10,000 year old structure found in Canadian lake

[UM-Bot]

Submitted by Alex Zelaya: In the world of history, thanks to Darwin's theory of evolution, the accepted cradle of civilization is commonly cited by scholars as being the continent of Africa. The Middle East - notably, in the area of 5 rivers; the Tigris-Euphrates (in modern day Iraq), the Nile in Africa, the Indus in South Asia, and the Huang-He-Yangtze in China are also figured prominently in the development of humankind.

View: Full Article | Source: Third Eye Concept

[Wookietim]

Yes - because there is no possible way that one rock could be piled on top of another two rocks naturally - especially when they are in the water with shifting tides....

That was sarcasm, by the way.

[Shuriken]

Yes - because there is no possible way that one rock could be piled on top of another two rocks naturally - especially when they are in the water with shifting tides....

my thoughts exactly...

[FairyJosie25]

Yes - because there is no possible way that one rock could be piled on top of another two rocks naturally - especially when they are in the water with shifting tides....

That was sarcasm, by the way.

my thoughts exactly...

In response to the two previous comments, here's part of the full article that wasn't quoted in the OP:

The discovery of this mystery rock formation (an assembly of now seven rocks) were thought to be compound perched erratics (found in northern North America), where 2 or even 3 rocks happened to land on top of each other, leaving behind a natural structure. However, when geologists and archaeologists saw images of the object - a 1,000 pound, elongated and south pointing rock sitting on baseball-sized stones at each end, which in turn, were resting on a massive, several thousand pound slab on top of the ledge, they expressed doubts about its natural origin.

Foremost, the straight edges and lack of roundness, as would characterize rocks scoured by glaciers, prompted them to discard the erratic theory. But could the structure be of human origin? If so, how could that be established?

It seems they've already covered that.......

[louie]

It looks suprisingly like a Dolmen.

http://www.dochara.com/tips/dolmens.php

[abadon19464]

The ocean ate the last of the land and poured into the smoking gulf, thereby giving up all it had ever conquered. From the new-flooded lands it flowed again, uncovering death and decay; and from its ancient and immemorial bed it trickled loathsomely, uncovering nighted secrets of the years when Time was young and the gods unborn. Above the waves rose weedy remembered spires. The moon laid pale lilies of light on dead London, and Paris stood up from its damp grave to be sanctified with star-dust. Then rose spires and monoliths that were weedy but not remembered; terrible spires and monoliths of lands that men never knew were lands... H.P. Lovecraft [The Crawling Chaos (1921)]

[www375]

Canada has been around for 10,000 years????? lol

[MysteryVy]

my thoughts exactly...

these claims aren't made by typical people like you or me (unless ur a scientist of some sort)

come now, have some faith in geologists and archeologists, they're not all r******s...

the rocks are just interesting, but some people on these forums should at least read and comprehend carefully

-me being dogmatic