Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: How to build a pyramid.
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Ancient Mysteries & Alternative History
Marchimedes
Oh my, did someone screw up and leave the door unlocked?

I'm back. Seems last go round I ruffled a few feathers. Oh my. I'll behave this time. (Yea, right, oh, damn, did I type that out loud? How do I delete this, maybe where it says...submit).

You may remember me. I'm the humble guy with the pleasant personality and charming disposition that had the perfect pyramid construction theory that know one could find a flaw with but my attitude so upset some of you that you tried to make up flaws anyway then I commenced with the caving in of skulls and slinging bodies around untill I got banned.

But did you see how much play that thread got?

Record breaking I say.

Well, it's been a while, and I've been working steady on my lil' pyramid thing. Probably 100,000 views so far around the net, no, nary the flaw, still, upgraded my game with the images and it carries on.

But YOU don't deserve that cause you are all sensative and when you call me names and I call them back you go run and tell.

But we all know the theory is solid. Like me.

So I'll let you have some anyway...

So, gonna try this again. I've gotten WAY better. looking around here, same ol same ol.

Hang on, this could get ugly.


linked-image
Marchimedes
linked-image
Marchimedes
linked-image
Marchimedes
linked-image

linked-image
lil gremlin
i like your drawings marchimedes.
your theory is definately worth checking out...have you thought of submitting it to some uni or egyptology dept.?
grin2.gif
Marchimedes
QUOTE(lil gremlin @ May 7 2007, 04:20 PM) [snapback]1664147[/snapback]
i like your drawings marchimedes.
\

Marchimedes, get it right for histories sake and thanks.
QUOTE
your theory is definately worth checking out...have you thought of submitting it to some uni or egyptology dept.?
grin2.gif


Of course I have, do it all the time. And write about the process extensively on my home site.

Sumpin you gotta understand here, everything that has come before me is wrong, dead wrong, they weren't even close. And these are guys who do TV and documentaries, books, teach at universitys, do radio, and they are wrong. I'm ending carreerrs and they are doing their best to ignore me. I'm taking thier goose that lays the goldren egg. They can't discredit my theory cause it works. The only thing they can do is hope I go away. Do you see that happening. The really bad thing for them is I get huge views wherever I go with this, so they can't sweep it under the carpet. I get checked by folks who read this just for the humor and insults, they can't compete with that.

I haven't wrote Dr. Hawwas yet. Soon. By summers end at the latest.

These are like 1/4 of my material allready finished. just for pyramids. Lke i said, there's obelisks, lots of back and forth, finer block moving methods.

Folks, this has been done solved for 2 years.

But I rubbed some the wrong way last time I was here.

Too bad for you guys.


Can I post links here?

One link to my thread some other site that has all this?
Marchimedes
While you all screw around deciding if you want to know the truth or not, let's have some fun before getting back into the cohronological building of a pyramid.

Days I get bored I play some, keeps the kids interested in my theory. See, cladking, on my home site my thread has none of that, "but, it won't, you're a whack job, aliens I say" none of that, they just kinda nod their heads and go, "duh, that make sence", then gone on about thier bidness.

Pretty soon you are gonna realize what a bunch of rookies you are. Then I get banned. Again.

If there is sumpin you don't understand, ask. if it don't make sence that means you are not bright enough to understand it without me holding your hand.

Oh, cladking? How about a little work on your presentation. i didn't make it through one post before I nodded off.

Lemme show you how it's done...

linked-image



Yea, it's gonna be like that. Keep reading, you don't have to admit you enjoy it.

So, did any of you know about that dent in the pyramid? Prove it. Link to where you pointed it out.


And yea, that be me, had to don the foil hat so this friggin wing nut site don't contaminate my colossal brain.


You are so not ready for what is coming.
cladking
I hate to break this to you guy but you've entirely missed the most important
aspect of making a huge pile of rock. -The pile!!!! There are thousands of ways
to move rocks around on a flat or nearly flat surface and they require very little
lifting.

How do you get them in a pile?

