So who are the Satan worshippers? And why did the founder himself worship Satan and why did the original founders dated back to the Middle Ages worship Satan? It seems that we are talking about two different churches here. All the Satanist I have spoken with in person by the way represent themselves as worshippers of Satan and I am not talking about gothic punks I am talking about middle aged and over men and women who from what they say accually were in LaVey's accuall commune back when he founded it.
Certainly there are people who worship satan, and I Suspect that they would call themselves Satanists or Luciferians or the like\. However this is taken from a COS FAQ.
4.6. To apply the name of Satan to this church implies a connection
to the Bible. What is the stance of the CoS on these popular
tales and predictions? Who is Christ to the CoS?
We take the name Satan in concept only. Any other connection is
thrust upon us by anxious, ignorant, and/or misinformed people. The
archetype itself, by whatever name is appropriate, is far older
than Xtianity or Judaism, and it was these religions that, in order
to gain a foothold in the world, decided to destroy and bastardize
the "pagan gods." Satan has generally been the character who has
challenged sterile thought, encouraged indulgence, rebelled against
slavery, and truly represented human nature and all that the
mundane world offers. By extension, instead of worshipping Satan,
we emulate him. The Xtian bible was probably one of the greatest
pieces of propaganda (with Mein Kampf running a close second) in
world history but, quite frankly, we think that the intelligent
members of a scientifically, philosophically, and technologically
advanced civilization should logically cease to have a need for
such outmoded parables and slave ethics. But, seeing as insecurity
never goes out of style, those in need seek their baby-sitters in
whatever avenue is acceptable; in LaVey's words, a "privileged lie."
Many Satanists also view the Xtian bible as an example of mankind's
hypocrisy, incompetence, and spinelessness. Jesus Christ is the
paradigm for these qualities, and is thus reviled by Satanists.
How can anyone with human insight and reasonable logic skills
accept the phrase "the meek shall inherit the Earth" without
laughing? History certainly doesn't support this assertion. From my
experience, many people who call themselves Xtians are so merely by
convenience and not so much by a rational decision, if rationality is
possible. It's a truly insecure philosophy that demands its tenets
to be installed in humans from early childhood, because if it was
introduced for the first time to adults, many would raise their
eyebrows in suspicion and disgust. Many Xtians I've met haven't even
read their bible (at least, not critically), but keep the book on
their coffee table to appear "righteous." And, some just skip the
sanguine parts. Many of them really seem to "get off" on their
religion; the self-righteousness feeds their impoverished egos.
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/religions/satanism/cos/I think that explains it quite well. And that entire FAQ is interesting for anyone who really wants an understanding of the COS
And from your discription a Non-Thiest sounds like someone who takes and picks from both sides. As I like to call it stradling the fence and picking fruit from both trees on that are both on one side of the fence.
Nope. Merely a question of the Source of most Metaphysical activity. Personally I think that more or less all Metaphysical activities, including the creation and destruction of gods come from the mind of humans and anyother intelligent creature.
Also in the case of magic usage by Satanists, Lets say that I am a Satanist and you are a Athiest or Non-thiest who does not believe in magic but is interested in the church. Lets say I use a spell to protect you on your way home tonight. And so you drive home without even a CD skipping. The next day I walk up to you and ask you if you had a safe drive home. You reply yes and I state it is because of my spell. Now technically by the rules of the church magic was used and supposedly proven by a active member so now you must respect magic as being factual even though it may go against you beliefs. Or lets say you try a spell, maybe one to hook up with a hot girl in the bar you are at(lets also say you did the spell before you left to the bar) and a few hours later a girl comes up to you talks for a while and askes if you want to pull a one night stand. Now technically by the rule number seven your spell worked so now you must aknowlege magic as fact even though you are skeptical. Am I correct on the matter?
I think to use magic at all is a kind of off beat way to get what you want or do something in your life desperation or not. I think it accually makes on weak since you dont believe in yourself enough to solve problems for yourself or accept defeat. Where is the honor in using magic? Where is the selfrespect?
7. Acknowledge the power of magic if
have employed it successfully to obtain your desires. If you deny the power of magic after having called upon it with success, you will lose all you have obtained.
You see that subtle difference between what you have said and what the rule states? If YOU employ it. Not if someone else tells you that they have cast a spell to make you safe. But if you were to open a book of spells and try casting one, be it out of a sense of fun or desperation, and that spell were to help you obtain your desires then it would be extremely hypocritical to then claim magic does not exist.
Anyhow. I should point out that I am not a member of the COS but I do respect quite a few of their teachings, though the internal politics of the Church reminds me to strongly of other organized religions.