OK for the sake of you guys that think the Bush administration had anything to do with it. First of all, major planning would of taken place. Many of the terrorist leaders were trained under the Clinton admin. by our rangers for the fight in Bosnia. All the information given to the Bush admin. was from the guy left over from the Clinton admin.. So if it was an inside job it was set up by the Clinton admin. Really I wouldn't put it past the Democratic party. They have been trying tooth and nail to take apart the Constitution of the U.S. for a long time and trying to steer everyone to-wards socialistic communism. They keep butting heads with the Constitution every day. Trying to erode it. They would like nothing short of shredding it and establishing a marxist regime.

ever hear of bin laden? taliban?....trained during the RAYGUN admin to fight the Soviets.

If the government can't hide a simple break-in at a seedy hotel in Washington they sure as hell could never hide what supposedly "Really took place" on 9/11

Impeccable logic....

Which seems to escape people...many people, it appears!

i guess its safe to assume that you accept the notion oswald acted alone?

Why thank you Impeccable *straightens tie* Me likes! ... But to be entirely honest the first little while (about a year and a half) after 9/11 I was fooled by the Conspiracy... Safe to say when you really get right down to it and sort through all the Bullsh!t ... There is not a strong case for a conspiracy whatsoever

Sunofone - While I see the possibility of a second gunmen, I don't see and physical evidence and I Probably never will

i agree that the clintons ought to be tried for their involvement with destroying our constitution by ordering the first attack on the wtc in 93,ruby ridge,waco and of course demolishing the oklahoma murrah building in 95 but the BUSH ADMINISTRATION surely attacked the wtc on 9/11 -- there is no way around it

doesnt this logic lead to the possibilty of an ensuing major cover-up more elaborate than watergate?

I only mentioned the possibility that does not mean I believe it wholeheartedly or even a tad there are witness reports stating that they heard shots from the grassy knoll I have no reason to say there liars so the possibility they are telling the truth is there.... I also mentioned that there is no physical evidence that's the smoking gun without physical evidence that leads me to the belief that there was only Oswald but this isn't really the place to discuss JFK

I wonder who will people blame when Bush is out of office

Reagan....it's all HIS plan to start with....

the bush admin will always be guilty of 9/11 or are you refering to the nuking of israel and iran

you seem to really believe what you are saying. I tend to blame the terrorists that flew the planes into the buildings. Why would they do that for Ol Georgy. They would'nt, they did it for their beliefs, and hatred for the US and the West not to make Bush and his buddies richer. That would make no sense for them to help him out. Be a bush hater if you want but make sense while doing it

The thing is, people get the idea that just because the Bush administration profitted from it, they MUST have had something to do with it.

I disagree. Clinton has became the scapegoat for September 11th. I was speaking in general. So many seem to blame Clinton for the 'problems' Bush came into office with, I just think it will be curious how the media and critics will play out the next administration if and when it goes horribly wrong. It's ridiculous really. If there is a democratic president next season, and they fail miserably as commander and chief. They simply failed because they are a democrat. But if a republican will be our next president, the blame will still lie on Clinton because the lord knows 'we don't tare down our own kind'.

It's still all Reagan's fault.....

Hillery's fault!

Prove it!!!

Well that's the lefties for ya no common sense.

this is a still from the collapse of bldg 7 -- the collapse took less than 7 seconds to fall perfectly into its footprint-- a new witness that will be featured in the coming loosechange video is set to confirm that explosions occured before the collpase of either tower which only cooberates the theory that demolitions were used and that there is an ensuing cover-up of mass proportions as does this image which is enough to prove someone is lying by itself-- norad standing down and allowing the pentagon to be targeted 45 mins after the second tower had been attacked and all doubt had been erased whether or not we had been attacked or not is conclusive circumstantial evidence-- the fact that the democrats and free press were attacked by us military grade anthrax which was never properly investigated at the same time the deliberations for the investigation into 9/11 were taking place as well as the ramming of the (treasonist)patriot act-- lets also not forget the insider trading of put options that led to cia big wig buzzy krongaurd that was never properly investigated-- firefighters,emts,journalists and bystanders all testify to hearing bombs,explosions,secondary devies,ba-booms,pops,flashes and every other description you can think of to describe a demolition from close range-- im going to assume you would take the word of fox over your own mothers though as the collaspe of bldg 7 should have done it for you and you are already psycologically blocking the truth

It is a place to discuss JFK because the same people that had Kennedy killed were involved in WTC

is it safe to assume that the pentagon would have more then one camera looking over its entire area? where are those pictures from the tank station now? and if the powers that be wanna shut us all up why not just release those pictures?
why are half the hijackers alive and well?
and how many perfectly logical coincidences are people expected to swallow?
how did the plane that hit the pentagon manage to leave not a single trace of impact on the grass?
how did the carbon(soft carbon) nose cone pass through the inside walls?
all perfectly explainable? you lot must be really easily pleased.
if this was a criminal case in any court the accused would be found guilty in the 1st day.

Answer to post #20 that actually sounds more like a CIA set up job. The black pope controls the CIA. Sounds to me like he is playing two ends to the middle. Divide and conquer.

Ditto

That is the exat thing that I was thinking ok maybe not exact but the evidnece I have that 911 attacks were planed is more forensic. But yes bush was aleged to have conections to the bin laden family and did ou notice that right after 911 hit the government just kind of droped it? The whole thing was an inside. I had a post about that just a wile ago. The people that disgreed had no evidence so they just said things like "Sorry don't buy it" and they put smiley faces which the forum prohibits.