Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Chemtrails - Croatia
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Conspiracies & Secret Societies
Pages: 1, 2
Ufogovernment
I hope that NATO will stop with spraying...Here some photos from Croatia, Split.

linked-image
linked-image
linked-image
linked-image
linked-image
linked-image
linked-image
linked-image
CuteCandy
how many people notice what happens above their heads?
Ufogovernment
Not many...we risk our freedom for them and they tell you you`re crazy. I think we should let them be sprayed, let them to have sick children maybe something come in their heads.
MID
This is very tired.

There is another thread which somehow still keeps going about these "chemtrails".

Those pictures are of what are called "contrails"...."condensation trails". They are a common and fully explained phenomenon which occurs in the upper atmosphere (above approximately 25,000 feet). When jet engine exhaust enters the upper atmosphere, it pushes out water vapor (a by product of the engine's fuel combustion). This water saturates the surrounding air, and condensation takes place in the form of a trail of minute ice particles (cirrus type clouds).

Contrails are not air pollution, and they are not "spraying" of any chemical in some clandestine attempt to poison children (or whatever other half-cocked theory based upon governmental distrust one may concoct). They have been around as long as we've had jets flying in the upper atmosphere...which is quite some time now.


Of course, it is fully permissible to believe what ever one wants. You should know that this ridiculous idea has its own thread already.
Ufogovernment
QUOTE(MID @ Mar 31 2007, 08:46 PM) [snapback]1607677[/snapback]
This is very tired.

There is another thread which somehow still keeps going about these "chemtrails".

Those pictures are of what are called "contrails"...."condensation trails". They are a common and fully explained phenomenon which occurs in the upper atmosphere (above approximately 25,000 feet). When jet engine exhaust enters the upper atmosphere, it pushes out water vapor (a by product of the engine's fuel combustion). This water saturates the surrounding air, and condensation takes place in the form of a trail of minute ice particles (cirrus type clouds).

Contrails are not air pollution, and they are not "spraying" of any chemical in some clandestine attempt to poison children (or whatever other half-cocked theory based upon governmental distrust one may concoct). They have been around as long as we've had jets flying in the upper atmosphere...which is quite some time now.
Of course, it is fully permissible to believe what ever one wants. You should know that this ridiculous idea has its own thread already.


I am so sorry that you are allready blind mutant because of those chemtrails, but NATO admited they spray, and they sprayed before. People made a tests on chemtrails fibres and found barium and aluminium..but you allready know that... wink2.gif
itsnotoutthere
QUOTE(Ufogovernment @ Mar 31 2007, 07:56 PM) [snapback]1607687[/snapback]
I am so sorry that you are allready blind mutant because of those chemtrails, but NATO admited they spray, and they sprayed before. People made a tests on chemtrails fibres and found barium and aluminium..but you allready know that... wink2.gif



Dear dear dear.... no.gif
itsnotoutthere
QUOTE(Ufogovernment @ Mar 31 2007, 07:56 PM) [snapback]1607687[/snapback]
I am so sorry that you are allready blind mutant because of those chemtrails, but NATO admited they spray, and they sprayed before. People made a tests on chemtrails fibres and found barium and aluminium..but you allready know that... wink2.gif


Actually, thinking about it you're probebly right. because whatever they're spraying is obviously affecting your ability to think streight.
Ufogovernment
QUOTE(itsnotoutthere @ Mar 31 2007, 09:16 PM) [snapback]1607709[/snapback]
Actually, thinking about it you're probebly right. because whatever they're spraying is obviously affecting your ability to think streight.

Now you see that I am in right laugh.gif
Moon Monkey
I used to think it was all crazy talk until recently.

I was sat on my patio with a few friends enjoying the sunshine recently. I live close to Manchester airport and we have the planes a few hundred feet over our heads every few minutes and a higher passing transatlantic route so are used to them. Anyway as I leaned back for a swig of beer I saw a plane that wasn't as high as the transatlantic boys but obviously not on a landing/ take off path for any airport around here. As I watched it fly west suddenly a trail began behind it that was not as wispy as usual planes and it seemed weird how it just suddenly started and didn't dissolve as fast as they usually do. Anyway I mentioned it to my friends, they all had a look and forgot about it. Not long later one of my friends pointed out that a second trail parralel to the first had stopped at the same line of longitude (or latitude i forget which is which). We knew it had just stopped as we could still see the plane heading east but it was too high to say it was the same plane. We put it down to coincidnce or temperature change or whatever and carried on chatting. About 45 mins later someone said look up and we saw an almost perfect checkerboard of 25 squares with 4 east/west and 4 north/south trails. The first one was getting a bit vague by now and it was getting dark so we didnt see what happened after that.

