Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: NYPD Ghost Car Chase
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Ghosts, Hauntings & The Paranormal
frodonet
Seriously,

I just watched this on youtube and i'm seriously stunned.

Please watch this car chase by the NYPD. Please look carefully,

The best proof ever, i think...and i don't think this can be faked ok. Ask Penn and Teller to shut up on this one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6UHLd_zxuo
Regency
It is a great clip. A question though, at the end when the police have their car headlights against the fence, you can clearly see the chain links of the left hand fence panel you expect the car to have gone through - but panel next to it on the right, you can't see anything of the chain links?
JustNormal
QUOTE(frodonet @ May 15 2007, 08:23 AM) [snapback]1675682[/snapback]
Seriously,

I just watched this on youtube and i'm seriously stunned.

Please watch this car chase by the NYPD. Please look carefully,

The best proof ever, i think...and i don't think this can be faked ok. Ask Penn and Teller to shut up on this one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6UHLd_zxuo


I did research on this video way back. Its all an illusion, plus if you look at the fence, there is an opening, but it is the sort of fence that is flexible. Also the reason they lost him is because he shut his lights off, and is a stunt driver..Its a hoax
JustNormal
QUOTE(Regency @ May 15 2007, 08:46 AM) [snapback]1675706[/snapback]
It is a great clip. A question though, at the end when the police have their car headlights against the fence, you can clearly see the chain links of the left hand fence panel you expect the car to have gone through - but panel next to it on the right, you can't see anything of the chain links?


Exactly..
frodonet
You see, if it was a real car.

The police could have taken note of the plate and catch the perpetrator on the next morning.

If there's no chain link on the right side, don't you think the police would have notice it...

maybe we can't see the chain link because the angle of it,

but the car was driving straight from the fence that has chain links...it wasn't diverting from a bend to straight...it seems straight before the fence and straight after the fence.
frodonet
QUOTE(JustNormal @ May 15 2007, 04:51 PM) [snapback]1675711[/snapback]
I did research on this video way back. Its all an illusion, plus if you look at the fence, there is an opening, but it is the sort of fence that is flexible. Also the reason they lost him is because he shut his lights off, and is a stunt driver..Its a hoax


Got any links which i can refer to your claims???
Barek Halfhand
hey frodo...
that is a classic video and new perspectives are a good thing right?...anyways it has been posted here a couple of times (while back) the last time I tried to freeze the drivers face for an enhanced photo..no luck then....I may try it again though if time permits.....on the skeptical side I do know cops love to set stuff like that up ahead of time to prank rookies....B





Buckethead (Seattle) "Welcome to Bucketheadland" thumbsup.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5w8NR0opPgI
jonas16
WOW! I don't know what to say! A really amazing video, thanks for the post! w00t.gif
JustNormal
QUOTE(frodonet @ May 15 2007, 10:06 AM) [snapback]1675738[/snapback]
Got any links which i can refer to your claims???


NO I watched it on television, and they re-enacted it..
frodonet
QUOTE(JustNormal @ May 15 2007, 09:56 PM) [snapback]1675958[/snapback]
NO I watched it on television, and they re-enacted it..


Sorry dude. I just can't accept your answer "i've watched on television". I know you might have but without any direct links, i won't know.

Second thing, anybody can RE-ENACT anything. It's not a problem, you can do that with the technology we have these days. You can even re-enact moon landing 10 times and does that mean the "moon landing is fake".

No, it doesn't. Just because someone doesn't believe it (i point it to you skeptics), doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
frodonet
QUOTE(Barek Halfhand @ May 15 2007, 08:43 PM) [snapback]1675868[/snapback]
hey frodo...
that is a classic video and new persectives are a good thing right?...anyways it has been posted here a couple of times (while back) the last time I tried to freeze the drivers face for an enhanced photo..no luck then....I may try it again though if time permits.....on the skeptical side I do know cops love to set stuff like that up ahead of time to prank rookies....B
Buckethead (Seattle) "Welcome to Bucketheadland" thumbsup.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5w8NR0opPgI


hi barek,

the perspectives are very good, and one thing i did notice another guy in youtube did an enhance footage of that driver, but it's really not clear. they made a smiley on the driver.lol.