Were all your safes on the ground floor? wink2.gif
Marchimedes
QUOTE(cladking @ May 7 2007, 05:21 PM) [snapback]1664255[/snapback]
I hate to break this to you guy but you've entirely missed the most important
aspect of making a huge pile of rock. -The pile!!!! How do you get them in a pile?

Were all your safes on the ground floor? wink2.gif


So you are saying you are with me so far?

Nuthin wrong?

How would you know?

You know, I've got a couple of gazillion more images on file.

Lemme ask ya.

That the best you got?

And sport, did ya notice how I got the block out of the quary pit, onto my road, with simple rollers and levers up 6" steps?

5 steps going up to a level of 2 1/2'. Just like the average height of each of the 203 levels.

See there Mr. Magoo, the answer to your question is in those first 3 posts of mine. But you are so gung ho and incompetant in the world of moving heavy stuff it flew by you.

You don't catch on very fast, do you?



QUOTE
There are thousands of ways
to move rocks around on a flat or nearly flat surface and they require very little
lifting.


Thousands of ways eh? I'll go a dozen or so. Lettuce hear just friggin one from you. Where do you get off building a pyramid when you can't move even one of the 2.3 million blocks?

This is gonna be ugly folks, just like I said it would.

Man, lecture time, and some abuse. I asked you on YOUR thread, you know, 8 gazillion posts leading to nowhere, a place I'm trying very hard to forget and will never visit again as you all will now be coming to me, how to make a block moving in a straight turn make a right.

Notice you didn't answer.

See junior, this lil' thing here is all about moving and stacking blocks. Well, we gotta teach you how to move them before you get all flat trying to stack them.


linked-image


Right turn sport.

You tell me that and I'll go right to stacking levels.

And that 6" step method? It works and it mine and it the key to this, the first and simplest of my methods.




Marchimedes
linked-image
Marchimedes
Folks, the devil is in the details. So last I checked I gots me some blocks staged, time to start setting them, right? Wrong. you gonna go running around willy nilly putting stuff here and there and hope for the best? Not on Marchimedes' thread you ain't. We gotta know where this thing goes. And put it down right. minor details, like level, orientation, saw someone round these here parts has a grasp on the stats, he/she can check stuff like this, maybe.

linked-image

linked-image

linked-image

linked-image

linked-image

linked-image

linked-image

linked-image

linked-image

linked-image

Marchimedes
Yes Virginia, these are all my own ideas and drawings...


linked-image

linked-image

linked-image
Marchimedes
This you need to understand...


linked-image

Oh, WAY more is on the way.
cladking
An exterior stone "ramp" is an interesting idea and seems to make a little more sense
than most. You still run into a nightmare putting this sucker together. To build it in 2 1/2
years you have to lift 400 stones an average of about 250' every hour. That's 400 stones
going up 500 six inch steps every hour. Every hour the men have to lift a stone up a six
inch step 20,000 times!! Worse, if they use a single ramp then a stone must pass each spot
on the ramp with a rate of 6 stones per minute.

Multiple ramps and longer construction would reduce this but won't solve the problem of get-
ting rid of the ramps nor will it explain how they then got the casing stone on. Rearrangement
of the ramps as they were removed would allow access to much of the exterior and then the
ramp stone could be hauled over for use in the next pyramid.

This still seems like far more work than workers can be squeezed on site. I'm still most dubious
that this problem can be solved with ramps. At some point they'd have to dead lift these stones
to complete construction, anyway.

Marchimedes
QUOTE
QUOTE(cladking @ May 7 2007, 07:25 PM) [snapback]1664422[/snapback]

An exterior stone "ramp" is an interesting idea and seems to make a little more sense
than most. You still run into a nightmare putting this sucker together. To build it in 2 1/2
years you have to lift 400 stones an average of about 250' every hour. That's 400 stones
going up 500 six inch steps every hour. Every hour the men have to lift a stone up a six
inch step 20,000 times!! Worse, if they use a single ramp then a stone must pass each spot
on the ramp with a rate of 6 stones per minute.