Anyway after I read about chemtrails on here I realised that if you wanted to cover the most densely populated area of Northern England that checkerboard would have covered it perfectly. For anyone familiar with the area I estimate the trails started about Stoke or Crewe in the south and went as far as we could see north and from the penines/peak district in the east to the coast (Merseyside) in the west. Just weird thats all.;
Ufogovernment
I saw one plane flying over my town relaseing a trail. It stoped relaseing 3 times, like go-stop-go-stop-go-stop and it went away without any trail.
You can see a plane and 3 trails on this video I took this month

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4g7J0WlogA
Ufogovernment
Tipe Ufogovernment in youtube search and you`ll se some other interesting videos about chemtrails wink2.gif
Colbert Nation
Why would you release "chemicals" at that elevation? There would be no way to control where the air/wind would take it.

Also...we're you at the same elevation as those so called "chemtrails"? Did you sample the air and find evidence of anything other than Jet Engine Exhaust?

NO...I didn't think so...

The entire theory of Chemtrails is stupid...case closed
Ufogovernment
I won`t repeate myself...I think I was clear about this subject. You are blind and that is not my problem. You have photos, videos, documents and NATO admition...I don`t know what do you want. You don`t know too.
Colbert Nation
QUOTE(Ufogovernment @ Mar 31 2007, 03:52 PM) [snapback]1607799[/snapback]
I won`t repeate myself...I think I was clear about this subject. You are blind and that is not my problem. You have photos, videos, documents and NATO admition...I don`t know what do you want. You don`t know too.


Unfortunately all your evidence is based off videos on Youtube...not a good sign
Ufogovernment
QUOTE(Colbert Nation @ Mar 31 2007, 11:05 PM) [snapback]1607821[/snapback]
Unfortunately all your evidence is based off videos on Youtube...not a good sign

Not all, and those videos are MINE. I have witness of fibres which were falling from the sky after spraying, we have lab evidence and admition...fot the third time. Shell I tell this 4th time..?
Obviousman
linked-image
Redtail
QUOTE(Ufogovernment @ Mar 31 2007, 09:11 PM) [snapback]1607823[/snapback]
Not all, and those videos are MINE. I have witness of fibres which were falling from the sky after spraying, we have lab evidence and admition...fot the third time. Shell I tell this 4th time..?


Where did Nato admit this? What did Nato admit to spraying? Why have I never seen any fibers falling from Pope AFB, Ft Campbell, or Tallahassee Regional which I live near at the moment?
frenat
Your lab "evidence" is worthless unless it was collected directly from the contrail shortly after emission. If collected on the ground there are many, many other things it could be from. There are many other much more likely sources for barium and aluminum in air pollution.

Plus as I posted in another thread,

QUOTE
Everything I've found about persistent contrails is they show up more often in the 1 or 2 days before a front because it is then when the conditions are more conducive to persistent contrail formation. They have been known about since planes could fly high enough. Now yes, they are more common lately but I think that can be explained as well. These are some of the main reasons I think they have increased.
1. Jet traffic has doubled a few times since the 70's. It is projected to double again in just 10 years.

2. Jet engines today are more powerful than older models. This means they burn more fuel and consequently have much more water vapor in the exhaust.

3. Jets travel higher now (on average) partly due to increased traffic and partly due to increased power allowing higher flight. Higher flight means more contrails. Read that study from 1942 for more explanation on this.

4. An increase in traffic increases the exhaust put into the atmosphere. This exhaust has a cumulative effect and results in conditions more conducive to contrail formation over the long run. I've read some studies about it but have been unable to find them online.

5. Evidence that airlines have changed their engines can be found in the noise regulations that the FAA has put out. Around 2000, Stage 3 regs went into effect. This is a regulation governing the noise output of jet engines and required every airline to either replace their engines or install hush kits. These newer engines are not only quieter but are more fuel efficient meaning again, more water vapor.

Even still there is evidence that persistent contrails existed before the late 90's when those on the internet say they started.
This 1942 report mentions they can be persistent given the right conditions
http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/report...ca-wr-l-474.pdf
and many bomber crews from WWII reported times when the contrails were persistent not only making them more visible to the AAA guns on the ground but also making it harder to see the other planes in the formation.

There is also phtographic evidence from the early 80's.
On this link they have quite a few pics taken by satellites and the shuttle in the early 80's showing persistent contrails mixed in with many other earlier and later pics.
http://www.astro.ku.dk/~holger/IDA/STSHH.html

As for why many think they started in the late 90's, I think that has to do with a few things. They started to become much more common then due in part to engine changes and increased traffic. The increase of use of the internet made it so more people started to notice them. Also recently digital cameras and scanners are much more common making it easy to show others pictures of these phenomena.

Another thing I noticed from my time at Tyndall AFB was that fighter pilots brief the contrail altitudes before each sortie. The altitudes for formation are easily predicted based on atmospheric conditions. They are of interst to fighter pilots because, like in WWII, they can give away one's position to the enemy. On days that I noticed the contrail altitudes were lower than other days I would also notice more persistent contrails from commercial flights in the area.

