Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Return of Wolves to Germany
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Science > Natural World
Owlscrying
Mar. 18

At least 20 wolves are now roaming the heaths of Lusatia, a region along the German-Polish border. Latent fears of the big bad wolf are remerging, but biologists say the animal is misunderstood. DER SPIEGEL spoke to Ilka Reinhardt of "Lupus," a German group of wildlife biologists, about the simmering conflict over the wolves.

Wolves are back in Brandenburg.
What with the three little pigs, Red Riding Hood and her poor old grandma, the wolf has had a pretty bad press through the years. But many biologists insist that the wolf is just misunderstood, and is really a shy creature, who's first reaction when faced with a human is to run away rather than try to bite a leg off.

Now the reappearance of wolves in the eastern German region of Lusatia, which includes parts of both the states of Brandenburg and Saxony, has brought out this old collective fear. Wolves were first spotted (again) in the area back in 1998, and are thought to have migrated from western Poland. Since then at least two packs of around 10 animals each are thought to be in the region, although researchers can't be sure that there aren't more.

Wolves had slowly died out in much of Europe in the 18th and 19th centuries. But there are now isolated groups of wolves in Spain, Portugal, Italy and France and bigger populations in eastern and Central Europe. It is thought that there are around 500 to 600 wolves in Poland, mainly in the east. Germany had killed off its wolf population by the beginning of the 20th century but now the animal is back.

Last week the German Environment Ministry held a meeting "Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf?" to discuss the reappearance of the wolf. Junior Enviornment Minister Astrid Klug opened the meeting by saying that the return of the wolf to its natural habitat was an "encouraging sign for animal protection."

However, a campaign has been launched by the "Sicherheit und Artenschutz" (Security and Species Protection) association to have the wolves shot because they may pose a danger to people. The group was set up by local hunters who say it is only a matter of time before someone gets hurt. Biologists in the research group "Lupus" have accused the group of whipping up latent fears of wolves. Lupus says it has documented 250 encounters between people and wolves in the Lusatia region and there were no problems in any of the cases.

DER SPIEGEL spoke with Ilka Reinhardt, a member of the Lupus team, about the conflict over the wolves of Lusatia.

SPIEGEL: "Who's afraid of the big bad wolf?" That was the theme of a meeting at the German Environment Ministry this week. How great was the fear?

Reinhardt: The mood in Berlin was very positive. The roughly 20 wolves we have in the Muskau and Neustadt heathlands are considered a great boon for nature conservation.

SPIEGEL: But there is contention in the region itself, in Lusatia?

Reinhardt: The association "Sicherheit und Artenschutz" (Security and Species Protection) is stoking fears in a massive way. They're even bringing in people from abroad who will sing from the same hymn sheet...

SPIEGEL: ... and who predict, in Germany's mass-circulation daily Bild, that children will soon be slain by the wolves.

Reinhardt: That's fear-mongering. It is extremely rare for wolves to attack humans. One needs to be careful when the animals have rabies or when they've gotten too used to humans -- when they're fed, for example. None of this is the case in Lusatia. The animals avoid humans.

SPIEGEL: Hunters are complaining that the wolves are causing economic damage.

Reinhardt: Shepherds are entitled to compensation payments. And in any case there are probably more deer and wild boars here than ever before. Still individual members of Saxony's regional hunters association continue to stoke the conflict. But I'm optimistic. There are 500 wolves in Italy, and Spain has more than 2,000. There, the animals have long been considered part of normality. The same will happen here.

SPIEGEL: Will the wolves continue to spread in Germany?

Reinhardt: We're expecting it. Twenty young wolves have already left the pack. We don't know where they've ended up. But there are certainly regions in eastern Germany, and also in some low mountain ranges in western Germany, that would be suitable for wolves.

go
Bill Hill

As much as I love wolves.. I think returning them to the wild is a big mistake. Er can you imagine, Go camping.. come across a pack of hungry wolves.
And they want to reintroduce them back into Scotland.
I blame hippies.
Unlimited
find me any accounts of wolf attacks on man?.....it doesnt happen. wolfs are part of the eco system....
Darkwind
QUOTE(billyhill @ Mar 18 2007, 10:05 AM) [snapback]1587863[/snapback]
As much as I love wolves.. I think returning them to the wild is a big mistake. Er can you imagine, Go camping.. come across a pack of hungry wolves.
And they want to reintroduce them back into Scotland.
I blame hippies.



