Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2
Fenris

Fenris Vs Falco: Theologys examined

69 posts in this topic

As per the title this topic is mostly ment to be between Myself and Falco, examining, contrasting and compairing our two theological standpoints. Its not ment as a proper debate as for the most part we probably won't be on opposing sides and there won't be an argument, however there will, hopefully, be an examination of the internal logical coherency of both PoV's

Whilst occassional 'peanuts from the gallery' are welcome on matters of logic (Not YOUR logic, but rather does each of the participents statements have an internal logic that holds with what they have posted to date in this thread! Feel free to point out contradictions if the other person misses it). Also this is an examination of the theological views of the two protaganists, for the perpouses of this thread YOUR theology is of no interest.... you want to push your theological position? Do so elsewhere. If you want to discuss a point raised here from your PoV feel free to start a second thread (I'm hoping there will be several such general open threads generated during this), THIS thread is predominantly concerned with the PoV's of Falco and myself.

So, how to kick this off? Falco, I suggest we both give a general overview of what brought us to our current position followed by a description in broad terms of the nature of our theological stance..... ending with a "How do you explain 'X' in regard to your PoV" question for the other side.

Being mostly raised in the Catholic area's of Glasgow I was basicaly 'force fed' that belief system from day one. However there where aspects of it that didn't sit right and also experiences that weren't explained by their doctrins. Age seven became a turning point, the blatent hypocracy of the church was simply too much.

A friends father was a drunkard and a wife beater, each Saturday he'd go to confession, admit his 'sins', say his hail marys and be absolved of the responcibility for his actions.... then go to the pub, get tanked, go home and beat his wife and kids black and blue again...... I knew the church was well aware of it, but he was a good catholic and didn't need to change his ways because each week they would absolve him of it and he had no reason to change... why when he would be 'forgiven' regardless!

Even at age seven, this was beyond the amount of hypocracy I could stomach, I decided there was something fundamentaly flawed in such a system and turned my back on the church..... This caused somewhat a theological void, I had questions but no longer accepted the dogma I was brought up with as an answer.... So I began the search for my own answers.

First point of call was science and to this day I have and abiding interest, especialy quantum physics..... however I was still having experiences that science couldn't (And still can't) answer. Over the thirty or so years since then I've walked a number of paths, both eastern and western, discounting those parts which are unscientific whilst examining the rest. Where I've found something I couldn't explain I've studied it to the point I could understand from my own PoV how its working (Sometimes thats accepting that paths viewpoint on it, sometimes working out how I believe it to be functioning)

I've walked many paths Buhdist, Taoist, Druid, even was a sanyasin for a while (Their active meditation techniques where a great help). Looked into but not followed others OTO, Golden Dawn, Satanism, Spiritualism. And underwent three formal initiations Shaman, Wiccan, Cabbalist.... No single path has given me all the answers and all the organised forms of 'worship' tend to have the same drawback.... where you have an organisation, people are drawn to it for the apparent power over others that an organisation automaticaly brings.

So here I am, rapidly aproaching the big Four oh-oh and walking no-ones path but my own. I do use the lable 'Pagan' in its loosest and most generalised form as its close enough in situations where going into great detail isn't an option.

In broad terms, theology isn't about dogma or rhetoric or following some book written 10K years ago/ 2K years ago/Early 1960's/yesterday nor following what someone else tells you to follow. Theology is about your relationship with the divine in whatever form you touch it, the answers aren't out here, if you are looking out here then you are getting it wrong, the answers are already there you just have to look long enough and deep enough inside yourself in order to find them.

And finaly, If I'm going to be asking the first question, lets make it the big one......

Falco, please explain in the terms of your theology the nature of the Divine (God, gaea, energy of the universe, However you percieve it)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep walking your own path, Fenris.

You're like me....we're both about the same age.....I've never subscribed to Christianity's (or for that matter, any religion's) dogmas, right from the time I was a small child. Anyway, for a start, I asked too many pointed (and embarassing) questions grin2.gif . I may have a certain affinity to various aspects of a belief system, but I don't subscribe to any religion in particular. I can think for myself, I don't need someone else to do it for me, plus I'm intelligent enough (I hope) to be able to find the answers I seek.

The logic of your path will come from your journey along it.....it may not fit anyone else's logic.....it may even offend some people's belief systems, but that's their problem, not yours. They will need to deal with it themselves.

So long as you find those answers you're seeking, that is all that's required. If anyone else becomes interested in your personal philosophies, good.....if not, then that's good as well. Each person has their own path to follow. Even if it's not a good path and they get led up the "garden path", so to speak. We all learn from our experiences (hopefully).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I preface my answer with a brief introduction since it ties in with what I believe. I was raised in a home where religion was of minimal importance. My Father was a Baptist that never really got any answers to his questions about Theology from the church, so in his adulthood he has become lapsed. My Mother is Jewish and German and a Holocaust survivor. Although she's never been forthcoming about what she experienced there whatever happened altered her view on religion forever..

Thusly, I was raised without being forced to go to church or without any preconceived notions of what God might be. I too have tried various Religions, the two main ones for me being Evangelical Christianity and Judaism.

Although I enjoyed both of them to an extent they both felt somehow incomplete for me. Mostly it was the fact that to be accepted in them you are forced to fight scientific fact that bears itself out in laboratory conditions. Why would a sensible school of thought argue with things that are known to be true? That bothered me to quite a bit. If they want me to believe that,what other falsehoods might I be forced to swallow?

Although disillusioned with various religions I find that I still believe in a higher power. So for the past few years I've tried to examine my thoughts and beliefs on what God might be. Although my thoughts are by no means fully formed here's how I perceive God as of today...