I have trouble believing that some secret government project is behind all chemtrails as I've not really seen any convincing evidence for it. I've used Flight Explorer and verifed myself that flights leaving persistent contrails are most often commercial flights and for all the talk I've seen about "chemtrails" being left by white unmarked jets, whenever I look at them with suitable binoculars or a telescope I see commercial markings.

Frankly, I've seen nothing that can't be explained with the known and established science behind contrails.


In addition, the only time I have ever heard of barium purposely being released for certain radar tests, it was done in the ionosphere, above 80 kilometers (260,000+ feet). That is well above the level that any airplane would fly at and was released by a rocket. It also has only happened a few times. Those releases would never affect a population on the ground.

Another thing to think about, if you are one of those that thinks they are spraying something to harm others.
If you wanted to spray a population what altitude would you do it at? 30,000 feet? 40,000 feet? No, to get any noticeable effect you would need to be below 5,000 feet. Anything sprayed at high altitudes would be impossible to aim as it would take days for any particulates to settle and would dissipate to such a low concentration by the time it does reach the ground that it would be useless.
Colbert Nation
QUOTE(frenat @ Mar 31 2007, 07:27 PM) [snapback]1608009[/snapback]
1. Jet traffic has doubled a few times since the 70's. It is projected to double again in just 10 years.

2. Jet engines today are more powerful than older models. This means they burn more fuel and consequently have much more water vapor in the exhaust.

5. Evidence that airlines have changed their engines can be found in the noise regulations that the FAA has put out. Around 2000, Stage 3 regs went into effect. This is a regulation governing the noise output of jet engines and required every airline to either replace their engines or install hush kits. These newer engines are not only quieter but are more fuel efficient meaning again, more water vapor.



Seriously...you just lost all credibility....look at whats in bold

Don't get me wrong...I agree that there is no such thing as chem-trails, they are ALL contrails...but seriously...how could you do this...
frenat
QUOTE(Colbert Nation @ Mar 31 2007, 11:40 PM) [snapback]1608229[/snapback]
Seriously...you just lost all credibility....look at whats in bold

Don't get me wrong...I agree that there is no such thing as chem-trails, they are ALL contrails...but seriously...how could you do this...

They can be both. They are more fuel efficient by burning the fuel cleaner and more completely and burn more fuel overall for more total power. There is no contradiction in what I wrote.
Raptor
I live near one of the busiest airports in the world, these 'chemtrails' are almost a daily occurance in certain weather conditions, and I've been seeing them ever since I could remember.

Why would 'they' be spraying from passenger planes?
MID
QUOTE(Ufogovernment @ Mar 31 2007, 04:05 PM) [snapback]1607748[/snapback]
I saw one plane flying over my town relaseing a trail. It stoped relaseing 3 times, like go-stop-go-stop-go-stop and it went away without any trail.
You can see a plane and 3 trails on this video I took this month

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4g7J0WlogA



That is also typical.
Do you know why this happens? I bet not.

It is because of changing atmospheric conditions along the route of the jet. Contrails sometimes form and linger, sometimes are intermittent, and sometimes don't form at all. It has to so with humidity.

You are using your imagination to concoct wild theories about what is essentially condensed water vapor trails in the upper atmopshere.

There is no evidence to support the idea that these things are chemical spraying.
Trinitrotoluene
QUOTE(Colbert Nation @ Apr 1 2007, 04:40 AM) [snapback]1608229[/snapback]
Seriously...you just lost all credibility....look at whats in bold

Don't get me wrong...I agree that there is no such thing as chem-trails, they are ALL contrails...but seriously...how could you do this...


Efficiency has nothing to do with the amount used in this particular example, there is no contradiction there!
Ufogovernment
Don`t make me to believe it is just contrails. You can`t change my mind like I can`t change yours. You live in your little paradise I live in mine, good for you good for me. Accept different opinions.
frenat
Yeah, cause the science describing them for the past 60+ years and the photos and stories dating back to before WWII could all be faked. rolleyes.gif
Ufogovernment
My photos dating back to a year, and chemtrails in Croatia showed up in year 2000. after signing "Partnership for peace" with NATO.
badeskov
QUOTE(Ufogovernment @ Apr 2 2007, 06:22 AM) [snapback]1609755[/snapback]
My photos dating back to a year, and chemtrails in Croatia showed up in year 2000. after signing "Partnership for peace" with NATO.


