Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: WTC-7 south face
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Conspiracies & Secret Societies
Pages: 1, 2
RAMS
QUOTE(el midgetron @ Mar 30 2007, 12:00 AM) [snapback]1605794[/snapback]
Man, you are so full of BS its pathetic.

I am going to make a prediction - the stills from Independence Day will be removed from your site pretty quickly, as I will be reporting you to 20th century fox.



Your contact for Twentieth Century Fox is here:

http://www.fox.co.uk/contact/

Contact away.

RAMS
coughymachine
QUOTE(Ashigaru @ Mar 30 2007, 04:12 AM) [snapback]1605663[/snapback]
A firefighter says he saw a large gash in WTC 7 and its just a rumor. A civilian says they saw a missile hit the pentagon and the CTs claim its the gospel truth.

You cannot lump everybody together like that. When one eyewitness report claims there was a 20 storey gash in the middle of the south face of WTC-7, yet everybody else (and all the available photographic material) points to a gash of roughly similar proportions at the south west corner, it is reasonable for ask for corroborating evidence.

As far as the Pentagon strike is concerned, the CT community does not universally embrace an eyewitness account of a missile.

In any event, have you considered that the reverse of your claim is equally true. OTers point to this one firefighter's testimony as fact, whilst dismissing the missile theory on the basis, they claim, that a larger body of evidence (which suits their world view) suggests a plane struck the Pentagon building?
RAMS
QUOTE(coughymachine @ Mar 30 2007, 01:12 AM) [snapback]1605845[/snapback]
You cannot lump everybody together like that. When one eyewitness report claims there was a 20 storey gash in the middle of the south face of WTC-7, yet everybody else (and all the available photographic material) points to a gash of roughly similar proportions at the south west corner, it is reasonable for ask for corroborating evidence.

As far as the Pentagon strike is concerned, the CT community does not universally embrace an eyewitness account of a missile.

In any event, have you considered that the reverse of your claim is equally true. OTers point to this one firefighter's testimony as fact, whilst dismissing the missile theory on the basis, they claim, that a larger body of evidence (which suits their world view) suggests a plane struck the Pentagon building?



And your signature clause is profound!! Well quoted.

RAMS
Saru
QUOTE
Man, you are so full of BS its pathetic. I am going to make a prediction - the stills from Independence Day will be removed from your site pretty quickly, as I will be reporting you to 20th century fox.

That's enough. A moderator has already requested a stop to the bickering here but it is continuing nonetheless, lets get this thread back on-topic otherwise there's no point keeping it open.
TK0001
QUOTE(coughymachine @ Mar 30 2007, 04:12 AM) [snapback]1605845[/snapback]
In any event, have you considered that the reverse of your claim is equally true. OTers point to this one firefighter's testimony as fact, whilst dismissing the missile theory on the basis, they claim, that a larger body of evidence (which suits their world view) suggests a plane struck the Pentagon building?


With all due respect, coughy, I quoted more than one fireman.
coughymachine
QUOTE(TK0001 @ Mar 30 2007, 03:20 PM) [snapback]1606126[/snapback]
With all due respect, coughy, I quoted more than one fireman.

I know, but to my knowledge, only one of them made a very specific claim.

Having said that, the argument is rather moot. I've recently seen evidence of, what appears to be significant damage on the south face, some distance away from the more commonly reported/commented-upon south-west corner. The nature of it is rather curious and it warrants further anlaysis, but unless the footage has been doctored, it's pretty clear evidence of major trauma.

ETA: WTC-7 footage of damage to south face
Hungrii Flea-Bagius
QUOTE(RAMS @ Mar 30 2007, 01:17 AM) [snapback]1605769[/snapback]
All that you would ever want to know is at the website. Thanks to tangling with Art Bell, that is 100% of the source of this stuff since 1999. Proof in fact of what conspiracy and other nonsense and its psychos followers are capable of and why there are courts and laws.

So you know, I was banned from the LC, JREF and too many forums to count for the exchanges on topics like this. Same o same o.

So, can we also consult your CV as well. And, you rely of course on Google, just as YouTube, both as the end all of end all of all things.

Don't like the message, attack the messenger. Just like Art Bell and ilk. Same pattern as here in 'Strange 2'. I note your choices as sourced from the same psycho groups of UFO sites. Great research.......
RAMS

Big deal i have banned from no less than 26 sites for my views on chemtrails and 9-11 all this shows is
that your annoying



C-V is a term used for resume..............................the interesting thing? its not widely used in the United States it seems to be a European or international term
which is also interesting isnt it?
TK0001
QUOTE(Hungrii Flea-Bagius @ Mar 30 2007, 12:22 PM) [snapback]1606288[/snapback]
Big deal i have banned from no less than 26 sites for my views on chemtrails and 9-11 all this shows is
that your annoying


'scuse me, HFB, but wouldn't this be your opinion? Why are you excusing yourself from the same behavior you so vehemently complained about me using?

And for what it's worth, I really don't see why it's necessary to assasinate RAMS' character, just because he disagrees with your opinion.
Hungrii Flea-Bagius
Im not assasinating his character ,
I am However \"questioning\" his CREDIBILITY and his Authenticity
as I am afraid I find his claims to be to much to believe and i fail
to see whay he would bother to be here with his Alleged Credentials


I find it interesting someone refers to a \"resume\" as a CV Unless they
are from the international scene or europe as the majority of U.S.
Citizens refer to them as Resumes.and from what other have found
looking into his claims

I find his credibility at stake thats all i am allowed to question credibilty arent I?
Saru
This thread is about the World Trade Center, it is not a place to attack or question the credibility of other members' backgrounds.

There have been two requests to get back on topic here and it's not happening, this thread is being closed.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.