that exists, wise unto all things, present in every place, imparts to it's faithful it's intolerance of others for who they are and how they feel about the intangible inspiration some call god, and as such inspires the same of it's faithful, it is no god example for anyone that omniscience accredits prejudice and intolerance as requisite to it's ideal of righteousness.

One would then be better served to believe in nothing, than to believe in anything that inspires separatism as holy.


I have said several times before in other threads that Christianity is an exclusivist belief, there's one way, not many, that is the belief.
Tangerine Sheri
Son Gw has not stated her beleifs other than to share wisdoms that are common to anyone and easily recognizable they need no mouth piece or scipture quoting , you apply them they work , or you apply them they don't...


outside of religion the abrahamics noone is pimping a beleif structure because they have remembered that we are all god/life/love what ever you wnat to call it, you have not remebered that and still are clining to being special and chosen and exclusive , the ego identification , its easily observable, alot of us don't even ask the other what they beleive it doesn't matter as becausee we see them for who they really are The beloved, oneness, divine gods or goddessess and its beautiful. .you have so many limts you aren't seeing that is all, its not taht serious , we understand you , Be who need to be son , walk your path but its jsut your path its not anything more than a fear construct..

again if its works for you great but for many it doesn't they have reconnected with thier true selves and see relgion in its persepctive that is exclusive divides , don't you notice you have alot of conflict unless its with other relgious people??Pa doestn' irish doens't 101 doesn't etc etc...., we want to get along with you and we have been trying to encourage you to make room for us too we get you now try and get us....post after psot GW is very kindly trying to help you ....., we all know you are relgious and except that ...

No one woudl ever tell you not to quetion but how are you quetioning, your questions already have the answers if they don't you dismiss the data thats not growth...do it if you choose but know there is a difference.....
IamsSon
QUOTE(Supra Sheri @ Dec 17 2006, 07:38 PM) [snapback]1465831[/snapback]
Son Gw has not stated her beleifs other than to share wisdoms that are common to anyone and easily recognizable they need no mouth piece or scipture quoting , you apply them they work , or you apply them they don't...
outside of religion the abrahamics noone is pimping a beleif structure because they have remembered that we are all god/life/love what ever you wnat to call it, you have not remebered that and still are clining to being special and chosen and exclusive , the ego identification , its easily observable, alot of us don't even ask the other what they beleive it doesn't matter as becausee we see them for who they really are The beloved, oneness, divine gods or goddessess and its beautiful. .you have so many limts you aren't seeing that is all, its not taht serious , we understand you , Be who need to be son , walk your path but its jsut your path its not anything more than a fear construct..

again if its works for you great but for many it doesn't they have reconnected with thier true selves and see relgion in its persepctive that is exclusive divides , don't you notice you have alot of conflict unless its with other relgious people??Pa doestn' irish doens't 101 doesn't etc etc...., we want to get along with you and we have been trying to encourage you to make room for us too we get you now try and get us....post after psot GW is very kindly trying to help you ....., we all know you are relgious and except that ...

No one woudl ever tell you not to quetion but how are you quetioning, oyour questions already have th answers if htey don't yo dismiss the datat tahts not growth...do it if you choose but know there is a difference.....


WHAT!?
Tangerine Sheri
QUOTE(IamsSon @ Dec 17 2006, 05:48 PM) [snapback]1465839[/snapback]
WHAT!?

Just as i thought .."shrugs'
MadMachine
QUOTE(IamsSon @ Dec 17 2006, 07:48 PM) [snapback]1465839[/snapback]
WHAT!?

I understand. I sometimes have trouble understanding what Sheri is typing as well, I don't think she's the best typist. No offense, Sheri. laugh.gif
But it's definitely worth it to read carefully and get the message. I always enjoy her posts.
Tangerine Sheri
QUOTE(MadMachine @ Dec 17 2006, 05:55 PM) [snapback]1465847[/snapback]
I understand. I sometimes have trouble understanding what Sheri is typing as well, I don't think she's the best typist. No offense, Sheri. laugh.gif
But it's definitely worth it to read carefully and get the message. I always enjoy her posts.

thanks, MM i know my typing sucks and as son says my syntax too,
it does require some getting used too...Tthanks for giving me an extra once over MM.... wub.gif
Isis-69
QUOTE(IamsSon @ Dec 17 2006, 11:14 PM) [snapback]1465733[/snapback]
Isis, I love it when people try to tell me what I believe or pretend to know why I do or say something. There are ways in which theologians can decide if a passage is literal, or symbolic, or poetic, or narrative. Most of those methods have to do with the context of the passage. It is unfortunate that people seem to think that if you say you believe the Bible is God's Word then you believe it is all literal, failing to take into account the various literary styles that are obvious especially when you read it in Greek or Hebrew (I don't read it in these languages but my best friend does along with reading it in Latin and German). I do not just rely on my interpretation of the Scriptures, I'm intelligent enough to know that I'm better off using resources and experts.

