Jay Alfred: Living Inside a Mega Brain: Metaphysicists identify the records imprinted on the zero point field as the "Akashic records". This forms the "memory" of the universal brain-mind or computer. According to metaphysicist, Charles Leadbeater, if the observer is not focusing on them, the records simply form the background to whatever is going on. Under such conditions they merely reflect the mental activity of a greater consciousness on a far higher plane which is accessible to us. We are in a sense living in this much larger brain. This suggests that all human beings (and other life-forms) can and do use the shared (information processing) services of a "universal brain".

Observing the dynamic and visual Akashic records would be like watching the larger brain's movie from a distance. As you move closer and focus on what is going on in a particular scene, you are immediately in the scene, surrounded by all the characters. The characters of course cannot see you. Neither can you change anything in the scene. In this way, a person can time travel as an observer, without violating causality. What you see is sometimes in the past and sometimes in the future. The rate at which "the story unfolds" can be altered. Genuine psychics and most people during near-death experiences have access to these records.

Leadbeater warns that the Akashic records must not be confused with mere man-made thought-forms, which exist in abundance in the higher energy planes or spheres. It is possible that if the right brain is not shielded effectively from the usually dominant left brain (the "theory maker") many errors will arise when reading the records.

"The Akashic records or 'The Book of Life' can be equated to the universe's super computer system." – Kevin Todeschi, Edgar Cayce scholar

The Universe is a Computer
According to Science reporter J R Minkel, in his article "If the Universe Were a Computer", information theory says that every physical system, from a glass of water to a microchip, holds "1"s and "0"s in the states of its component particles. Changes in those states could be called "computation", just as your desktop machine computes by changing the information in its memory. The only possible outcomes of measuring an electron’s spin are "up" and "down". You can choose any axis to measure the spin but once that axis is chosen only two results are possible. These outcomes could just as well be labeled as "1" and "0" – as they are in digital computers.

According to Seth Lloyd in a paper called "Computational Capacity of the Universe", all physical systems register and process information. The laws of physics determine the amount of information that a physical system can register and the number of elementary logic operations that a system can perform. The universe can therefore be considered a physical system or a gigantic computer. As a computer the number of elementary operations the universe has performed to-date has been calculated to be 10^120 operations on 10^90 bits.

Filaments and Nerves
It is interesting to note that the higher energy universes (as described by plasma metaphysics), composed of filaments punctuated with galaxies, bear an uncanny resemblance to our brains, composed of nerve fibers punctuated with neural cell bodies.
These successive universes can operate as the many layers of a gigantic electronic brain (analogous to the cortex and sub-cortex in our biomolecular brain) inside which our own subtle brain-bodies live and think. The filamentary structures carry current — just as nerves (to some extent) do. It would not be difficult to incorporate logic gates and arithmetic units into these structures.

The computational power required to generate a tiny living ant, which responds to multiple inputs from the environment and with its unique structure and behavior, would be challenging even to our current supercomputers. Considering that there are maybe trillions of life-forms on this planet alone, only the computational power of a series of higher energy universes (equivalent to the many layers of a universal brain) would suffice. This is the source of "universal intelligence and creativity".

View Image: Brain neurons and universe evolution comparison

© Copyright Jay Alfred 2007

Main reference: Alfred, Jay, ''Brains and Realities'', Trafford Publishing, 2006, ISBN 1-412-08877-1.
http://www.amazon.com/Brains-Realities-Jay...d/dp/1412088771

I've actually considered this notion for years. The thing is, I've never been able to back it up or put it into words. Hmmm, very interesting.

This is kind of similar (but more thought out and probable) to the theory that solar systems are atoms and galaxies are elements forming molecules and forming substances in a world higher than our own, and that our atoms are each individual solar sytems inteacting in galaxies and molecules that form our world which is ultimately the universe itself, then things keep repeating forever and the end is GOD muahahaha

That was an entertaining read

Where can I get that book? At the Amazon is out of stock.

That was a good read thanks for posting this.

Excellent

well the simulation theory seems to be THE most logic explanation of our universe to me for some time now...

I had the thought last night that our brains are a reflection of the world around us, and vice-versa!

Quick question, what if the universe does'nt actually exist, what if what we view from within our own solar system is just scenary?
I read a post i could'nt really understand the mechanics of, that a few pc programmers were discussing. Sort of like if you walked to the edge of your propety, which does have an edge, and did'nt go further because there was no further to go. Yet you see grass and trees and other house's that continue, even though you know their not real. To flesh out the program and what you want those in it to view, so they can develop the way you want.

That would also involve all the 0's and 1's you mentioned.

I understand Amazon will restock in 1 to 2 weeks time.
You can also obtain the book from Trafford Publishing (Canada)

According to quantum physics, under the Copenhagen interpretation, the universe exists only when you observe it. So where is it before you observe it? Quantum physics teaches us that the observer and the observed can never be separated and Schrödinger's cat can be both alive and dead at the same time. Does the universe exist or not exist? – It's your choice i.e. I believe it depends on the strength of your measurement (as argued in the book, 'Brains and Realities'). On a classical level, though, due to gravitational lensing and other weird optical illusions created by gravity there may be duplicate images of existing astrophysical objects. Hence, some of the perceived objects in the universe are in fact optical illusions.

