Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Astronauts Columbia Left Behind
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Science > Space and Astronomy
dougadam
QUOTE
March 22, 2007 Books of The Times
The Astronauts Columbia Left Behind
By JANET MASLIN Skip to next paragraph
TOO FAR FROM HOME

A Story of Life and Death in Space
By Chris Jones

While the world grieved for the Columbia crew lost on Feb. 1, 2003, three lonely men in space had a somewhat more complicated reaction. They were the members of Expedition Six, two Americans and a Russian installed at the International Space Station. They had been there since the previous November, and they were getting ready to come home. But the disaster suspended space travel, so no new crew would arrive to relieve them in the foreseeable future. Suddenly they were stuck in a sci-fi limbo.

This crisis became the basis for an Esquire article in which Chris Jones recreated the experience of the three men: Dr. Donald R. Pettit, Capt. Kenneth D. Bowersox and Nikolai M. Budarin. Mr. Jones focused tightly on this story, giving it both intimacy and suspense. Now, one National Magazine Award later (Mr. Jones won for feature writing in 2005), his longer, less assured version of Expedition Six’s perilous journey has been turned into a book.

Like air in a vacuum, the story told in “Too Far From Home” expands to fill the boundaries it has been given. But it has lost its tight focus and some of its verve. Mr. Jones’s efforts to provide context for Expedition Six yield more generic, less compelling historical detail about both the American and Russian space programs, as well as occasionally inflated prose about the lyrical loneliness of an astronaut’s mission.

“Like every astronaut and every cosmonaut, from the first to the last, they were seen as something alien and wonderful, these ordinary assemblies of skin and tissue that had been turned into artifacts by virtue of the places they had been,” he writes about the Expedition Six members, post-expedition. And: “Between expectation and reality, between flying and falling — between earth and space, between home and away — there will forever remain some kind of gap.” Whatever this is, it isn’t the right stuff.

With his book based largely on the astronauts’ recollections (“NASA declined to help me out — for reasons I’ve never been able to fathom,” Mr. Jones writes) and on data that is also well documented on the Web site Space.com, he must bring something unusual to what would otherwise be a relatively routine mix, despite the drama of Expedition Six’s temporary dilemma.

So he concentrates on the you-are-there physical peculiarities of life in space. Oh, wow: Imagine what happens when someone puts Alka-Seltzer in a bubble-sphere of water under zero-gravity conditions. This account is actually at its best with space-trippy images of that kind.

Then there are the diapers. With no inkling about how notorious these would become, Mr. Jones makes diapers part of his detailed examination of how astronauts perform bodily functions in space. No spitting allowed: they have to swallow their toothpaste. Moisture from their sweat will eventually wind up in their tea.

Russian cosmonauts are too tough to wear diapers. Americans do, but the Expedition Six crew declined to use them once it had been determined that they would go home on an outmoded Russian capsule, the Soyuz TMA-1. That trip, which became a nail-biter, was supposed to be relatively brief.

“The American space program has traditionally paid little attention to the psychological health of its astronauts in space,” Mr. Jones notes. But “there is strong evidence that spending a long time in space can make people crackers.” Diapers and all, “Too Far From Home” is certainly prescient this way.

Still, in spite of potentially nerve-wracking claustrophobia and other strains, the Expedition Six team members stayed level-headed and sane.

“Bowersox was the firstborn brother,” Mr. Jones writes. “He was reason and responsibility. Pettit was the wide-eyed kid who loved eating his drinks with chopsticks.” (Dr. Pettit loved experimenting with fluids. His other efforts included that Alka-Seltzer trick.) “Budarin was the weird uncle from Russia.” Although he spends much more time describing each of them, the author doesn’t much deviate from those simple thumbnail descriptions.

Still, Mr. Jones finds ways to overstate each case. “Like Picasso going through his Blue period, Pettit had once been obsessed with clocks,” he says of Dr. Pettit’s ingenious tinkering. Much is also made of Mr. Budarin’s revelation that a breakfast packet of dried strawberries, if soaked in water all day, would make a nice dinnertime dessert. “Another lesson learned, another trick revealed,” Mr. Jones writes of this.