Context is immensely important when studying the Bible because God intended the Scriptures to be clearly understood by the people of the culture it was written in, and so, in order for us to have a clear understanding of its message we need to understand the verse in relation to the passage it is a part of, the book it is a part of (remember, originally these books/letters were not separated into chapters and verses), the original audience for the book/letter, the language including grammar, syntax, sentence structure, correct meaning of words, implication of particular words/phrases in the language, what covenant existed between God and His people at the time of the writing, and quite a few other requirements. As you can see, there is an incredible depth of study required to correctly place Scripture in context, not something to be taken on lightly which is why I like to rely on resources and experts.

It is because of the importance of truly knowing the context of Scripture and the dangers of not doing it correctly that James admonishes "Not many of you should presume to be teachers, my brothers, because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly." (James 3:1)
You may want to look at the citation again. There is no book of Ecclesiasticus in the Bible, there is no Chapter 42 in the Book of Ecclesiastes (which is the closest named book to what you wrote) and there is no verse 42 in Chapter 12 of Ecclesiastes, so I have no idea what you are quoting. If it isn't in the Bible then it really has no bearing on what I believe about the Bible. If you cited this wrong please post the correct citation.


Thanks for being honest. I did not expect you ta have this in your bible. I have 2 bibles with in in. This book, along with the book of wisdom, book of Tobit, book of Enoch and a few others haven been taken out the bible I dont know how long ago.
The book of Enoch was taken out 1000 years ago, and when we read it then we know why. Because Enoch predicted his own return as none other then Jesus, and he predicted that the last 12 sheppards (Apostles) will mislead more of Gods Sheep then anybody before them.
The book of wisdom lets us know that Wisdom: she is the Holy spirit of God. I dont need to tell you who did not want woman to know that they are in the image of the Holy spirit, or?
The book of Tobit has the earliest marriege seremony in it, and it did NOT involve the help of a priest! So guess why it had to go?

And the book of Ecclesiasticus...when woman start reading the bible themself, they shurely would not have made it their favorite book after reading this crapp....or what do you think?
Now please tell me, who had the right toke ANYTHING out the bible, if it was written or inspired by God?
Isis-69
QUOTE(IamsSon @ Dec 18 2006, 01:21 AM) [snapback]1465820[/snapback]
So, when I tell others what I believe I'm being presumptuous? So, are you presumptuous when you tell others what you believe? When have I ever told anyone that what they believe is wrong without pointing out where their error is (and I only do this if someone is quoting Scripture or saying what they think Christians believe)

First, I do like learning from others, but that doesn't mean I'm going to adopt their beliefs, and it certainly doesn't mean I'm just going to learn without questioning.

Second, the omniscience issue has still not been resolved. I have yet to see any Scripture quoted that, when looked at in context doesn't deny the idea that God is everything and everything is God. I'm not going to simply accept something which I know to be wrong. I'm still learning from people.
How is my talking about what I believe and correcting misconceptions about Christianity any different than what anyone else posting on these forums does? I'm sure that if a Wiccan noticed someone misquoting or misstating their beliefs they would try to correct the error, just like a Buddhist would or an atheist would. If you don't want me correcting your errors then stop posting or do some research.

I have said several times before in other threads that Christianity is an exclusivist belief, there's one way, not many, that is the belief.


