For the past five decades the human race has been caught between two worlds, two paradigms. While millions of people worldwide have come to understand they are not alone in the universe, that an extraterrestrial presence has become manifest about the planet, the governments of the world, frozen in place by fear and indecision, have been unable to publicly engage this new reality.

Stephen Bassett, is a lobbyist, activist, commentator and columnist. He is the founder of the Paradigm Research Group and the Executive Director of the political action committee, X-PPAC. His work has been referenced in, among others, the Washington Post, Washington Times, New York Times, Legal Times, Christian Science Monitor, National Journal and O'Dweyer's Washington Report. He has been featured in documentaries and a guest on numerous radio programs addressing the "Politics of Disclosure."

In this highly spirited and passionate interview, Stephen calls on every citizen to demand the proof of extra terrestrial life that we intuitively already know exists. Get ready to be inspired and motivated!

Proof of Life
http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/members/sbassett.htm

If you dig a little deeper you'll find that the USA is the really the only government that hide's the facts about UFO's from it's citizen's......I think once other countrys find more proof the US will have to come clean, already countries like Mexico and Russia and even Japan are open on this subject......

Most people on the planet would agree that chances are good that we are not alone in the galaxy. Not to mention the entire universe. There is still no proof though. Sure, people are free to believe what they like.

Me, I dont deal in belief, I deal in knowledge. Bottom line, the evidence for extraterrestrial visitors has not in any way convinced the scientific community.

The fact that so many UFO and alien sightings conform to rather standard depictions is taken by some as evidence that the observers are not mistaken. They must be seeing the same things!? I think that its more likely that they see what they see because of their expectations, which are based on stereotypes created largely by the mass media, movies and tv shows. In this respect, and maybe some others as well, UFO an alien sightings might be compared to Santa Claus sightings.

Several recent television shows have soberly addressed the possibility that alien craft are violating our air space, occasionally touching down long enough to allow their crews to conduct bizarre (and, in most states, illegal) experiments on helpless citizens. While these shows tantalize viewers by suggesting that they are finally going to get to the bottom of the so-called “UFO debate”, they never do. That bottom seems perennially out of reach.

It strikes me funny how "the government" can be considered both a God-like entity that can withhold the truth of UFOs from millions of people, and a leaky sieve of information that anyone can find in books or the internet.

What can I say? Perhaps guilt by association?

The link goes to a site, with a perhaps tolerable lead video. However, there are further selections offered, most notably George Green (The Big Picture). It should be seen by anyone interested in the credulity of non-discerning individuals...

He says he used to raise cattle, and later moved with important policy makers. I believe the ranching story. As for the rest, I 'll just characterize by saying that cattle produce material which must dealt with, and so forth.

Maybe it's a type of disinformation who knows really..But i have to say the video didn't do anything for me really.....

This is the area that's the problem. This gentleman starts with the fore gone conclusion that ET is already here on Earth and demands the proof of such because such proof obviously exists...because ET is already here on Earth! Circular reasoning anyone?




No, "inspired and motivated" are not the words I'd choose.

governments know et exists....it's just none of your business. your business is going to work. and paying taxes into that govt that shields you from the truth!...and maybe as a bonus you can produce a few soldiers for them...I watched the US govt investigate a UFO landing sight for eight hours..USAF and NASA so I know they know....

The USA is a leaky sieve. I think 20 to 30 million illegals have proven that. Tech and trained people are only worth something if they are actually used.

Were you the one that called them to the landsight?

Why should we believe you? Your past claims havent come true...

yes...

your credibility is lacking, I think this is more BS...

Actually, there are scientist who believe that ET visitation has been taking place here. Even astronomers have recorded their own UFO sightings.

SCIENCE IN DEFAULT:
22 YEARS OF INADEQUATE UFO INVESTIGATIONS

James E. McDonald, Institute of Atmospheric Physics
University of Arizona, Tucson

(Material presented at the Symposium on UFOs,
134th Meeting, AAAS, Boston, Dec, 27, 1969)

http://www.cufon.org/cufon/mcdon2.htm

I seriously doubt that, especially when there are tons and tons of data evidence that supported the eyewitness accounts of artificial flying objects whose performance characteristics firmly excluded balloons and other conventional aircraft, and the data shows that these flying objects were flying much faster (over 9000 mph) than the X-15 years before that craft even flew and which never flew beyond 6000 mph, a UFO was clocked at over 7200 mph over the Washington D.C. area in 1952.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<^>

TIME Magazine - August 4, 1952

SCIENCE:
Blips on the Scopes

"Air traffic was light at Washington Airport one midnight last week, and the radar scope of the Civil Aeronautics Authority was almost clear. At 12:40 a.m. a group of bright blips showed. The operator estimated that they were about 15 miles southwest of Washington. Then the blips disappeared abruptly and reappeared a few seconds later over northeast Washington. The operator called his boss, Senior Controller Harry Barnes, 39, a graduate of the Buffalo Technical Institute who has worked for the CAA as an electronics expert since 1941. The operator told Barnes: "Here are some flying saucers for you."

"Barnes laughed at first, but the blips kept popping up all over the scope. They sometimes hovered, sometimes flew slowly and sometimes incredibly fast. Technicians checked the radar; it was in good working order."

Over the White House.
"Barnes began to worry when he saw the blips apparently flying over the White House and other prohibited areas. He called the airport control tower. Sure enough, its radar showed the strange blips too. When the towermen measured the speed of a fast blip, they found that it had flown for eight miles at 7,200 m.p.h."

http://www.project1947.com/fig/1952a.htm

http://www.globalaircraft.org/planes/x-15_hyper.pl

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<^>

In the case of the TV programs in question, undeniable evidence that can be re-examined time and time again, were also presented



Violations of civilian and military airspaces by UFOs are well-known and have been reported in the media from time to time and many of those accounts are also backed by data and other evidence that corroborated the eyewitness accounts.

