Three Request For Corrections (RFC) were filed with NIST regarding its handling of their World Trade Center 9/11 report. Jerry Leaphart represents the three filers. See the official press release for full details:

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2007/3/prweb515165.htm


Be sure to check out the scientific evidence for directed energy weapon usage at the WTC in former mechanical engineering professor Dr Judy Wood's RFC. (This 43 page PDF is the last link given in the government site linked in the press release above.)


Important update: Dr Judy Wood files Supplement#1 to her Request For Correction (RFC) with NIST. Her Supplement shows that NIST had contracted with a company directly affiliated with Directed Energy Weapon research and manufacturing, for their 9/11 NIST report.

See Dr Wood's site for PDF files:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/#news


For new readers: Please understand that there is now proof that the World Trade Center was destroyed by a directed energy weapon on 9/11, under the control of the military industrial complex.

'Proof'? I don't believe Judy Wood's claims can be considered evidence of proof. Or did you have something else in mind? if so, please provide a link.

Hysterically funny supposition. Okay, I'm new here and I'll take heed to this amazing warning about the foofoo beams taking out the WTC. But gee, what about the 920,000 human beings that saw airplanes hit the structures, first hand, standing there seeing it happen for real? Hilarious stuff......

RAMS

By all means of respect, but are you aware of the amount of energy required to demolish a building? And that no directed energy weapon of such caliber even exists? Secondly, that weapon would have to be airborne or space borne, which only makes the energy weapon idea even more absurd.

Best,
Badeskov

Yes!

Lasers! It's all so clear now. The Daleks destroyed the WTC.
Now if I could only figure out how they used the Evil Plungers to hate America.

--Jaylemurph

You've figured it out... EX-TER-MI-NATE!

well.... if a directed energy weapon couldn't do it, how could gravity?

Lasers? In space?? See here: http://www.911researchers.com/node/25

Eh, I guess the fireball from the jet fuel weakened the structure of the building to the point where it couldn't hold the upper floors and it collapsed. Pretty basic stuff, actually. And as has also been laid out in all the official reports on the matter.

Current directed energy weapons (DEW) do not have the power to bring down a building the size of WTC. The most powerful airborne laser is the military's ABL (Airborne Laser) system for theater ballistic missiles. It uses a chemical oxygen iodine laser and heats up the skin of the missile, which melts and deforms, thus causing breakup. Such a laser system would have to be much, much more powerful in order to heat up the I-beams of the WTC to the point where they lose structural integrity. And such a system does not exist.

Secondly, if it was really a DEW that did it, you would expect that the roof would collapse and then you would slowly walk your way down the building. It would be a very, very slow and inefficient way of doing it. The dear Doctor also mentions that cars and people have vanished due to these alleged weapons, which is simply pure nonsense and so far out it isn't even funny. Maybe she should use some of hear education and calculate how much power one actually needs to vaporize a even a small car; there is no DEW even remotely close to that.

Best,
Badeskov

if ur new to this forum expect to go round in circles about the same things over & over and every now and again u get a gem like this thread, the last time i mentioned about eywitness statements it was just brushed under the carpet as here-say lol so have fun & enjoy

How do you know those weapons don't exist?


The towers didn't collapse, they were pulverized: http://www.acebaker.com/9-11/HTR/web-conte...es/HTRHome.html

Where did all the building material go?

Quite easily, actually. Knowing lasers, the current state of power generators and the amount of energy it literally takes to bring down a building the size of WTC, it is obvious. I can only reference the current state of art in this field, which is the ABL. And that has no where near the energy required to demolish WTC.



They collapsed, which is very obvious looking at the footage from the incident.



What do you mean, where did it go? It was trucked away. Are you implying that some of it simply vanished into thin air?

Best,
Badeskov

Oh, well, if a internet site says it exists, then it must...

--Jaylemurph


PS: Someone please -- how did the Daleks use their Evil Plungers to cause destruction in America?! I may have to come up with my own Conspiracy Theory...

No..... "some" of it didn't vanish into thin air... the vast majority did!!

The final photo in the animation link was taken within days of 9/11.
http://www.acebaker.com/9-11/HTR/web-conte...es/HTRHome.html

The data shows that the towers were pulverized into powder, including the steel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVRh4U2BlhQ

There is plenty of debris and enough to say that WTC did not vanish into thin air.

