Sorry for the delay in response. Evidently you can turn dead sea salts and other salts into gold and other precious metals, I will give a link on that. As for an Alchemist near the EU he is in Great Briton and evidently has trained under Don, do a google search or what ever search you use over there. I will also give a little more insight on the science of this. The link for making gold is
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/dsassays.htm <QUOTE From Forum Member> Hi Barry,
Excellent articles on resonance, vibration, and quantum coherence concerning
ormus. It appears that the boson box/cage framework is a good model to explain
properties of ormus. Well done!
It reminds me of Michael Grady's theory of a Liquid Phase Transition model of
our Universe. (this actually fits in a more inclusive Fractal Hologram Model).
Anyway, his idea is that the Universe is a giant crystal growing in a
five-dimensional liquid and quantum fluctuations are simply the random sloshing
back and forth of heat in the bulk of the fluid. "These heat fluctuations
continually buffet the phase boundary in which we live.
Now, the subatomic particles that form the building blocks of our world, these
particles come in two types: "fermions" such as electrons, which obey the Pauli
exclusion principle forbidding two particles from occupying the same quantum
state; and "bosons" such as photons, which observe no such restrictions. Grady
believes bosons are "phonons", or vibrations of the crystal lattice, while
fermions are defects of the lattice known as "screw dislocations". Think of the
planes of a crystal as the stacked floors of a multistory parking lot," says
Grady. "A screw dislocation is like the spiral ramp connecting the floors."
Two identical screw dislocations obey the Pauli exclusion principle because
they repel each other when forced together. And a mirror-image pair of screw
dislocations, differing only in the sense in which they spiral, behave just like
a particle and its antiparticle. When they meet, they cancel each other and are
annihilated in a burst of energy. The opposite of this process is "pair
production", in which two screw dislocations of opposite sense pop into
existence if vibrational energy is supplied to the lattice.
According to Grady, screw dislocations even obey Einstein's special theory of
relativity, with the speed of sound in the solid acting like the speed of light
in our Universe. The link between the speed of sound and the rate at which screw
dislocations can travel was first shown by the Russian physicists J. Frenkel and
T. Kontorowa in 1938. According the their picture, as a screw dislocation
approaches this limiting speed it compresses in the direction of motion by
exactly the amount predicted by Einstein. At the same time, the stress energy of
the screw dislocation rises, again in accord with Einstein. "At the speed of
sound, the energy, and hence the effective mass, of the dislocation becomes
infinite," says Grady. "Fermionic matter is therefore prevented from traveling
faster than light.
Anyway, ORMUS elements exhibit quantum properties and behaviors which are only
associated with bosons.
So, since bosons are force carrying particles...ORMUS platinum group metals
etc., must be a type of boson despite the fact that metallic platinum group
metals are fermions. Further, quantum coherence, quantum non-locality,
superconductivity, tunneling and other generally strange behaviors are
associated with bosons but not fermions.
Further, this means that a particle acts as if it were a spherical oscillator.
(Quantum theory requires particles to meet this requirment, that the frequency
of its waves to be proportional to its mass in accordance with the formula f =
mc2/h.)
And, these particles as an oscillator, exhibit a Standing Wave Center that
resists coupling unless both have the same resonant frequency. Thus the term
Particle and Standing Wave Center are interchangable.
So, these Higgs fields are also scalar fields which tap into dark energy.
This gets into Zero Point Energy, the Aether and so on...
Which leads me too Hans Jenny's Cymatics; where a vibrating surface is covered
with sand and the frequency of the vibration creates patterns -- apply this in
3D/4D
and the over sensitivity to frequency processing in our brains points to the
emergence of 'archeypal' forms.
And, ultimately making the leap to our analysis of fundamental particles.
Which has led to the distinctions of two basic types -- fermions and bosons. Is
it coincidence that the general behaviours of these types reflect properties of
objects (fermion-like, no superpositions, discrete) and relationships? And
(boson-like, superpositions, waves) which seem to be a possible link of brain
oscillation behaviour and the resulting patterns to the beginnings of the
universe based on the oscillations, the dynamics of fermion/boson interactions?
A quote from the American Institute of Physics:
"A superfluid is a liquid that flows without viscosity or inner friction. For
a liquid to become superfluid, the atoms or molecules making up the liquid must
be cooled or "condensed" to the point at which they all occupy the same quantum
state. A liquid of helium-3, an atom whose nucleus is made up of an odd number
of particles, is a type of particle known as a fermion. Groups of fermions are
not allowed to occupy the same quantum state.
