QUOTE(thirteen13 @ Mar 27 2007, 12:11 PM) [snapback]1602239[/snapback]
...a rectangular stone on a andean mountainside ledge.this stone ,40ft. wide 20ft. tall 120ft. long. now this stone was claimed to have been cut out of a mountainside 60 miles away with nothing between its origin and its present location except for mountainous terrain. i remember the show saying how if this stone was on the plains in the usa, all of modern technology could not move it let alone over 60 miles of mountainous terrain.
Odd that you can't remember the specifics of the show, etc., yet you recall the size of the stone...?
As Lil' Gremlin said, the Roman site at Baalbek has the largest worked stone ever found.
For both of you, here's a short list of cranes capable of lifting the Baalbek stone completely off the ground and setting it pretty much anywhere and in any orientation you might want (something the Romans certainly
did not attempt at Baalbek):
QUOTE
M-1200
Max. Loadmoment: 24660tm
Max. Capacity: 1300t
Max. Radius: 118m
Main boom: 46.6..115.2m
Jib: 15.2..76.2
Twin Ring
Max. Loadmoment: 28578tm
Max. Capacity: 1440t
Max. Radius: 130m
Main boom: 48.3..76.7m
Jib: 29.7..59.7
PTC
Max. Loadmoment: 33705tm
Max. Capacity: 1600t
Max. Radius: 163m
Main boom: 49.4..97.3m
Jib: 27.5..87.2
CC 12600
Max. Loadmoment: 39780tm
Max. Capacity: 1600t
Max. Radius: 122m
Main boom: 54.0..138.0m
Jib: 42.0..84.0
Platform Ring
Max. Loadmoment: 47592tm
Max. Capacity: 2000t
Max. Radius: 185m
Main boom: 15.3..124.7m
Jib: 29.7..87.5
MSG-50
Max. Loadmoment: 75242tm
Max. Capacity: 3070t
Max. Radius: 160m
Main boom: 46.9..107.0m
Jib: 15.4..70.3
(My emphases to highlight capacities.)
From:
The Mammoet Crane company, the Netherlands.This is an excellent example of why one should look into these matters for oneself, rather than to take the word of some pseudoscientist that's trying to sell books. The claim that large worked stones all over the world couldn't be moved even by today's technology is a common, powerful and completely bogus attempt to legitimize the idea that some sort of ancient technology has been either lost to us or hidden from us by the ubiquitous "THEY" or "THEM."
Please note that the quoted capacities above came from a single search return at the first crane company I looked at, after using Google to find large capacity cranes.
Also, Lil' Gremlin, the Baalbek stones were
not moved uphill. Rather, they were moved down a shallow slope. More info about this
Roman structure (sometimes called the trilithion)
HERE.
QUOTE(jaylemurph @ Mar 27 2007, 04:43 PM) [snapback]1602638[/snapback]
...And I think the place you're talking about is Tiahuanaco, Bolivia -- particularly, the Gate of the Sun...
--Jaylemurph
Jaylemurph,
I concur. The only problem is that given the dimensions that thirteen13 gave, the "stone" couldn't be made out of stone at all, it would in fact be far less dense than any type of stone:
QUOTE
The sun gate is the apex of this temple complex. Adding to the enigma, elaborately carved symbols on this enormous 45-ton piece of stone are a riddle, and endless source of fascination for scientist, archeologist, and tourist alike.
Source.At 120'X40'X20' (96,000 cubic feet, 165,888,000 cubic inches)and 45 tons (90,000 lb), it's density comes out to around .9375 lb/cubic foot or 0.00054253472 lb/cubic inch.
Given that the density of water is 62.4 lb/cubic foot, compare that to this humongous stone with a density of .9375 lb/cubic foot and we can all see that, if the Inca (or their predecessors) didn't float the thing up there via some mountain stream, then it's possible a gust of wind blew this stone to it's current perch in the Andes.
Harte