When I was browsing online about the Ashtar Command AKA Satan Command I noticed that the supposed picture of Ashtar looked a lot like the King of Mars photograph of my avatar, check it out....Its my personal opinion this is the face of Satan himself, but I think the coincidence between the two pictures is strikingly similiar

I'd like to add this link as well

http://www.mt.net/~watcher/angelicconspiracy.html

Satan Command huh?

Good grief!

Satan is referred to in the Bible as being "the prince of the powers of the air"

I wouldn't argue against that. That however doesn't mean Satan and Demons are flying around in UFOs either. You don't think Satan is responsible for Lightning, or Meteors do you?

Well,

My personal opinion is that aliens are either fallen angels who lost their looks in the war in heaven or a big hoax manifestation put on by Satan to make people ask well "why would god create alienz" sort of deal. I am more leaning to they are fallen angel breed and I believe the anti-christ has a squad of "enlightened ones" who are going to come down during the tribulation period in spacecraft to deceive those who are left on earth during those times. There are many versus in the bible that may hint to POSSIBLY something like this happening. Ashtar is a collective entity that makes contact with new age channelers and preaches things like "love one another" and "we are your gods"...they even have their own phony Jesus. I think the being depicted as Ashtar in that pic is either the exact image of satan pre-fall, or pretty darn close...let me state this is clearly my opinion. I just thought it was very odd the similarities between the two photos...why would there be a human face on mars?

holy **** that face looks so real

Yes...yes it does

That's kinda like someone drawing a picture of someone resembling the face of the Sphinx, and commenting as to how similar they look...

How does that correlate between those two photos that I posted? Are you saying someone drew that ashtar pic from the king of mars pic?

If that's the best Ashtray can do, it is not very impressive. Whether from orbit, or on the surface, that certainly looks like just more Martian terrain.

People who study geology and planetary geology of other bodies in the solar system, see all sorts of patterns at the surface. Plus, perspective is important. If you zoom in, it is just rocks and caves and ravines and grit and sand.

Your "angel" is some generic northern european unisex face. They are a dime a dozen.

Yep.

Satan is pretty for a blonde . I think it seems to be photoshoped. The chin definition is too similar to the drawn photo.

i have to say... that is my all time favorite site on the net... i've been following the information on that site since my sophmore year in highschool...

I don't get it. Is there a reason no one has pointed out that the "face on mars" comparison photo is doctored? Did I miss something? You do know that's not a real photo of the face right?

how do you know its not real? because NASA/the government tells you its fake? I wouldnt trust in them. I cant prove to you its real, but i'm pretty sure you cannot provide concrete evidence to prove to me its fake.

Sssshhhhhhhhh!

You're clearly injecting logic where it isn't wanted. This thread is about comparing an imaginary picture of the Devil to an imaginary picture of an imaginary face on Mars. Even given the post-modern state of the world, I find that a little too meta.

--Jaylemurph

Ok like I said folks show me some documents not from NASA or the GOV saying this picture is false. Perhaps maybe the "artist" himself who rendered it? If so I will lean more toward it being a hoax...till then I am keeping an open mind to the POSSIBILITY the king of mars pic is legit...

They're not saying it's false because it's not. If you look at anything from the right angle at the right distance you can make out a shape that could 'mean' something, in this case, and most commonly, a face. It's not abnormal, it's in us to spot faces in random things (clouds, rock formations, smudges on glass, etc).

But still, why are you comparing a DRAWN picture to that REAL picture? I mean, if you were comparing two REAL photo's I'd say you had something, but a DRAWN one...

Actually you are presenting the idea. Therefore you have the obligation of presenting your case or referencing your ideas, and everyone else has only the obligation of hearing your case or entertaining your ideas.

Where anyone to be forced to "show" anything it would be the person presenting the ideas.

Pareidolia

http://skepdic.com/pareidol.html

RAMS

Well the drawn photo was done by a new ager who receives telepathic communication from this ashtar collective. i feel the drawn photo is a real picture of an entity, my guess would be satan, my opinion however...and i just thought ashtar looked like the king of mars picture...i just thought it was a strange coincidence...

Great! So it can be said with absolute certainty that this information is completely derived from outside sources that are wholly independent of UAP activity.

That's all that needs to be said.

Why are we even posting replies to crack pot theories.......oh god i'm doing it too..DOH

We don't need to. A huge face on Mars. Hmmmm. Let me think about that. What are the odds of it actually being a face? Astronomically against it. There. Thats your proof.



Right. Let me get this straight. You DON'T believe NASA, who have a good half a century's worth of scientific, empirical research behind them, and present almost all of their scientific findings to the public for free on the internet, but you DO believe someone who claims to recieve communucation from a fictional space collective?

I just looked up the Ashtar Collective. Heres what i found:

http://www.luisprada.com/Protected/ashtar_...and_mission.htm

"Integrated to the Intergalactic Command and in Active Service for the Light Planet Earth
Addressed by the "Holy Chief" Ashtar Sheran from Venus"

VENUS??? COME ON.

No, actually I AM saying that the "Mars face" photo presented here is doctored. I'm saying that because it is. The proof is that NASA never released that photo like that. They didn't release it because it doesn't exist. Someone took the photo of the "face" and doctored it and this dude believes it's real and now we all have to suffer for it trying to explain the obvious.

It's not like there are infinite sources for photos on Mars. Either NASA released this or they didn't. They didn't. End of fairytale.

Like I said earlier, we're clearly injecting a sense of rationalism where it isn't wanted.
It's like when people find random moments of porn on children's cartoon VHS tapes -- it's not what's expected, it doesn't mesh with the context, and it's generally offensive to the intended audience.

... doesn't mean it's not a little funny to watch, though.

--Jaylemurph

Tough crowd

I dont see it. And I dont think the devil put his face on Mars.

Ok then where is God if satan is in the air? Could God be in the air as well?