At least you thinking, some.

Told you to get into the first three, right?

8th panel of the first image. See those double yellow lines? Lanes. Double yellow lines should leap out at you some more. They mean sumpin.

Well, was gonna put some "lane" drawings here but now they wont come up.

Likely too much for this sites PC today.

I'll try them alone on the next post.

Not really ramps either. Exterior steps. Wide as they frigging need to be. I used three lanes just to cut down on drawing time. Could make these exterior steps 10 lanes wide, right? And that's just on one side. What if they were extended all the way around? 40 lanes. Next you'll ask me how to set so many at once. Same first image of post #7. You've got a LOT to chew on sport. kinda overwhelmed right now, eh? You've been usurped, usurped I say.


QUOTE
Multiple ramps and longer construction would reduce this but won't solve the problem of get-
ting rid of the ramps


Slow down, you've confusified yourself.

QUOTE
nor will it explain how they then got the casing stone on.


I believe I said sumpin about not getting ahead, now I've wasted presious time reminding you of such.

QUOTE
Rearrangement
of the ramps as they were removed would allow access to much of the exterior and then the
ramp stone could be hauled over for use in the next pyramid.

This still seems like far more work than workers can be squeezed on site. I'm still most dubious
that this problem can be solved with ramps. At some point they'd have to dead lift these stones
to complete construction, anyway.


No ramps, no dead lifting, ever. my blocks are never on a unlevel surface except for any roads leading to the pyramid and never higher than 8" off the ground.

Which brings me to safety.

Does the word "safety" appear in one of your posts?

See, when you do this for a living, safety comes first.

So, cladkind, is this sinking in yet?

I've got lots more, beginning to end, yes the big blocks too.
crystal sage
happy.gif disgust.gif


I still like the poured concrete idea better!!!!

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/internation...,625686,00.html

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/worl...ticle656117.ece

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2007/0...ting-stones.asp

QUOTE
Recent analysis of pyramid fragments4 strongly suggests that some of the stones were cast, not quarried. Comparison of the chemical makeup of these fragments to that of stone from nearby quarries shows them to be different. Dr. Michel Barsoum, reporting his findings in the Journal of the American Ceramic Society, has demonstrated that the relative amounts of the elements silicon, calcium, and magnesium in the pyramids fragments differ markedly from the ratios in limestone from the quarries. In addition, these elements are chemically combined in a way not found in nature.5

Furthermore, the ground-up limestone components of the pyramid concrete have chemical characteristics seen only in man-made stone. Specifically, the tiny particles of limestone are hydrated; that is, they are chemically bound to elements of water.6 When limestone crystallizes naturally, these elements of water disappear, but rapid crystallization in man-made limestone traps these elements in the crystals. Such hydrated limestone is the type of limestone which Dr. Barsoum, using electron microscopy, found in the pyramid fragments, demonstrating that the fragments consist of man-made material.7
Kyle Rajasthan
Here's a question for you. How did the ancient Egyptians manage to quarry and dress, to a fine finish, all that hard limestone and granite (the "kings chanber is made of granite), with nothing but copper tools to work with? Acording to "experts" all these people had to work with was hardened copper. Copper will barely mark limestone and it will not cut granite at all. Got any theories on that?

Good Journey.

Kyle Rajasthan.
Marchimedes
QUOTE(Kyle Rajasthan @ May 7 2007, 11:32 PM) [snapback]1664765[/snapback]
Here's a question for you. How did the ancient Egyptians manage to quarry and dress, to a fine finish, all that hard limestone and granite (the "kings chanber is made of granite), with nothing but copper tools to work with? Acording to "experts" all these people had to work with was hardened copper. Copper will barely mark limestone and it will not cut granite at all. Got any theories on that?

Good Journey.

Kyle Rajasthan.


Well, I'll give you this, you got most your facts right.

For the Granite they used a rock called Dolomite. It's harder than granite. beat on the Ganite with Dolomite, the weaker gives away quicker than the stronger. Lotta work for sure, but then look at the pyrmaids. These guys were not afraid of hard work.