Finding a pack of wolves while camping would be rare sight. Personally I would be thrilled to see them in the wild. I have heard them when we use to camp in Canada when I was a kid, but never saw one. Dogs are a much bigger threat than wolves. They don't fear human and will attack and kill. Even the family dog can be dangerous when allowed to run loose.
Pax Unum
QUOTE(limited @ Mar 18 2007, 08:12 AM) [snapback]1587992[/snapback]
find me any accounts of wolf attacks on man?.....it doesnt happen. wolfs are part of the eco system....

“NEW ROCKFORD, DAK, March 7 - The news has just reached here that a father and son, living several miles northeast of this city, were destroyed by wolves yesterday. The two unfortunate men started to a haystack some ten rods from the house to shovel a path around the stack when they were surrounded by wolves and literally eaten alive. The horror-stricken mother was standing at the window with a babe in her arms, a spectator to the terrible death of her husband and son, but was unable to aid them. After they had devoured every flesh from the bones of the men, the denizens of the forest attacked the house, but retired to the hills in a short time. Investigation found nothing but the bones of the husband and son. The family name was Olson. Wolves are more numerous and dangerous now than ever before known in North Dakota." (Saint Paul Daily Globe, March 8, 1888)

Here an account is reported which included an eyewitness and the family name. Some have reasoned the wolves were rabid. That is unlikely as these animals were functioning as a pack. A rabid wolf is a loner. Our research has never found a single historical account of packs of rabid wolves on this continent. Individual animals are the norm. Further, accounts of rabid (hydrophobic) animals were common in that day and were reported as such.

The winters of 1886-1888 were very harsh. Many western ranchers went broke during these years. The harsh winter could have been a factor in the attack.

Noted naturalists documented wolf attacks on humans. John James Audubon, of whom the Audubon Society is named, reported an attack involving 2 Negroes. He records that the men were traveling through a part of Kentucky near the Ohio border in winter. Due to the wild animals in the area the men carried axes on their shoulders as a precaution. While traveling through a heavily forested area, they were attacked by a pack of wolves. Using their axes, they attempted to fight off the wolves. Both men were knocked to the ground and severely wounded. One man was killed. The other dropped his axe and escaped up a tree. There he spent the night. The next morning the man climbed down from the tree. The bones of his friend lay scattered on the snow. Three wolves lay dead. He gathered up the axes and returned home with the news of the event. This incident occurred about 1830. (Audubon, J.J., and Bachman, J.; The Quadrupeds of North America, 3 volumes. New York, 1851 - 1854)

George Bird Grinnell investigated several reported wolf attacks on humans. He dismissed many reports for lack of evidence. Grinnell did verify one attack.

This occurrence was in northwestern Colorado. An eighteen-year-old girl went out at dusk to bring in some milk cows. She saw a gray wolf on a hill as she went out for the cows. She shouted at the wolf to scare it away and it did not move. She then threw a stone at it to frighten it away. The animal snarled at her shouting and attacked her when she threw the stone at it. The wolf grabbed the girl by the shoulder, threw her to the ground and bit her severely on the arms and legs. She screamed and her brother, who was nearby and armed with a gun, responded to the scene of the attack and killed the wolf. The wolf was a healthy young animal, barely full grown. Grinnell met this girl and examined her. She carried several scars from the attack. This attack occurred in summer about 1881. (Grinnell, G.B.; Trail and Campfire - Wolves and Wolf Nature, New York, 1897)