Are you saying that there were no contrails from planes in Croatia before that? And what makes you sure that they are chemicals? Why would NATO start spraying? Just curious....original.gif

Best,
Badeskov
Pax Unum
QUOTE(Colbert Nation @ Mar 31 2007, 10:40 PM) [snapback]1608229[/snapback]
Seriously...you just lost all credibility....look at whats in bold

Don't get me wrong...I agree that there is no such thing as chem-trails, they are ALL contrails...but seriously...how could you do this...

linked-image more Colbert, than Colbert...
chemical-licker
i can believe chem trails i mean who would throw glass bottles of lsd into the underground rail system in the 70s? ow the government! and no one was aware at the time.

say 20 years from now we will find out that these chemtrails are true, just depends what their spreading. its easy to bury ones head in the ground and deny anything like this is going on.
frenat
The problem is if one believes that they are spraying to affect the population then they are doing it the most ineffective way imaginable. By spraying at 30,000 or 40,000 feet, the chemicals would be impossible to aim as some would not settle for days or even weeks and by the time they did settle they would be so diluted to be completely unidentifiable and useless.
LordBishop
Don't worry UFOgovernment, not all people are skeptical. I believe in chemtrails. Nice pictures and videos, BTW. thumbsup.gif
Ufogovernment
Thank you LordBishop. I don`t care about them, I would like people to see what is going on and help themselves, but if they don`t want to, it is not my job to protect them original.gif
Rodack
contrails or chemtrails?
why would aircraft be flying those particular patterns?I mean those are pretty deliberate looking lines being left like that.
even if they are simply contrails, as many of you suggest. Why are the planes flying to make actual grids? May i ask how
much time elapsed while you were taking these shots? did they make the whole pattern while you watched? Or was it over
like a 4 hour time frame? i know i have seen similar things but those pictures certainly show some sort of patterns
maybe it was an air show? or something?
I have read about chemtrails and so many people take pot shots at what you are talking about. When they say stuff like
Why would they spray chemicals in the air ?I understand what you are saying about the chemicals.They arent really chemicals
they are Metals and Barium. from what I have read they have found these two things in many air samples. i then read about Barium
and found it is indeed harmful to Us . I dont think they are spraying these things in order to affect the population at all
so many folks attack the Chemical part of this Chemical isnt really a fair word barium is being used to attract all the availible moisture
in the surrounding air which in turn creates clouds the aluminum chaffe must be being used to either reflect light,or reflect or attract other charged particles
cool photos and videos something to think about

MID
QUOTE(Rodack @ Apr 3 2007, 12:10 AM) [snapback]1610882[/snapback]
why would aircraft be flying those particular patterns?I mean those are pretty deliberate looking lines being left like that.
even if they are simply contrails, as many of you suggest. Why are the planes flying to make actual grids?



These are definitely patterns made by design.
All commercial, or military jet traffic, flying from one place to another in the skies above 18,000 feet ASL (above sea level) flies along pre-arranged jet routes...always. There are many jets flying the world over every day, and there are hundreds upon hundreds of established jet routes. The patterns you see are the results of different jets going in different directions, many of which are crossing paths, often at different altitudes, and in different directions. In many many areas, these paths cross and may look like a tic-tac-toe grid, or a cone, or a parallel group of lines, etc.

The planes are not flying to make grids. They're not even flying to pull connies. The captians don't even care about that stuff. They're paying attention to their aircraft, and ATC's instructions as they fly along. They simply pull connies, depending on atmospheric conditions at altitude. That just happens to be the confluence of various jets at similar times, along different routes, at different altitudes--an exceedingly common occurrance in many locations all over the world, every day.

There is no mystery here, if you understand aviation, the nature of the all-too-common contrail, and jet routes.

LordBishop
QUOTE(Rodack @ Apr 2 2007, 09:10 PM) [snapback]1610882[/snapback]
contrails or chemtrails?
why would aircraft be flying those particular patterns?I mean those are pretty deliberate looking lines being left like that.
even if they are simply contrails, as many of you suggest. Why are the planes flying to make actual grids? May i ask how
much time elapsed while you were taking these shots? did they make the whole pattern while you watched? Or was it over
like a 4 hour time frame? i know i have seen similar things but those pictures certainly show some sort of patterns
maybe it was an air show? or something?
I have read about chemtrails and so many people take pot shots at what you are talking about. When they say stuff like
Why would they spray chemicals in the air ?I understand what you are saying about the chemicals.They arent really chemicals
they are Metals and Barium. from what I have read they have found these two things in many air samples. i then read about Barium
and found it is indeed harmful to Us . I dont think they are spraying these things in order to affect the population at all
so many folks attack the Chemical part of this Chemical isnt really a fair word barium is being used to attract all the availible moisture
in the surrounding air which in turn creates clouds the aluminum chaffe must be being used to either reflect light,or reflect or attract other charged particles
cool photos and videos something to think about


There could be many reasons as to why they are spreading the small metal particles in the air - one theory is like you're saying about reflecting light; to reduce the sun's glare and theoretically reduce global warming. Other reasons are to see how they can effect the weather. There have been several "reports" about how people say that the sun's light (sunlight) doesn't look the same as what it used to a few years back, that the light is more white than yellow. I know that in my city, it's always hazy and only after a good rain storm is the sky clear.
Mostar
Interesting video.

