Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: What would happen if Atheists ran things
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Spirituality vs Skepticism
Pages: 1, 2
Tangerine Sheri
QUOTE(hyperactive @ Jan 31 2007, 04:15 PM) [snapback]1524642[/snapback]
Sheri,

In order to seek a "higher order" one must first be aware that a "higher order" is possible.

As much as I do not like repeating things, I am again stating how so much comes down to habituation. I would be too idealistic to think the culture of modern man would turn on a dime when its inertia is like that of an oceanliner. Like the oceanliner, a quick turn would only come when "clear and present threats" present themselves, much like the rock or the iceburg. Much like the oceanliner, not all cultures are awake at the helm to notice and react in time, and thus are now lost. Man won't be gone as a result of these disasters though. It is a case of will mankind wake up in time to see the threats on the current course, or will the oceanliner sink leaving the survivors to start afresh. Evolution and revolution (of man's contructs): while one is fast and discontinuous and the other is slow, they tend to eventually result in the same outcome (as both are driven by reactionary forces).

Thankyou that is very well put.....
latsot
QUOTE(truethat @ Jan 30 2007, 09:52 PM) [snapback]1522851[/snapback]
Why so? Why do people get so bothered that others believe in God?

I don't think that most atheists have a problem with people believing in god if they want to. Speaking for myself, my main concern with religion is that it teaches the next generation not to question or to think. I don't accept that ignorance is ever a good thing.
uth
QUOTE(Supra Sheri @ Feb 1 2007, 12:06 AM) [snapback]1524630[/snapback]
Great point Hyper..i was thinking the first work of order would be into unifying our conciousness, , seeing all as equal and integral to the whole , raising awarenss, seeing that which benefits one benefits all , and seeing that which we fail to to for one is a failure to all we simply do not have the maturity to change things at this time we are barely out of kindergarten, WE have a planet that is tapped out and a whole lot of people saying its nothing to worry about,and a whole lot of people who have yet to question their own beleifs ..... At this juncture we almost have to take a poll as to if enough people give a damn to build something of a higher vision.. the roots are being layed it seems .....i am optimistic, but even this may be too optimistic even for me..One day at a time is about the best step at this point..would you agree??


I really don't believe in talk of 'evolution towards higher conciousness'. For a simple proof.. Evolution doesn't just happen, it comes about by a process of natural selection.. The superior traits survive because they are more adaptable. Now people who argue like you that the planet is 'tapped out' tend to have fewer children than those who don't out of concern for the environment. (and this isn't just speculation, I've seen studies that show this trend), so if anything, humans are evolving away from this worldview.

Anyway, apart from that, humanity has many negative traits that work against a 'unified conciousness'. Many people don't question their beliefs and will not question their beliefs because they are simply not 'wired' to do so. They get into fights with each other often trivial things, and on a larger scale this leads to wars, etc. People can't even agree on what the truth is since every political/conspiratorial stripe has its own media proclaiming its own truth to their own unquestioning believers. The internet seems to spawn more and more subcultures, so I think as people we are drifting further and further apart with less to unite us.

I'm not fully convinced that we are on the brink of humanity-induced environmental destruction, but if we are, I don't see anything stopping it. Too many people are simply unwilling to cut back on their lifestyle arguing they only are a drop in the bucket towards the problem. Ok, I do see one thing... the significant decline in human population caused by the disaster brings things back into balance.

Sorry for the dim depressing view original.gif I used to be more optimistic, but the more people I get to know the less hope I have for most of our species.
Ryo Ohki
I wonder what would happen if pagans ran things? We should get a pagan president.
Tangerine Sheri
QUOTE(uth @ Jan 31 2007, 07:12 PM) [snapback]1524826[/snapback]
I really don't believe in talk of 'evolution towards higher conciousness'. For a simple proof.. Evolution doesn't just happen, it comes about by a process of natural selection.. The superior traits survive because they are more adaptable. Now people who argue like you that the planet is 'tapped out' tend to have fewer children than those who don't out of concern for the environment. (and this isn't just speculation, I've seen studies that show this trend), so if anything, humans are evolving away from this worldview.

Anyway, apart from that, humanity has many negative traits that work against a 'unified conciousness'. Many people don't question their beliefs and will not question their beliefs because they are simply not 'wired' to do so. They get into fights with each other often trivial things, and on a larger scale this leads to wars, etc. People can't even agree on what the truth is since every political/conspiratorial stripe has its own media proclaiming its own truth to their own unquestioning believers. The internet seems to spawn more and more subcultures, so I think as people we are drifting further and further apart with less to unite us.

I'm not fully convinced that we are on the brink of humanity-induced environmental destruction, but if we are, I don't see anything stopping it. Too many people are simply unwilling to cut back on their lifestyle arguing they only are a drop in the bucket towards the problem. Ok, I do see one thing... the significant decline in human population caused by the disaster brings things back into balance.

Sorry for the dim depressing view original.gif I used to be more optimistic, but the more people I get to know the less hope I have for most of our species.

Uth, ((HUGS))) welcome to UM.....Thankyou for sharing that most depresing persepctive , but in many ways i can relate, I am proactive to keep from sinking into a darl abyss of hopelessness myself, I have a great pal fortunately who supports a vision for a newer humanity, especially in my darkest hours which helps alot....(he knows who he is) ....It makes me feel better to look for seemingly inconsequentail blurbs in the growth of humanity...LOL.... I am a vegan and very into the enviorment, but i have three kids, I do apprecaite those that decide not to have kids for the reasons you stated and there are alot more of them, Unfortunately its the best people who really should have kids who decide not too,go figure...
Tangerine Sheri
QUOTE(latsot @ Jan 31 2007, 06:22 PM) [snapback]1524783[/snapback]
I don't think that most atheists have a problem with people believing in god if they want to. Speaking for myself, my main concern with religion is that it teaches the next generation not to question or to think. I don't accept that ignorance is ever a good thing.

lats, i agree with this, it really does impede the thinking process.....the educational system is dumbing down the next generation too...
KBA
QUOTE(Irish @ Jan 30 2007, 11:29 PM) [snapback]1522978[/snapback]
Man goes to war for four reasons they are expansion, financial gain, revenge or power.
Religion, liberation and concern are just the excuses to justify the above.
Man does not need God or a belief in God to make war he only needs himself.

Irish


Somehow "Jihad" (Or, holy war) doesn't fit into those categories. And word has it there's quite a crowd screaming "Jihad for Allah".

Just a thought.
hyperactive
kba,

irish is correct.

the true understanding of jihad allows for it to be called only in response to a threat = defense (revenge).
those using it for their own agendas are interested in power (which includes expansion and financial gain).
KBA
QUOTE(hyperactive @ Feb 1 2007, 05:14 AM) [snapback]1524933[/snapback]
kba,

irish is correct.

the true understanding of jihad allows for it to be called only in response to a threat = defense (revenge).
those using it for their own agendas are interested in power (which includes expansion and financial gain).


And which also include better standing with their God. Do you think people are driven to blow themselves and a group of others up so they can have power?
Cadetak
QUOTE(KBA @ Feb 1 2007, 01:45 AM) [snapback]1525005[/snapback]
And which also include better standing with their God. Do you think people are driven to blow themselves and a group of others up so they can have power?


Your talking about the soldiers of the war...wars are not started by soldiers. The soldiers are fighting for the causes of religion. But if there was nothing to gain from the war(revenge, expansion, money, power, etc.) then their would be no war. Somebody somewhere has to be gaining something.
Symbol
It depends on what kind of atheists run it.

Personally I think a country run by agnostics would be probably the best.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.