In 1942, Michael Dusiak, section foreman for the Canadian Pacific Railway, was attacked by a wolf while patrolling a section of track on a speeder (small 4-wheeled open railroad car). Dusiak relates, "It happened so fast and as it was still very dark, I thought an engine had hit me first. After getting up from out of the snow very quickly, I saw the wolf which was about fifty feet away from me and it was coming towards me, I grabbed the two axes (tools on the speeder), one in each hand and hit the wolf as he jumped at me right in the belly and in doing so lost one axe. Then the wolf started to circle me and got so close to me at times that I hit him with the head of the axe and it was only the wielding of the axe that kept him from me. All this time he was growling and gnashing his teeth. Then he would stop circling me and jump at me and I would hit him with the head of the axe. This happened five times and he kept edging me closer to the woods which was about 70 feet away. We fought this way for about fifteen minutes and I fought to stay out in the open close to the track. I hit him quite often as he came at me very fast and quick and I was trying to hit him a solid blow in the head for I knew if once he got me down it would be my finish. Then in the course of the fight he got me over onto the north side of the track and we fought there for about another ten minutes. Then a west bound train came along travelling about thirty miles an hour and stopped about half a train length west of us and backed up to where we were fighting. The engineer, fireman and brakeman came off the engine armed with picks and other tools, and killed the wolf."

It should be noted that this wolf was skinned and inspected by an Investigator Crichton, a Conservation Officer. His assessment was that the animal was a young healthy wolf in good condition although it appeared lean. ("A Record of Timber Wolf Attacking a Man," JOURNAL OF MAMMOLOGY, Vol. 28, No. 3, August 1947)

Common Man Institute, in cooperation with Abundant Wildlife Society of North America, has done extensive research on wolves and their history for several years. We have gathered evidence on wolf attacks which occurred in North America.

A forester employed by the Province of British Colombia was checking some timber for possible harvest in the 1980s. He was met by a small pack of three wolves. The forester yelled at the wolves to frighten them away. Instead, the wolves came towards him in a threatening manner and he was forced to retreat and climb a nearby tree for safety. The wolves remained at the base of the tree. The forester had a portable radio, but was unable to contact his base, due to distance, until evening. When the call for help came in, two Conservation Officers with the Ministry of Environment were flown to the area by floatplane to rescue the treed forester.

When the Conservation Officers arrived, the forester was still in the tree and one wolf, the apparent leader of the pack, was still at the base of the tree. The officers, armed with shotguns, shot at the wolf and missed. The wolf ran for cover and then started circling and howling near the two officers. After a couple missed shots, the wolf was finally shot and killed.

The wolf tested negative for rabies. It appeared healthy in every respect, but was very lean. The Conservation Officers felt the attack was caused by hunger. (Taped Interviews and a photo of the wolf on file at Abundant Wildlife Society of North America.)

This is but one example from British Colombia. Wolves overran Vancouver Island in the 1980s. Attacks became so common that articles were published in Canadian magazines documenting such attacks. (Copies available upon request.)

Wolf Attacks on humans have occurred in national parks, too. In August 1987, a sixteen-year-old girl was bitten by a wild wolf in Algonquin Provincial Park in Ontario. The girl was camping in the park with a youth group and shined a flashlight at the wolf. The wolf reacted to the light by biting the girl on the arm. That bite was not hard and due to the thick sweater and sweatshirt the girl was wearing, she sustained two scratch marks on her arm. The wolf was shot by Natural Resources personnel and tested negative for rabies. (Interview with Ron Tozer, Park Naturalist for Algonquin Provincial Park, 7/25/88.)

Well-known wolf biologist Dr. David Mech took issue with this attack stating it couldn't really be considered an authentic attack since the girl wasn't injured more severely. It was exactly nine years when such an attack would take place.

Algonquin Provincial Park is one of several areas where people are encouraged to "howl" at the wolves in hopes of a response from the wild wolves in the area. In August, 1996, the Delventhal family of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, were spending a nine-day family vacation in Algonquin and joined a group of Scouts in "howling" at the wolves. They were answered by the howl of a solitary wolf.

That night the Delventhals decided to sleep out under the stars. Young Zachariah was dreaming when he suddenly felt excruciating pain in his face. A lone wolf had bit him in the face and was dragging him from his sleeping bag. Zach screamed and Tracy, Zach's Mother, raced to his side and picked him up, saturating her thermal shirt with blood from Zach's wounds.

The wolf stood menacingly less than a yard away. Tracy yelled at her husband, Thom, who leapt from his sleeping bag and charged the wolf. The wolf retreated and then charged at Tracy and Zach. The charges were repeated. Finally the wolf left. Thom turned a flashlight on 11-year-old Zach and gasped "Oh, my God!" "The boy's face had been ripped open. His nose was crushed. Parts of his mouth and right cheek were torn and dangling. Blood gushed from puncture wounds below his eyes, and the lower part of his right ear was missing." Zach was taken to a hospital in Toronto where a plastic surgeon performed four hours of reconstructive surgery. Zach received more than 80 stitches in his face.

