It’s kind of amusing to me that people will begin questioning the bible based on the incredulity of the stories therein. They will then pick an account such as Noah’s building of an arch the size of the Titanic and begin pointing out how scientifically implausible this is, or how science has never verified how this could be possible. The most amusing thing to me about this practice is that they will pick arguments that ,scientifically speaking, have a chance of going either way. They’ll argue whether or not a person can survive in the belly of a whale for three days, or they’ll argue whether or not animals could have migrated from all over the globe to the Arch. They will argue whether or not Jesus was born in Bethlehem or whether or not Herod killed all the children two years and younger. And they do this based on the idea that if science hasn’t proven it happened or it could ever happen than that fact proves the stories in the bible are false.
What makes this interesting to me is that they dance around the slightly plausible. Why not just skip to the meat of things?
The bible says GOD made man out of dust.= well that has been observed many times…right?
The bible says GOD halted the sun so a old testament battle could continue.= do you realize the physical implications of this claim…happens all the time… right?
The bible says a burning bush talked to a man.= Science has totally proven bushes can talk…right?
Walking on water?= we see it all the time.
Water to wine?= sure…I saw it on the discovery channel once.
Talking fiery mountains, talking donkeys, people rising from the dead? Surely science has proven them all…right?
But I think that’s the point. The stories are not just unbelievable but ridiculous to common experience. If they were not in the bible no one would except them. If someone told me a bush was talking to them my first thought would be that they need to quit smoking that stuff. So why would a normally prudent person take or except such an irrationally ridiculous leap of logic? Surely if a GOD existed he would be aware of how these stories sound to us that live without the least common experience of anything described in the bible. Surely he is aware that no ones logic can possibly bridge this expanse. He would defiantly know we would have to make a jump trying to get to the other side and even when we jump we will not make it to the logically plausible other end of the bridge. This makes me suspect this was done intentionally. It clearly separates the people who want to know GOD and want to do his will from the people that don’t. The ridiculous gap makes it easy for people who don’t care to walk away feeling justified by the fact of the distance. Plus it gives credit to those who actually jump because you can’t jump without putting your self at risk. No one gets credit for believing the obviously irrefutable. No one gets credit now a days for believing man can fly, walk on the moon, travel across the world in a day, or talk to someone thousands of miles away. But someone would get credit for believing these things in the 15000 because believing them would take a leap of logic. Even more credit is bestowed on the people who believed so much that they made it happen. Scientific endeavors are not guaranteed to be successful so the people who attempt them attempt them with leaps of logic known as intuition. They want to believe and that fact separates them from the people who don’t want to, or are indifferent or scared. Many ask why GOD would expect us to jump this ridiculous expanse. I don’t think he is looking for people who can. I think he’s looking for people who will, even when they know they are not going to make it.
