Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Nxt2Hvn

Obama Shatters Records With

39 posts in this topic

Sorry I posted all of this instead of wating for people to go to the link ... but the last bit is the most interesting!

******************************************************

Barack Obama's staggering fundraising prowess -- the Democratic presidential candidate raked in a record-breaking $150 million in September and more than $604 million since the start of his campaign -- has raised the game of political cash as well as questions over whether the public financing system is now obsolete.

Public financing, which restricts how much cash a candidate can raise, is meant to curb the influence of money in presidential campaigns. In an interview on "FOX News Sunday," John McCain took issue with Obama's war chest, saying the exorbitant amount of cash Obama has raised has created the potential for scandal and lays a "predicate for the future that can be very dangerous."

"I'm saying that history shows us where unlimited amounts of money are in political campaigns, it leads to scandal ... this is the first since the Watergate scandal that any candidate for president of the United States, a major party candidate, has broken the pledge to take public financing. We enacted those reforms because of that scandal," McCain said.

Indeed, contributions to Obama far outdistance those of McCain, who kept a pledge to use the public financing system employed by all previous presidential candidates since the Watergate-era reform was enacted.

Obama is the first major party candidate to opt out of public campaign financing in the general election since the law was enacted in 1971 and revised in 1974. George W. Bush dispensed with public financing during his 2000 Republican primary battle, in which he defeated McCain.

By accepting public financing, McCain was given $84 million in funds to use between the Republican National Convention in early September and Election Day. His campaign spent $37 million in September and has had an additional $47 million available since Oct. 1.

In comparison, even before September's fundraising haul, Obama had $77 million on hand. When October fundraising is counted, Obama is expected to surpass the $695.7 million that John Kerry and President Bush -- combined -- raised in 2004.

Obama raised $454 million dollars during the primary campaign -- covering the period from the start of his presidential bid to Aug. 31, 2008, days after he accepted the Democratic Party nomination. McCain raised $240 million during that same time.

In 2004, Bush and Kerry were limited to $74.62 million in public financing in the general election. Bush raised $269.6 million during the primary campaign, while Kerry raised $234.6 million. In the 2000 general campaign, Bush and Al Gore were restricted to $67.56 million in public financing. Bush and Gore raised $95.5 million and $48.1 million in the primaries, respectively.

In 1996, Bill Clinton acquired $42.5 million during the primary campaign; his opponent, Bob Dole, raised $44.9 million. The limit for public financing in that general election campaign was set at $61.82 million.

Clinton raised $25 million in private donations seeking the Democratic nomination and got $12.5 million in matching money in 1992. President George H.W. Bush raised $27 million and got $10.1 million in matching money. Both candidates were restricted to $55.24 million in campaign public financing during the general election.

In 1988, both candidates -- Bush and Michael Dukakis -- were under a $23 million primary spending limit.

Obama's September take was made possible by more than 630,000 new donors, who contributed an average donation of just under $100, according to the Obama campaign.

"The 604 million gives the Obama campaign an extraordinary advantage in the ground game in the closing day of what has been a two-year campaign," said Harvard University public policy professor Richard Parker.

"Having the dollars to execute a plan draws even more dollars, support, media attention, and fixation to a candidate," Parker said.

Despite the unprecedented number of dollars raised, the Obama campaign is urging supporters to continue to donate. Campaign manager David Plouffe asked supporters over the weekend to dig just a little bit deeper, saying the campaign needs more cash to defend itself against McCain's "terrible" tactics in the final stretch.

"We can't afford to make any cuts. We have to execute everything that we think is required to win. We are also expanding the campaign into new battlegrounds," Plouffe said in a video message to supporters.

The Obama campaign has banked on the candidate's message of hope and change to attract millions of new contributors. Steve Weissman, associate director of the Campaign Finance Institute, said he doubts Obama will face a backlash because of his excessive haul.

"Obama raised half a billion (dollars) in the primaries, so his campaign has set records for how much you can raise during the primary season -- and there hasn't been a backlash yet," Weissman said.

"There's not likely to be backlash if the message that's put out resonates with voters. Clearly, it's better to have more money than less. But the key to success is not money alone. ... We have had plenty of millionaire candidates who have failed, like (California Senate candidate) Michael Huffington, for example. The combination of the ability to get the message out and whether the message itself is one that resonates with people is critical," he added.