The real question is.

IF its real.

How can you stop it ?

Use the old SAM sites from the war.

And from such high altitudes wouldnt it all just scatter ??

You dont see those planes which cover crops doing it from so high........

And to what Rodack said.........have you ever heard of plane routes ?

I agree with MID

Dosta vise saovim.....
Lizardian_guy
Apparently, someone's never seen an airliner fly above their house, leaving the white trail of water vapor behind.
Essan
QUOTE(Ufogovernment @ Mar 31 2007, 05:36 PM) [snapback]1607606[/snapback]
I hope that NATO will stop with spraying...Here some photos from Croatia, Split.


NATO would love to be able to prevent contrails form forming

http://ams.allenpress.com/perlserv/?reques...FC%3E2.0.CO%3B2


BUt your best option to prevent scens like those in your photos would be to close all your airports and make holidays makers come to Croatia only by land. Most persistent contrails are produced by commercial airliners, the numbers of which have hugely increased over the past 2 decades.

Persistent contrails are also a growing concern with regards global warming (Pat Minnis and his team at NASA have calculated that, in theory, all of the warming observed over the continental USA during the 80s and 90s could have been due to persistent contrails).

Efforts are continuing to reduce them. But as more and more people insist on flying more and more often it's no easy task.
Ufogovernment
QUOTE(Mostar @ Apr 4 2007, 02:17 PM) [snapback]1612706[/snapback]
Interesting video.

The real question is.

IF its real.

How can you stop it ?

Use the old SAM sites from the war.

And from such high altitudes wouldnt it all just scatter ??

You dont see those planes which cover crops doing it from so high........

And to what Rodack said.........have you ever heard of plane routes ?

I agree with MID

Dosta vise saovim.....

Nitko te ne tjera da se zamaraš ovim.
Essan
QUOTE(LordBishop @ Apr 3 2007, 10:24 PM) [snapback]1611949[/snapback]
There could be many reasons as to why they are spreading the small metal particles in the air - one theory is like you're saying about reflecting light; to reduce the sun's glare and theoretically reduce global warming.


Persistent Contrails cause global warming - but I guess one should never let bad ol' scientific facts get in the way of a good conspiracy wink2.gif


QUOTE
I know that in my city, it's always hazy and only after a good rain storm is the sky clear.


It's called pollution. Try using a car less often to reduce it.
Rodack
QUOTE(MID @ Apr 3 2007, 10:05 PM) [snapback]1611922[/snapback]
These are definitely patterns made by design.
All commercial, or military jet traffic, flying from one place to another in the skies above 18,000 feet ASL (above sea level) flies along pre-arranged jet routes...always. There are many jets flying the world over every day, and there are hundreds upon hundreds of established jet routes. The patterns you see are the results of different jets going in different directions, many of which are crossing paths, often at different altitudes, and in different directions. In many many areas, these paths cross and may look like a tic-tac-toe grid, or a cone, or a parallel group of lines, etc.

The planes are not flying to make grids. They're not even flying to pull connies. The captians don't even care about that stuff. They're paying attention to their aircraft, and ATC's instructions as they fly along. They simply pull connies, depending on atmospheric conditions at altitude. That just happens to be the confluence of various jets at similar times, along different routes, at different altitudes--an exceedingly common occurrance in many locations all over the world, every day.

There is no mystery here, if you understand aviation, the nature of the all-too-common contrail, and jet routes.

I dont Know there MID.....that second photo and some of the others of the same shot are simply Not adhering to what
your presenting to me. I understand that aircraft fly along pre-arranged routes and as you state above 18000 feet
But the patterns in the photos surely do NOT represent the Pre-arranged Routes that you are speaking of
Take a close look at those photos while planes COULD have flown those routes fora particular reason the manner and proximity

of the routes are simply too close to each other and too intertwined for any type of NORMAL air routes
Perhaps that morning something was ahppening and there was cause for planes to fly a close knit pattern as shown in the photographs?
But what possible reason could there have been? I mean really if any of us were to aquire the Jet route traffic in any given area
do you expect for us to find a pattern as shown in the photo? because out of the 43 jet route maps i have looked at since you posted
I have YET to find a SINGLE area that comes anywhere close to what shown in the photos


So there MUST be some particular reason that on that day that grid was painted while the photographer watched it
Your extremly simplified explanation does not withstand scrutiny. as i stated jets do NOT fly patterns like those shown in the photos
I did not see where anyone here suggested that they were flying to make the patterns.Rather questioning why they are flying these type
of patterns as they do not seem to match any flight route data i have looked at

I think there is a mystery her as to why are the contrails being deliberatly layed in patterns that change into light cirrus cover ?
I understand how your looking at it yet it dosent add up No your right planes do leave contrails .and the patterns or grid in the photo
is a contrail,But its not a normal contrail. I dont see where the captains would care about the contrails either? Nor did i see where there
was any dispute of that or contrails..


