Tofi says everythijg is inevitable and predictable. What we mean by 'predictable'is hard to define - our concepts of time and being are

perhaps not adequate to do so yet.This lack of adequate definition leads to some arguments aainst the second part of Tofi.

Similarly with probability but this concept does at least give an item of evidence for Tofi.

A helicopter pilot looking at the North Pole by telescope is asked 'What is the probability there will be snow at the North Pole one millionth of a second from now?' He answers 100%

A similar pilot is aked the same question while looking at the centre of the Sahara Desert. He answers 'Zero%'.

Every future event can be given a probability of between 0 an 100% by a human being. some will be what we call correct, some not, when compared with actual performance over a number of events but nothing is likely to be found incompatible with Tofi.

The decision to assign a probability, the estimated probability and the actual outcome are all inevitable and the accuracy of the assessment of the probability will depend on how much is known and the complexity and time distance of the event.

Elementary statemns but they demonstrate the campatibility of such concepts with Tofi.

Some ideas against please Derek brockis.