post any realistic pics of it that you have seen,I have seen quite a few,but I keep seeing the ones that are just doglike creatures with mange.

It is pretty hard to find real photos of something that does not exist...

Gee. Aren't we all?

Umm...Fantasycat....if we had 'real' photos of chupa, don't t you think it would be classfied
as a REAL animal, instead of a myth?

Welcome to UM, and good luck with the quest.

sorry,I meant ones that have not been identified as a hoax,and i believe it is real

That's fake.

That's a horrible pic! I don't care if it's a model, it looks like when you leave a pie in the oven for too long and the pastry goes all burnt and black! Bleugh!

I think thats what we all are waiting for......

You mean there are realistic pictures!?!?!

Here's the most realistic picture ever:



(Psst! It doesn't exist.)

im just trying to get feedback,I think it does exist,I think its an undiscovered animal,im just looking for photos some people may have snapped,I know the fake ones,I saw pictures of the elmendorf beast,people thought it was a chupa,and I saw pics of the sea skate that people thought was a chupa,im just looking for any new pics they may come up.I did not create this topic so people can say it doesnt exist,if you don't believe in it,dont post here,please,im just looking for information.

Not the best pictures in the world, but from what I know they haven't been proven fake yet.

That's a pretty tall order. I've combed through dozens and dozens over the years and havn't ever really singled out one as credible. Try, perhaps via a good 'Googling', to search other countries like, Indonesia or South America where if a sighting would surface, a cover-up would'nt be as finite initially.

Welcome to UM. Dont remember where I got this but it's supposed to be a chupa. I doubt it though.

This one is as old as the Stonehenge... It's a movie prop, and it's been mentioned on these forums a thousand times.

I don't think it's quite as old as Stonehenge (4,000 - 5,000 years old), but yeah, it's old.

Until we invent a camera that takes photos of people's daydreams, I don't think we'll get any good pics.

cryptoray-thank you,thats the kind of stuff im looking for

Ah then thats probably where I got it. LOL

of course its real...We haven't discovered all of the earth! and now were trying to discover whats in outer space...now we're finding new species of various marine life forms! for all we know the chupacabra could be living under the ground. there has to be more species of animals that are hiding...didn't they discover something like the chupacabra in mexico? awhile back?

of course its real...We haven't discovered all of the earth! and now were trying to discover whats in outer space...now we're finding new species of various marine life forms! for all we know the chupacabra could be living under the ground. there has to be more species of animals that are hiding...didn't they discover something like the chupacabra in mexico? awhile back?

Hah, how can Stonehenge be older than the earth?!



I think you're talking about the dead dogs and coyote who had mange.

And yeah, it's entirely possible some kind of little carnivorous monkies to be living in isolated parts of South America. However, most sightings of Chupacabra have been so different that I highly doubt it.

Skinny, tall, pale human that sucks the blood of goats.
Small, furry creature that looks like a Tasmanian Devil. Ooh, scary!
One that looks like a skinned Spider Monkey.
One that looks like the love-child of a kangaroo/reindeer relationship. Now this is just silly...if I came across this in the jungle I'd drop and roll around laughing.
Another that looks like a skinned wolf with abnormally long eye-teeth, and so on.

Which leads me to believe that all sightings of the Chupacabra are based on ignorant townsfolk, quick thinking business owners and stoned college students on their way to Tijuana.

sigh,,,

Does this suffice?



It looks a little bit like a Chupacabra..., but I don't know. . .
Sorry, I can't find the un-outlined image. I've looked everywhere though.
What do you think?

and so was the UFO that wasn't real...but no...I seen one of them suckers! didn't fly like any aircraft I had seen...it was also ball shaped. But back to the chupacabra...its nice to know what other people think...opinions..."thats what made this country great! people...and opinions". nah...I heard that from a videogame. lol. come on...theres still the ocen we have to think about! what do you think lurks at the bottom of the sea? hmm...?? so many possiblities...

I cant quite tell because of the outlining,but I appreciate the photo

Erm those marine species tend to be small or just misidentified as being part of another species, not that many new species are discovered each year. In fact quite few are, however there is no physical evidence of chupacabra, no one has ever found any so it is highly unlikely that it exists.

stoned college students on their way to Tijuana.
Dang! What did you do, have me followed?

Do mean like the physical evdence that proves Jesus existed.

Is that in any way shape or form relevant?

I know they are not discovered each year. have you read any mainstream news lately? even in that news they were able to post what they have found...I'm not talking about micro organisms...I talking about fish, sharks, dolphins...Well thats just your opinion...nothing I can do about it...

Absolutely... you need physical evidence to prove the existence of any crypto, I am asking for the physical evidence that also proves Jesus existed... He was a physical being, I bet there are more people that believe in him than people that believe in the Chupacabra.

Damn.. this physical being even walked on water.

Most likely, but that is religion, it only becomes a problem if people try to counter actual science with it.

God is religion.. Jesus was supposed to have been a physical being... try taking that comment to the "Spirituality, Religion and Beliefs" section.

Science and scientists have an easy cop out... "they need physical evidence or use Mass Hysteria" as an answer...You don't have to repeat it in every post to make your point unless you need to increase your post count.

It is not an easy cop out, it explains the none existance of these creatures. If you don't like it well that is your problem not mine.

You won't find any. It doesn't exist.

Raw nerve...

It is an easy cop out... Blinker visioned Scientists (if it is not in the book it does not exist) only need to reply back with "Mass Hysteria or I need physical evidence" but to prove it exists I need??

Great quality photo's (and if they are great they are fake)
A physical body.
Blood tests.
Video Evidence (but if it is great it is faked)
etc etc etc

I don't have a problem, I am merely giving my opinion on a topic and don't see where it states in the UM rules that I have to seek approval from other members for it... I personally don't care what you think or wether you approve and most importantly I don't ram my opinion down members throats using the same old post... "no physical evidence" it is getting boring.

Sorry but it is way science works. If you do not like it there is nothing I can do.