The Obama campaign hopes his fund-raising prowess will translate into votes, and it is doing its best to spend the money smartly.

Obama has bought a good deal of television ads, particularly in traditional swing states like Ohio and Florida, as well as some new battleground states like Colorado and North Carolina. And the campaign has said it intends to increase its ad spending in the final two weeks before Election Day, Nov. 4.

In an unusual move, the campaign has bought a half hour of political ad time to air concurrently on CBS, NBC, and FOX on Oct. 29. Obama's campaign paid $3 million in total to air the 8 p.m. program on the three networks.

With $604 million, the campaign could buy about 201 prime-time, half-hour blocks to be run simultaneously on all three networks.

For $604 million, the Obama campaign could buy all the shares of La Salle Hotel (with $58 million left over) and almost all the shares of Papa John's Pizza (with a market cap of $606 million).

The campaign could also buy almost all the shares of the Cheesecake Factory (market cap of $640 million) and more than 50 percent of Fannie Mae's outstanding shares (market cap of $1.016 billion)

For the average American, the figure could buy 25,036 Ford Tauruses and more than 140 million gallons of milk.

An individual making $50,000 a year would have to work 12,080 years to earn $604 million.

Link/source

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. LOL. People are actually attacking Obama because his campaign is so much more successful, and he has collected so much more money then McCain?

LOL. This might be stupider then the "ACORN Scandal".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow. LOL. People are actually attacking Obama because his campaign is so much more successful, and he has collected so much more money then McCain?

LOL. This might be stupider then the "ACORN Scandal".

Did you just say "stupider"??? :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did you just say "stupider"??? blink.gif

Yeah, but I meant something more like:

Even more pathetic, idiotic, worthless, and desperate then the lies they've been spreading about ACORN.

Don't tell me you think that ACORN's commited "voter fraud" or something...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they should both be ashamed. taking campaign money, which allots to donated money, which equals free money. 'economic crisis" anyone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
they should both be ashamed. taking campaign money, which allots to donated money, which equals free money. 'economic crisis" anyone

They should be ashamed that people are supporting their campaigns?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, but I meant something more like:

Even more pathetic, idiotic, worthless, and desperate then the lies they've been spreading about ACORN.

Don't tell me you think that ACORN's commited "voter fraud" or something...

Yes I do. And it's a shame that Obama has raised that much money when our economy is so bad.

I so agree ravergirl!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They should be ashamed that people are supporting their campaigns?

No they should be ashamed for taking it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow 604 Million ?

Isn't it the Republican party that had been labeled by the Dems as the party of the rich ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW, that's insane!!

I'm gonna be bombarded by repetitive "McCain, more of the same" ads lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet somehow if mccain had raised that much that Next, you would be rubbiung it in peoples faces, wouldnt you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know what is done with the "left-over” money after the election?

I know Obama is STILL pulling money in and lots of it, and I am sure mist of it is going to go towards last minute commercials, and paying off the media adds. But what happens to the funds once the election is over? Does he get to keep it?

Maybe that’s why the media loves Obama so much, because they are receiving millions of dollars from him and his campaign to advertise on their networks and in their news papers.

Maybe they are only biased because of money Obama is dishing out to them. They are more than happy to take McCain’s money as well I’m sure. Then they turn around and bash him. It must be nice for Democrats to have a monopoly on the media.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does anyone know what is done with the "left-over” money after the election?

I know Obama is STILL pulling money in and lots of it, and I am sure mist of it is going to go towards last minute commercials, and paying off the media adds. But what happens to the funds once the election is over? Does he get to keep it?

Maybe that’s why the media loves Obama so much, because they are receiving millions of dollars from him and his campaign to advertise on their networks and in their news papers.

Maybe they are only biased because of money Obama is dishing out to them. They are more than happy to take McCain’s money as well I’m sure. Then they turn around and bash him. It must be nice for Democrats to have a monopoly on the media.

I wish we could have a president based on how good of a leader he would be and not by how many people would attend his bithday party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like Obama is doing pretty well, and whats the problem again? Oh ya, Obama is cleaning house.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wish we could have a president based on how good of a leader he would be and not by how many people would attend his bithday party.