But if the cops are going to prank rookies, certainly they are not doing on this tape. It was a speed chase and in the middle of the public road, they can't take the risk and if they willing to made the video public, it seems that the police have checked out everything.




Finsup22
Wow, thats pretty freaky. Cool vid. thumbsup.gif
coldethyl
QUOTE(frodonet @ May 15 2007, 05:05 AM) [snapback]1675737[/snapback]
You see, if it was a real car.

The police could have taken note of the plate and catch the perpetrator on the next morning.


Not if it was stolen.

This video has been on here a million times. Everytime it's concluded that the fence isn't attached at the bottom.

Do a search and you'll see.
JustNormal
QUOTE(frodonet @ May 15 2007, 02:26 PM) [snapback]1675995[/snapback]
Sorry dude. I just can't accept your answer "i've watched on television". I know you might have but without any direct links, i won't know.

Second thing, anybody can RE-ENACT anything. It's not a problem, you can do that with the technology we have these days. You can even re-enact moon landing 10 times and does that mean the "moon landing is fake".

No, it doesn't. Just because someone doesn't believe it (i point it to you skeptics), doesn't mean it doesn't exist.


I am far from a skeptic, I just know it's a hoax, and like you, I dont have to prove it..
BRAT2
real or fake it's still a pretty cool video. thumbsup.gif i remeber the first time i seen it i tried to freeze it and look at the face, but no luck, i suck at that stuff. disgust.gif
MasterPo
Definately not the NYPD. No place in NYC looks like that.
MUM24/7
QUOTE(mom4 @ May 16 2007, 05:36 AM) [snapback]1676433[/snapback]
real or fake it's still a pretty cool video. thumbsup.gif i remeber the first time i seen it i tried to freeze it and look at the face, but no luck, i suck at that stuff. disgust.gif


You and me both mom4........ yes.gif
frodonet
QUOTE(MasterPo @ May 16 2007, 10:57 AM) [snapback]1677123[/snapback]
Definately not the NYPD. No place in NYC looks like that.


The video is shot in the night, and clearly you can't see any great landmarks or what place it is.

but, from the video there's a word "GARDCITYPD". Not sure whether it holds any values.

Jennie 1
Garden City, New York babe!
Love the vid, but I'm pretty sure it is nothing paranormal.
Just a fast car going through a lousy fence.
JustNormal
QUOTE(cyqe @ May 16 2007, 03:33 AM) [snapback]1677178[/snapback]
Garden City, New York babe!
Love the vid, but I'm pretty sure it is nothing paranormal.
Just a fast car going through a lousy fence.


I dont think its paranormal either, but I have to admit, the way he drives and seems to slide from one lane to another is very clever.. yes.gif
MasterPo
Garden City is not part of NYC.

Just saying there are no roads like that in NYC. NYPD is the PD of NYC.
JustNormal
QUOTE(MasterPo @ May 16 2007, 01:19 PM) [snapback]1677745[/snapback]
Garden City is not part of NYC.

Just saying there are no roads like that in NYC. NYPD is the PD of NYC.


It was not stated that it was New York City, it was the Garden City Police, it states that on video.
Blue_army
QUOTE(mom4 @ May 15 2007, 08:36 PM) [snapback]1676433[/snapback]
real or fake it's still a pretty cool video. thumbsup.gif i remeber the first time i seen it i tried to freeze it and look at the face, but no luck, i suck at that stuff. disgust.gif

The fence is completely intacked and this was a real chase theres no holes and the fence is white so if the police lights where switched off there would be no fence.
Violet_Blue
Very interesting video! Would love to get a closer look at that fence.... it definately looks like it drove right through it! ohmy.gif
frodonet
QUOTE(eric_13 @ May 17 2007, 01:40 AM) [snapback]1678179[/snapback]
The fence is completely intacked and this was a real chase theres no holes and the fence is white so if the police lights where switched off there would be no fence.


My sentiments exactly, the fence is intact, if the car drove thru it...there should have been some remnants of that action such as the fence swaying but if you notice, the fence is stationary.

Is there any investigation done on this one maybe by the so called experts?
coldethyl
The fence is not attached at the bottom.

I don't HAVE to be a so called expert to deduce that for myself.

