QUOTE(dlv @ Jan 9 2007, 10:58 PM) [snapback]1494952[/snapback]
It is best to follow what is prescribed by your teacher or technique. It takes a big ego to think that one is "all that" already, without any proper guidance from a master. Nobody is "all that."
I would like to point out within this thread, that you were the first to bring up the term "master."
QUOTE(dlv @ Jan 10 2007, 03:07 PM) [snapback]1495739[/snapback]
Exactly. On the other hand, a "good" master is merely a vessel, a conduit of the energy. In the end, it is the Universe's task to help. But, one thing leads to another, just like being on this forum. And we were all novice once, at one point in time in this particular lifetime. Whether we read the meditation technique in a book, seen it on film, friend's guidance, and so on, the outcome is just the same -- the mind was infected once. Why should one assume that a "master" is so advance that he or she has become some kind of icon, etc.?
Surely, we've learned putting a label on ourselves, such as witch, Christian, Hindu, Satanist, and so on, from someone else, don't you think? Who wrote those books in the first place? Who defined those spiritual concepts we hear today? There's a great scene in The Devil Wears Prada (movie) about ignorance -- watch and learn. At any rate, a "good" master is another story, however, and he or she is usually hard to come by in our power-hungry world.
I'd really like to know what your religion or practices are.
Okay first, no one said a "master" was an Icon, except for you. Everything has already been put into some form of words for anyone to know anything. That is how people come to *know* things, and no one ever said "Oh! I never read anything about meditation I just do it!!" on top of that, if a "master" isn't "advanced" in whatever he is a "master" of then why exactly is he being called a "master" to begin with ?? Okay. Personally, when I meditate all my troubles (or whatever else) go to the universe.

No "technique" is inscribed in stone and therefor, IMO; can be changed in any form or fashion as so desired by the one who is using the "technique." A technique is a guideline IMO. I think for the most part that MOST knowledge has been in fact written at one time or, we would all still running around eating poisonous berries to find out which ones were edible and which ones would kill us.

Although I do not label myself a witch, I *Pro-claim* I am a witch and I am proud of it, because it takes a lot more to be a witch than just waving a little wand around yelling out "ABRACADABRA" and pointing it at something waiting for something to happen. : rolleyes: But if you don't mind, please from here on out don't include witches within an example consisting of other religions to make a point because not all witches use it for a religion. Thank you very much, I'd appreciate it. I personally don't care for meryl streep, so I didn't watch "the devil wears prada" so you can keep watching it for yourself and learn from it yourself.

Although, there are far better examples of ignorance all around with in reality. At any rate.. if someone is a master at whatever it is they do, I would think that they are already "good" enough... however; I certainly wouldn't hold it against any "master" (of whatever they would be considered a master in.) on not wanting to teach certain people. When it comes down "finding a good master" I don't believe it would be the master who would be hard to come by, but the right student, one who would not use whatever they were "trained" for to use it for their own personal "power-hungry" needs. A master who teaches a student anything.. usually will pass their views on to that student.. so there is dogma involved, but since the student was looking for a master, I wouldn't think the dogma would hurt anything at all.
I still stand by what I mentioned... Do what is conformable, FOR YOU Moe. Meditation is about relaxation and calming the mind.