QUOTE(Ashley-Star*Child @ Jan 14 2007, 07:45 PM) [snapback]1501581[/snapback]
Draconic it's absolutely nothing to do withthe book of Enoch. Have you even read it? It IS indeed Biblical.
Of course I read it. If you read my post, I mentioned that it helps establish that both the anicent Jews and Christians acknowledged that the Seraphim were dragons, even though Christianity tried to cover this up later on.
But if it were truly "Biblical" why do none of the religions that recognize the Bible as inspired scripture recognize Enoch as inspired.
But don't feel bad. Most of the New Testament can hardly be considered "Biblical" either. Like Enoch, these New Testament texts are filled with Pagan Zoroastrian dualisitc ideas of an evil Satan that challenges God, in complete contradiction of the Old Testament Satan, who is a "Son of God" and obedient servant creature to God.
I believe you have claimed Enoch is one of the oldest books in the Bible, but no serious scholar supports this. Like the New Testament, it is filled with Zoroastrian dualistic ideas. It is safe to assume it was because of Enoch that the New Testament has an evil Satan.