Your feminist point of view is noted. If you apply nature and anthropology to this subject, you would find things are quite the opposite in some cases. Please don't take this as argumentative, but rather a slightly different perspective.
QUOTE(Siara @ Jun 5 2007, 07:15 PM) [snapback]1710867[/snapback]
My take on the Christian version:
*snip*
Obviously, when it comes to the basics of reproduction (not including the moral demands civilization) being a male is easier than being a female. Females have the additional onus of housing a more complicated reproductive system which is more susceptible to things like cancer. The female goes through a fertility cycle inwhich much of her body's energy is utilized to create conditions in which a separate human can grow. With the male, all energy is utilized by him, except for the negligible energy necessary to create sperm.
I believe many people would argue that the mans relatively simple reproductive system is a product of his rougher life than women (hunting, gathering, creating housing, protecting his family/clan/village from invaders).
QUOTE(Siara @ Jun 5 2007, 07:15 PM) [snapback]1710867[/snapback]
Obviously, (excluding civilization's huge demands) females have a harder row to hoe than males. Without modern medicine's intervention, the female's body belongs partly to herself and partly to her species. The male's body belongs to him and him alone.
The mans body and life belong to his biological family. He puts his life on the line every day for them, knowing that if HE dies, his offspring will likely be killed by whoever takes his woman as his own.
QUOTE(Siara @ Jun 5 2007, 07:15 PM) [snapback]1710867[/snapback]
Christians assume that a just God created the universe, including humanity. So why would that just Judaic-Christian God portion out the biological responsibility so unfairly? Obviously, because the females belong to a sub-group that DESERVES to be cursed. The explanation for God's unfairness appears in Genesis. It was Eve (the first FEMALE) who first "ate of the tree of knowledge" and went on to corrupt her innocent mate, Adam. Eve commited the big sin and "it is fair" that all humans in her likeness (ie-WOMEN) should br cursed with a harder biological destiny. Menstruation is called "the curse" because it is a symbol of femaleness.
I don't think you are too far off from the truth here.
QUOTE(Siara @ Jun 5 2007, 07:15 PM) [snapback]1710867[/snapback]
I think, in general, signs of femaleness are considered bad because if being a female isn't bad, then God is unfair. If God is unfair, why kneel over to him in adoration? And why give money to his representatives on earth? I think that most religious conservatives (of all faiths) disapprove of birth control because it excuses women from that curse which is proof of God's fairness.
Again, as far as Mans ideas on females in relation to religion, not too far off I think.
QUOTE(Siara @ Jun 5 2007, 07:15 PM) [snapback]1710867[/snapback]
Did you all know that American doctors used to disapprove of painkillers for birthing women because "it wasn't what God intended"?
I think that there was and still is in some communities, an ideal that childbirth is a natural thing, and that the pain is there for a reason, to create the natural chemicals in the body that spur on contractions, pushing, etc. My first child was born medication free. As far as what "God" intended, again, that's a Man created religious idea.