Canadian officials baited the Delventhals' campsite and captured and destroyed a 60-lb wild male wolf. No further attacks have occurred since. (Cook, Kathy; "Night of the Wolf" READER'S DIGEST, July 1997, pp. 114-119.)

Humans have been attacked by wolves in Alaska. The late David Tobuk carried scars on his face from a wolf attack on him as a small child. The incident occurred around the turn of the century in interior Alaska. David was playing in his village near a river. An old wolf came into the village and bit David in the face and started to carry him off. Other Eskimos saw the wolf dragging the child off and started yelling and screaming. The wolf dropped the child and was shot by an old Eskimo trapper who had a gun. (Interview with Frank Tobuk, brother, Bettles, Alaska, December 1988.)

Paul Tritt, an Athabascan Indian, was attacked by a lone wolf while working a trap line. Paul was setting a snare, looked up and saw a wolf lunging at him. He threw his arm up in front of his face and it was bitten severely by the wolf. A struggle ensued. Tritt was able to get to his sled, grab a gun and kill the wolf. Nathaniel Frank, a companion, helped Tritt wash the wound with warm water. Frank took Tritt, via dog sled, to Fort Yukon to see a doctor. The arm healed, but Tritt never regained full use of it. Several years later, the arm developed problems and had to be amputated. (Interview with Paul Tritt, Venetie, Alaska, November, 1988)

Two wolf attacks on humans occurred in 2000.

Icy Bay, Alaska - Six-year-old John Stenglein and a nine-year-old friend were playing outside his family's trailer at a logging camp when a wild wolf came out of the woods towards the boys. The boys ran and the wolf attacked young Stenglein from the back, biting him on the back and buttocks. Adults, hearing the boy's screams, came and chased the wolf away. The wolf returned a few moments later and was shot. According to Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) officials, the wolf was a healthy wild wolf that apparently attacked without provocation. The boy was flown to Yakutat and recieved stitches there for his wounds. Later, however, the bites became infected and the boy had to be hospitalized. (Reports and Interviews on file and available upon request.)

Vargas Island, British Colombia - University student, Scott Langevin, 23, was on a kayak trip with friends. They camped out on a beach and, about 1 AM, Langevin awoke with something pulling on his sleeping bag. He looked out and came face to face with a wild wolf. Langevin yelled at the wolf and it attacked, biting him on the hand. Langevin attempted to force the wolf toward a nearby campfire, but as he turned, the wolf jumped on his back and started biting him on the back of his head. Friends, hearing his yells, came to his aid and scared the wolf away. Fifty (50) stitches were required to close the wound on Langevin's head. British Colombia Ministry of Enviroment officials speculate the reason for the attack was due to the wolves occasionally being fed by humans although there was no evidence that Langevin or any of his party fed these animals. (Reports and Interviews on file and available upon request.)

This is but a brief summary of a few verifiable accounts of attacks on humans by healthy wild wolves in North American History.

Biologists tell us that the wolves of Asia and North America are one and the same species. Wolf attacks are common in many parts of Asia.

The government of India reported more than 100 deaths attributable to wolves in one year during the eighties. (Associated Press, 1985) This author recalls a news report in 1990 in which Iran reported deaths from attacks by wolves.

Rashid Jamsheed, a U.S. trained biologist, was the game director for Iran. He wrote a book entitled "Big Game Animals of Iran (Persia)." In it he made several references to wolf attacks on humans. Jamsheed says that for a millennia people have reported wolves attacking and killing humans. In winter, when starving wolves grow bold, they have been known to enter towns and kill people in daylight on the streets. Apparently, in Iran, there are many cases of wolves running off with small children. There is also a story of a mounted and armed policeman (gendarme) being followed by 3 wolves. In time he had to get off his horse to attend to nature’s call, leaving his rifle in the scabbard. A later reconstruction at the scene of the gnawed bones and wolf tracks indicated that the horse had bolted and left the man defenseless, whereupon he was killed and eaten.