I misss this about the omnipresents of God...ect, and I dont like reading whole scriptures on the net, I have my own bible's. I aggree with you that God (who is not an old man sitting on some claud, sending us here and then the devil to bring us to fall, so that he can fry us in eternal hell) is omnipresent. For in the beginning there was only God. So the only materie he had to create us from is himself. God is light and he is love, right? For matter of visiulizasition we might picture him as a big, big light exploding into millions of sparks, each one representing US, a piece of God himself. Do you sincerely believe that God would burn himself or a piece of himself in eternal hell?
GoddessWhispers
QUOTE

I John 4:20 "If someone says, "I love God," and hates his brother, he is a liar; for the one who does not love his brother whom he has seen, cannot love God whom he has not seen." jesus


QUOTE(IamsSon @ Dec 18 2006, 01:21 PM) [snapback]1465820[/snapback]
So, when I tell others what I believe I'm being presumptuous? So, are you presumptuous when you tell others what you believe? When have I ever told anyone that what they believe is wrong without pointing out where their error is (and I only do this if someone is quoting Scripture or saying what they think Christians believe)

First, I do like learning from others, but that doesn't mean I'm going to adopt their beliefs, and it certainly doesn't mean I'm just going to learn without questioning.

QUOTE
Second, the omniscience issue has still not been resolved. I have yet to see any Scripture quoted that, when looked at in context doesn't deny the idea that God is everything and everything is God. I'm not going to simply accept something which I know to be wrong. I'm still learning from people.
I respect that for you this is true. Even when yeshua said the kingdom of heaven is within. Even when god has said he is everywhere and in everything and not even temples made by man may contain "him". Even when the very definition of omnipresent is defined as ubiquitous. Being everywhere, at the same time. Everywhere, as in every place, every part, in all places. I accept that for you, omnipresence, with respect to your understanding of your gods powers, does not mean "he" can be within people as well.



QUOTE
How is my talking about what I believe and correcting misconceptions about Christianity any different than what anyone else posting on these forums does? I'm sure that if a Wiccan noticed someone misquoting or misstating their beliefs they would try to correct the error, just like a Buddhist would or an atheist would. If you don't want me correcting your errors then stop posting or do some research
. How is it that anyone that may know anything about scripture comes before your scrutiny that inevitably imparts, per your understanding, that they are in error!? Even when one uses your faiths scriptures to define their meaning of a subject, you claim they're wrong because they don't understand the context. Has it ever occurred to you that perhaps it is you that are in error of the context!?



QUOTE
I have said several times before in other threads that Christianity is an exclusivist belief, there's one way, not many, that is the belief.
I've not been on board regularly enough to count. But I believe you, just reading what I have of your understanding of your faith and practice. That's why it amazes me that you do not see your own words that contradict your own claims that you wish to learn something from people. How do you imagine you'll ever learn anything if you measure and judge everything anyone has to say when you say you believe there's only one way to believe!? All you'll ever learn, thinking there's only one way to think, is that you are entitled to continue to think your way because from your point of view, anything else not in keeping with that exclusivist mode of thought is the wrong way to think! You don't realize it, I don't think. Or perhaps you do, but you are espousing separatism. And that is bigotry! And by the way, as there is only one way, not many. Though there are certainly many people that believe many things, they're all wrong unless they believe one way. I ask you, exactly which way is the one?! Certainly not the christian. Because there is not a belief system that pronounces itself as such. There is denominational christianity, which translates as many tenets defining the christian dogma just so. So, when there is just one way, of which denomination do you speak of, and in that speak to all others that your way says are wrong!?

And how is it you would presume to claim there is only one way when your faiths messiah said love one's neighbor as one's self. Coming to salvation through jesus is the only way to accomplish that, if one reads your bible. None come to the father save through me. And yet, where does it say there's only one way to abide jesus principles and teachings, toward all other people!? Jesus showed mercy to all people, when he himself was said to be the savior, that messiah promised to save the world , in the OT. Jesus laid his hands on the sick, the dying, the possessed. And all this was before the advent of anything known as "christianity". Much less denominational christianity. Much less before the advent of dogma that would take all that jesus is said to have done in his fathers name, and make it all part of that "exclusivity" of which you speak today.

