QUOTE(Sadonis @ May 26 2007, 06:34 AM) [snapback]1694674[/snapback]
War...that's the key topic of this thread. What is really the motivation behind a war. Sometimes it isn't the direct motivation for a certain region to enter into war..it is done because there are two religions that wholly disagree with each other.
The big ones?
Islam
Christianity
Judaism
I wont list the Asian religions because...well....they are somehow compatible with each other.
The three listed find some combination to not be compatible. People may post here and say Islam is the problem, but you can't say that with your tongue still feeling as though it seethed a fair statement. Someone that is Islamic could say Christianity is the problem. Everyone knows about the Crusades....fight over a piece of land where some guy apparently did something important to their religion. That's a bunch of bull. More like a piece of land that can get you a lot of money through trade and what not.
Now, I'm not atheist..I dont like that word. I'm not agnostic, I'm...enlightened.
Thoughts? I could list a lot of wars that have occurred that have been recorded and probably 3/4th of them are motivated either directly or indirectly by religious controversy.
People must notice this? Jeesh...
reason for war is self-interest
IMO, it is not religion, it is peoples' understanding that limits.
like, we read the same book but we pay attention to different pages or what we learn from it would be different because of personal understanding and likes. even, if we reread the same book we might learn some other thing.
the main problem of trouble maker reliogious people is that they believe they know ---enough---they think they understood. yet, as long as we live, we can learn and be better.
when a person feels satisfied with his limited knowledge, then we can expect him to be a trouble amoung us.
when someone stops learning, he usually starts judging and trying to change others to make them like himself.
while doing it so, whoever loses the connection between intelligence and conscience would become cruel. intelligence without conscience can only think for himself without any empathy or compassion.
i rather have conscience than having intelligence but no conscience. why?
because intelligence could develope by having education. if a person isnot educated then he would be more ignorant than educated ones.
but conscience is not like that. it doesn't need to develope. it's the voice of heart. education wouldnot help it at all.
you have it or you don't. it is that simple.
so, people who wants war do not really listen to their conscience. they don't consider all of those children would be suffering over those war lovers' passion, which is generally related to money.
thank you for your time