QUOTE(Moon Monkey @ Dec 27 2006, 04:36 AM) [snapback]1474878[/snapback]
I suppose it all depends on your take of NWO or one world government (if they are the same thing) and what this actually means.
Okay... let me try to keep this sweet and to the point (so much for short

) . I Think it more depends on the WORLDS take on NWO lead by america not just mine.
QUOTE
Why should you immediately assume all will be bad resulting in chaos with one insane person drunk on power calling the shots thats not the way the EU happened and the EU certainly is not 'never never land'.
I didn't say that ALL would be bad. I said the begining would be. Possibly you're not aware of the USA's controversy of being in war, etc... I shouldn't have to go into details on it.. do a google search. The EU is completely different from the USA and aparently your nation for the moment has nothing to worry about because it's already merged, but it's in NO way of a WORLD order. So please stop thinking the same will come to be with the ENTIRE world. BTW, I never did say that EU *Was* "never never land" also, I never took shots at the EU. I know very little about it as a matter of fact.. because I don't live there. The little information that I do know.. is what I googled out of it to see when it was formed.
QUOTE
Precedent has been set for merging of clashing cultures many times throughout history and do you not think those tribes and countries that were merged into a single entity were originally afraid of what it would mean for them ?.
I'm sure they were concerned, who wouldn't be to know what is going to come when two different cultures merge.. possibly they didn't have TOO much to worry about because one portion of the nation wasn't yelling out "we'll kill you anyway we can, however we can, as long as you just DIE."
QUOTE
However the resulting culture of the 'unity' would take the best of the 'clashing' cultures resulting in a better society/ economic situation for all, its called progress and has been happening since the dawn of time with a one world government a logical conclusion.
you term clashing completely differently than the way I used it.. but I can deal with that. But I have no problems with understanding it can help a lot of nations that would need it, yes it would be one of the pro's of NWO. It doesn't necessairly throw me into a complete 180 (degree turn) and say wo wo wo ... yes!! bring on NWO.
QUOTE
It wont happen overnight of course but aside from the usual mountain-man-militia-conspiracy-theory speel I don't see a serious reason against it in your post. [color=#FF0000]It will be those stockpiling food/ammo and weapons fighting (militarily...no shock there) against a world democracy that will cause the chaos.
The reason for being against it is that, the talk of AMERICA bringing on the NWO. Is it just me or does anyone else understand how much america is hated right now ? To bring on a NWO at THIS time.. would be a very bad idea. Highlighted area: Those stockpiling food/ammo and weapons is not going to be a majority of idiots who fight for nothing, it'll be people who are going to have the understanding of being prepared for the worst and praying for the best, and trying to protect their family from radicals. I suppose if you're nation was invaded you'd invite people trying to kill you in for a cup of tea and to talk it over as to why they want to kill you? The chaos would be certain leaders saying " Oh yes... we can make this happen." and once it happens... their people completely turn on the new.. "One world government" idea and... retaliate.
QUOTE
Should the world democratically decide against it it will not come to be, the states cannot occupy a 2nd world nation of 20 million so there is no chance of them forcing this upon the world as a whole,more likely it will be the rest of the world forcing it upon the states.
American view -- Instead of democracy being a government of the people, by the people, and for he people, American democracy has evolved into a government over the people, with dissent tolerated as long as it is not effective. In the U.S. style democracy, the people are deceived, lied to, and manipulated into acceptance of policies which are against their own interest, or which have significant side affects that are hidden until irreversible. In the U.S. model of democracy, the governing elite decides for the public which policies are appropriate, and the public is manipulated through endless propaganda into believing that public debt is good, that transfer of national wealth from the many to the few is appropriate, and that war is necessary to make peace. The public, in its stupor and unquestioning acceptance, is often not even conscious of its own lost freedom and increased injury. -- I Guess that should sum it up as to WHY I Wouldn't want america bringing on the NWO. Also, america is still in middle east, because radicals DO NOT want democracy in THEIR nation. So I would think that certain countries are not going to. Now if someone want's to give documented proof that the NWO is going to bring peace love and understanding, from other nations; then, I'll consider shoving the foot into thy mouth.. Until then.. BAD IDEA FOR AMERICAS PRESIDENT or any other of politician to be throwing that phrase around like it's candy. BTW, when bush jr said "we're attacking" UN didn't give much insite to it except " no stay out of it." No other nation said " do it.. I dare you." (oh.. yeah thats right bin laden did... but.. really now, this guy wasn't a UN offical. Hope this meets up to your satisfactory Moon Monkey. I have a feeling.. I'm sure it wont be.. but it's a lot better than " JUST BECAUSE!" and of course, let me remind you that this is MY view as to why a NWO would be bad. Sorry for the long post.. hope this helps you to understand my first post.