So tell me Son, now that jesus is gone from this world and his parables and miracles have been left to the descendent's of the apostles and those that come after to read those dogmas that are drafted in the spirit of what jesus the man/savior himself said and did, which man made dogma is the one way to see now, all that jesus himself did in the name of love for all people then!?
Isis-69
QUOTE(GoddessWhispers @ Dec 18 2006, 02:45 PM) [snapback]1466309[/snapback]
I respect that for you this is true. Even when yeshua said the kingdom of heaven is within. Even when god has said he is everywhere and in everything and not even temples made by man may contain "him". Even when the very definition of omnipresent is defined as ubiquitous. Being everywhere, at the same time. Everywhere, as in every place, every part, in all places. I accept that for you, omnipresence, with respect to your understanding of your gods powers, does not mean "he" can be within people as well.
. How is it that anyone that may know anything about scripture comes before your scrutiny that inevitably imparts, per your understanding, that they are in error!? Even when one uses your faiths scriptures to define their meaning of a subject, you claim they're wrong because they don't understand the context. Has it ever occurred to you that perhaps it is you that are in error of the context!?
I've not been on board regularly enough to count. But I believe you, just reading what I have of your understanding of your faith and practice. That's why it amazes me that you do not see your own words that contradict your own claims that you wish to learn something from people. How do you imagine you'll ever learn anything if you measure and judge everything anyone has to say when you say you believe there's only one way to believe!? All you'll ever learn, thinking there's only one way to think, is that you are entitled to continue to think your way because from your point of view, anything else not in keeping with that exclusivist mode of thought is the wrong way to think! You don't realize it, I don't think. Or perhaps you do, but you are espousing separatism. And that is bigotry! And by the way, as there is only one way, not many. Though there are certainly many people that believe many things, they're all wrong unless they believe one way. I ask you, exactly which way is the one?! Certainly not the christian. Because there is not a belief system that pronounces itself as such. There is denominational christianity, which translates as many tenets defining the christian dogma just so. So, when there is just one way, of which denomination do you speak of, and in that speak to all others that your way says are wrong!?

And how is it you would presume to claim there is only one way when your faiths messiah said love one's neighbor as one's self. Coming to salvation through jesus is the only way to accomplish that, if one reads your bible. None come to the father save through me. And yet, where does it say there's only one way to abide jesus principles and teachings, toward all other people!? Jesus showed mercy to all people, when he himself was said to be the savior, that messiah promised to save the world , in the OT. Jesus laid his hands on the sick, the dying, the possessed. And all this was before the advent of anything known as "christianity". Much less denominational christianity. Much less before the advent of dogma that would take all that jesus is said to have done in his fathers name, and make it all part of that "exclusivity" of which you speak today.

So tell me Son, now that jesus is gone from this world and his parables and miracles have been left to the descendent's of the apostles and those that come after to read those dogmas that are drafted in the spirit of what jesus the man/savior himself said and did, which man made dogma is the one way to see now, all that jesus himself did in the name of love for all people then!?


Jeus came to 'save' the 'lost. He cannot save anybody who does not believe to be lost or who is NOT lost. It is up to God to judge who is, and who is not lost. But I find it rather starnge that after having millions of Christians proclaiming that they are the only ones going to be saved, it is written, taht ONLY FEW will indead make it into the kingdom (144000). So what happnes to the rest? Could those be the ones who heal, drive demons out in his name ect., to whom he promised that he 'will know them not', because they did not love their brothers but just their fellow-believers?

IamsSon
QUOTE(Isis-69 @ Dec 18 2006, 05:06 AM) [snapback]1466179[/snapback]
Thanks for being honest. I did not expect you ta have this in your bible. I have 2 bibles with in in. This book, along with the book of wisdom, book of Tobit, book of Enoch and a few others haven been taken out the bible I dont know how long ago.
The book of Enoch was taken out 1000 years ago, and when we read it then we know why. Because Enoch predicted his own return as none other then Jesus, and he predicted that the last 12 sheppards (Apostles) will mislead more of Gods Sheep then anybody before them.
The book of wisdom lets us know that Wisdom: she is the Holy spirit of God. I dont need to tell you who did not want woman to know that they are in the image of the Holy spirit, or?
The book of Tobit has the earliest marriege seremony in it, and it did NOT involve the help of a priest! So guess why it had to go?

And the book of Ecclesiasticus...when woman start reading the bible themself, they shurely would not have made it their favorite book after reading this crapp....or what do you think?
Now please tell me, who had the right toke ANYTHING out the bible, if it was written or inspired by God?

Goddess, here are some links to sites that talk about how books that appear in the Bible were chosen and why sme were left out.
LINK1

LINK2

LINK3

I think Link 3 is the best one.

