QUOTE(hewa @ Apr 10 2007, 01:12 PM) [snapback]1621431[/snapback]
You misunderstood me, the grimreaper is a complete myth, it fits into all the symbolic characteristcs, the myth and the experience of the uncle-in-law were completely seperate. However, reflecting on this now, it is possible that the tales of the grim reaper are misinterpreted astral-projections of near-death-experiencees, and that the fact had myths added onto it. All myths come from some facts people just don't understand. Now that I think of it, the whole typical grim reaper comes from the Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens, not as the Grim Reaper, nor holding all of his characteristics, but the robe, boney finger and the hidden face, and it evolved into a modern grim reaper. The fact is that Charles Dickens uses the Ghost of Christmas yet to come to show death as the future holds, since no one can live forever, and after which people have believed that Charles Dickens was hiding some truth in what he had said. So the Grim Reaper is a myth, credits to Charles Dickens and LATER mixed Astral projections in future 'accounts'.
I know what you meant, the Reaper was a myth, then some people started to believe, then more, and more. After a while people who believed would say they saw him, including before and after someone dies, it's there minds way of dealing with the grief, by creating something that is not there.
I believe it is true, not because it actually exists, but because it is created by the mind. The Reaper was probably created by someone who wanted to scare others.
So as I said before I don't think it is an actual thing, it's just a creation of the mind, but the mind truly believes it is there.