QUOTE(cyqe @ Aug 1 2007, 03:53 AM)

No, I read his post's from start to finish. He wasn't insulting.
He only stated his opinion and differing opinions, do seem to be considered insulting by some. I'm sorry that you took offense to a differing opinion. Maybe if some were a little more open-minded?
Good try at what? Logic?
If your call your argument "logic," then you need to buy a good dictionary.
You blindly state ipatt "wasn't insulting" -- notwithstanding that I quoted his numerous insults in red font. I mean, how'd you miss that?? Moreover, if others, myself included, were insulted by ipatt's personal attacks and negative choice of words, then that judgment call is OURS to make, not yours. Kapeesh?
It's obvious you have jumped in here simply to "get a piece of the action" and add insult to injury with your sorely apparent BIASED view -- much the way a drunk jumps into a barroom brawl -- since you came out swinging blindly, insisting others took offense to ipatt's "differing opinion."
Either that or you are lying when you say you have read his posts. But whatever...
First of all, no one really gives two hoots and a holler about ipatt's opinion, said opinion, as I have said, should have taken only "six" little words to share: "I do not believe in Ouija Boards."
So please stop slinging insults and accusing everyone of taking offense to ipatt's "opposing view." An opposing view is nothing to be offended by.
However, what you seem to have completely and conveniently overlooked is ipatt's characterization of himself as having a "keen analytical mind" (oops, I forgot... he was being "satirical"...) while characterizing the opposing view as "ignorance," "nonsense," "alarmist propaganda," as well as making uneducated comments like, "omg itsa deemen," and calling others "naysayers who miss the point" who are "spooked by superstition."
Did you catch all of that?? I mean, I didn't use red font that time, so I hope you were able to grasp.....
It's more than obvious that it's ipatt himself who has taken offense to differing opinions, just as it's more than obvious you love a good fight and need to get involved. But you seem to be in a battle of wits here, and you've stumbled out unarmed...
"Logic" -- a science that deals with the principles and criteria of validity of inference and demonstration.
I believe I have validly inferred and demonstrated my point.
However, all you have offered is, "he wasn't insulting," as well as accusing others of "taking offense to a differing opinion," and "not having an open mind."
Now, this barroom brawl is officially over. The overhead lights are on, the chairs are upside down on the tables, and they're wanting to mop the floor. (hint-hint)
Shoo!