The simplest answer is that anyone can sit down and write a book purporting to be about Jesus or a message from God, but that doesn't make the author's statement true nor does it make what he wrote God's word. God has chosen to work through man as part of the mystery of His plan and He gave some men wisdom, guidance, and authority to choose the books that would be considered His Word.
IamsSon
QUOTE(Isis-69 @ Dec 18 2006, 09:44 AM) [snapback]1466340[/snapback]
Jeus came to 'save' the 'lost. He cannot save anybody who does not believe to be lost or who is NOT lost. It is up to God to judge who is, and who is not lost. But I find it rather starnge that after having millions of Christians proclaiming that they are the only ones going to be saved, it is written, taht ONLY FEW will indead make it into the kingdom (144000). So what happnes to the rest? Could those be the ones who heal, drive demons out in his name ect., to whom he promised that he 'will know them not', because they did not love their brothers but just their fellow-believers?


Isis, there are a great deal of misunderstandings having to do with the Book of Revelation. Here is a very succinct explanation:

QUOTE
Among the many false doctrines taught by these who call themselves Jehovah's Witnesses is the one that only 144,000 will be saved in heaven. They cite Rev. 14:3: "And they sung as it were a new song before the throne and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth."

A study of the text and context will show the fallacy of their strained interpretation. The passage does not say that only 144,000 will be saved in heaven. Verse 4 says they were the firstfruits, indicating there would be others. After John saw the 144.000 he said, "After this I beheld, and lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb . . ." (See Rev. 7:1-17).

In Rev. 7:4 we learn the 144,000 were Jews; and they were men who were virgins (Rev. 14:4). According to the Witnesses' theory, therefore only Jewish men who were virgins will be in heaven. There can be no women, not even the mother of Jesus, nor any married man not even the married apostle Peter!

The Witnesses err in limiting the number for heaven to 144,000, for the Bible does not teach that limitation. After John saw these 144,000 Jewish virgin men, he plainly says that he saw a great multitude that no man could number (Rev. 7:9), who were of all nations. The Witnesses ignore this and try to number those who will be before the throne of God in heaven.

Be not deceived by this false doctrine of False Witnesses. All who obey God's commandments will have a right to enter the city (Rev. 22:14). Eternal salvation is promised to all who obey Christ (Heb. 5:9). You can be among that great multitude which no man can number, whether you be man or woman, Jew or Gentile, married or unmarried. Be not misled by the false prophets (preachers) who are determined to be cast into the lake of fire and brimstone to be tormented day and night forever and ever (Rev. 20: 10). If you blindly follow leaders you too will fall into the ditch with them (Matt. 15:14). "Beware o: false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves" (Matt. 7: 15)
.

SOURCE
GoddessWhispers
QUOTE(IamsSon @ Dec 19 2006, 04:19 AM) [snapback]1466368[/snapback]
The simplest answer is that anyone can sit down and write a book purporting to be about Jesus or a message from God, but that doesn't make the author's statement true nor does it make what he wrote God's word. God has chosen to work through man as part of the mystery of His plan and He gave some men wisdom, guidance, and authority to choose the books that would be considered His Word.



Ah, so god inspired to the hearing of men his words. Because he's god and as such it was his prerogative to communicate his thoughts as inspirations. And then, after all that was said, he inspired some men with wisdom , guidance and authority to take only certain parts from all that he said and call that his word. After he spoke so many words, only those exclusive ones were his words. And then, after certain of those words were considered his words, there's only one way to read those words, one way to know god through the inspiration of those words. And why that is is a mystery. So said god? Or so said those certain men god gave wisdom , guidance and authority to say that.

So why did god say all those other words!? Only to allow certain of them to be transcribed by certain select minds of certain select men, to dispense those words unto only certain select one's to receive them and understand gods word?! And what happened to all those other words god just felt like saying for no purpose, because those certain men were not told to take them as gods words!?

And if only certain ones were selected to pick amid all those god spoken words, and compile them as the only real collection of god's words, exactly which denomination , or select group, is the group for which those words were intended!? And if god spoke all those words, only to allow considered certain of them as his officially, why did god creator of all things and knower of all that is known, create others for which those words are not meant!? Of all the great many people populating this earth, doing beautiful things in the name of the spirit of their faith, in the spirit of their own sense of self in the event they are faith-less (non-religious), why are they here doing their thing!? When the only people for which words of salvation were spoken by god , so as to assure salvation, are a certain people for only those certain words ordained by god as "his" words are intended!? Which people exactly was god of the universe speaking to, on an earth populated by so many of those that emanated from him as creator!?

And when god inspired men to take only certain of all that he had said/inspired, and call that his word, why did he speak more words than those few that were so chosen!? What was it's purpose, if he chose to speak only to certain mortal men in the first place, being god and all. If he was only to say after, through inspiring mortal mens minds yet again, that they were to take only a select few of those words said, and call them gods word!?

