Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
morrison1976

Scientist admits to study of Roswell debris!

332 posts in this topic

Now, i have always thought that the american government was lying about what really happened in roswell. The weather balloon did not make sense, and project M did not make sense either. Now, im not saying i believe it was ET, as it could have been a number of things. Just came across this, and if true, then it makes this case more interesting. Have a read, and tell me what you think, or if you know anymore about this.

http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2009/08/scienti...of-roswell.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now, i have always thought that the american government was lying about what really happened in roswell. The weather balloon did not make sense, and project M did not make sense either. Now, im not saying i believe it was ET, as it could have been a number of things. Just came across this, and if true, then it makes this case more interesting. Have a read, and tell me what you think, or if you know anymore about this.

http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2009/08/scienti...of-roswell.html

Question is how serious Bragalia is. And how do these scientists (named by Bragalia) know it is the Roswell debris from the crashed ET spacecraft they examine and testing?

Well, to me it does seems it was an ET spacecraft that crashed, the deathbed confessions confirms it, and there were lots of first hand witnesses who came forward, some of them risked their lives by that like for example some Nurse X, a Nurse maked a drawing of one of the dead (4 feet tall) alien bodies, but she was then suddenly "transferred" because she could not keep her mouth shut, so they had to kill her too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now, i have always thought that the american government was lying about what really happened in roswell. The weather balloon did not make sense, and project M did not make sense either. Now, im not saying i believe it was ET, as it could have been a number of things. Just came across this, and if true, then it makes this case more interesting. Have a read, and tell me what you think, or if you know anymore about this.

http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2009/08/scienti...of-roswell.html

Hi Morrison,

Unfortunately, I would not hold my hopes too high.

First of all, Mr. Bragalia is not exactly the most credible researcher around and, secondly, in this particular case he is making an outright wrong assessment (whether deliberately or not I shall leave unsaid). One of the central letters from Batelle essentially tells the Air Force that before they can do anything they need something tangible to work with, i.e. Batelle and the Air Force did not have any material at all to work with. And could thus not have concluded anything as being of neither terrestrial not extraterrestrial origin.

Secondly, Mr. Bragalia alleges that this particular study initiated the development of Nitinol. Unfortunately for Mr. Bragalia then Nitinol has a very well documented research and development history dating back to 1938, some 9 years before Roswell. To put it bluntly (and using Evangium's analogy), then his book has little or no more value than regular toilet paper.

All in all, Mr. Bragalia is out to sell books. Plain and simple.

Cheers,

Badeskov

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is being discussed (among other things) in the More Best Evidence thread:

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum...853&st=1125

(Post #1126 by Badeskov in case the link doesn't work.)

And I thought this would be something new! But in fact, I see no reason for this thread.....JMO.

Well, its new to me, and maybe to other people too, and if you read the link, its also quite intersting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Morrison,

Unfortunately, I would not hold my hopes too high.

First of all, Mr. Bragalia is not exactly the most credible researcher around and, secondly, in this particular case he is making an outright wrong assessment (whether deliberately or not I shall leave unsaid). One of the central letters from Batelle essentially tells the Air Force that before they can do anything they need something tangible to work with, i.e. Batelle and the Air Force did not have any material at all to work with. And could thus not have concluded anything as being of neither terrestrial not extraterrestrial origin.

Secondly, Mr. Bragalia alleges that this particular study initiated the development of Nitinol. Unfortunately for Mr. Bragalia then Nitinol has a very well documented research and development history dating back to 1938, some 9 years before Roswell. To put it bluntly (and using Evangium's analogy), then his book has little or no more value than regular toilet paper.

All in all, Mr. Bragalia is out to sell books. Plain and simple.

Cheers,

Badeskov

Cheers badeskov. Yes, after reading this, it does sound a bit dodgy :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Well, its new to me, and maybe to other people too, and if you read the link, its also quite intersting.

I agree, its quite interesting, and Bragalia also wrote about that the scientists compare the human made material to the crashed ET spacecraft's material (debris). Also try search under "Roswell debris confirmed as Extraterrestrial" (also by Bragalia) there you can read about it too......

You can find the Roswell debris in Wikipedia "Material with exotic properties" were Jesse Marcell descripe the debris he found including the I-Beam with Hieroglyphics on it as no one are able to decipher........

Edited by Ra_Sun-God

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Cheers badeskov. Yes, after reading this, it does sound a bit dodgy :(

I agree, Badeskov's statements about Bragalia sounds dodgy. Bragalia is one of the most credible researchers. I don't think Bragalia just wants to sell books, no, to me Bragalia is serious enough..... ;)

Edited by Ra_Sun-God

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cheers badeskov. Yes, after reading this, it does sound a bit dodgy
I agree, Badeskov's statements about Bragalia sounds dodgy...

You know quite well that was not what morrison meant by that statement. Please don't do this again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Battelle's historic involvement in applying our science to understanding extraterrestrial science is no longer hidden. The truth is now revealed. Battelle Memorial Institute analyzed the materials of construction of a crashed craft from another world.

Something which I least believe because it would have been a great news if every specialists on earth admitted....and also from previous works I doubt their entire credibility....

