if this is not human made pyramids

people, those hills are the craziest hills i ever seen in my life

latest findings that there is magnetic field around bosnia pyramids


bosnian sun pyramid







bosnian moon pyramid








if this is not human made , hm

what do you think , is this human made pyramid or what ???

wow, thanks for the pics, they are amazing. The first one looks quite large. IMO there is no way that those are natural.

sun pyramid


this is what they found on moon pyramid

yeah, i don't see how they could be natural. it's pretty amazing that they are so overgrown

not only that there is network of tunels in the valley of bosnian pyramids






this is what they found on moon pyramid, nobody knows what this is






this is on the top of moon pyramid

I think we are just starting to scrape the surface of our past. There is so much evidence and learning we need to experience yet before we can even come up with a hint as to who built these, how they are connected to other pyramids and why they were built.

Erm... if I recall correctly there is a Roman Settlement on one of the hills which includes tunnels, which accounts for the pictures above...

Lets not get too carried away until the archaeologists have dug it up eh

only on the top of bosnian sun pyramid

So the Romans only put a building in one place?

INDEED IT WAS AN OUTPOST.
if you wanted to debunk the idea it would make much more sense if you used "VISOKI" (once Bosnian capital) it was located on TOP of the hill... and this is what it looked like


however lets face it it was on top of the hill and TUNNELS spread for miles in all directions away from the hill... this would make no sense if they used tunnels for escape... why build in all directions lol ....

anyhow admins please merge this with other pyramid topic ???

I'm just saying that people get very excited about the pyramid theory and don't explore all the possibilites for the evidence.

Its still early days yet and there is little professional excavation - these things take years to investigate.

Once I see the excavation reports with any material culture recovered, then I can explore what is going on in the area. Without structured details all this supposition is just that - supposition.

Besides, if you want to know if the hills are a natural formation, all you need to do is ask a geologist

well i am sorry but all i can tell you is LOOK on the OTHER thread loads of more information for you there ... about 200 pages worth

In a region that's been inhabited for thousands of years, it's amazing they're uncovered so few traces of human settlement and building .... Except the medieval well Most of what looks artificial is actually natural bedrock made to look that way by the excavation methods (which, you'll note, consist of digging narrow sections into a steep hillside, levelled off with another section dug above and also levelled, to give the false impression in photographs that the actual hillside consists of pyramidal type blocks).

WHO SAID that todays humans couldnt build a pyramid huh ?

I haven't seen anything convincing yet.. sorry but that's my opinion

... to escape in any direction?

tunnels go for miles... most escape tunnels are made just to lead out of the city's .... however even if this is part of the "VISOKI" i say its something that hasnt been known to bosnian people and Osmanagic was one who "Showed" it to us...

well there is no way for me to convince you and i am not really going to try... what the heck. you got your opinion and I got mine all we can do now is sit back, relax, and watch the info that flows in only way that you can change your mind or i can change mine is "Brake through" by osmanagich and boys so lets hope it happens this year

lol
I agree

first artifact found in tunels, some kind of stone wheel

Very interesting, Aragon. I also heard that they have found some ancient inscriptians in one of those tunnels. Osmanagic is getting someone in to se if those are possible letters, signs or just natural marks. He is not sure about that and does not want to speculate.

Anyways, it is getting interresting.

10 May 2007 Tunnel excavations reveal new clues

Work in the tunnels in at Ravne is progressing according to schedule. The excavations are expected to reveal the truth, or otherwise, of local
stories in which people in the past are said to have entered the tunnels and emerged at the top of
the Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun. This week the Foundation revealed images of objects found
inside the tunnels, including a wheel-shaped stone and the image of a fish cut into rock.

possible new artifact found in tunels

on top of the moon pyramid

Could you explain what this means.

thos stone blocks are on the top of the bosnian moon pyramid


more photos

Meanwhile, the professional community has become more outspoken, notably with a recent field trip to the site by Anthony Harding, who is president of the European Association of Archaeologists, and in response to a proposed UNESCO mission to the site.
I am with Themis on this one. It's all about credibility of Osmanagic.

"First off, by way of summarizing it all, we are still awaiting any credible evidence that these hills are man-made pyramids and that they date to the end of the Ice Age. That's the big claim, and the burden of proof is on those making it. Semir Osmanagic says, "It's such a huge construction undertaking that the only answer is, yes, this is the work of a supercivilization" (see "Pyramid Scheme" in the July/August issue of ARCHAEOLOGY; abstract here). But where are the artifacts? Where are the settlements in which the people lived? Where are the dates?

"Not any evidence at all has been found," says Harding, quoted by the Associated Press. "I've seen the site, in my opinion it is entirely natural." But the same article, widely carried with slight variations (here is one example), still describes Osmanagic as "the amateur Bosnian archaeologist who has been investigating Latin American pyramids for 15 years." The conclusions reached by him, that the Maya originally came from outer space, identify the kind of researcher Mr. Osmangic is, but that's ignored by the reporter."