That's kind of special don't you think!? The god of the universe speaks to mortal men, his thoughts!? So why isn't all of his words, all of gods word?! Why would he say so much, only to mean so little be heard!? And then, only by an exclusive few?! And, if god is creator of all, knows all, is all powerful, why would he create all people, if his inspiration to salvation was only intended for a few of his created!? What does that mean for the rest of us that were created from him from the beginning!? As he is the all powerful, all knowing, ever where present creator of everything that exists. Seen and unseen!? We were all made from his power as god, giver of life right!? All life comes from god!? So , amid all the human population, only a select few (which are those, again, btw?) , are his chosen!? So, besides asking you why he said so much if only a bit was to actually be heard and considered "his" word, why did he make so many people, when only a select few were meant to know him and his words, his will!? And how is anyone created from that god that is responsible for all life, everyone that came from that source in the beginning, how is it they are in deficit of returning to god when god made everything there is to come from and go to after life!? Even the void, as some believe in. Even the hells, or the pit of fire, etc... How does anyone go anywhere, how is anyone imperiled by not being the chosen ones, when they came from the source that calls itself god creator of all things, the only one source for infinity , for all existence?! How does one get created by the creator and not be permitted to return to that creator, after the creator made it, because the creator didn't make it to be that exclusive member of the one group for which that is an entitlement!?
Spurious George
Well after a weekend of parties, drunkeness, debauchery, limos and strippers I'm back and sufficiently 'sinned up' enough to reiterate my claims that God's prophets are frauds or failures because after all this is Satan's holiday season lol. Christmas is one of the bigger Christian holidays, if not the biggest, and all I see is money being spent, eating too much, drinking way too much and perverted Santa Clauses oogling the girls as they walk through the mall, "Don't get any funny ideas with this one Santa or I'll bust your hip ya geezer!", and some aggression lol. Two things I noticed is, one Christmas in general is probably the most un-Christian time of year and two it really looks to me that this is what most people want. People dont need to be tricked or brainwashed to know that indulgence is what they want, Christmas wasnt stolen from anyone, it was traded in for a good time of parties and more parties lol.

Then I thought God with all his "sins" must be against human nature, this God of commandments and sin is alien to the human condition of pleasure and desire. God is like a tongue with no tastebuds, ears with no eardrums, eyes with no sight and a nose up his own a**. People are having a good time, enjoying themselves, happy being "sinners" and this is not what God wants from us. He must want sensory deprived, naive, unexperienced drones preaching salvation from sin and giving up human nature for servitude. Non serviam!

Then I thought of all Gods cheerleaders convinced that their God will somehow win this battle of good and evil, of souls, against Satan. Ya right have you seen the world around you lol?!? We're throwing Gods yoke off our shoulders faster than you can say, "another double rye and coke please!" Maybe if God wasnt so outdated, wrong on so many occasions throughout history and on the side of human experience it wouldnt be the case but after two thousand years its already been too long a wait for the 'God system update'.

And now for a few comments on some previous replies. Re stem cells; religion may not be the only reason people are against it, but I recently saw a poll that took the people that disagreed with stem cell research and polled them on their reasons they are against it. Number one 'religious belief', number two 'what they heard' and last on the list 'education'. Out of those that are against it religion is the number one reason, education is the last, sounds about right doesnt it lol.

Re homosexuals are sinners like everyone else; get a grip on this guilt complex jeez. We're not all sinners, we arent sinners because of what we do, we are what we are and God doesnt like that. Perhaps the free will we have wasnt given to us by God but by a higher power because it seems to me God still cant get over the fact that we are free to make our own decisions unlike his enslaved angels.

QUOTE(antiaging @ Dec 17 2006, 09:57 AM) [snapback]1465460[/snapback]
They are not failures. Peter was used by God to accurately predict the coming of people like you in the last times:
Look at this.


Oh stop you're making me blush lol.

