911 conspiracy theory evidence.
1. My first piece of evidence that suggests that 911 was an inside job is the probability. As we all know there were (supposedly) four planes one for the pentagon. Two for the trade centers. One for the white house. Based on the evidence the passengers in the plane headed for the white brought the plane down. The odds of passengers on the white house flight knowing how to take control of a plane and bring it down are highly unlikely. And there are multiple places that the plane could have been brought down. And it comes down in an open field of all places. There is a ¼ chance of the one plane headed for the white house (The most powerful place on earth) crashing. And the plane crashed in an open field of all places.
The odds of that plane crashing in an open field are unlikely. The odds are the people knowing how to guide the plane are unlikely. The people confronting the terrorists. Terrorists that have knives combat skills, is unlikely. You would think that the (supposed) terrorists, Terrorists with months of training would plan for the scenarios.
This is a recreation of the report of light 93. The plane that was headed for the white house has crashed in an open field. The brave average citizens that clearly don’t know anything about flying planes overcome the strength of highly trained terrorists and took control of the plane and crashed it. And we don’t even see the wreckage.
And heres another one. There were three terrorist on the hijacked aircraft. That means that if the heroes wanted to crash the plane they would have had to do it right then and there. They had no time to steer the plane. So if the plane crashed into an open field. It would have had to have been flying right above it when the hero’s took control and crashed the plane. What are the odds that the hero’s just happened to be flying right above an open field when they crashed the plane? The odds of this are unlikely. Most of these claims that the government makes are questionable and sketchy.
And these terrorists have knives and used intimidation force. If someone tried to take control of the plane why didn’t the terrorist just stab then entrance to the cockpit really isn’t all that hard to guard.
2. Now we move on to the structural damage to the twin towers. There is a multitude of evidence that suggests that that flight 97 was a controlled demolition. The government claims that the twin towers were destroyed by the fire. But when you look at the pictures there is a small opening in the building where the planes hit. The opening extended to about three or four floors. Now if the fire spread throughout the building like the government officials said then the smoke from the fire would have to come out of the opening that the planes made. The opening is about four floors high. As listed above. All that smoke cannot come out of that opening so the fire you have put itself out to lack of air. And how does the fire spread more that four floors. The stone that the floors are made out of are not flammable. So the fire would spread throughout the four floors and that’s it. The fire would not at all accelerate. So there would be four floors intact with burnt wreckage. And the fire cannot cause structural mills to bend because the heat of the plane fuel gas is not enough to corrode metal.
Now let’s say the fire causes the steel mills that hold the buildings up to collapse. (Major benefit of the doubt) If the fire caused the structure mills to corrode they would bend either inward or outward. And that would show. On theses photos and videos of the 911 attacks there is no evidence that suggests that the structure corroded. Now let’s say that the structure bent and we just missed it. If the four floors collapsed the building would come down one floor at a time. There are a hundred and ten floors. Now let’s say the floors came down ½ second speed that’s fifty-five seconds. But the twin towers came down in eight seconds. That’s controlled demolition speed.
And heres another little claim when the tower comes down there are explosions. As evidenced by the puffy reddish-orange clouds. In fifteen minutes all the gas from the planes would be burned up so what caused those explosions. Just steel, metal, and concrete clashing together isn’t enough to cause an explosion.
Everything was vaporized in the demolition. And in controlled demolitions there is vaporization. If it was really the fire that brought the building down there would be large debris but there is nothing!
When you see the tower go down you see explosions. The only way there could be explosions is if there were… well explosives. If it were a fire the structure would have corroded and there would not have been red puffy clouds that evidence explosions. But there are!
Look carefully at what the arrow is pointing at. Those are explosions. Look at the steel structure. If it was a fire that brought the building down there would be corrosions. There would be pieces of metal sticking out and there aren’t so the claim the building was brought down by a fire is a ridiculous claim.
3. And thirdly let’s take a look at the circumstantial evidence. All the videos we have seen of Osama have been blurry right in there with Bigfoot. There are eye witnesses that say the planes had no windows and were the wrong size and did not have American airlines markings on them. If you ask the firemen that were sent to go in find and retrieve the victims most of them will say the there were explosions going on inside the trade centers. And one of the witnesses that were there in the building said that there were explosions and then he was quickly taken way by government officials. Bush and his family were supposed to have connections to the Osama family. The terrorist groups were “supposedly” in Afghanistan yet we invade Iraq. Sure bushes father had to settle the feud he started with Iraq. But you would think that bush would put finding the al’queda terrorist group on the top of his priority list. If theses people can kill twenty-eight thousand people in the flash of an eye bush should have gone in and found them before he goes into Iraq. And if he can find suddam who is a world leader. Why can’t he find Osama who is just some nutcase who dislikes Americans intensely? The whole 911 plot is very fishy. We all know that Bush is not one of the brightest leaders we have had but you would think that he would have done more to try and make 911 look more like it was done by the terrorists.
Im confused.
Man, you are hilarious........and actually I didnt vote for Bush, I dont know where you got that assertion from.