Im sorry but your again extremly simplified explanations just dont add up to what is being witnessed
frenat
If you are talking about the pictures in the OP then you must realize that jet routes are often many miles wide. Add to that the fact that a plane will not always fly down the center of it. They may be told to offset a few miles for spacing. Then you will also have contrails that are left get blown by the wind (wind at those altitudes can be well over 100 knots) and a plane later flying in the exact same geographical location will leave a contrail that could be miles offset from the previous contrail. None of those pictures look odd to me. They are all what I would expect from normal persistent contrails among intersections of normal jet routes.
Saru
QUOTE
Dosta vise saovim.....

QUOTE
Nitko te ne tjera da se zamaraš ovim.

English please.

QUOTE(Ufogovernment)
I am so sorry that you are allready blind mutant because of those chemtrails

Lets keep this topic serious please, in particular lets try and avoid the tired old 'you are blind' response when someone doesn't agree with you, all that tells us is that you can't support what you are saying with a rational arguement.
Rodack
QUOTE(frenat @ Apr 9 2007, 12:23 PM) [snapback]1620029[/snapback]
If you are talking about the pictures in the OP then you must realize that jet routes are often many miles wide. Add to that the fact that a plane will not always fly down the center of it. They may be told to offset a few miles for spacing. Then you will also have contrails that are left get blown by the wind (wind at those altitudes can be well over 100 knots) and a plane later flying in the exact same geographical location will leave a contrail that could be miles offset from the previous contrail. None of those pictureslook odd to me. They are all what I would expect from normal persistent contrails among intersections of normal jet routes.



Yes in particular picture Number two,Im sorry but i have to disagree with your assumption that these jets were Offsetting the route for spacing.Also I find that when persistent contrails are blown by the winds of the atmosphere they Rarely if ever remain Tight straight lines like those shown in photograph number two..towards the end of the op there are picture's that demonstarte what i am referring to as the trails in photo 2 have been blown and as we all clearly see the have degradaed as the volume of the trail is far less as they spread into a cirrus fluff.They also do not remain defined or straight after several hours


maybe some of what you have said would apply to this if the Photographer hadnt watched the grid be layed while he photographed it according to the photographer this all occurred while he watched it. Implying that it was NOT a plane flying by later leaving a second trail. What I have witnessed also bears that truth i have watched planes fly like this .I have always been of mind that it was some sort of science related issue perhaps studying the various wind patterns and associated shear in weather patterns

It makes sense you fly a pre-determined set of routes leaving contrails laden with barium to attract moisture and aluminum to reflect and show easily in radar. then you watch the shear point and roll over points and watch the entire grid for changes in the atmosphere and its make up.In short Trolling to see whats about in the Atmosphere. In a sense scanning for possible Scalar waves in the atmosphere. this is a possibility that remains most plausible in my mind.


planes do not fly consistent patterns as shown in the photos they fly by whats known as ----------Initial true great circle headings------and if you were to plan several flights between airports or destinations within your area, you will not be able to duplicate a grid as shown in the photos. and as i state in the last paragraph when trails are blown by the wind which they do----they generally have begun to dissipate and generally also begin to lose theyre form and become curved bent or broken as they are blown
MID
QUOTE(Rodack @ Apr 9 2007, 02:21 AM) [snapback]1619696[/snapback]
Take a close look at those photos while planes COULD have flown those routes fora particular reason the manner and proximity
of the routes are simply too close to each other and too intertwined for any type of NORMAL air routes




They are not close to each other. The parallel lines are several miles apart. Jet routes are, I believe , 9-10NM wide. Typically, airline traffic flying along frequently travelled JRs is spaced by ATC (horizontally, and/or vertically depending on how many aircraft are flying at any particular time). Often, we see them in the Eastern US flying out of JFK, LGA, or BOS, along southwesterly JRs...some days 5 or 6 flights, all at the same time, on the same route, some parallel to each other and spaced per ATC instructions, others, being vectored into the JR to assume a position some miles behind the existing traffic, some following sweeping arcs to intercept a route.

It's a painting in the sky some days...all of it being directed by the people who do that every day, for their livelyhood. Air Traffic Controllers.

What you're looking at is odd-looking, but there are more odd-looking patterns in the skies, in many locations.

QUOTE
I think there is a mystery her as to why are the contrails being deliberatly layed in patterns that change into light cirrus cover ?


Contrails are cirrus clouds...sometimes, they dissapate and spread. Sometimes, they quickly vanish, and sometimes they bend, many times only in one place along the contrail's tracing, and sometimes, you'll see them stop appearing, then re-appear later.

All of these things are common manifestations of contrails. The mechanics are all well understood.