Thanks

B???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cheers badeskov. Yes, after reading this, it does sound a bit dodgy :(

Yeah, unfortunately it does. I would love it to be true, but this sounds way out of whack to me. Pity people like Bragalia has to keep coming around with their pseudo-scientific "investigations". If Bragalia had really stumbled across something so significant he could have sold the story for millions to the New York Times (or similar) and then written a book.

Now his book comes out and will probably not really get any attention. One wonders why...;)

Cheers,

Badeskov

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree, Badeskov's statements about Bragalia sounds dodgy.

Tsk tsk tsk. That was not nice, Ra!

Bragalia is one of the most credible researchers. I don't think Bragalia just wants to sell books, no, to me Bragalia is serious enough..... ;)

You have still to reply to my post 1126 in the More Best Evidence Thread. Care to reply to that particular post?

Cheers,

Badeskov

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Question is how serious Bragalia is. And how do these scientists (named by Bragalia) know it is the Roswell debris from the crashed ET spacecraft they examine and testing?

Well, to me it does seems it was an ET spacecraft that crashed, the deathbed confessions confirms it, and there were lots of first hand witnesses who came forward, some of them risked their lives by that like for example some Nurse X, a Nurse maked a drawing of one of the dead (4 feet tall) alien bodies, but she was then suddenly "transferred" because she could not keep her mouth shut, so they had to kill her too.

I won't deny that these people could be right.... However unlike you I won't jump the gun and say they are telling the truth either mostly because people lie all the time, long term memory is unreliable and it's all second hand information.

I have some questions for you.

1: Have you heard or anyone else (living) heard these deathbed confessions?

2: Who is this nurse? How do you know she was 'disappeared'? What evidence do you have of this?

3: While everyone claimed to be risking their lives how do you know they really were? If true since the story is so fantastic and unbelievable why not just let them talk since people wouldn't believe them anyway?

4: In the last 60 years how come no one from the inside has come forward to present evidence? A conspiracy this big would be full of leaks just like Watergate regardless of security.

I agree, Badeskov's statements about Bragalia sounds dodgy. Bragalia is one of the most credible researchers. I don't think Bragalia just wants to sell books, no, to me Bragalia is serious enough.....

Books = income....

Scientists make peanuts for money, my friend Gary is a physicist and only makes about 50k a year... Bragalia has every reason to write a book and make money, I would...

More questions.

1: How do you know Bragalia is one of the most credible researchers? (having a college/university education does not count as an answer.)

2: How do you know he doesn't wanna write a book and make money?

3: How do you know Bragalia is serious and not lying to exploit your beliefs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, unfortunately it does. I would love it to be true, but this sounds way out of whack to me. Pity people like Bragalia has to keep coming around with their pseudo-scientific "investigations". If Bragalia had really stumbled across something so significant he could have sold the story for millions to the New York Times (or similar) and then written a book.

Now his book comes out and will probably not really get any attention. One wonders why...;)

Cheers,

Badeskov

You are so wrong again. Bragalia is serious enough! Don't listen to Badeskov! And I mean it! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You know quite well that was not what morrison meant by that statement. Please don't do this again.

Please don't do this. You know that Badeskov is wrong about that. Please don't fall into that trap Lilly!

Edited by Ra_Sun-God

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please don't do this.

You mean respond rationally?

You know that Badeskov is wrong about that.

No, I don't. Actually, I know quite the opposite.

Please don't fall into that trap Lilly!

You mean the *trap* of rational thinking?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its still hear say ! Until real 100% materail proof is presented to all the World. Just stuff of Fiction Im affraid !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its still hear say ! Until real 100% materail proof is presented to all the World. Just stuff of Fiction Im affraid !

Exactly, no matter how many articles one may choose to publish, it still doesn't make it real.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I second that motion. Although there is now more and more sightings and more people making claims of hearing this, that, or the other, I would still like to see more evidence of aliens or in scientific words, extratrestial beings, then it'll make things more believable. Even though something tells me that something like the movie District 9 or Halo wouldn't be that bad in a few ways but bad in a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe its just a re-make of "Guess who`s Comeing to Dinner"

Or To Serve Man?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now, i have always thought that the american government was lying about what really happened in roswell. The weather balloon did not make sense, and project M did not make sense either. Now, im not saying i believe it was ET, as it could have been a number of things. Just came across this, and if true, then it makes this case more interesting. Have a read, and tell me what you think, or if you know anymore about this.

http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2009/08/scienti...of-roswell.html

Thank you!

I have been telling people for years that the Roswell incident was caused by extraterrestrials and that is the same message that I have been receiving here in Corpus Christi, TX from those who were there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you!

I have been telling people for years that the Roswell incident was caused by extraterrestrials and that is the same message that I have been receiving here in Corpus Christi, TX from those who were there.

And they have the same evidence again and again (but I'd love to be proven wrong).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something huge deffinetly happened in 1947.

It wasn't a weather ballon either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It may of been smaller than we know ? Fit it all in a cargo plane,supposed bodys and all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you!

I have been telling people for years that the Roswell incident was caused by extraterrestrials and that is the same message that I have been receiving here in Corpus Christi, TX from those who were there.

... and the fact - there is no factual data (physical properties/chemical composition) on that "fancy" Roswell material in OP's link - does not bother you? I read "blah, blah, blah" only, nothing substantial.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.