Side note: For much limestone quarrying they used copper chisels, I say for evey guy chiseling they had a guy sharpening as copper is so mallable. But the indigeneous ore they obtained their copper from has traces of arsenic in it making thier copper slightly harder than the usual copper.

Did you know that?

I like the quotes around the "experts". These "experts" can now just call themselves "hacks". There's a new "expert" in town.

Goes by the name Marchimedes.

Giddyup.



Now these are the kind of questions I deem acecptable.
Feanor
Interesting reading, really interesting. Post more if you have!

PS, I don´'t liek your ego, but thats fine, I like your theory!
Marchimedes
linked-image
Marchimedes
QUOTE(crystal sage @ May 7 2007, 09:13 PM) [snapback]1664577[/snapback]


Now you gotta choice, take that stupid garbage and start your own thread or I'll come down on that ridiculas theory, and you, like you had no idea coming down on could be done.

This thread is about common sence, known data, science, twiwdi and me. The smartest man alive.

(If those smilies means you're just jerking my chain, good one, keep that stuff coming, I can take what I dish out).

Ah, I see we can link to other sites here.

(In the voice of Mr. Burns) Excellent.

Though I'm sure the rules are different for me. Which I will prove to you later.

These other sites you can view without joining. There are parts of these sites you need to join if you wanna read me when I'm off my leash, but beware, not for the faint of heart.

At these sites I'm known as "teacher". Lowercase "t", even when starting a sentence.

My home site, where I have way more allready done and have allready dealt with the stupid questions you WILL be asking here, which if you DON'T ask will save us time, me ammusement, and you utter humiliation. Feel free to view there and reply here. I'll answer, abuse, or summarily ignore you depending on my mood. As I'm still in the process of taking this site over, again, I need to keep this train wreck rolling here. All aboard!

Site home page...

http://www.debatepolitics.com/

If you join you get to goto "The Basement" forum where I have a humor thread that's sumpin you've never seen before.

The pyramid thread on that site...

http://www.debatepolitics.com/science-tech...ld-pyramid.html

Now, if any of you know Jack spit about the Giza platau you should be familiar with the obelisks. The PBS show "NOVA" "How to raise an obelisk" or what should be called "how to dance with death" has three times tried to stand one up. Dismal failure, but then they are a bunch or archaeologists (dirt sifters I call them) who wouldn't dare ask a lowly blue coller guy like me. I just amazed none of then are flat and dead yet. Of course I have this, too, solved, I stopped here on this one giving enough info (you gotta understand twiwdi first cause I ain't writting stuff twice, the methods I use for pyramids I assume you allready know for working on the obelisk) for the folks to be able to use what I have taught so far to ba able to finish the rest. I'll get to it sooner or later. On this site I've just started tipping the obelisk up.

That sites home page...

http://www.hardcorepolitics.com/

The obelisk thread on that site...

http://www.hardcorepolitics.com/history-ci...r-way-amen.html

There's some good stuff on that thread that will help you begin to conceive just how friggin much I know about moving heavy stuff. And to move and stack heavy blocks to build a pyramid you have to know more than saying "well, the desert was wet and that's that".

If you do join either site please throw ol' Marchimedes (teacher) a bone and say I refered you.

Removed By Moderator/ Please revue the rules here.


You kids having fun yet?
Marchimedes
linked-image
Fluffybunny
Marchimedes, you need to tone down on the rude/condescending and snarky replies; you are out of line and similar posts will not be tolerated.
Themis
You said that you submitted this to a University? I would be interested to hear what they thought of your theory.
Feanor
QUOTE(Marchimedes @ May 8 2007, 01:41 PM) [snapback]1665359[/snapback]
linked-image



Hum, I don’t hate you nor I love you.
I think its great, you have something to show the world, and also I don't really care how you will show it.
I will keep track of this thread because I love history and I am student of history and art and so far you got my attention. I usually don’t even bother with topics regarding How pyramids were built, etc, because most of them are full of the same old crap, you know what I'm talking about I suppose!

