******************************************************************
QUOTE
Subject:
Estoppel Activated against IRS and U.S. Department of the Treasury –
there is no liability statute for taxes imposed by IRC subtitle A
Date: March 27, 2007 A.D.
INTERVENOR'S NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT; AND,
SIXTH NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE
(Tenth Circuit #07-2017):
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad06.htm
See item (7).
This pleading was mailed yesterday (see PROOF OF SERVICE).
A second such NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT
was mailed today (3/27/2007):
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad07.htm
Subject:
RIP: The Federal Income Tax Officially DIED today (3/27/2007)
at 13:53:58 PDT
My Fellow Americans:
We bring you tidings of great joy.
That was the date and time stamp on our Sales Receipt
from the U.S. Postal Service at downtown San Diego,
California, USA, at the very moment we posted this
NOTICE OF DEFAULT:
INTERVENOR'S NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT; AND,
SIXTH NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE
(Tenth Circuit #07-2017) here:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad06.htm
FINALLY, the federal income tax is officially dead.
Not only is the U.S. Department of the Treasury legally estopped.
U.S. DOJ attempted to appear on behalf of a Delaware corporation
which has been revoked. Therefore, the U.S. Department
of Justice is also legally estopped from enforcing IRC subtitle A
and from attempting to rebut the AFFIDAVIT above, because
the Relator in that appeal preempted DOJ the moment Relator
appeared on behalf of the United States ex rel:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/a...ntervention.htm
It is now the official position of the United States (federal government)
that there is no federal Statute at Large which creates a specific liability
for income taxes imposed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code.
For standing high Court authority, see Commissioner v. Acker:
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.htm (see Am Jur abstract!)
Moreover, U.S. DOJ cannot now attempt to appear on behalf
of the United States (federal government), because
the United States is already legally represented in that appeal:
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/priv...ney.general.htm
IT'S OVER, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN -- FINALLY!
PLEASE TELL EVERYONE YOU KNOW THIS GOOD NEWS:
THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX OFFICIALLY DIED TODAY (3/27/2007)
AT 1:53 P.M. PACIFIC DAYLIGHT TIME.
Yes: this news is significant for all 300 million Americans,
particularly as the annual April 15 tax deadline approaches.
There is no liability STATUTE for taxes imposed by subtitle A
of the Internal Revenue Code: IRS tried to create that liability
with regulations instead, but it's not legal for IRS to do that:
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm
An administrative regulation is NOT an "Act of Congress":
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/1/101.html (defines "Act of Congress")
Regulations are written and promulgated by Executive Branch agencies,
NOT by the Congress of the United States i.e. the Legislative Branch.
Only the Congress can "make federal laws":
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1
EVEN IF IRS were a de jure service or bureau within
the U.S. Department of the Treasury (which they are not),
they would STILL not have any authority to create a tax liability
by means of regulations published in the Federal Register.
So, in point of fact, IRS has been impersonating the Congress
and impersonating the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
These are violations of 18 USC 912 and 31 USC 333,
respectively:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/912.html (felony federal offense)
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/31/333.html (civil and criminal penalties)
And, since Treasury fell silent in response to a proper and lawful
SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE, they were legally estopped
the moment we filed a NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT
at the Tenth Circuit today. Service of LEGAL MAIL is effected
on the day it's posted.
"Estoppel" basically means that they cannot come
forward any longer, because they had their chance,
for several years, and they couldn't produce a STATUTE.
So, now it's O-V-E-R for them.
EVEN IF they produced a liability STATUTE tomorrow,
that STATUTE (which doesn't exist, by the way)
can be stricken from evidence at the Tenth Circuit
on the basis of legal estoppel. In simple language,
they cannot change their minds to the detriment
of their opposing party(s):
Estoppel Activated against IRS and U.S. Department of the Treasury –
there is no liability statute for taxes imposed by IRC subtitle A
Date: March 27, 2007 A.D.
INTERVENOR'S NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT; AND,
SIXTH NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE
(Tenth Circuit #07-2017):
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad06.htm
See item (7).
This pleading was mailed yesterday (see PROOF OF SERVICE).
A second such NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT
was mailed today (3/27/2007):
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad07.htm
Subject:
RIP: The Federal Income Tax Officially DIED today (3/27/2007)
at 13:53:58 PDT
My Fellow Americans:
We bring you tidings of great joy.
That was the date and time stamp on our Sales Receipt
from the U.S. Postal Service at downtown San Diego,
California, USA, at the very moment we posted this
NOTICE OF DEFAULT:
INTERVENOR'S NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT; AND,
SIXTH NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE
(Tenth Circuit #07-2017) here:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad06.htm
FINALLY, the federal income tax is officially dead.
Not only is the U.S. Department of the Treasury legally estopped.
U.S. DOJ attempted to appear on behalf of a Delaware corporation
which has been revoked. Therefore, the U.S. Department
of Justice is also legally estopped from enforcing IRC subtitle A
and from attempting to rebut the AFFIDAVIT above, because
the Relator in that appeal preempted DOJ the moment Relator
appeared on behalf of the United States ex rel:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/a...ntervention.htm
It is now the official position of the United States (federal government)
that there is no federal Statute at Large which creates a specific liability
for income taxes imposed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code.
For standing high Court authority, see Commissioner v. Acker:
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.htm (see Am Jur abstract!)
Moreover, U.S. DOJ cannot now attempt to appear on behalf
of the United States (federal government), because
the United States is already legally represented in that appeal:
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/priv...ney.general.htm
IT'S OVER, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN -- FINALLY!
PLEASE TELL EVERYONE YOU KNOW THIS GOOD NEWS:
THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX OFFICIALLY DIED TODAY (3/27/2007)
AT 1:53 P.M. PACIFIC DAYLIGHT TIME.
Yes: this news is significant for all 300 million Americans,
particularly as the annual April 15 tax deadline approaches.
There is no liability STATUTE for taxes imposed by subtitle A
of the Internal Revenue Code: IRS tried to create that liability
with regulations instead, but it's not legal for IRS to do that:
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm
An administrative regulation is NOT an "Act of Congress":
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/1/101.html (defines "Act of Congress")
Regulations are written and promulgated by Executive Branch agencies,
NOT by the Congress of the United States i.e. the Legislative Branch.
Only the Congress can "make federal laws":
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1
EVEN IF IRS were a de jure service or bureau within
the U.S. Department of the Treasury (which they are not),
they would STILL not have any authority to create a tax liability
by means of regulations published in the Federal Register.
So, in point of fact, IRS has been impersonating the Congress
and impersonating the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
These are violations of 18 USC 912 and 31 USC 333,
respectively:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/912.html (felony federal offense)
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/31/333.html (civil and criminal penalties)
And, since Treasury fell silent in response to a proper and lawful
SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE, they were legally estopped
the moment we filed a NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT
at the Tenth Circuit today. Service of LEGAL MAIL is effected
on the day it's posted.
"Estoppel" basically means that they cannot come
forward any longer, because they had their chance,
for several years, and they couldn't produce a STATUTE.
So, now it's O-V-E-R for them.
EVEN IF they produced a liability STATUTE tomorrow,
that STATUTE (which doesn't exist, by the way)
can be stricken from evidence at the Tenth Circuit
on the basis of legal estoppel. In simple language,
they cannot change their minds to the detriment
of their opposing party(s):
continued in much more detail here