It's all about the glitz and glamour now I'm affraid. Damn most of the ralley's I'v seen look like the halftime show at the superbowl. They should move Washinton D.C. to Hollywood lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, well. Now whatever happened to those poor democrat supporters who can't barely make it and needs government assistance???

Tax the rich! While they give their money to Obama, pathetic!!!

Edited by AROCES

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone read the article that a lot of Obama donations were in the odd numbers? Like $979.45, $723.13 $578.32 or $456.21.

It's been speculated that these are foregn donations and what we see is the dollar excahnge total.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone read the article that a lot of Obama donations were in the odd numbers? Like $979.45, $723.13 $578.32 or $456.21.

It's been speculated that these are foregn donations and what we see is the dollar excahnge total.

Yep.. there is just something about this man that I don't trust. Call it a hunch ... :hmm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's all about the glitz and glamour now I'm affraid. Damn most of the ralley's I'v seen look like the halftime show at the superbowl. They should move Washinton D.C. to Hollywood lol.

I don't have a problem with rockstar presidents. I have a problem with rockstar canidates. you should be dirt poor and grovelling (not really but "you know") for the opportunity, privilege, and duty to be the President of this nation. and earn your rewards in action. The post of President was glorified by the acts of the Roosevelts, Lincoln, Washington, Reagan even. It has been villified by some, and it has recently been shat upon. We don't need a revolutionary President, we only need one that can restore honor and faith and fear ((rather than religious terror) which is what fighting terrorism has to be fought with incidentally)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yep.. there is just something about this man that I don't trust. Call it a hunch ... :hmm:

Well, could not think of any other logical explanation really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, people will find anything to complain about won't they? If I wanted to donate my money to someone, no one has the right to tell me I should spend it elsewhere. Yes, the economy is bad, but what is $604 million going to do that $700 billion didn't? This is really silly people. I'm not even a democrat and I can see that. McCain has more money than Obama, why should either of them be "dirt poor and grovelling"? I think they have both bettered themselves though out their lives. I may be wrong, but I wasn't aware that either of them was born into a wealthy family?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow, people will find anything to complain about won't they? If I wanted to donate my money to someone, no one has the right to tell me I should spend it elsewhere. Yes, the economy is bad, but what is $604 million going to do that $700 billion didn't? This is really silly people. I'm not even a democrat and I can see that. McCain has more money than Obama, why should either of them be "dirt poor and grovelling"? I think they have both bettered themselves though out their lives. I may be wrong, but I wasn't aware that either of them was born into a wealthy family?

Because msmischief, anyone can buy popularity. and Popularity wins you votes, and votes win you electoral votes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Because msmischief, anyone can buy popularity. and Popularity wins you votes, and votes win you electoral votes.

This is true, but I don't think he is buying popularity. Obama was already popular, which is why people are donating their money. He has been around for awhile now. I first heard about him, probably over 10 years ago. Friends and coworkers spoke of him as someone to watch, someone with potential.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is true, but I don't think he is buying popularity. Obama was already popular, which is why people are donating their money. He has been around for awhile now. I first heard about him, probably over 10 years ago. Friends and coworkers spoke of him as someone to watch, someone with potential.

He has been around a lot less than Palin has, and out of all 3 of her male counter parts she has the most CEO experience than they all have put together. But democrats want to turn her into a "dumb bimbo" because they are scared that she actually single handedly got republicans excited about the presidential race again.

Most republicans did not want McCain to be their presidential nominee, in fact I am still figuring out how the hell he pulled it off? But since Palin has been put in the race republican’s care again, and that gets democrats scared, so they have to turn her into a villain.

When she was on SNL they had the highest rating in YEARS, but as soon as her part was over everyone turned the channel. This says a lot about her popularity that the dems are trying sooooooo hard to tarnish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He has been around a lot less than Palin has, and out of all 3 of her male counter parts she has the most CEO experience than they all have put together. But democrats want to turn her into a "dumb bimbo" because they are scared that she actually single handedly got republicans excited about the presidential race again.

Most republicans did not want McCain to be their presidential nominee, in fact I am still figuring out how the hell he pulled it off? But since Palin has been put in the race republican’s care again, and that gets democrats scared, so they have to turn her into a villain.

When she was on SNL they had the highest rating in YEARS, but as soon as her part was over everyone turned the channel. This says a lot about her popularity that the dems are trying sooooooo hard to tarnish.

That's nice, but the topic is not about her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.