Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Modern Humanist Philosophy and Religion
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Spirituality, Religion and Beliefs
GoddessWhispers
"We're all in this together" . Some thoughts on a new look to an old way of life. What if "I" am the temple of the god of one's faith!? What if we are spirits from god, having this human experience!? And from the Atheist perspective, what if I am one atom in the particles of creation. Making this vision of me, but one piece of the mosaic!? This puzzle called , for each one of us, "my labyrinth", is the path each of us walks, believing we see our steps uniquely. But if we're all here walking our particular patterns, isn't it us that see our way to make this life what we believe it should be to make us what we feel? Happy, peaceful, sad, under siege, beset, fearful, etc...!?

What if everything we think is how it should be done, given what that's gotten us so far, is just the opposite of how it should be!? For believers, what if worshiping god means living open to other peoples ideas of exactly what god means. Or doesn't!? Isn't there wisdom in seeing things a different way?! If one can see things differently, doesn't that give it life just in the thought it's there in the first place?! All thought makes a difference, so says the science. We are what we think ourselves to be?! As a global community, how's that working out so far!?

What if changing our mind could make a difference and it wouldn't put our imagined souls at stake, given how we've thought to take care of what we imagine is a soul so far, has gotten us to where we are today. What's the harm in taking a look at another way of seeing ourselves. Not as separate from that what co-creates this world with us, but as one with what is proof of our creation, as soon as we act on our thoughts and live for the sake of , "me".


Modern Humanist Philosophy and Religion
Humanism as a philosophy today can be as little as an perspective on life or as much as an entire way of life; the common feature is that it is always focused primarily on human needs and interests. Philosophic Humanism can be distinguished form other forms of humanism precisely by the fact that it constitutes some sort of philosophy, whether minimalist or far-reaching, that helps define how a person lives and how a person interacts with other humans.

There are effectively two sub-categories of Philosophical Humanism: Christian Humanism and Modern Humanism.



Modern Humanism

The name “Modern Humanism” is perhaps the most generic of them all, being used to refer to almost any non-Christian humanistic movement, whether religious or secular. Modern Humanism is often described as Naturalistic, Ethical, Democratic, or Scientific Humanism — each adjective emphasizing a different aspect or concern which has been the focus of humanistic efforts during the 20th century.

As a philosophy, Modern Humanism is typically naturalistic, eschewing belief in anything supernatural and relying upon the scientific method for determining what does and does not exist.




Are You a Humanist?


As a political force, Modern Humanism is democratic rather than totalitarian, but there is quite a lot of debate between humanists who are more libertarian in their perspective and those who are more socialist.
The naturalistic aspect of Modern Humanism is somewhat ironic when we consider that early in the 20th century, some humanists stressed that their philosophy was opposed to the naturalism of the time. This is not to say that they adopted a supernaturalistic outlook in how they explained things; instead, they opposed what they considered the dehumanizing and depersonalizing aspect of naturalistic science which eliminated the human part of the equation of life.

Modern Humanism can be conceived of as either religious or secular in nature. The differences between religious and secular humanists are not so much a matter of doctrine or dogma; instead, they tend to involve the language being used, the emphasis on emotions or reason, and some of the attitudes towards existence. Very often, unless the terms ‘religious’ or ‘secular’ are used, it can be difficult to tell the difference.



Christian Humanism

Because of the modern conflicts between fundamentalist Christianity and secular humanism, it might seem like a contradiction in terms to have “Christian Humanism” — and indeed, fundamentalists argue just that, or even that it represents an attempt by humanists to undermine Christianity from the inside. Nevertheless, there does exist a long tradition of Christian humanism which actually predates modern secular humanism.

Sometimes, when one speaks of Christian Humanism, they may have in mind the historical movement more commonly referred to as Renaissance Humanism. This movement was dominated by Christian thinkers, most of whom were interested in reviving ancient humanistic ideals in conjunction with their own Christian beliefs.

Christian Humanism as it exists today does not mean exactly the same thing, but it does involve many of the same basic principles. Perhaps the simplest definition of modern Christian Humanism is the attempt develop a human-centered philosophy of ethics and social action within a framework of Christian principles. Christian Humanism is thus a product of Renaissance Humanism and is an expression of the religious rather than the secular aspects of that European movement.

One common complaint about Christian Humanism is that in attempting to place humans as the central focus, it necessarily contradicts the fundamental Christian principle that God must be at the center of one’s thoughts and attitudes. Christian Humanists can readily respond that this represents a misunderstanding of Christianity.

Indeed, it can be argued that the center of Christianity is not God but Jesus Christ; Jesus, in turn, was a union between the divine and the human who continually emphasized the importance and worthiness of individual human beings. As a consequence, putting humans (who were created in the image of God) in the central place of concern is not incompatible with Christianity, but rather should be the point of Christianity.

Christian Humanists reject the anti-humanistic strands of Christian tradition which neglect or even attack our basic humans needs and desires while devaluing humanity and human experiences. It is not a coincidence that when secular humanists criticize religion, exactly these features tend to be the most common targets. Thus Christian Humanism does not automatically oppose other, even secular, forms of humanism because it recognizes that they all have many common principles, concerns, and roots.
Leonardo
The religious humanist philosophy is, I suppose, a natural evolution from pre-Information Age religious belief. As the name implies, the Information Age is all about people knowing things. Not just in the scholastic sense but also in knowing that your actions will have consequences and, in many more ways than we used to, we are aware of what those consequences may be. Of course this applies to the secular humanists also.

Humanism is about assuming responsibility. Historically religion has been able to deny responsibility for some of the consequences of it's clergy's actions. No longer are they able to do this as easily. The Humanist movement may be a sign we are finally starting to grow up.

I suppose I would consider myself a Humanist, but definitely of the secular variety.
brave_new_world
Humanist philosophy is the same as all the other religions with the perennial component. Respect one and another and find your true identity within.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.