It can be explained. Take the explanation or don't. But realize that IT CAN BE EXPLAINED.

thumbsup.gif
TheFallWithin
Hmm...I dunno. Notice the part right when the police car turns towards the fence and look at how the top bar on the fence on the left side is slanted down. Also the left side is very dark as if the getaway car rammed the chain link part backwards in the direction it was going. The part where the cop stops makes it seem like the car went through the fence because he stopped by the support bar on the right side which makes it seem like the car went right through the fence leaving it undamaged; it seems to sag slightly towards the right near the ground too.

The part that baffles me is that you can't hear the fence slamming into the car and breaking despite the engine sounds and the sirens. If the fence was broken, why didn't the police officier(s) continue on and not stop at the part of the fence as they did?

I'd have to say I'm neutral on this....I'm saying I believe it or don't believe it.

linked-image

Oh and by the way, look at the damage to this fence as to what I was saying about the left side of the fence in the first paragraph. If you cut off the picture to the left of the support pole on the far right it would like the fence is undamaged
frodonet
QUOTE(coldethyl @ May 17 2007, 03:52 AM) [snapback]1678472[/snapback]
The fence is not attached at the bottom.

I don't HAVE to be a so called expert to deduce that for myself.

It can be explained. Take the explanation or don't. But realize that IT CAN BE EXPLAINED.

thumbsup.gif


i do not see the fence is not attached to the bottom. and your deduction is wrong.

the fence however is STATIONARY yes.gif . if th car has hit thru the fence, the atmosphere would have been a bit chaotic for eg, the fence moves due to newton law of motion, some sand scattering around the air (which is not seen on the video), the car would not be a "calm and collected" drive state.

But does anyone knows, where the fence leads to??? yes.gif
frodonet
QUOTE(TheFallWithin @ May 17 2007, 02:29 PM) [snapback]1679230[/snapback]
linked-image


Great point, but fence are connected with each other, so if one is damaged, the other side would have slanted or cause an obvious deformation.

For the video though, the fence that stood in front of the cop's car seems perfect and untouched.

Is that your house's fence by the way tongue.gif ?
coldethyl
QUOTE(frodonet @ May 17 2007, 06:32 AM) [snapback]1679448[/snapback]
i do not see the fence is not attached to the bottom. and your deduction is wrong.

the fence however is STATIONARY yes.gif . if th car has hit thru the fence, the atmosphere would have been a bit chaotic for eg, the fence moves due to newton law of motion, some sand scattering around the air (which is not seen on the video), the car would not be a "calm and collected" drive state.

But does anyone knows, where the fence leads to??? yes.gif


Excuse me? How do you know my deduction is wrong?

You prove to me that the fence was fully attached everywhere. Oh, wait, you can't. No more than I can prove otherwise except for the fact that it logic dictates that the fence was not fully attached and the vehicle drove thru it because of that.

Please.

linked-image
frodonet
QUOTE(coldethyl @ May 17 2007, 11:09 PM) [snapback]1679709[/snapback]
Excuse me? How do you know my deduction is wrong?

You prove to me that the fence was fully attached everywhere. Oh, wait, you can't. No more than I can prove otherwise except for the fact that it logic dictates that the fence was not fully attached and the vehicle drove thru it because of that.

Please.


I say your deduction is wrong because you are making an assumption from just one fact (the fence not attached to the bottom, where you get that and can you prove that?).

Please don't give me someone reenact that BS again, anyone can even re-enact the moon landing...fyi

You can't just judge something and give a verdict just from one fact. that's not a cordial way.

you must research on many points before saying it's fake or true. from my previous post, i told some few points, if you took time to ponder it...it could have made you a less sceptic though.
coldethyl
If you took time to read anything I wrote you'd know that this has been posted a lot before. Not just me, but a lot of people came to the conclusion about the fence. It is logical and it's actually what it looks like in the video.

Why don't you prove that it's a ghost? Because you can't just like I said before. I go on the logic that when you rule out the impossible that whatever left, no matter how improbable, is the truth. It looks like the fence isn't attached at the bottom or sides and the chain link just went right over the vehicle, it had gone right back into place by the time the patrol car got to it.

Now how can you tell me I am wrong? You have no evidence to the contrary.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.