Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Still Waters

Pictured: Hubble space telescope images

10 posts in this topic

Hubble's greatest hits: Hubble space telescope images.

Link/Pics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Hi Still Waters, Hope your well;

I think one of my most favorite hubble imagiges is the M104 or better known as the Sombrero Galaxy and especially if taken from spitzer in infrared that brings the colors out as blue,

Good link SW and thanks,

TFF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great post -this pics just amazing.

linked-image

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic, thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

The Seagull Nebula

linked-image

Edited by thefinalfrontier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use that picture of the Orion Nebula as my desktop background. :tu:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If people cast their minds back a few months. remember Hubble picked up an unusually bright light which was too bright for any known sun. So did they ever find out what the light was?

I'd like to think it was a laser beam from our galactic cousins. hehe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I will never cease to be amazed by the wonders of the universe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

i got this one set as my desktop backround :tu:

linked-image

just not as big and without the glitch :hmm: sorry about that....

Edited by dr alien

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

If people cast their minds back a few months. remember Hubble picked up an unusually bright light which was too bright for any known sun. So did they ever find out what the light was?

I'd like to think it was a laser beam from our galactic cousins. hehe.

Hi Steve;

Yes they have figured out what the bright flash was heres the story,

Hubble Finds Rare Progenitor to a Supernova

Heres the story followed by a photo;

Release No. STScI-2009-13

Image Credit: NASA, ESA, A. Gal-Yam (Weizmann Institute of Science), and D. Leonard (San Diego State University)

NASA's Hubble Space Telescope has identified a star that was one million times brighter than the sun before it exploded as a supernova in 2005. According to current theories of stellar evolution, the star should not have self-destructed so early in its life. "This might mean that we are fundamentally wrong about the evolution of massive stars, and that theories need revising," says Avishay Gal-Yam of the Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

The doomed star, which is estimated to have had about 100 times our sun's mass, was not mature enough, according to theory, to have evolved a massive iron core of nuclear fusion ash. This is the prerequisite for a core implosion that triggers a supernova blast.

The finding appeared yesterday in the online version of Nature Magazine.

The explosion, called supernova SN 2005gl, was seen in the barred-spiral galaxy NGC 266 on October 5, 2005. Pre-explosion pictures from the Hubble archive, taken in 1997, reveal the progenitor as a very luminous point source with an absolute visual magnitude of -10.3.

The progenitor was so bright that it probably belonged to a class of stars called Luminous Blue Variables (LBVs), "because no other type of star is as intrinsically brilliant," says Gal-Yam. As an LBV-class star evolves it sheds much of its mass through a violent stellar wind. Only at that point does it develop a large iron core and ultimately explodes as a core-collapse supernova.

Extremely massive and luminous stars topping 100 solar masses, such as Eta Carinae in our own Milky Way Galaxy, are expected to lose their entire hydrogen envelopes prior to their ultimate explosions as supernovae. "These observations demonstrate that many details in the evolution and fate of LBVs remain a mystery. We should continue to keep an eye on Eta Carinae - it may surprise us yet again," says supernova expert Mario Livio of the Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Md.

"The progenitor identification shows that, at least in some cases, massive stars explode before losing most of their hydrogen envelope, suggesting that the evolution of the core and the evolution of the envelope are less coupled than previously thought, a finding which may require a revision of stellar evolution theory," says co-author Douglas Leonard from San Diego State University, Calif.

One possibility is that the progenitor to SN 2005gl was really a pair of stars, a binary system that merged. This would have stoked nuclear reactions to brighten the star enormously, making it look more luminous and less evolved than it really is. "This also leaves open the question that there may be other mechanisms for triggering supernova explosions," says Gal-Yam. "We may be missing something very basic in understanding how a superluminous star goes through mass loss."

Gal-Yam reports that the observation revealed that only a small part of the star's mass was flung off in the explosion. Most of the material, says Gal-Yam, was drawn into the collapsing core that has probably become a black hole estimated to be at least 10 to 15 solar masses.

Gal-Yam and Leonard located the progenitor in archival images of NGC 266 taken in 1997. It was easily identifiable only because it is so superluminous. Only Hubble could clearly resolve it at such a great distance.

The team then used the Keck telescope to precisely locate the supernova on the outer arm of the galaxy. A follow-up observation with Hubble in 2007 unequivocally showed that the superluminous star was gone. To make sure the new observation was consistent with the 1997 archival image, the astronomers used the same Hubble camera used in 1997, the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2.

Finding archival images of stars before the stars explode as supernovae isn't an easy task. Several other supernova progenitor candidates have been reported prior to the Hubble observation. The only other absolutely indisputable progenitor, however, was the blue supergiant progenitor to SN 1987A. In the case of SN 1987A, it was thought that the progenitor star was once a red supergiant and at a later stage evolved back to blue supergiant status. This led to a major reworking of supernova theory. The progenitor star observed by Gal-Yam is too massive to have gone through such an oscillation to the red giant stage, so yet another new explanation is required, he says.

The Hubble Space Telescope is a project of international cooperation between NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) and is managed by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) in Greenbelt, Md. The Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) conducts Hubble science operations. The institute is operated for NASA by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., Washington, D.C.

linked-image

Edited by thefinalfrontier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.