But seriously Peter denied Jesus three times and you put your faith in him? Ever wondered why Jesus' apostles never really understood what he was talking about, why Jesus scolded Peter calling him Satan? Was he trying to suck or did he just fail at being their teacher? Well some say Mary Magdalene got him but that seemed to only get Peter angry and his panties in a bunch, seems Peter was a bit of a misogynist and had some anger management issues, and they call him the Rock, I'd say he's Mud lol.
Isis-69
QUOTE(IamsSon @ Dec 18 2006, 04:51 PM) [snapback]1466397[/snapback]
Isis, there are a great deal of misunderstandings having to do with the Book of Revelation. Here is a very succinct explanation:
SOURCE


Now let me first of all aggree with you on your statement that there are a great deal of misunderstanding about the revelation.In fact of the whole Bible, possibly because all the so=called experts disaggree with each other and again duo tothe fact that there are so many different versions of bibles (including the revelation).
Do I understand you right, that you assume that the 'witnesses' written about in the bible might be the Yehovahs? And that they believe NO woman goes into the kingdom (where-ever they believe that to be)? How can they get away with discreminating against their own woman like that? Are you sure about this, because I think this must be impossible in this century! Wow...
GoddessWhispers
Considering if it weren't for women in this life there would be no Jehovah witnesses to speak of at all. wink2.gif Their god might want to realize if it wasn't for god needing that woman Mary, christians of any sort wouldn't even be in this discussion.
Isis-69
QUOTE(Eleleth 4/4 @ Dec 18 2006, 07:15 PM) [snapback]1466555[/snapback]
Well after a weekend of parties, drunkeness, debauchery, limos and strippers I'm back and sufficiently 'sinned up' enough to reiterate my claims that God's prophets are frauds or failures because after all this is Satan's holiday season lol. Christmas is one of the bigger Christian holidays, if not the biggest, and all I see is money being spent, eating too much, drinking way too much and perverted Santa Clauses oogling the girls as they walk through the mall, "Don't get any funny ideas with this one Santa or I'll bust your hip ya geezer!", and some aggression lol. Two things I noticed is, one Christmas in general is probably the most un-Christian time of year and two it really looks to me that this is what most people want. People dont need to be tricked or brainwashed to know that indulgence is what they want, Christmas wasnt stolen from anyone, it was traded in for a good time of parties and more parties lol.

Then I thought God with all his "sins" must be against human nature, this God of commandments and sin is alien to the human condition of pleasure and desire. God is like a tongue with no tastebuds, ears with no eardrums, eyes with no sight and a nose up his own a**. People are having a good time, enjoying themselves, happy being "sinners" and this is not what God wants from us. He must want sensory deprived, naive, unexperienced drones preaching salvation from sin and giving up human nature for servitude. Non serviam!

Then I thought of all Gods cheerleaders convinced that their God will somehow win this battle of good and evil, of souls, against Satan. Ya right have you seen the world around you lol?!? We're throwing Gods yoke off our shoulders faster than you can say, "another double rye and coke please!" Maybe if God wasnt so outdated, wrong on so many occasions throughout history and on the side of human experience it wouldnt be the case but after two thousand years its already been too long a wait for the 'God system update'.

And now for a few comments on some previous replies. Re stem cells; religion may not be the only reason people are against it, but I recently saw a poll that took the people that disagreed with stem cell research and polled them on their reasons they are against it. Number one 'religious belief', number two 'what they heard' and last on the list 'education'. Out of those that are against it religion is the number one reason, education is the last, sounds about right doesnt it lol.

Re homosexuals are sinners like everyone else; get a grip on this guilt complex jeez. We're not all sinners, we arent sinners because of what we do, we are what we are and God doesnt like that. Perhaps the free will we have wasnt given to us by God but by a higher power because it seems to me God still cant get over the fact that we are free to make our own decisions unlike his enslaved angels.
Oh stop you're making me blush lol.

But seriously Peter denied Jesus three times and you put your faith in him? Ever wondered why Jesus' apostles never really understood what he was talking about, why Jesus scolded Peter calling him Satan? Was he trying to suck or did he just fail at being their teacher? Well some say Mary Magdalene got him but that seemed to only get Peter angry and his panties in a bunch, seems Peter was a bit of a misogynist and had some anger management issues, and they call him the Rock, I'd say he's Mud lol.



For somebody who says she does not believe, your shurely know a lot about the bible! I am a Christian by birth, but I do not believe in Christmas just like I dont believe in the Bible. Jesus was not even born on Christmas. It was Nimrods birthday and it was then that the first christmas tree was put up in his honor. His mother was the first 'madonna/Heaven Mother being worshiped like the Cathlic worship Mary, yet the church calles those people back then gentiles or worse! Hypocrates, Jesus would call them...
Christmas has nothing to do with Jesus birthday or love! It is a feast for the businessman/woman who sell their stuff ...and yes, some people are going overboard with their celebrations on all those so-called holy days...
God forgive them, for they dont know what tey do..
Or they do, but dont care...
What the heck; Jesus died for their sins...right? lol...
Isis-69
QUOTE(IamsSon @ Dec 18 2006, 04:19 PM) [snapback]1466368[/snapback]
Goddess, here are some links to sites that talk about how books that appear in the Bible were chosen and why sme were left out.
LINK1

LINK2

LINK3

I think Link 3 is the best one.