As for your drawings, I really like them.

So, post more of your stuff, I will read for sure, though, I still don't like your ego!

Regards.
Marchimedes
QUOTE(Fluffybunny @ May 8 2007, 02:40 PM) [snapback]1665627[/snapback]
Marchimedes, you need to tone down on the rude/condescending and snarky replies; you are out of line and similar posts will not be tolerated.


(here we go)

Aw Ma, I was just funnin.

Okay boss, gonna mean a whole lotta time editing drawings and such, but I'll give it a go, do my best, score one for the gipper, take my medicine, get what's coming to me, bite the bullet, hunker down, play the game, try to fit in, walk the line, suck it up, keep a stiff upper lip, dumb it down, don't be the squeeky wheel, get in the corner, take it like a man, give some to get some, march in lock step, capitulate, genuflect, prostrate myself, prostitute my integrity, leash myself, bite my tounge, wave the white flag, get a grip, snap out of it, simmer down, back off, reel it in, toe the line, get with the program, batten down the hatches, ride the storm out, try not to draw attention to myself...

linked-image

What exactly does "snarky" mean?

Or is that a word you made up to descibe me?

I prefer...haughty.



Fluffybunny
snark·y (snär'kē) Pronunciation Key
adj. snark·i·er, snark·i·est Slang

Rudely sarcastic or disrespectful; snide.
Marchimedes
QUOTE(Fluffybunny @ May 8 2007, 03:34 PM) [snapback]1665687[/snapback]
snark·y (snär'kē) Pronunciation Key
adj. snark·i·er, snark·i·est Slang

Rudely sarcastic or disrespectful; snide.


Oh, like I said...me.

Thanks.

We do have a sence-o-humor here, right?

If I may be so bold, could you PM me and lettuce hammer out the limits of this place in private? I full well know the deal with me, but it helps to get a...gist, of what EXACTLY is acceptable and what is not. The flavour, ambiance if you will.

I'm sure you can see I got sumpin going on here, let's chat. Please?
Marchimedes
QUOTE(Feanor @ May 8 2007, 03:02 PM) [snapback]1665650[/snapback]
Hum, I don’t hate you nor I love you.


I'll be working that to one end or the other.
QUOTE
I think its great, you have something to show the world, and also I don't really care how you will show it.

Well, "they who are called they here" do. Likely cause of the gazillion complaints they've no doubt allready received.
QUOTE
I will keep track of this thread because I love history and I am student of history and art and so far you got my attention.

As was my intention.
QUOTE
I usually don’t even bother with topics regarding How pyramids were built, etc, because most of them are full of the same old crap, you know what I'm talking about I suppose!

Sure do, and I play it to the hilt. You are a perfect example of...
I try to present this in a entertaining fashion. To make people read that which they normally could care less about, it's gonna sink in, even a little maybe, without their noticing it. maybe one day the conversation on this topic comes up and they are all "you know, I read a guy that thinks..." or remember my name and know where to find this. i refuse to go the holier than thou official acedamic thesis propasal route. One, i don't think I'd last 5 seconds, not cuase my idea is flawed, cause of my attitude, as I'm sure you understand. Two, cause I want to rub these arogent know it all noses in it and prove they could care less about actual advancement on the topic, more they want to hold tenure and get funded. that chaps my azz big time.

And tell me, have you ever seen solid scientific theory presented in this format? I haven't and I like to think a new era has dawned in education. (At least when I'm in the house).
QUOTE
As for your drawings, I really like them.

Thank you. Lot of work is going into this. And it has forced me to advance my computer skills exponentialy. I didn't know what a C drive or and image was when I started this, now I am...

Master of Paint

QUOTE
So, post more of your stuff, I will read for sure,


I will, until I get the probable boot, I suggest copy down those links to where else to find me, this has happened before, sometimes they delete everything so they can get back to Elvis building this thing with Voodoo.
QUOTE
though, I still don't like your ego!

