Your contact for Twentieth Century Fox is here:

http://www.fox.co.uk/contact/

Contact away.

RAMS

You cannot lump everybody together like that. When one eyewitness report claims there was a 20 storey gash in the middle of the south face of WTC-7, yet everybody else (and all the available photographic material) points to a gash of roughly similar proportions at the south west corner, it is reasonable for ask for corroborating evidence.

As far as the Pentagon strike is concerned, the CT community does not universally embrace an eyewitness account of a missile.

In any event, have you considered that the reverse of your claim is equally true. OTers point to this one firefighter's testimony as fact, whilst dismissing the missile theory on the basis, they claim, that a larger body of evidence (which suits their world view) suggests a plane struck the Pentagon building?

And your signature clause is profound!! Well quoted.

RAMS

That's enough. A moderator has already requested a stop to the bickering here but it is continuing nonetheless, lets get this thread back on-topic otherwise there's no point keeping it open.

With all due respect, coughy, I quoted more than one fireman.

I know, but to my knowledge, only one of them made a very specific claim.

Having said that, the argument is rather moot. I've recently seen evidence of, what appears to be significant damage on the south face, some distance away from the more commonly reported/commented-upon south-west corner. The nature of it is rather curious and it warrants further anlaysis, but unless the footage has been doctored, it's pretty clear evidence of major trauma.

ETA: WTC-7 footage of damage to south face

Big deal i have banned from no less than 26 sites for my views on chemtrails and 9-11 all this shows is
that your annoying



C-V is a term used for resume..............................the interesting thing? its not widely used in the United States it seems to be a European or international term
which is also interesting isnt it?

'scuse me, HFB, but wouldn't this be your opinion? Why are you excusing yourself from the same behavior you so vehemently complained about me using?

And for what it's worth, I really don't see why it's necessary to assasinate RAMS' character, just because he disagrees with your opinion.

Im not assasinating his character ,
I am However \"questioning\" his CREDIBILITY and his Authenticity
as I am afraid I find his claims to be to much to believe and i fail
to see whay he would bother to be here with his Alleged Credentials


I find it interesting someone refers to a \"resume\" as a CV Unless they
are from the international scene or europe as the majority of U.S.
Citizens refer to them as Resumes.and from what other have found
looking into his claims

I find his credibility at stake thats all i am allowed to question credibilty arent I?

This thread is about the World Trade Center, it is not a place to attack or question the credibility of other members' backgrounds.

There have been two requests to get back on topic here and it's not happening, this thread is being closed.