Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Pyramid UFO's [Taken from Pyramid Cam]
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Extraterrestrial Life & The UFO Phenomenon
Graylady
linked-image
linked-image
linked-image
linked-image
linked-image
linked-image
linked-image

http://www.pyramidcam.com/

cool site..

Does anyone know if there is any "No Fly Zone" restriction law over pyramid?
Jjbreen
Umm - this has already been posted and it was found to be a hoax. The UFO is a car that is cut/pasted into the photograph. If you look at the second one down and zoom in - you can see the hood, the door, front main window and such. It's just another sad hoax - unless we've actually master flying cars!! grin2.gif But I don't think we have yet.
Graylady
are you talking about the second one???

all 3 pictures are different sightings..if you visit that site then you can see that they take pictures of pyramid everyday...

i don't think that all of them can be hoaxes...

Colbert Nation
wow, more blurry non-conclusive pictures...absolutley amazing thumbsup.gif
Cinders
I've watched that interesting cam on occassion.

Back on Feb. 14 2007 I caught several things over the pyramids I took a few screen shots.

I compiled the images in sequential order to view as a swf. Unfortunately for some reason imageshack is not working properly -- might try it later.
So for now I had to upload this over on Putfile. (not as good to view in larger size but at least it's working)

Things seen over Pyramids Feb 14 2007
Jjbreen
Ok - I'll guess that you do not know how to examine photos w/a photo editor?

Picture 01: (Egypt 01)
Can you tell me two things that are obvious in this picture that make it more than just questionable?
Click to view attachment

Hint: Notice how parts of the surrounding UFO is missing - just cut off.

Hint: Download the picture and zoom in on the UFO. Notice 'grain print of the surrounding sky outside of the square and then notice the 'grain print' inside the UFO area square. Two totally different 'grain prints'. They would have been the same if this was all the same pic.

Picture 20: (Egypt 02)
This one is seriously just to obvious a "fixed" picture I should not even need to point out the flaws in this one.
Click to view attachment

Picture 03: Egypt 03
This is just the above picture compressed to 480x360 and darkened some - the EXACT same picture as Picture 02. All you need do is to brighten the picture as shown.
Click to view attachment

Picture 04: Egypt 04
This is simply the same 'object' (car) that is in picture 02 and 03. Made darker looking and zoomed in on. I simply brightened the picture and guess what you see.
Click to view attachment

Picture 05: Egypt 05
One this could just about be anything. When you zoom in as I did and lighten the picture some it does resemble a plane. Not saying it is or isn't - I'm saying the picture is simply not good enough to say it's not a plane.
Click to view attachment

Picture 06: Egypt 06
Capella (Star)
Capelle (Alpha Aurigae) is the brightest star in the constellation Auriga. It is located 42 Light Years from Earth. It has a magnitude of 0.1 = Very Bright and absolute mag of -0.5 (again very bright).
It has the luminosity of 162 Suns. (So take our Sun and multiply it's brightness 162x's.

I did semi-fast forward the stars motion and it did follow the small limited trail of the star in the picture. So it would be a safe bet: Capella.

Here is the thing - both of these stars show 'motion' as our planet spins - so a camera that is not tracking it would show 'motion trail'.

The above is all based on the date and time stamp on the picture.

I have often stated: to be in this field you really need a working knowledge of:
Astronomy - Astro-physics.
Buy a good astronomy program so that you can check the night skies at a given time of sighting - IF at night.

A good photo editor software program.
So you can zoom in.
Change the brightness / contrast.
Just give a picture a good look see.

All these pictures have very good natural explinations - nothing ET about them at all.
Cinders
Jjbreen.. The owners of that web cam VERIFY that an image someone sees and sends to them MATCHES with what they on record - they keep it in their database and before releasing a questionable image they verify that it is the same image that they have.

I spotted one a few months back and submitted it to them.. they posted about it, but explained it was probably from a Leonids Meteor Shower. Others posted there are explained that they are probably meteors but others are unknowns. BUT they don't post up "photoshopped" images there.
Unlimited
I got this one off a washington cam...interesting pics greylady....
Jjbreen
QUOTE(Cinders @ Apr 24 2007, 10:47 AM) [snapback]1644263[/snapback]
Jjbreen.. The owners of that web cam VERIFY that an image someone sees and sends to them MATCHES with what they on record - they keep it in their database and before releasing a questionable image they verify that it is the same image that they have.