QUOTE
I understand how your looking at it yet it dosent add up No your right planes do leave contrails .and the patterns or grid in the photo
is a contrail,But its not a normal contrail.


I understand contrails. I have left a few myself.
These are all normal contrails. What is an abnormal contrail to you?

QUOTE
Im sorry but your again extremly simplified explanations just dont add up to what is being witnessed



The question begs...what is being witnessed, or rather, what is being imagined?

Contrails are simple. They are very easy to understand. I give simple explanations of simple phenomena because they really are simple.


Rodack
Oh i see people are Imagining things now?Very well then i guess you have summed it all up then havent you?
so when i see planes flying back and forth creating a grid like in the op .its just my imagination they arent doing it while i watch
these are happeneing over time and far apart i imagined the rest of it? Hmmmm seems pretty unlikely that all these poeple
are imagining things? I have been told that I am not wrong for thinking something is happening.I havent been told what
just that im not crazy and that im not wrong by a very credible person in my life.I dont have the answers of what exactly is happening
But I like discussing it


Thank you for agreeing that the patterns in the op ar indeed Odd as in not your normal contrail patterns I dont dispute the mechanics of Contrails or the existence of contrails either.What I think i am seeing and reading about is related to Contrails as they are apparently adding some aersols to some of the contrails of some aircraft that seem to be dedicated to flying these patterns.I appreciate your explanation of ATC and what they do but some of what i have seen as well as what was in the Op here doesent seem to me to be addressed by that.Im really not of the mind that commercial aircraft are even invloved.and havent ruled out pilotless craft being used to fly some of the grids


It seems to me as i was saying earlier on in the discussion ,that if one wanted to watch the behavior of certain areas of the atmosphere it would be easy to watch for changs or roll over and shear point if there were Very Persistent contrails laden with aeresolized metals like aluminum and barium to attract more moisture to the contrail to hold it longer the chaffe in the trail would make it easily watchable by radar or whichever means they were using to track these items.they shear and other items are POSSIBLY being induced By Scalar weaponry used by Russia and china Based On nikola Tesla and his theories .if we can determine how they ar effecting the atmosphere and weather in a certain region we can combat it with our own scalar technology present at the Gakona station in Alaska


As well there are some other technologies that also rely on aeresolized metals for theyre work....and then there is the very real and practiced science of weather Modification But lets not intertwine the two as they ar seperate technologies weater modification is publicly discussed and practiced here and abroad they also use aeresols to disperse into the atmosphere BUT I DONT BELIEVE they have ANYTHING to do with CHEMTRAILS these seem to be Militarily used and defended with a FERVOR un parralelled in conspiracy circles



yes Contrails are Simple and easy to understand But thats NOT what we are discussing ????
Mostar
I live next to an airport, Surprize Surprize, i see "chemtrails" all the time, because the Aeroplanes fly above my head, leaving them at high atl.

its no big deal......
Waspie_Dwarf
QUOTE(Rodack @ Apr 12 2007, 06:06 AM) [snapback]1624887[/snapback]
Oh i see people are Imagining things now?Very well then i guess you have summed it all up then havent you?
so when i see planes flying back and forth creating a grid like in the op .its just my imagination they arent doing it while i watch
these are happeneing over time and far apart i imagined the rest of it?


No one has said this is imagination (have you read through the thread?) What they are saying is that these are not "chemtrails" but contrails that jet aircraft have always produced.

Also no one is saying that these grid patterns don't exist, what they are saying is that these are the normal flight patterns for aircraft.

If you are going to attack a point of view at least attack one that has actually been expressed.
Trinitrotoluene
QUOTE
Q
Chemtrails are often made side-by side, as if one or several planes have carefully flown a pattern to cover the entire sky. Why would commercial airliners do that?

A
Well, that will happen if they follow parallel courses for some reason, but mostly this phenomenon has a different reason: For safety reasons, air traffic is kept in corridors. The sky is actually full of one-way motorways. So the planes all follow identical courses, like beads on a continent-wide string. However, as mentioned in the article high winds prevail in those high altitudes, and the and the lane phenomenon is mostly due to cross-wind: The first plane makes a contrail, which drifts with the wind. Those winds are easily 100mph, so by the time the next plane comes along, the contrail from the first has drifted a considerable way to the side. As a long succession of planes fly the highway, each adds a new lane to the drifting pattern, till the sky is virtually striped. To verify this, watch a contrail while keeping reference to a ground-object (tree, mast, or tall building). You will see it drifting.

Q
Why is the sky sometimes covered by a checkerboard pattern?

A
Same reason as above, only you are watching one of the many places where corridors cross. They are not intersecting, because there is a difference in altitude, but that is not evident from the ground.

Q
Sometimes I see trails that go on and off so the resultant stripe is dashed. Surely planes do not turn their engines on and off like that?