I'll never ask you to like it, just tolerate it. And isn't that what America is supposed to be about?
Themis
QUOTE
i refuse to go the holier than thou official acedamic thesis propasal route. One, i don't think I'd last 5 seconds, not cuase my idea is flawed, cause of my attitude, as I'm sure you understand. Two, cause I want to rub these arogent know it all noses in it and prove they could care less about actual advancement on the topic, more they want to hold tenure and get funded. that chaps my azz big time.


So you didn't submit it to a University?

I don't think you would last two seconds either, not because of your attitude, but because you didn't use the spell check!

bee


Well...you are a bit of a one (off).....my brain is a bit mushed up after reading YOUR thread.....but what springs to my over stimulated brain is that I just don't buy all

this heavy, heaving and lifting and rolling and heaving and levering and heaving and rolling and........

Somewhere in your avalanche of theory and amusing self love, Crystal Sage said she prefered the concrete theory....and added a quote about analysis of the mineral content of pyramid 'stones not matching the raw material in the quarries.

My present theory of how the pyramids 'might' have been built is this.....rubble could have been put into the required contained shape....using a wooden frame or something similar. In situ. Then melted. Don't know if you've come across 'Browns Gas'....there is a lot about it on the internet. Anyway Browns Gas can melt rock. So maybe, instead of humping flipping huge blocks of solid rock....who-ever built the pyramids might have melted rubble in the required position?

Browns Gas (named after the man who discovered/re-discovered it) is about recombining oxygen and hydrogen into water, and the energy released reaches temperatures high enough to melt rock.

What do you think about my 'rubble' theory? You don't HAVE to respond....but if you do...bring it on!
Marchimedes
I think you all are ready for this now...

linked-image

it's how it's gotta be. In the presence of excellence and all you know.


linked-image


Marchimedes
QUOTE(bee @ May 8 2007, 04:29 PM) [snapback]1665767[/snapback]
Well...you are a bit of a one (off).....


Remember a post or two ago when i said the rules are different for me and I'll prove it?

there ya go, fine for you guys to insult me (I love it) but not the other way. Fish in a barrel people, dance puppets.

QUOTE
my brain is a bit mushed up after reading YOUR thread.....


And this is the simple version.
QUOTE
but what springs to my over stimulated brain is that I just don't buy all

this heavy, heaving and lifting and rolling and heaving and levering and heaving and rolling and........


Then tell me how it's wrong and/or show me sumpin better.
QUOTE
Somewhere in your avalanche of theory and amusing self love,



thank you...

QUOTE
Crystal Sage said she prefered the concrete theory....and added a quote about analysis of the mineral content of pyramid 'stones not matching the raw material in the quarries.



Garbage that has no place on this thread. yea, lemme help with the lab anylisis and I'll buy that.


QUOTE
My present theory of how the pyramids 'might' have been built is this.....rubble could have been put into the required contained shape....using a wooden frame or something similar. In situ. Then melted. Don't know if you've come across 'Browns Gas'....there is a lot about it on the internet. Anyway Browns Gas can melt rock. So maybe, instead of humping flipping huge blocks of solid rock....who-ever built the pyramids might have melted rubble in the required position?



Garbage. Then all the blocks would have the same shape, that of the form you speak of.
lisaterry
QUOTE(Marchimedes @ May 8 2007, 06:00 PM) [snapback]1665815[/snapback]
Remember a post or two ago when i said the rules are different for me and I'll prove it?

there ya go, fine for you guys to insult me (I love it) but not the other way. Fish in a barrel people, dance puppets.
And this is the simple version.
Then tell me how it's wrong and/or show me sumpin better.

thank you...
Garbage that has no place on this thread. yea, lemme help with the lab anylisis and I'll buy that.

Garbage. Then all the blocks would have the same shape, that of the form you speak of.





hmmm... interesting. out of curiosity why would you not just dig out the pyramid instead of building it? it takes less effort to dig than to move those dam blocks dont you think? i mean if you dig down in steps sort of like what you illustrated and then formed the steps into blocks in place where they were you could build a good base for the pyramid and not have to build it up so far from the ground to make it. then it would be larger in actual size than it would look.
bee
QUOTE(Marchimedes @ May 8 2007, 11:00 PM) [snapback]1665815[/snapback]
[there ya go, fine for you guys to insult me (I love it) but not the other way. Fish in a barrel people, dance puppets.