A Russian Linguist, Will Graves, provided our organization with reports of wolves killing Russian people in many areas of that country. Reports indicate some of the wolves were diseased while others appeared healthy. (Reports on file and available upon request.)

Reports have also come from rural China. The official Zinhua News Agency reported that a peasant woman, Wu Jing, snatched her two daughters from the jaws of a wolf and wrestled with the animal until rescuers arrived. Wu slashed at the wolf with a sickle and it dropped one daughter, but grabbed her sister. It was then Wu wrestled with the animal until herdsmen came and drove the beast away. This incident occurred near Shenyang City, about 380 miles northeast of Beijing. (Chronicle Features, 1992)

LINK-> WOLF ATTACKS ON HUMANS
Wolf MacCanine

QUOTE
Are Wolves Dangerous to Humans?

There has been much debate on whether or not wolves are dangerous to humans. Some 19 million visitor days have been recorded in Minnesota's Superior National Forest without any wolf attacks. Millions of safe visitor days are recorded at parks and wilderness areas in Canada and Alaska as well.

Historically, wolves were persecuted by humans throughout much or their range. Probably because of this, most wolves are shy and avoid humans. This has given rise to the quote that "there has never been a documented case of a healthy, wild wolf killing a human in North America" - a quote which is still true. Yet, in some rare cases wolves have become fearless of humans and the result has lead to serious injury and in some countries, even death.

In September 1998, at Canada's Algonquin Provincial Park, a 19-month-old boy was grabbed around the chest by a wolf and tossed three feet. The infant received minor injuries and was treated at a hospital and released the same day. This situation was preceded that summer by other encounters with this wolf which had become fearless of humans and frequented campsites.

Also in Algonquin, in August 1996, an 11-year-old boy was grabbed around the head by a wolf while the boy was sleeping out on the ground. The boy was seriously injured and received 80 stitches. However, the wolf may have been attempting to simply grab the boy's sleeping bag. There was a tear in the sleeping bag that suggests the wolf had tried unsuccessfully to tug the bag away before taking another try and grabbing the boy's head. While studying wolves on Ellesmere Island, wolf biologist Dr. L. David Mech has had arctic wolves on two occasions try to grab empty sleeping bags. Wolves, like dogs, seem attracted to soft, fluffy or fur-like items, which they enjoy playing with and ripping apart. The same wolf that grabbed the 11-year-old boy had been seen days earlier taking tennis shoes and food from people in the area. Here again a wolf had become fearless of humans and may have been rewarded (fed) during his exploits near campsites.

Fearless wolves have also been a concern in India. Wolves there roam freely around remote villages. In 1996, 64 children were seriously injured or killed on the outskirts of small villages in one area of the country. In some of the cases, evidence collected by a U.S.-trained Indian wolf biologist points to one or more wolves being involved. In 1997, another 9 or 10 children fell prey to wolves in the same region. Some authorities believe there may even be an incentive for parents to neglect their children. When children are killed by wild animals in India, parents are compensated at a rate higher than an average annual salary. Also, the density of wild prey in India is low and livestock are very well attended. This combination of lack of fear, low prey abundance, and the presence of many unsupervised children may promote in some wolves the tendency to experiment with killing children as prey.

In North America, there have been no verified reports of wolves killing humans. In fact, encounters which have ended in contact between wolves and humans have been rare. With the possible exception of the 1998 incident in Algonquin, incidents seem to have been the result of mistaken identities, defensive reactions, or a person getting between a wolf that was attacking a dog.

It is important to keep wolf-human encounters in perspective. Most wolves are not dangerous to humans and there is a greater chance of being struck by lightening or killed by a bee sting than being injured by a wolf. The serious injuries which have occurred were caused by a few wolves that became fearless of humans. Nonetheless, like bears or cougars, wolves are instinctive predators that should be kept wild and respected.


Source: http://www.wolf.org/wolves/learn/intermed/...n/dangerous.asp

QUOTE
Do wild wolves kill people?

Wolves have potential to kill people because they are large animals who prey on big, speedy, weighty creatures like bison and musk oxen. So will Highland residents and hill walkers be safe among wolves?

