QUOTE(coldethyl @ Jun 4 2007, 03:15 PM) [snapback]1708973[/snapback]
What's your opinion on them?
Well, it does seem to me that people dream them up for various reasons, mainly the one you pointed out-- something to blame their personal problems and feelings on. I feel pretty sure that people do that.
What I'm not sure of is the factual basis, if any, for these imaginary scapegoats. In other words, did "demons" enter the human imagination via sightings of real creatures? An account of such a sighting is given in
The Hunt for the Skinwalker. Two members of an scientifically-trained investigation team witnessed the event, but only one was in a position to clearly see any details. And what he says he saw conforms exactly to the classic description of a demon. Both witnesses even smelled sulphur.
Other strange events at the site (and there were plenty) were devoid of any particular religious overtones. Instead, they were suggestive of some kind of "portal" into another place, dimension, level, frequency, or what have you. The entities responsible certainly seemed mischievous and sometimes downright malevolent, but all of the associated phenomena seemed completely neutral with respect to religion. I think that would tend to support the idea that perhaps people have seen these things throughout history and called them demons or devils and fit them into their religious frames of reference.
Then again, it could be the other way around. It could be that these creatures, whether somewhat real or wholly imagined, take their appearance entirely from the observer's own frame of reference, in effect showing us what is already in our minds-- what we expect to see. According to this hypothesis, people may have dreamed up demons first and then started seeing them. I don't think so, though. I think it was more likely the other way around. The reason is that the phenomena at the site in question refused to conform to anyone's expectations or fit into any coherent, human frame of reference. Other than "demons," members of mainstream religious pantheons and bestiaries were conspicuously absent. This makes me lean toward the idea that these things are what they are, and human beings invent certain beliefs about them. It does not seem that the belief creates the things.
So if "demon" refers to anything real, or is based on anything real, then I don't think it exactly fits the religious concepts, like "fallen angels," enemies of Christ, and so on. If they're anything outside of human imagination, then I think they must be creatures from somewhere else, creatures whose appearance has informed human mythology. If that's the case, then that mythological concept of "demon" is inaccurate and not helpful.
That's what I tend to think, but if someone has other information, I'd like to hear it.