But he makes it clear that the astronaut world has needed to lose its daredevil edge, and that a new breed of calm, stoical, strawberry-soaking astronauts will help give a business-as-usual facade to great space leaps of the future. At Edwards Air Force Base in California, where Tom Wolfe’s test pilots created their legends in “The Right Stuff” and where Captain Bowersox later trained as a test pilot, “the romance has been waived for reason,” the book says. “And at the end of the day, today’s students are far more likely to retire to the in-school lounge with their textbooks and a cup of coffee than to some dusty desert bar with black-and-white photographs of dead pilots on the wall.”

For all the professionalism and sang-froid described in “Too Far From Home,” though, there remains a real, underlying sense of what makes astronauts so far removed from the ordinary. Even when performing routine repairs, an astronaut may gaze at his or her foot and see behind it a similar-sized object that turns out to be Australia.

Emotions in space are no less strange; they bring higher highs and lower lows. And the title “Too Far From Home” hints at the secret ambivalence that goes with this territory. At first glance, to the sentimental reader, the title may signify the loneliness of space travel. But when the men of Expedition Six returned to Earth, they missed their privilege and isolation. They were homesick here too.


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/22/books/22...=spaceandcosmos
Magikman
Doug,

We tend to frown on posting solitary news articles without comment. This is a discussion forum and as such an explanation or a reasoning from you for its inclusion is required, otherwise its difficult to ascertain what you are hoping to accomplish. We'l leave this open for a short period of time to give you a chance to expand your thoughts on the article, in the meantime I have moved it to a more appropriate category.

MM
MID
I have a hard time with the title of the story, "The Astronauts Columbia Left Behind".
The first paragraph...


QUOTE
While the world grieved for the Columbia crew lost on Feb. 1, 2003, three lonely men in space had a somewhat more complicated reaction. They were the members of Expedition Six, two Americans and a Russian installed at the International Space Station. They had been there since the previous November, and they were getting ready to come home. But the disaster suspended space travel, so no new crew would arrive to relieve them in the foreseeable future. Suddenly they were stuck in a sci-fi limbo.


...is wrong.

I think it's a creative story line, but the fact of the matter is that Columbia left no astronauts behind.
STS-107 had nothing to do with the ISS. It was a non-station mission of intense orbital science and research. It never got near the ISS and its orbit was inclined about 12 degrees more equatorially, and was about 50 SM lower than the ISS.

The ISS Expedition 6 crew was about three quarters of the way through their planned term on-orbit when STS-107 burned up during re-entry. They wouldn't be getting ready to come home for another month and some, nominally.

The disaster did not suspend space flight, save United States vehicle flights, that is. The ISS always has a Soyuz attached to her. That spacecraft is there for the return and deposit of crews, and one is always hanging around in case emergency get-out-of there is required.

The statement that no new crew would relieve them for the foreseeable future is nonsense, since Expedition 7's crew was in preparations to come up and relieve them on schedule. That schedule was backed out from late March to late April because of the re-adjustment necessary, but that was no crisis.


Expedition 7 was originally scheduled to fly aboard the Shuttle on STS-114. That of course was cancelled because STS-114 was re-assigned as the return to flight mission, which would be after the planned Expedition 7 crew arrival at ISS. The Expedition 7 crew arrived in late April, aboard the Soyuz TMA spacecraft, and the Expedition 6 crew returned aboard that spacecraft on May 3.

Everything about ISS operations continued normally in the wake of Columbia's destruction.

Thus, Expedition 6 had no crisis, nor dilemna...save their completely understandable reactions to comrades being killed in such a space disaster, and an extra 4 weeks or so on-orbit. There were plenty of consumables on board, and plenty of work to be done.

Sci-fi limbo, indeed!

And this...

QUOTE
Russian cosmonauts are too tough to wear diapers. Americans do, but the Expedition Six crew declined to use them once it had been determined that they would go home on an outmoded Russian capsule, the Soyuz TMA-1. That trip, which became a nail-biter, was supposed to be relatively brief.


What is this nonsense about?
Diapers? The ISS crew goes to the bathroom in a very high tech toilet, similar to a Shuttle John. No one wears diapers, Americans or Russians or any one else. One sits on the can just like they do on Earth...

The "diaper" reference may refer to the waste containment system which is utilized in EVA suits. I'm not sure that's an option during long EVAs. I would venture a guess that the #2 capability of this thing has rarely been used, but #1 most assuredly, as it was during all Apollo EVAs (the #1 and #2 functions are integrated into the garment.

