QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

back again too

BAM
Table tennis emoticons

QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

As I said, with the Cotteningly photos, it is not a matter of belief 'For Me'. I no longer use the word belief when speaking of such matters as fae.
Hrmmzz.... what word do you use, you seem pretty convinced the imagantive creatures exist?
Originally, your claim appeared to have psychological interests. As you have not pursued other examples, I'd say you have not begun to explore that option.
So, what is your interest?
QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

Yes, I really do think that it's real possible that the girls took 4 fakes and 1 genuine picture. When dealing with a 16 year old and a 10 year old, I think it's quite possible.
If they hadn't held out even unto death with their affirmations that the 5th photo was real, I would be more inclined to denounce it as others have...
Obviously you have no children.
Think about this -
4 fakes and one original.As for the fith photo, as n_a_t_a_l_i_e (who's avatar I absolutely love btw) has already offered this
QUOTE
"The two cousins are divided about the authenticity of the fifth picture... Frances insists that it was a genuine photograph of fairies... Elsie, on the other hand, insists that all five photographs are of cut-outs" (Wiki).
Perhaps you might look a little closer at this case before making a call huh?
Honestly, if you really really believe this, could I interest you in a nice bridge going over Sydney Harbour, only one owner..........PM me with credit card details for the purchase of a lifetime!!!
4 fake, 1 genuine sheeesh

QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

I'm not sure what is so intriguing about the fashions. I wouldn't be surprised at any picture of a fae wearing any manner of clothing. According to what I've researched, they seem to have an astute eye for glamour and fashion.
You don't find it the least bit strange that when these creatures are caught on film that they just happen to share the same tastes in clothing and grooming as the discoverer?
Astute eye for glamour and fashion?? You have to be kidding me. I can't say I have ever spotted a fairy at a fashion or hair show. How is it they can keep up with the modern times so well, Fairy tabloids? Must be pretty tough considering how they avoid human contact. If they need to avoid us, why copy us?
QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

I haven't heard of a Prophet Yaweh, so I can't comment on him.
He claimed he could summon UFO's at will. He had someone organising them for him a kilometer away. Peole do strange things for attention.
Kids too.
QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

There are over 3000 names for 'mystical beings' world wide. They are on virtually every continent of the world and in almost every culture. There seems to be a 'being' for most every good and bad deed that you can think of. The beings range from flesh to spirit, from wee to massive size, from saint to demonic.
And............................................................
That proves that fairies must exist?
No.
It proves it was a popular tale. Humans have spread across the globe, spreading culture globally. It's what we do. Classic tale - good and bad.
QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

As for the percentages of sighters, that is beyond my knowledge, I haven't read any stats on it.
I was referring to the people from what I have read in many books about many different cultures...
When stating statistics on the amount of sightings, don't you think that would be prudent???
Going of your last statement, I would say you have little understanding of the human race, it's rise and development. Might I suggest you have a look at
anthropology I am sure it can help you find many of the answers you seek, and give you a more realistic idea of tales and human nature.
It is a most intriguing field.
QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

No, there's no arrogance in acknowledging the authors of legends and lores had/have clever minds and usually an underlying agenda.
That's what I am doing, for the first part of your statement

What does the second part mean, where are you going with that
"underlying agenda" comment? And why do you believe there was any more than one wanting to share, just like J. K. Rowling or J. R. R. Tolkien? Surely
they don't have an underlying agenda? Surely you do not claim Harry Potter or Hogwarts exist. Or Hobbits. Other than Homo Florensis of course,
now that I would recomend you pursue. A genuine little person". No wings or magical powers, fashion wasn't going to win any award either, just boring old island dwarfism, but at least these homnids
did exist 
QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

If you are referring to me personally, I assure you that 'Imagination' is not a factor in the making of my opinions.
Please, enligten me. Just what is your "factor"
QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

I am a realist. Things are what they are and sometimes they are not...
No your not, and that statement is admission that you are not.
Things are
what they are.Things are never
what they are not.If you believe that statement, please offer an example to support it.
That statement is one of a dreamer.
QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

Just because I haven't seen nor encountered something, doesn't mean that it can't exist.
Wow, come up with that all by yourself? how philisophical !!!
I agree by way of derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Physics, chemistry, environment, feasability, all that sort of rot comes into play here.
It pays to know the difference between being thorough and just wasting time.
QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

I'll be honest, I mostly research the American lores and legends. I'm mostly interested in the 'nature folks' the 'wee folks' that are considered gnome types. There's limited info on them and it's tough to find because it seems to be common practice amongst the 'authors' to use the word fairy interchangably with gnomes and the other nature folks, so I have learned quite a bit about fairies even though I didn't mean too.
-----
That is commendable - learnng about lore and legend.
I am currently delving into the indigenous Australian culture. Fascinating isn't it.
You have to remember how far we have advanced in the last 100 years, and the better levels of education. More people understand the physics of local phenomena. These days, we don't need a supernatural being to explain things we do not understand. Nowadays, we actually understand these phenomena.
The words are interchangeable because they are fictional characters.
QUOTE(dea @ Jul 19 2007, 06:11 PM)

Here's a copy of one of my comments on another thread.
~
These book titles are about personal encounters that reportidly took place as recent as the past few decades and also in days of yore.
Little People by Ron Quinn
Cherokee Little People By Lynn Lossiah
The Real World Of Faeries by Dora Van Gelder
(These books are not the normal 'fluff'....)
~

I saw that. I have even found an online excerpt of
Little People. The works are impressive. They should be taken for
what they are is all.
As education levels become more widespread, you will see less and less claims.