This link is quite enlightening

http://www.archaeology.org/online/features...gic/update.html

You know it's possible this is just a natural hill that's been used for agricultural purposes. The whole step levelling you see was used alot in the past, I remember seeing it in the Troodos mountains in Cyprus and thinking there must be structures there years ago, but I know now it's just a farmind technique. Just a theory anyway.

on bosnian moon pyramid

I have seen the signe on the middle picture somewhere. Can not remember where. This is going to bugg me now.

what do you think about that, is it natural or man made sign ?????

for me it looks man made, if it was nature it would be crazyyyyyyyyyy , to make it so beautiful in the stone

Serious? Harding are asking for evidence such as artifacts and settlements. Didnt theese excavations start just a year ago? What do he expect after just scraping the surface on the hills/pyramids? Excavations in Troy started in the 1870s and are still going on..
If this this prove to be pyramids do he think they will find remains of settlements on the pyramid walls, or? Of course there will be no settlements there!
My guess such traces are buried under the city of Visiko and its surroundings. The flat sediment banks on the sides of the rivers are the places where people probably would build cities.

This looks like models for spearheads and probably some kind of axe.... Interesting.

For me there is no doubd that it is man made. The only two questions are how old this structure is and how much of it IS man made.

The way I see it, there is a combination of natural and man made, which raises an even more intriguing question: What culture was able to come up with the Idea to combine the natural and man made.
This culture was far more advanced then we want to confess. And to confess - this is the main reason why some of the scientists are negativ about the Pyramids. They have then to change and question all that what they know and teach.

The second question is the age. If the tip of the pyramid shows it is e.g. 2000 or 3000 thousend years old, the base might show an even older date. How long did it take to build it from the begining to the end???

Lots of questions.

I think you misunderstand the tenor of the article that Harding wrote. He is no way suggesting that he expects to find remains of settlements on the walls. He is arguing that for such a huge construction there would have to be similar remains of settlements nearby. Unfortunately no such remains have been found (yet). Visiko is quite an ancient site and I would have to agree with Harding that during various phases of reconstruction somebody would have come across such evidence.

The previous post shows, quite clearly, natural limestone (guessing limestone, but sedimentary nonetheless) bedrock formation, it does not suggest the hand of man. Whether man decided to "chisel" the shape of a pyramid from the natural bedrock is another question though, and one that will be answered in time. It would be an equally astounding feat.

Totally agree, they look like moulds for casting a spear-head and an axe of some kind. The stone it is carved into is hard to identify, and I would be interested to know from the sampling if Bronze, iron, or copper was the die material. I would like to know also if it was found in-situ.

Settlements? This is another game that Harding is playing.

The Settlement in Giza were discovered only a few years ago. This changed the idea that the Pyramids were built by slaves.
Now, mr. Harding is asking to see settlements in visoko??? Wait, it took us centuries to discover Gizas secrets. Time will tell and prove.

Cant see any signs of a hole where an axle might be placed though!

Being Osmanagic, he will declare them to be made by Aliens!!

Is it not valid to ask the question?
And Harding will not jump to any romantic notions of a man-made pyramid in Bosnia, because there is simply NO evidence for it. The same area has dozens of "pyramidal" structures.
In England (Portsmouth) there is an island called "Whale" island - and it does look like a whale from the air. But nobody is suggesting that it is actually a man-made construct from the last ice-age.
Osmanagic is such a joke in Archaeological circles... he rushes forward with his own notions and tries to make the facts fit his own theories and agenda. But then... he does make money (like Erich von Daniken) with his wild and unsubstantiated claims.

ok so what now ???
you have stated your opinion
so had HARDING
and So has OSMANAGICH
who is right ??
Who Is Wrong ???
idk... No One Knows ... all we can do is sit and wait until such time when we have enough evidence to say "HE IS RIGHT"

you stating your opinion and arguing does NOTHING digging will continue with or without your mine or anyones support so whats the point of arguing about it ...

you have FIRM belief that Its Natural... K .... Great... I Don't.. so why don't we wait and see who is right and who is wrong instead of idk bashing people we have NEVER MET ???

it this is natural i will jump through my window down on the street and kill myself

this have to be man-made engraving

I agree that looks non-natural.

No i didnt misunderstand Harding, but the excavations are being done at various sites on the hills. Early settlements could lie bellow the surface today and could also have been found earlier, but maybe nobody took notice? I mean some remains could be miscorrectly be taken for roman buildings etc because we dont excpect to find something else in this region. The romans did also many times build their buildings on sites of older buildings. Baalbek is one such example.
Have there been any major excavations in Visiko earlier?

A skeptic would say that this is formed by a puddle on a flat mud-shale. Mud-shale is a usually flat plate-like rock and sometimes has leaves or other fossils in it.

I am interested to know why in all of these pictures there is no scalar used to give us an idea of the size of artifact or object in question,.

If this "dig" is professionally led then I would expect to see such indications. The pictures in the public domain suggest that it is by any account, a very amateur probing.

The unidentified marking on the stone, the one that looks like a lady's shoe, may be 1 centimetre long, or one metre long!

One thing that is certain is that these artefacts have been moved from their original site and cleaned up for photographic clarity. This will make them worthless in determining their provenance with the surrounding site. I hope that all the meticulous grouindwork was completed before moving them. I am also concerned that it appears that Joe Public is also being allowed access at the moment which might also be destroying vital evidence.

and what makes u think they were MOVED from what i see they are exactly where they were found (shoe Picture)

that is so awesome...the wheel thing is very interesting...seems like theyve mastered carving stuff that can be usefull to them for everyday life...its broken though...and some parts are missing...also it has no hole in the middle...perhaps it was used as a marker or a little stand for valuable things to put on.

photos from bosnian moon pyramid