E.g., see here. And the towers certainly weren't pulverized and turned into powder, as this picture clearly shows. Looking at various pictures from various sources, in my honest opinion, it is very obvious that no debris is missing (or added) and the state of the debris is as expected.

Best,
Badeskov

Come on... you don't honestly believe that those pictures show enough debris for two 1/4 mile high towers??

This person apparently didn't have cable when this originally happened. Apparently this person wasn't glued to the TV as it did happen, and see it with his own eyes, or fly over the site a week later. It must be the same for the Kennedy's having to hear crack-pot theories about the death of a family member so many years past. (No, I'm not sold on any theory on Kennedy).

Energy weapons...please. This thread should be closed just because it's as offensive as it is ludicrous.

The Weakening Defense is something of a mind control tactic in which everyone
will go along with. Yes I can go along with that you say in your mind.

Any one do material strength compression testing, do a reality test because when all the beams are broken
you certainly will get a top to bottom pancake only with explosions on the way down.

A compression vs temperature test might tell one something about 2000 degree steel, there was a tipping effect
as sort of a signal to bring it down in a hurry.

http://www.epa.gov/wtc/pictures/pages/12.htm

^Jet fuel did a job on those beams. They were weakened and got twisted on the way down of course.

I'll take 4000 degree thermate explosions over beams and jet fuel any day.

So they used lasers. That leaves only one possible suspect.

^ I'll catch the true terrorists for one billion dollars, pinky finger by the lip.

Actually, yes I do. Honestly, I am not pulling your leg on this. The first picture I linked to shows a huge debris field from the air. I believe the size of that is reasonable for the WTC. The second picture only shows a part of the debris, but showing that some of the debris was rather large.

Admittedly, I am no mechanical/structural engineer and I can claim no authority on this field, however, I do feel that I can gauge whether there is debris enough for the WTC and in my honest opinion there is.

Best,
Badeskov

Keep in mind, that "pile" is a few stories high, and there was a LOT of empty space below the towers (subways etc.) that was packed tight with debris too. Don't forget the TONS of material that was literally vaporized, like drywall and such, that blew all the way to Long Island for days.

Being absolutely objective, with the new space beamo evidence, you are correct.

RAMS

Ummm..... no.. there's no evidence to suggest that there "was a LOT of empty space below the towers (subways etc.) that was packed tight with debris"

In fact, the evidence refutes it:


PATH train was not crushed:



Mall (1st subbasement) not crushed (photos filed 9/19/01):





Empty hole in subbasement under WTC 2 (photo filed 9/18/01):



Photos sourced from Drs Wood/Reynolds' "Star Wars Beam Weapon" paper:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam1.html

NIST contracted with Applied Research Associates (ARA) for the 9/11 NIST report.

Not only is ARA a manufacturer of directed-energy weapon technology,
but are also a founding sponsor of Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).

DEPS, founded in 1999, put out their first newsletter one year before 9/11.
An excerpt from this newsletter is as follows:

"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry."

http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf

Your point?

I have done graphic failure analysis for ARA. Most of what they produce is line energy signature development. You may contact Denny Boesen, Chair, DEPS, and inquire on the level energy displacement in the energy transmission field.

This is not weapons.

This is direct infused communication lasers, operating in the 14.2 kilowatt (kW) laser light at an infrared wavelength of 1.61 microns, to avoid drift corruption in the IM field, and the main customer of interest so far is DoD, US Navy. This laser technology is operated deep into the IR band. It is a test bed FEL (Free-Electron Laser) instrument that someday will allow for direct line aquisition as a weapon platform to dazzle incoming missiles.

These platform mounted FELs on orbit will dazzle beligerent assets because it is tunable in the IR band field, avoiding field focus corruption.

This is 5 to 10 years off into the future, and had nothing to do with 911.

You and so many continue to further discredit the 911/UFO, et al, conspiracy movement with these sort of claims. To say energy beams were used on 911 day is like claiming the terrorists always take their accordions deer hunting. Your claim and anyone who claims same that energy weapons were used on 911 day is assinine.

Consider.

RAMS