I spotted one a few months back and submitted it to them.. they posted about it, but explained it was probably from a Leonids Meteor Shower. Others posted there are explained that they are probably meteors but others are unknowns. BUT they don't post up "photoshopped" images there.

Well all I can say is the evidence speaks for itself. The first FOUR pictures are al the same picture.
The object is NOT an orginal part of the picture - this is all to obvious to see.
Doesn't even take a photo expert to see this, it is obvious that this was a cut/paste job and not a good one at that.
-- So my question is why do we have four different pictures w/3 of them altered (this is obvious).

The 5th Picture is likely a plane and nothing that extraordinary - the blur makes it well blur. Sharping the picture and cleaning it up as much as is possible for a webcam - it pretty much looks like it could easily be a plane.

The 6th Picture is the star mentioned - so no problem there.

Jj -
Colbert Nation
QUOTE(limited @ Apr 24 2007, 12:55 PM) [snapback]1644286[/snapback]
I got this one off a washington cam...interesting pics greylady....


Yes, that is a very interesting balloon...
Jjbreen
QUOTE(limited @ Apr 24 2007, 10:55 AM) [snapback]1644286[/snapback]
I got this one off a washington cam...interesting pics greylady....

Limited - there are two points in this picture that suggest that this was cut & paste too.

Here are the close ups of the two pieces that don't fit. They have been seriously added into the picture -aka- cut and pasted. Here they are enlarged in the picture.
Click to view attachment
lost_shaman
QUOTE(Jjbreen @ Apr 24 2007, 06:06 PM) [snapback]1644752[/snapback]
Limited - there are two points in this picture that suggest that this was cut & paste too.

Here are the close ups of the two pieces that don't fit. They have been seriously added into the picture -aka- cut and pasted. Here they are enlarged in the picture.
Click to view attachment


Jj,

I think your confusing pixelation and compresion as sure signs of manipulation. They are not.

Look here a random webcam shot of D.C. I pulled, notice the pixelation.

linked-image


Jjbreen
QUOTE(lost_shaman @ Apr 24 2007, 07:21 PM) [snapback]1644973[/snapback]
Jj,

I think your confusing pixelation and compresion as sure signs of manipulation. They are not.

Look here a random webcam shot of D.C. I pulled, notice the pixelation.

linked-image

No - I'm aware of pixilation - if you look at the two objects blown up - there are clear indicators that these were copied and pasted - the reflection in the lake - blow up - note just the four dark corners and that if you go outside the square there is no - zero indication that these should even be here. I copied beyond the 'square' of the object on purpose to show these 'marks' that are pretty 'B&W' of pasted from another picture.

As for the "air object" notice the clear indication that they croped just a tad to close on the R-Side and well not enough on the L-Side.

Jj -
Emma_Acid
I just don't see why blurry blobs on a photo are any more valid as UFO photos simply because they have the pyramid in shot. Like there's any source outside of science fiction and crack pot theorists that associate the pyramids with aliens. Its just dumb.
Jjbreen
QUOTE(Emma_Acid_88 @ Apr 25 2007, 07:33 AM) [snapback]1645571[/snapback]
I just don't see why blurry blobs on a photo are any more valid as UFO photos simply because they have the pyramid in shot. Like there's any source outside of science fiction and crack pot theorists that associate the pyramids with aliens. Its just dumb.

I can answer that - people want to be important, need attention - to fill their attention deficit disorder. Then people wonder why this isn't taken seriously??? blink.gif

Plus as one person put it, I like seeing just how stupid people will choose to get to believe. I don't agree w/him and have stated so - but then he's proven his scams accurate. Some people get pretty stupid just to believe.

With so many bogus, hoaxed, scams, mis-ID and such - it's going to take very extreme evidence to make this field go any where at all.
Unlimited
QUOTE(Jjbreen @ Apr 24 2007, 11:06 PM) [snapback]1644752[/snapback]
Limited - there are two points in this picture that suggest that this was cut & paste too.

Here are the close ups of the two pieces that don't fit. They have been seriously added into the picture -aka- cut and pasted. Here they are enlarged in the picture.
Click to view attachment


it came directly from the cam..it wasnt cut and pasted and that airspace is restricted...
Jjbreen
QUOTE(limited @ Apr 25 2007, 08:50 AM) [snapback]1645730[/snapback]
it came directly from the cam..it wasnt cut and pasted and that airspace is restricted...

Says who? What validation do we have this? Because the picture speaks for itself.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.