A
No they don’t. But the boundary between the altitude where contrails form and where they don’t can be quite sharp, and not only can this boundary be at different height at different times, but there are very often a sort of waves in the air. If you have ever seen one of these time-compression movies of clouds, that wave motion can be very evident. When there is no clouds, we don’t see it, but it can still be there, and when a plane happens to fly right through these waves, you can see its contrail go on and off.

Q
Sometimes chemtrails look like they are dripping?

A
Contrails are a form of clouds, and they can take on strange shapes. In the wake of an airplane is a trail of quite violent turbulence. To generate lift, the wings have to push down on the air as they pass; this is a complex mechanism, but the bottom line is that to keep 70 tons of airliner airborne, you inevitably create a long wake of turbulence. Depending on conditions, this turbulent trail may twirl the contrail into quite exotic shapes.

Q
I once saw a picture of long stripes of quite thick and low-hanging clouds. Surely those are not contrails?

A
No, they are a natural phenomenon, although some of the mechanisms are the same. Especially on summer days, you will see these little cauliflower-shaped cumulus clouds. Often the sky is clear in the morning, then these little clouds begin to form, and by afternoon, it is semi-overcast. They are generated when the ground is heated by the sun. This makes the air rise over hot surfaces like cities, rocky surfaces, or open fields. When the warm, moist surface air reaches a certain altitude (depending on conditions this will happen between 500 yards and two miles up), it has expanded and cooled so much that the moisture condensates, and a cloud forms. If it is a calm day, it will more or less sit there and maybe grow big and strong, ending as a thundershower. If there is a fair to strong wind, however, the cloud drifts away from the area that started it. However, the condensation process releases heat, so once started, the cloud is self-sufficient: As it drifts along, it sucks up more moist air and can even grow this way. But the area that caused it to form will generate a new cloud, which will drift away, and after some time, we have long rows of clouds drifting across the sky. If the conditions are just right, they can form long, contiguous cloud stripes.

Q
I often see an extra high amount of chemtrails appearing just before a weather change, so I think they are doing something in order to influence the weather?

A
In fact it is the other way around: The change in weather influences the contrails. When the air becomes more moist at high altitudes, contrails are more likely to form and will persist longer. Ahead of an approaching front, especially a cold-front, the low-lying layers of air are pushed upwards. Rising air expands (because the pressure decreases) and expanding air gets colder, thus putting the moisture in it closer to the condensation limit, and more contrails form. The amount of planes is the same, but if they don’t form contrails, you are rarely going to notice a high-flying plane.

Q
Sometimes, the day starts out clear, then chemtrails are made, and into the afternoon, the sky gets totally hazed over.

A
As the sun heats the air, moist air rises. Sometimes it will form clouds, on other days it just generally pushes the whole column of air upwards, and come the afternoon a high-altitude haze forms. This is a normal weather-mechanism, and it is for this reason that sunsets are usually redder than sunrises. Except for the rare occasion of super-saturated air, contrails have nothing to do with it, except that they of course add to the hazy look of the sky.

Q
After days with lots of chemtrails, both I and others feel slick, coughing and having flu-like symptoms.

A
Well, contrails are most prominent on moist, hazy days. So is air-pollution. The hazy, possibly polluted air may make you cough and feel uncomfortable, but the culprit is the cars and chimneys right around you, not the planes passing miles over you. Watching the sky and imagining evil people spraying you isn’t going to make you feel any better.

Q
I have seen some photos where the trail starts right at the wings of the plane, even if the engines are rear-mounted. Surely those cannot be created by the exhaust?

A
No, those are created by the pressure-waves that exist around the wings. Those pressure-waves are basically what keeps the plane up, and in the right conditions, they can be seen, although they will mostly be difficult to see against the much more prominent contrail from the exhaust.

Q
I have seen photos of organic fibers and something that looked like blood-cells, collected on days with many chemtrails. Do you suggest that these reports are fake?

A
No, I have seen those micro-photos, and they seem genuine enough, but I find it extremely unlikely that they should come from high-flying planes. Just think about it: How fast do such near-microscopic particles fall? A few ft. per minute? Those planes fly at 30,000ft or even more. Microscopic particles and fine aerosols fall at maybe 2 ft. per minute or less, that means they would take about ten days to reach the ground from 30,000ft. And, of course, by that time they might have been carried a thousand miles from the release point. No, whatever is in those pictures is simply pollution, and if you want to find the source, you should not look up, but upwind.


http://www.hans-egebo.dk/skeptic/contrails.htm

This guy is pretty much saying exactly what I wanted to say.
Rodack
QUOTE
No one has said this is imagination (have you read through the thread?) What they are saying is that these are not "chemtrails" but contrails that jet aircraft have always produced.



QUOTE(MID @ Apr 10 2007, 01:23 AM) [snapback]1621245[/snapback]

The question begs...what is being witnessed, or rather, what is being imagined?



i was responding to this
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.