Secondly, you can't say that the universe has an "edge" because you need to compare the universe with what is outside it - and there is nothing outside it... It's like an ant crawling on the surface of a ball - it will always see the scenery in front of it even if it went round the ball a thousand times. As far as the ant is concerned there is no edge to its universe - its space is finite yet unbounded. A programmer would of course be able to extend his virtual digital universe if she wanted to - but only within the type of space that was defined by the programme.

So your saying due to the currently understood scientific understanding, that in effect, it would be like the startrek series holodeck. You are not really moving, even though the illusion of movement is there. The program makes you think there is an expanding horizion so to speak. Yet finite.

this pretty muchcorrelates with my theory of the answer to the great question. relates to being able to understand how one could use both sides of the force for the real good of the whole. opposites and the tension between them - will it create a split or a bond, is it loving tension where they dance, or hateful tension where they fight and push off each other until they finally decide to die and split ways. niether choice is wrong, wright, bad or good, there just simply is two choices for every one thing. the only reason they even let the tension develop in the first place is because they accept it as the thing that has to develop for existince to continue existing. within the tension they view themselves as a whole-on the majority-so to continue their complete existence they must continue their tension, whatever form of tension they decided to choose. on the fightful/hateful path of tension they will grow apart and start to view themselve as, maybe not seperate from the whole, but as a seperate piece of the whole. further continuation of the growth of this ego will lead to a fission of the two and the sudden rememberance that they really didnt need to be dependent on the other for their own existence because before they were one two's, they were two one's. its a path to a smaller existence but its still existence. on the flip side of things though through the tension of love you will find the same things out, only you'll interpret their actualness in the opposite way- see the other side of things. youll become close with your other and realize the importance of your oneness as well as your seperateness. you remember you could exist without the other, but thats not the point of existence, (to exist just to continue existing), but to exist to become the biggest thing possible and keep bonding so you can grow and radiate onto the most things. but dont think that this means love is the only path to take to get to the answer you want. this type of thinking is of and from the ego; you know, if the meaning of life is to be the biggest thing possible, then why not seperate myself from the whole so i can be the only thing and therfor the biggest thing. problem answered correctly, but in some eyes probably solved the wrong way. the meaning of life is a selfish one, but wether or not you seperate or integrate your self with the rest will tell you in which way your being selfish. are you partly selfish or wholy selfish? our universe is partly selfish, if not it wouldnt be its own part as a seperate universe, and this is why things in it develop as partly selfish things with egos and why things are more likely to break apart when force is applied rather than not. we try to make our one self into the most parts possible by constantly choosing the hateful path to cause ourslef to keep splitting with itself. we choose to hate ourselfs because we love to introduce as many things as we can into this hateful existence. we hate for love to exist but love for hate to exist. they're both there for the same cause....... i got lost again in trying to explain our simple paradoxical infinitism. my bad, i rambled.

I'm not sure if anyones mentioned it but in the movie/doco masterpiece ''Koyaanisqatsi''(Life out of balance)
The camera slowly pulls away from the earth in one scene from a large city at night & gives you the distinct impression of a massive computer/computer chip...

Yes, you could say that...its an interesting extrapolation!

I'm reminded of the old adage "as above, so below" -- the microcosm of the macrocosm. Most scientists disputed the analogical view that our solar system is a macrocosm of the atom because planets don't jump from one orbit to another. In 1950, Immanuel Velikovsky theorized that Venus displaced Mars from its original orbit and caused it to move outward to its current one. Living inside a gigantic brain may sound just as far-fetched, but it's a lot better than living under a giant's thumbnail.


I'll have to watch it again. I bought the Quatsi trilogy when they first came out on CDs. Thanks.

That would actually explain different theory's on how mars is today. If there was ever a population on it, and there were survivers from the orbital shift, they would natrualy come to this planet, still being in the preferred habital zone.

Well, as we all learn if we pay attention as we grew up here, it does'nt matter what the real truth is, only what those who rule want you to believe. It's quite bothersome to sift through all their mountains of bullpock they generate for the rest of us.{layers of deciet, for our own safety supposedly}

Whatever, it won't be long before i escape their control, and throw in a few wrinkles of my own{the truth}

Well this part of the brain is having dirty thoughts

Well, i'm pretty sure that applies to the mind as well. So either way, were in a brain.

It seems to me that mankind seems to be the center of most things. Like the way people use to think everything revolved around Earth. If humans were to die out wouldn't the universe still go on as it always have? So far, Earth has been the only planet with actual beings. Makes you wonder it it's for a purpose or just a freak of nature.

I've thought similarly. When you look at the sky and universe and the vastness of space beyond, it resembles a fetus in the womb, bacteria swimming through the blood and fluids of the body, etc. Birth expels fetuses into this world, death expels us into another world. When science was able to take internal videos of humans and animals, I was struck by how similar it was to looking into the vastness of space.