The first comprehensive and detailed report of attacks by wild wolves on humans in Europe, Asia and North America has now been published (Linnell et al 2002). The report's eighteen researchers reviewed the most reliable records they could find, written in 13 languages and dating from the 16th century to the present.

They identified three kinds of wolf attack:
Rabid - where wolves have gone mad because the rabies virus has infected their brains.
Predatory - unprovoked attacks where wolves appear to regard humans as prey.
Defensive - where wolves are provoked by people to attack, such as when trapped or cornered.
They found that:
Most fatal attacks were by rabid wolves.
There were few fatal predatory attacks and none in North America.
There were no fatalities when wolves attacked defensively.
Many records are fragmentary so cannot provide the total number of people killed by wolves, but do show that wolves have killed hundreds of people - and we can expect as many wounded people. However, given these attacks were over a period of 400 years and throughout the northern hemisphere, attacks by wolves are rare.

Most fatalities were pre-20th century. In the last fifty years the researchers could only find records of something over seventeen people killed in Europe and Russia, and none in North America - coinciding with the decrease of the spread of rabies in these regions.

Factors predisposing wolves to attack people were identified as:
Rabies - the main factor.
Habituation - when wolves lose their fear of humans and approach too close.
Highly modified environments - this includes few natural wolf prey, human poverty and large numbers of unattended small children, characteristic of pre-20th century Europe and India today (see below).
Provocation - when humans molest or try to kill wolves.
The researchers conclude that the risk of wolf attack in Europe and North America today is very low because the factors associated with wolf attack are now rare.

People in the Highlands, therefore, have little or nothing to fear from wolves: rabies does not exist in Britain and conditions are not typical of highly modified environments as described above.


Source: http://www.wolftrust.org.uk/faqpeople.html

QUOTE
When considering the wolf hybrid, one cannot avoid discussing both the wolf and the dog. It is commonly accepted that the modern dog resulted from the domestication of the wolf, a process that began 12,000 to 15,000 years ago. Until this century, there has been little further interest in cross-breeding the two species.
It is likely that wolves and dogs have sporadically interbred in nature for as long as both species have coexisted. Most matings probably occurred between roaming or feral dogs and wolves living apart from a pack.

The offspring from such matings may have posed a hazard to the human communities near where they lived. After studying numerous historical and modern accounts of wolf attacks on humans, the Canadian naturalist C.H.D. Clarke concluded that most attacks involved either rabid wolves or hybrids.

One such event may have occurred in the Cevennes region of south central France between the years 1764 and 1767, when about 100 people were attacked and at least 64 killed by what was described as a pair of savage wolves. Most of the victims were children. These animals came to be known in local lore as the "beasts of Gevaudan." After being hunted and killed, it was found that the male weighed about 140 pounds and the female about 110 pounds; these weights were unusually high for the local wolf population. Their marked aggressiveness and other described physical attributes have led to speculation that these two animals may have been wolf hybrids, perhaps siblings born from the breeding of a wolf with one of the large dog breeds commonly kept by farmers in the region.


Source: http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/newsletters/v5n4/5n4wille.htm

...

Truthfully,any mentions in newsprint from earlier times concerning wolf attacks should be looked upon with some suspicion.Even Audubon's story may have been nothing more than hearsay.Besides...mankind has had a tendency to exaggerate...or simply lie.

During much of mankind's history,wolves were not studied.Therefore,we do not know if any attacks by wolves upon humans may have been caused by a lack of suitable prey for the wolf in the area,rabies...or the human threat.In the past few decades,much research has been taking place in several areas with different packs of wolves.The research going on has dispelled at least several myths regarding wolves...but the only thing that it can't dispell is the fear bred of ignorance that some of mankind has in regards to the wolf.

Wolves will usually shy away from humans,although if they feel threatened they will defend themselves.Too,if a human acts in some way like "prey",a hungry wolf may mistake the human as prey.

What gets me is that those who do not want wolves around do not take into consideration that the wolf has just as much right to be in an area as the humans do.They are a vital part of the eco-system.When you take a predator like the wolf out of an area,the population of those creatures who are normally prey for that predator will end up growing too large for the eco-system to support...which may lead to disease,encroachment on human settlements,and a need for human intervention.The wolves help keep a healthy balance within the local eco-systems.Very rarely will the wolf over-hunt in an area.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.