Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: For British Viewers
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Conspiracies & Secret Societies
JET SAVAGE
I just noticed this. The first time I have seen this strong a biasing from a western media service, this being a stronger form of reverse psychology media advertising.

linked-image

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a...-by-tories.html

I have never seen in my 15 years in the media industry stronger more open dictatorial media biasing, I assume that msn are independent no longer. I am guessing that the show will include new or special subliminal programming because I cannot figure out why the UK Illuminati would want to raise the dust on this story when they held all the cards on Diana since before she was born.

Channel 4 are by no way independent as they promote themselves to be. If they are allowed on air in the UK with this much success, then they are now controlled just as the Fledgling Pure Freemasons way back when were infiltrated and taken over by the dark side an era or so ago.

I studied CH4annel Four's intelligent and modern approaches to suggestive biasing in their documentaries on sensitive subjects like Iraq or Darfur. They show with a liberal tongue a cause for world justice and independent reporting on the surface, but their subtle properganda is probably the sharpest spear of UK destiny, because it is a service made famous by viewers from the graduate and professional sectors of the UK.

So the Diana show should be watched, or avoided, or whatever? I just see this as a new level of people sheeping advertising, quite exciting and perhaps not the last increase on their Big Brother experiment.. Well, they have most of the sheeple dosed up already, so I wonder why Diana, why now, and what programming is actually continuing about her. and if we will ever get diana stamps to collect..

Whenever the media bring up a for or against debate, there is always, always a programming going on.




Malruhn
Well, perhaps they are bringing it up because the show was recently released...

Do you actually read your posts? Your wording is not only strange, it is nearly unreadable.
bee
QUOTE(JET SAVAGE @ Jun 5 2007, 09:15 PM) [snapback]1710526[/snapback]
[I studied CH4annel Four's intelligent and modern approaches to suggestive biasing in their documentaries on sensitive subjects like Iraq or Darfur. They show with a liberal tongue a cause for world justice and independent reporting on the surface, but their subtle properganda is probably the sharpest spear of UK destiny, because it is a service made famous by viewers from the graduate and professional sectors of the UK.


Could you explain a bit more what you mean by this.....I'm interested in subtle propaganda!

QUOTE
Whenever the media bring up a for or against debate, there is always, always a programming going on.


Are you saying that Channel 4 are using her for revenue?


I have my own thoughts on Diana's death....but do you know what......I think that she would welcome any

examination on the circumstances of her untimely demise. But if they are just going to re-hash 'the paparazzi's

to blame theory', then that will be boring!

There is STILL a big question mark over what happened, and who did what.....
Lord Umbarger
Diana is the U.K. answer to "JFK". If she would've died on live tv there would still be accusations of conspiracy. Personally, I don't see what the big deal about her was. She was a woman who married a prince, divorced him and then died. Hasn't that ever happened before?
Cradle of Fish
QUOTE(JET SAVAGE @ Jun 5 2007, 08:15 PM) [snapback]1710526[/snapback]
I just noticed this. The first time I have seen this strong a biasing from a western media service, this being a stronger form of reverse psychology media advertising.


Have you turned Fox News on lately?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.