Hate to disappoint you, but saying someone is a 'one off' is complimentary!


QUOTE
Then tell me how it's wrong and/or show me sumpin better.


Melting rubble...in situ.

QUOTE
Garbage that has no place on this thread. yea, lemme help with the lab anylisis and I'll buy that.


But it IS on the thread....and if it's correct, then the solid block theory comes under the spotlight.

QUOTE
Garbage. Then all the blocks would have the same shape, that of the form you speak of.


The blocks would have what-ever shape the 'frame' created....the same, or not the same.

But hey.....don't want to rain on your parade.....like them or hate them...your posts are pure ART.
Themis
I would like to see your emails to Dr Richards (who incidentally works at the University of York in the UK) - He is a specialist in British Historic archaeology rather than egyptology but I'm sure he did a couple of terms on egypt for his degree.

It may be better to approach an Egyptologist? Or alternatively write a book. That way your theory gets known and you make a living out of it?

Spelling as bait? Well its an original method certainly.

What does 'I drop sledges mean'?
venusram
Wrong question, not how but why? that's was the real puzzle.
Marchimedes
A mans gotta do what a mans gotta do!

linked-image
Irish
QUOTE(Marchimedes @ May 8 2007, 12:39 PM) [snapback]1667288[/snapback]
Remember a post or two ago when i said the rules are different for me and I'll prove it?


Rules are the same here for YOU as everyone else. We don’t make rules based on the size of one ego.
Now pay attention Teacher, rules broken in your first post of the day;

4. No racism, threats, personal attacks, harassment or hate related posts

5. No posting private messages in the forum
Please keep private messages private, no copying and pasting private messages in to forum threads.

6. No flaming, flame baiting, mocking, verbal abuse or trolling.

Now the line was infringed upon when you decided to share your private messages with people who are here to read your theory not your love/hate mail.

Please keep in mind the following

9. Use proper forum etiquette when posting Please try not to do any of the following as these will draw negative attention and annoy other users:
• Don't write your posts or topic titles in all capital letters
• Don't quote huge amounts of text from previous posts just so you can add one line in response
• Avoid posting enormous pictures that distort the page so users have to scroll horizontally
• Always post topics in the forum section pertaining to the subject being discussed

As I mentioned earlier you are NOT exempt from the rules. So this post will serve as a friendly reminder. Further violations of the well posted rules (I recommend you read them) will result in first a suspension of your posting privileges here right up to an outright ban. I am sure this does not worry you as I am sure it happens all the time to you.
You have an interesting theory and it would be a shame to have to visit you in your lonely site to read them because you were unable to play nice while visiting ours.

Thank you for your understanding. thumbsup.gif

Irish
Themis
Fair point on my spelling. I will ensure all posts back to you in future have been thoroughly checked!

You lost me with the rest since I didn't PM you and I fail to see the relevance of your remarks!

and by the way...

I'm a female...
Fluffybunny
I tried to be fairly straightforward in my request for you to tone it down and stop with the snarky responses... you don't seem to be capable of that. You have an interesting topic but you have been so uncivil and rude that there is no way that you are going to be able to contribute in a manner that is in line with the rules of the forum that you agreed to when you became a member.

I am going to give you 3 days off and hopefully enough time to reflect on whether or not you wish to contribute to this forum in a positive manner or not at all (I have pretty good idea, but I will give you the benefit of the doubt).

I am also going to close this thread; as you will not be able to respond and no doubt people will continue to reply to you in a fashion that (while deserving) is equally against forum rules.

Perhaps there is a forum out there that accepts your kind of rude and uncivil behaviour, but this isn't one of them, and you have no one to blame but yourself for your time off and potential ban should you not learn to treat others with repsect.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.