YES, George is awesome! I have his book that he gives away for free at www.NoHoax.com, and I have the DVD's of The Big Picture. If anyone is interested in hearing what he has to say, here are the links.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=42...16273&hl=en

The Big Picture

http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/members/ggreen.htm
http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/members/ggreen2.htm

Even China, Chile, India, Belgium, France, Peru, Brazil, Agentina, and other nations around the globe are more open than the USA but I expect the position of the USA to change eventually because there are those within our government, including those in the military, who are becoming more and more vocal on what they know about UFOs.

EXTRATERRESTRIAL CONTACT: Analysis & Implications

http://www.ufoevidence.org/Analysis.htm#An...0the%20Evidence

I've been hearing that from believers for the last 30+ years...the "truth" is always just about to be revealed.

You will pardon me if I don't take your word for it.



Why should I listen to a group of people who find it necessary to attack skeptics simply because they require evidence before believing?? It just seems rather odd that instead of taking the time to prove themselfs correct, they spend that time trying to show that skeptics are somehow biased against them.

All that I have ever asked (from believers) is that they present evidence that is conclusive...something that can ONLY be explained by alien visitors.

...but that seems to be too much to ask...

call them and ask them........

The trend has already began and actually, more and more UFO revelations have been coming from government officials themselves over the past 10 years, much more than the previous 3 decades so in that respect, it is just a matter of time.

Actually, the UFO evidence in question has nothing to do with believers, since much of the evidence were handed out by government officials and other credible sources, including those within the military and there are tons of documents available under the Freedom of Information Act and other credible sources to underline my point.



Considering what I have been reading in the past, the facts plainly speak for themselves. After all, there are skeptics who continue to take the word from skeptical websites that have proven track records for getting their facts all wrong and I can list a few excellent cases to underline that point as well.



I have posted data evidence on numerous occasions in the past and challenged skeptics to refute what the data depicts. What I got were rewritten notes on the laws of physics in order for the data to depict what wasn't depicted even though I had the backing of commercial and military pilots, air traffic control personnel and radar controllers, meteorologist and even other scientist and engineers themselves yet I continued to be met with skepticism ffrom the skeptics despite the backing from those experts. In other words, the skeptics know more than the experts themselves on the issue of UFOs yet they continue to take their cues from those closed-minded skeptical websites.

That simply told me that they did not understand what the data evidence depicted or perhaps, they do not want to know what the data evdience depicts.

But still............there is nothing

On the contrary, there's a lot more that we know that we didn't know 20 years ago and now, even astronauts and cosmoanuts are talking UFO reality.

It is just a matter of time!

So as long as the "officials" are telling you what you want to hear, then they are credible?? But if they are saying that there are no aliens, they are not?

If must be nice to have the ability to pick and choose what you will accept...sure makes it easier to be a believer, doesn't it.



But that's not what I am talking about. I don't give a damn what any particular skeptical website says. I care about being shown that there are actually aliens visiting this planet, and the evidence for that must be convincing to me.

I on't care who agrees with you...I want to know
where is the physical evidence of spaceships?? Where are the live aliens? (or their bodies?) Where is the conclusive proof that what you say is actually real??



That is so ridiculous, it doesn't deserve a response.

What you consider evidence simply is not. Nothing you can say will change the fact that you are allowing yourself to believe your conclusion without the foundation of evidence necessary to reach that conclusion.

You are fooling yourself, and that is where our differences lie...I will not allow myself to be fooled by faulty "evidence"

It is not just a matter of what I am hearing from them, it is also a matter of what I understand about what the data evidence they have been releasing, depicts.

I have often said in the past that knowledge gives you the abillity to know when to hold 'em, or when to throw 'em. Without knowledge, you are at the mercy of those who think they know it all, but in reality, they don't.



The data evidence has been convincing enough even for the experts. Ask Stanton Friedman what he thinks.

Wright-Patterson AFB, OH.



Wright-Patterson AFB



Hardly being fooled, since I witnessed a true saucer-shaped flying object myself and I understand enough to know what the data evidence reveals.

I tried. They said they'd be here on Christmas... but, suprise suprise, they were a no show.

How do you know? Can I see those ships and bodies personally?

How very convinent it is for you to name a military base that the average person has no access to...

In other words, if you can't prove it, then it is worthless to say it....

Fact is you post a lot of stuff you can't prove. It's a good thing for you that you don't need proof...all you need is your own blind belief.

LOL, and what, ask if a guy named 'limited' called in a UFO report? you must be kidding... like when you claimed trillions of federation ships would arrive at Christmas, or did they get lost passing Uranus?

the ships are out there watch some of those NASA videos...they are cloaked NASA knows it....the enlightenments on easter..I was bluffing the NSA/CIA complex. who read these boards; and who you might be..with the xmas date...everyone knows the revelations on easter.

That is where the clues lead.

For instance, the Air Force's ETOS, 1948, which stated that some UFOs were "interplanetary spaceships," originated at Wright-Patterson AFB. It was from Wright-Patterson AFB where a detachment was sent to Alaska to film UFOs in flight and they were quite successful according to one of the officers involved. A former commander of Wright-Pattersn AFB also stated that alien beings and their bodies were sent to his base for examinations, which corroborates testimony from other military witnesses, engineers and scientist and other civilian workers at Wright-Patterson AFB. It was Wright-Patterson AFB where the Roswell debris was sent, not to mention the FBI memo stating where some of the debris were sent, which was Wright-Patterson AFB. Wright-Patterson AFB is where Senator Barry Goldwater wanted to take a look but was denied.