By cooling the liquid to a low enough temperature, helium-3 atoms can pair up
(left panel). The number of particles in each nucleus adds up to an even number,
making it a type of particle known as a boson. Groups of bosons can fall into
the same quantum state, and therefore superfluidity can be achieved. Helium-4
(middle panel), a boson, does not need to pair up to form a superfluid; groups
of helium-4 atoms condense into the superfluid state at about 2 degrees above
absolute zero. Superfluidity, especially the kind that exists in helium-3, is
analogous to conventional low-temperature superconductivity, in which electrons
flow through certain metals and alloys without resistance. In a superconductor
(right panel), electrons, which are fermions, pair up in the metal crystal to
form "Cooper pairs," bosons which can then condense into a superconducting
state."
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg1612...ic-crystal.htmlBarry wrote:
Dear David,
Thanks for a very well written description of this concept. I
generally use one of Hans Jenny's videos in my workshop to illustrate
this concept.
If I might add a bit on to your explanation and relate it to ORMUS:
Imagine that the ORMUS elements can function as quantum coherent
resonators. Now imagine that these resonators hang out inside of the
balloon and that the balloon is a water molecule. If the resonators
changed frequency then the shape of the water molecules would change
in response.
I have written three articles on this theory starting in 2002:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/box.htm2004 from my Workshop slide show:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/resonance.htm2006:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/spincoherence.htmAt 09:44 PM 7/13/2007, you wrote:
>Hi Bo,
>
> You are on to something!
>
> You are getting into Sympathetic Vibration & Fractal
> Geometry. From a physics [ PHI - CYCLES ] point of view, the
> fundamental basis of all natural phenomena is vibration. All
> natural forces manifest to us in a vibratory or cyclical manner.
>
> Standing Waves - sound and form - When a vibration or wave
> reflects off of something, such as another wave, it can interfere
> with its own reflection. The interference is alternately
> constructive or destructive as the two waves move past each other.
> This creates a standing wave . Only waves with certain frequencies
> can create standing waves. This is because the distance from one
> node to the next must always be some fraction of the total length
> (one half, one third, etc.).
>
> All objects have a frequency or set of frequencies with which
> they naturally resonate when struck, plucked, strummed or somehow
> disturbed. Each of the natural frequencies at which an object
> vibrates is associated with a standing wave pattern. When an object
> is forced into resonance vibrations at one of its natural
> frequencies, it vibrates in a manner such that a standing wave is
> formed within the object. So the natural frequencies of an object
> are merely the harmonic frequencies at which standing wave patterns
> are established within the object.
>
> These standing wave patterns represent the lowest energy
> vibrational modes of the object or complex system. While there are
> countless way by which an object can vibrate (each associated with
> a specific frequency), objects favor only a few specific modes or
> patterns of vibrating.
>
>The favored modes (patterns) of vibration are those which result in
>the highest amplitude vibrations with the least input of energy.
>
> In 3D standing waves, a structure, with all characteristics of a
> platonic solid, is formed for each standing wave mode. Within an
> atom, which is the building block of matter, the platonic solid is
> not formed by salt or known particles, but by electromagnetic waves in vacuum.
>
>Both the students of Buckminster Fuller and his protege Dr. Hans
>Jenny devised clever experiments that showed how the Platonic Solids
>would form within a vibrating / pulsating 3D sphere.
>
>In the experiment conducted by Fuller's students, a spherical
>balloon was dipped in dye and pulsed with pure sine wave sound
>frequencies. A small number of evenly-distanced nodes would form
>across the surface of the sphere, as well as thin lines that
>connected them to each other.
>
>If you have four evenly spaced nodes, you will see a tetrahedron.
>Six evenly spaced nodes form an octahedron.
>Eight evenly spaced nodes form a cube.
>Twelve evenly spaced nodes form the icosahedron
>and twenty evenly spaced nodes form the dodecahedron.
>
>The straight lines that we see on these geometric objects simply
>represent the stresses that are created by the closest distance
>between two points for each of the nodes as they distribute
>themselves across the entire surface of the sphere
Anthony North: Of all the esoteric arts, none are more controversial than alchemy. Indeed, the standard image we have of the Magician – pointy hat, wise look on his ancient face, and surrounded by books and glass vials – is really that of the Alchemist. Existing in a world of mystery, the Alchemist seemed to be a dark, occult shadow over much of Europe from Medieval times to the birth of the modern world. And his claims were quite often fantastic.Famous alchemists: Europe produced many alchemists. 17th century physician Helvetius told of how a stranger showed him three sulphur-coloured lumps of stone. Stealing a fragment, Helvetius heated it in a crucible with lead, producing gold.In 1782 a James Price took several distinguished men to his Surrey home where they claimed he turned mercury into silver and then gold. Around the same time Scottish alchemist Alexander Seton went throughout Europe with a yellow powder producing gold. The Elector of Saxony imprisoned and tortured him for the secret. Seton managed to escape but died shortly afterwards. Perhaps the most famous Alchemist was the Count St Germain. First appearing in Vienna in 1740, this enigmatic man claimed to be immortal and to have achieved the most famous quest of the Alchemist.
View: Full Article | Source: Beyond the Blog
to decribe the importance of the
