Truelies23, you've changed your question and how you interpreted it...
QUOTE
I’d like to open this topic by asking you: what are the true sacred rituals practiced to this day by thousands of members of so-called secret societies, occult organizations, and most often by highly educated professionals. Rituals that originated in Sumer, Egypt, and India. Rituals that, though denied and closely guarded, were revealed to the highest ranking members of the Freemasons and practiced by men and women alike, by necessity, for centuries.
After bringing up Mary Shelley's
Frankenstein, then you bounce into a question about sacred rituals that have been practiced by Freemasons... Sorry, but that reads like an accusation to me. While the story of Frankenstein may have been based upon the concept of homunculi creation, it was necrophilia and necromancy in its purest sense. There were a large number of allegorical references in the story, but to the common reader, it was necromancy. That is why I brought it up.
The Seven Liberal Arts and Sciences that are promoted in Freemasonry are grammar, rhetoric, logic, arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy, so alchemy isn't even close to being included. In all my study, alchemy has yet to be discussed, save as a passing note that this famous Freemason dabbled in alchemy, or that one was into chemistry.
This is why I am defensive.
Then you say that you want to know all the sacred rituals that Masonic men AND WOMEN have practiced for centuries... another baseless and incorrect assumption. It sounds like you already believe you KNOW what rituals you refer to and are just looking for some lap dogs to stroke your ego and let you feel superior for knowing it before them, OR you are trolling, looking for a joker to take the bait.
It looks like I'm that joker...
I am a student of Freemasonry, learning as much as I can absorb. I am also a student of anti-Masonic thought, because I feel that one can learn more about an organization if you understand how nay-sayers come to their beliefs. In my years of studying Freemasonry, I have never heard of the study or promotion of alchemy - nor of scientology. Likewise, as I said above, in my years of studying anti-Masonic thought, I have never encountered it. Now, in what appears to be a poorly veiled accusation, you say that they are linked... and I expressed my incredulity.
I have never heard the insinuation that Freemasons were involved in anything remotely related to alchemy - AND I just really, REALLY like that word... incredulity. (thanks for giving me the excuse to use it!!)(yes, I am arguing AND having a smile at the same time....
Then you FINALLY get to a specific question... what rituals did Parsons, et al, use to attempt to create the homunculus. According to the wiki (who's accuracy may not be too good...), they didn't attempt to create one - rather they attempted to summon a goddess to change the future of mankind. That is quite a large difference. I would ask that you not confuse Freemasonry with OTO - as the OTO was started as a separate organization and was only transmogrified to model Freemasonry by Crowley - who by that time had been kicked out of Freemasonry. You mentioned Jack Parsons - and might leave some readers to believe that he was involved in Freemasonry, but that isn't true. He was OTO - and according to wiki (again), attempted to summon a GODDESS - not create a homunclulous.
While I agree that the story of the golem in Prague is fanciful, aren't you shooting your own argument in the foot by immediately dismissing it? I thought that it was supposed to have been obscurred in allegory and based upon a kernel of truth... and you are throwing it out? Sorry, but I'm trying to find out where you stand... and am coming up wanting.