QUOTE(skyeagle409 @ Apr 9 2007, 02:27 AM) [snapback]1619433[/snapback]
What I find amazing is, that despite what has happened over the decades as far as UFOs are concerned, there are still scientist who think that there is nothing to investigate despite the fact that aircraft were scrambled to intercept the UFOs and visual contact made by the aircrews in many cases, of metallic saucer-shaped, cigar-shaped, triangular-shaped flying objects and other shapes, which were also tracked on the screens of airborne and ground-based radars.
The characteristics of their performance, as recorded via a number of electronic and optical means, exclude conventional aircraft. UFOs have interfered with our nuclear assets and continue to present a safety-of-flight hazard to military and commercial air traffic around the globe and still, they say there is nothing to investigate.
In the world-view of many science types, if the data doesn't come from the scientific method, then it doesn't exist. Of course the problem there is the scientific method assumes that the experimenter either has control over the subject, or the subject will reoccur at a predictable time & place. Worse, instead of trying to explain these things, many scientists work instead to explain them away. Venus, Swamp Gas, Car headlights, sleep paralysis, temporal lobe epilepsy, drugs, hallucinations, fantasy-proneness, etc. Then they'll believe that because UFOs might be explained by one or more of the above, there's nothing to investigate. Problem is, those psycological & neurological explanations could theoritically mimic virtually any kind of human experience. IE If someone was hallucinating that burglers were breaking into his house, does that mean burglers don't exist? Of course not.