...would you want to go out on a 7 hour EVA without the capability of peeing anywhere but inside your pressure suit, and of course, if your breakfast didn't settle quite right and you just had no choice but to poop...do it in your million dollar EMU???


...sorry guys, but look; being an astronaut isn't really as glamorous as it seems on the surface. They're just people, and all people I've ever known go potty.

Anyway, the diaper reference is ridiculous. Anyone in an EMU wears one of those things. It's part of the gig.



Further, the Soyuz TMA is not an "outmoded capsule". It is the workhorse of the Russian program, a high successful reliable manned spacecraft which has taken many a crew up (including the current Expedition crew (save Suni Williams, who flew in the Shuttle)), and returned many a crew safely.

In fact the TMA was re-designed in 2003 and was first used by the Expedition 7 crew to get up there, and by the Expedition 6 crew in returning to Earth.

It's advanced. It's not outmoded. All ISS crew members, whether scheduled to fly aboard the TMA or not, take custom made seat liners for use in the Soyuz. Suni William's is installed on her seat aboard the TMA attached to the station at this moment, despite the fact that she's scheduled to come back on a Shuttle. The spacecraft is there as a lifeboat, if necessary, in all ISS expeditions.

"Outmoded" capsules are not a part of the ISS system.


Any re-entry in a vehicle moving 17,500 MPH is a nail biter of sorts, especially when your a little steep, 250 miles off course, and your the first Americans to ever fly in a Soyuz spacecraft (which the American members of the Expedition 6 crew were). They landed a bit off target, and it took a couple hours to get to them, but they were all just fine.

With so much nonsense, inaccuracy, and overt embellishment posted in the premises of this article, I am inclined to ignore it.




Unlimited
no matter ...God bless the space pioneers who lost their lives for their country!!
Waspie_Dwarf
QUOTE(MID @ Mar 27 2007, 11:18 PM) [snapback]1602605[/snapback]
I think it's a creative story line, but the fact of the matter is that Columbia left no astronauts behind.
STS-107 had nothing to do with the ISS. It was a non-station mission of intense orbital science and research. It never got near the ISS and its orbit was inclined about 12 degrees more equatorially, and was about 50 SM lower than the ISS.

Not only is this correct but Columbia was not capable of visiting the ISS (or Mir before that). As the first shuttle built she was considerably heavier than those that followed. That greatly reduced the payload that she could carry to the ISS. Columbia was, therefore, never modified to have the docking systems needed for a visit to the ISS.

QUOTE(MID @ Mar 27 2007, 11:18 PM) [snapback]1602605[/snapback]
What is this nonsense about?
Diapers? The ISS crew goes to the bathroom in a very high tech toilet, similar to a Shuttle John. No one wears diapers, Americans or Russians or any one else. One sits on the can just like they do on Earth...

this is reference to the diapers used by shuttle crews during countdown and launch. The Russian cosmonauts traditionally refuse to wear them on Soyuz missions, mind you Soyuz missions tend to get off the ground on time a lot more that the shuttle does, requiring a lot less "crossed leg" time.

QUOTE(limited @ Mar 28 2007, 12:12 AM) [snapback]1602676[/snapback]
no matter ...God bless the space pioneers who lost their lives for their country!!


That's countries plural. STS-107 carried an Israeli national and Indian / American dual national.
MID
QUOTE(Waspie_Dwarf @ Mar 27 2007, 07:28 PM) [snapback]1602690[/snapback]
this is reference to the diapers used by shuttle crews during countdown and launch. The Russian cosmonauts traditionally refuse to wear them on Soyuz missions, mind you Soyuz missions tend to get off the ground on time a lot more that the shuttle does, requiring a lot less "crossed leg" time.


Oh, those....

yes.gif


Well, Waspie, you have a point about those launch things..., and the fact that the Russians don't spend quite so much time on board prior to launch.

I don't know, Shuttle or Soyuz, two hours or four, I'd probably feel like peeing myself at about T zero!!


...I still do, and I'm only watching!



QUOTE
QUOTE(limited @ Mar 28 2007, 12:12 AM)
no matter ...God bless the space pioneers who lost their lives for their country!!


QUOTE: Waspie Dwarf
That's countries plural. STS-107 carried an Israeli national and Indian / American dual national.




Let us hope we never have to experience that again...one country, or three.



This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.