QUOTE(SunnyOutlook @ Jan 2 2007, 06:54 PM) [snapback]1482994[/snapback]
So, my question is, is it really conceivable that a person's spirit can never visit a loved one.
To me, you either believe the Bible or you don't. There are other debates, such as which version, etc. that I won't get into. I believe the Bible is God's written word and I go by it. The Bible says there is a great gap between the living and the dead. However there is, at least, one example, that of Samuel visiting Saul, of the dead visiting the living. The mainstream Christian view of most of these occurrences (the real ones reported here) is that they are demonic in nature and not examples of the dead coming back to visit or plague the living. As to my own views, I do not rule out actual dead people somehow visiting the realm of the living, but I do think that most negative occurrences labeled as "hauntings" on this forum ARE demonic manifestations.
"My pastor friend says that why would they even want to if they are with the Lord, who would want to leave him?"
Who cares about this? It's what God allows, not what people want. It's actually who you are dealing with. Most of these occurrences have to be dealt with on an individual basis. Those whose fruits are ultimately negative are not of God.
"I can't help but think God gives people certain gifts and I believe being sensitive to the spiritual is a gift whether someone is able to sense things, hear things or even see things."
I think you have to ask yourself what the end result(s) of these "gifts" are. Ultimately, do they serve to help people and/or elevate God/Jesus in the hearts and minds of folks? Or do they wear the individual who has them down or take him/her or others away from Jesus?
"So, do you all think this pastor's counsel was off base or maybe I'm just confused."
I am not trying to give offense at all here, but rather illustrate a portion of the human condition. There is no way for us to know exactly what he said or meant because we were not there. Assuming that your memory is accurate, I think he was trying to steer you in the right direction. The problem here as in many areas, is the lack of a similiar knowledge base for both parties, which inhibits affective communication. If both sides knew the same thing though, there would be no reason for communication in the first place. I will say that for a Christian preacher to deny the spirit realm nigh onto completely tears down the faith. For the Christian faith to be real there must be a spirit realm. There
must be the supernatural. It was common when I was growing up to attend church and then have the preachers or lay people say "there's no such thing as ghosts". Some of them meant well. They meant to allay the natural fears a child has of the unknown. IMHO, they do nothing for the child if based upon an untruth, despite the best of intent. Part of this was the trend of our western society away from the spirtual and towards the physical brought about by the great interest in science of the period. Going clear back to Thomas Jefferson, and his "bible" commissioned to have all the miracles taken out of it, and back beyond, I'm sure, there have always been those "within" the church who have sought to divorce the spiritual from our existence and deny it. It is nothing short of error. Still others are bandying semantics when they say there is no such thing as ghosts. They are literally stating what they believe and have been told about the great gap between the two realms and the difficulty and seldomness of its crossing. They are failing to educate the kids in that even if they believe completely this way, there are spiritual manifestations in this world that people call "ghosts" be they angelic, demonic or something else in origin. This is simplifying the argument to the point of it being unintelligible. So, with what you've given us of the conversation, it seems that your pastor was giving you the normal explanation of a Bible-believing, orthodox, conservative denomination of Christianity.
As far as confusion goes, it is quite common and just as commonly understandable. In the final analysis, it is undeniable that the Bible remains silent on some things, says little about others and is difficult to translate on yet other issues. This is not a criticism but an acknowledgment that God is the only One who knows all.