i dreamed this entire post last night... lol... so i figured i'd post it...
Disclaimer: when i use the word EVOLUTION, i'm talking about the specific part of the theory that one species (ex. hippo) will turn into a completely different species (ex. whale)
the word CREATIONISTS refers to Christians in a broad sense...
sorry for leaving everyone else out... too much ground to cover
In The Beginning
Creationists
believe that God is eternal and always existed... no one knows how are where He came from...
Evolutionists
believe this was random chance started by an infinitely dense speck of space dust/singularity/cosmic egg...
no one knows where it came from or how it came to exist....
Origins of Life
Creationists
God created every thing and gave it life...
the evidence used is the fact that we exist...
Evolutionists
believe life beginwith Abiogenesis - the theory that non living matter gave rise to living matter, but only once...
the evidence used is that fact that we exist
The Rise of Man
Creationists
God formed man from the clay and breathed life into his body...
no evidence for it...
Evolutionists
believe man slowly evolved from lower species until we came to be what we are now...
lacking fossil record and observation... so there is no evidence for it (ideas and theories don't count as evidence)
Faith Based Belief System
Creationists
base their faith on the Bible...
various stories and experience written in 66 books/letter by at least 40 people over thousands of years
Evolutionists
originally based their belief on an idea of a single person before any "evidence came in"
The Evidence For Both Sides
Creationists
base their belief on what they observe in nature... nature itself is the evidence for a creator
evolutionists argue that observation of nature is not proof
Evolutionists
base their beliefs on the observation of Charles Darwin who came to his conclusion by observing nature
evolutionists argue that this is science and is evidence of evolution...
Personal Comment
i wanted to comment on the section directly above...
why is it considered science for Darwin and not for Christians?
it can't work both ways... either it's science or not...
either Darwin went about it scientifically... which would make the Christian observation also scientific..
if not... then Darwin wasn't using science but faith... which would mean science founded evolution on faith...
Missionaries
Creationists
try to convince people of the THEORY that God created everything...
methods: t.v., radio, tracts, newsletters, websites, email, etc...
evidence to date: nothing... just a bunch of ideas and opinions
Evolutionists
try to convince people of the THEORY that one animal can turn into a completely different animal given enough time
methods: t.v., radio, tracts, newsletters, websites, email, etc...
evidence to date: nothing... just a bunch of ideas and opinions
Conclusion
i honestly don't see one single difference in what makes EVOLUTION an actual science vs. it being a religion...
according to scientists Darwin based his theory on observation which is science...
so the Christian observation that God exists IS ALSO a science...
if Christian observation is not considered science
then that means Darwin took a leap of faith when he came up with the theory of evolution... (i repeated the above in case anyone forgot)
so the question is... what makes EVOLUTION (remember the disclaimer) a science?
is it simply the fact that someone decided to say... "this is science because we said so?"
is it because scientists study what they have in order to persue a BELIEF that they THINK to be true?
Christians also study what they have in order to persue a BELIEF that we THINK to be true... so why isn't that considered science?
i'm just asking everyone for their opinions to those 4 questions... this is not to prove one or the other false...
no posting of articles... just your OWN OPINION about the questions...
Provide Links If You Have Them
Evolutionists
1) the fossils cannot be drawn/painted/illustrated in anyway... must be actual photos...
2) if the link you provide contains known hoaxes... please acknowledge it when you post it...
3) the fossils should show an example of this: hippo, stage after hippo... and so on until you reach a whale... (feel free to pick any species you want)
4) New findings in the DNA code
5) please DO NOT provide links to fossils that are the same type of animal... (ex. multiple Trilobyte fossils... they are ALL still Trilobytes)
6) please do not post links to OPINIONS or THEORIES... please only post actual findings
Creationists
1) examples of animals that defy evolutionary theory (ex. incubator bird or platypus)
2) examples of fossil hoaxes that have been PROVEN... not just suspected (ex. Nebraska Man or Piltdown man)
3) New findings in the DNA code
4) please do not posts OPINIONS or THEORIES or SERMONS or BIBLE STUDIES... please only post actual findings...
The Goal
1) we all participate in gathering the evidence for each side (TRUE science)
2) we all provide feedback on the evidence provided and show how it supports or doesn't support your side
3) if you comment on someone else post... please no INSULTS aimed at the individual (UM rules anyway)
4) please state what significance your post has to your religion/science
since both sides will be skeptics and religon... i put this thread in this section...
so if you want to participate... bring it...
hopefully EVERYONE from BOTH sides will view the information provided and learn something...
if we post actual findings instead of opinions... maybe we can all expand our frame of reference and truly understand both sides of the coin...
which IMO is vastly more productive than throwing insults and questionable opinions...