The simplest answer is that anyone can sit down and write a book purporting to be about Jesus or a message from God, but that doesn't make the author's statement true nor does it make what he wrote God's word. God has chosen to work through man as part of the mystery of His plan and He gave some men wisdom, guidance, and authority to choose the books that would be considered His Word.


You have lost me here. I thought the bible was written and inspiried by God from day one? So why did God have to give some man wisdom to change 'his own word' later, or to take out what he chose to have taken out. Did he change his mind about what he wrote before?
Or does that mean that if I put a 'link onto the net' and explain why I write a new bible and leave out what I dont aggree on, like the churchfathers did, and I claim God told me to do so, than that makes it OK and I get away with it? Is that correct?
Paranoid Android
QUOTE(Isis-69 @ Dec 19 2006, 02:44 AM) [snapback]1466340[/snapback]
Jeus came to 'save' the 'lost. He cannot save anybody who does not believe to be lost or who is NOT lost. It is up to God to judge who is, and who is not lost. But I find it rather starnge that after having millions of Christians proclaiming that they are the only ones going to be saved, it is written, taht ONLY FEW will indead make it into the kingdom (144000). So what happnes to the rest? Could those be the ones who heal, drive demons out in his name ect., to whom he promised that he 'will know them not', because they did not love their brothers but just their fellow-believers?
Allow me to add another dimension to this passage. I take a slightly different view of this 144,000 saved passage than does IamsSon. Numbers are symbols that represent certain things throughout the Bible. Numbers and multiples of numbers. The number 7 is the number for completion/perfection - 7 days of creation, 7 weeks (and 77 weeks) in Daniel. The number 4 represents the world - 4 corners, 4 winds, 4 horsemen of the apocalypse. The number 12 represents God and his people - 12 tribes of Israel.

How did the author of Revelation arrive at his 144,000? The text shows us - 12,000 from each of the 12 tribes of Israel (note that 12,000 is also a multiple of 12). we could take the literal approach taht there are only 144,000 people, but (at least to me) this does not make sense. 144,000 people was an extremely large number of people back in those days. Using the symbolic nature of Revelation, the symbolic representation of the number 12, what we have are 144,000 of God's people, 12x12,000. One could look at it then that those who are saved belong to a very large, but ultimately finite group of people.

Numerical symbology, that's how I see it - 144,000 refers to a large, but ultimately finite group of people.

Regards, PA
Isis-69
QUOTE(Paranoid Android @ Dec 19 2006, 12:59 AM) [snapback]1466965[/snapback]
Allow me to add another dimension to this passage. I take a slightly different view of this 144,000 saved passage than does IamsSon. Numbers are symbols that represent certain things throughout the Bible. Numbers and multiples of numbers. The number 7 is the number for completion/perfection - 7 days of creation, 7 weeks (and 77 weeks) in Daniel. The number 4 represents the world - 4 corners, 4 winds, 4 horsemen of the apocalypse. The number 12 represents God and his people - 12 tribes of Israel.

How did the author of Revelation arrive at his 144,000? The text shows us - 12,000 from each of the 12 tribes of Israel (note that 12,000 is also a multiple of 12). we could take the literal approach taht there are only 144,000 people, but (at least to me) this does not make sense. 144,000 people was an extremely large number of people back in those days. Using the symbolic nature of Revelation, the symbolic representation of the number 12, what we have are 144,000 of God's people, 12x12,000. One could look at it then that those who are saved belong to a very large, but ultimately finite group of people.

Numerical symbology, that's how I see it - 144,000 refers to a large, but ultimately finite group of people.

Regards, PA


Taking into concideration that Jesus spoke in parables, and many other passage are written rather symbolic then litturally, I can see your explaination. People back then had no idea of what was 'beyound' them. Its like I think that the floot was not over the earth, but rather an island that was flooded. The people on that island oviously thought that the horison was the end of the world, taking into concideration that they believed it was flat...What do you think?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.