I believe there is one God who is an energy or force that is the embodiment of sentient thought in the universe. God represents the something more we always refer to when we speak of conscience or the soul or higher thoughts. I believe there is only one God but that he has worn many faces throughout time. Whether it was Marduk or Athena or El it seems that something was performing miracles and giving signs long before the Worlds' current dominant theology was locked into place. I doubt highly that a God or whole Pantheon of them would just dissappear because the state didn't allow them to be worshipped. Rather I believe that the Gods of old and God as he currently exists are just an aspect of the total Divine Force and that God can be thought of or worshipped in whatever form that people can best comprehend him in. The Ancient Romans had a term for it. Divine Genius. I think that term sums it up best for me. God is more of a Spiritual Force or energy for me than a physical being.

That's merely a bare skeleton of my belief but I think it's enough of a frame work to begin with..

So Fenris, I would ask of you the same question. What is God to You?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmm we are not so far apart on this, there are diffrences but far more points of simularity.

Here is 'divinity' from my PoV..........

There is an energy out there that for want of a better lable I think of as 'divinity', it isn't inteligent in the way we recognise inteligence, it isn't some kind of omnipotent puppetmaster, nor is it a celestial 'father figure' who can pat us on the head and take away the responsibility for having done negative crap. It doesn't 'love' us or try to 'look after us' in any way we would recognise, not in its base form. It is simply a force of nature that follows its own set of rules (That we haven't figured all of them out) much like a storm is a force of nature that follows rules.

however, that divine energy can be used/molded by the will of inteligent beings (All life is ALSO part of that energy!). This is the root of all the myriad gods and goddesses that human beings have interacted with throughout the ages. When the first caveman tried to understand the world around him and decided there where forces beyond his reach... that first metaphysical thought started the first god archetype. Another caveman contemplated and tried to understand the concept and in some places he agreed, in others he disagreed (And possibly clubbed the first guy over the head with a rock for being a heritic *g*).... and so on through the ages, those things that agree making the archetypes stronger and those that don't agree, if enough people believe then a new archetype evolves.

Those archetypes are the basis of all the gods, goddesses, etc that we have interacted with, but it isn't until we personaly interact with them that they become 'real'. No longer just an archetype, but an archetype viewed through who we are and how we understand the world. A mix of ourselves and what has gone before.

That doesn't detract from their value though, divinity as an energy is infinate and as finite beings we can never truely understand anything infinate except in the most abstract of terms, its just too big, it doesn't fit into our finite understanding. So breaking it down into chunks that we CAN relate to, anthropomorphising bits so we can interact and communicate, helps us not only understand bits of divinity but also (Because what we deal with is formed through who we are as well as the archetypal template) helps us understand ourselves. The danger comes when we forget the limitations of 'god' and get bogged down in dogma and ignorance, letting others tell us what we 'should believe' rather than learning who we are and where we fit into the whole.

OK, basing the next question on what you have there.......

Given we both recognise the multi-faceted nature of the divine, in which of its forms do you personalty relate to it and in what manner do you do so? do you 'worship' it? Use it as a kind of tool? Treat it like "Buddy Divinity" just another aspect of you life? Totaly ignore it? Point your fingre and laugh at it? What?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow what a great thread......why wasn't I invited. crying.gif .....jjk

After reading these Pov's so far I can't help but come away feeling that what is being described by each of you gentlemen is the power or force of nature. This is how I percieve this power.....I personally do not like to use the human invented word 'God'.....for I feel these Gods are a personification of this nature force.

Specific examples of Gods in many cultures in my opinion may represent 'visitors' of some kind.

It makes me feel good to see that neither of you gemtlemen subscribe to a final Judgement or damnation or salvation as reward or punishment.

I was wondering if these concepts enter into your beliefs or not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I guess the short answer is that I don't relate to it on a day to day basis.It's enough for me just know that it's there. I don't engage in regular active worship the way most would recognize it. On occasion, when I have a quiet moment I like to meditate on the nature of God Him/Her?Itself, and hope that by reaching a higher level of understanding that I will grow closer to God myself. Although I never pray to ask for anything or follow a set prayer routine.

I've already been given free will and sentient thought, to ask for more than that seems selfish somehow..

Every once in a while I'll throw a friendly greeting into my meditation routine. It may sound silly, but it can't hurt to be nice.. wink2.gif

However there have been times when it seems that force has chosen to interact with me. I don't mean I have visions or speak with Angels or anything like that. But every single time in my life that events have been totally out of control and everything was about to hit the wall, I've been saved at the last minute by something or other. And it's usually something I've had nothing to do with. This has happened far too many times for me to chalk it up to good luck..

I'm also aware that this may just be Hubris on my part, but It just doesn't feel like it...

I still wouldn't take this to mean God loves me, at least not in the way we humans define it. Insofar as I can understand the nature of it at all, I think Gods' version of emotional response would be far different than ours. It would have to be if you were omnipotent pure energy. I definitely don't see God as my buddy. If I'm really being saved, I'm sure it's to some end I can only guess at. Or maybe for no purpose at all but random interference to bolster my beliefs..

I hate to sound like a Parrot, but Your question was a good one, so I'll send it back to you..

Also you mentioned that you believe Gods' energy can be influenced by beings with intelligent thought. You seem to mean mean that our thoughts turn God into physical beings for us. But do you believe it possible that we can use some of Gods' energy for ourselves personally? And if so, how? I'm wondering because there are some who have claimed to have worked miracles in Gods name. I'm wondering how miraculous healing and such fits into your theology.

Edited by Falco Rex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To respond to Chauncy. No I don't believe in final judgement of the soul or final reward. At least not at this basic a level of existence. I think we simply move on to something else. People speak of the afterlife, but who can say that it's the only one? There may well be levels of existence even beyond that..

Perhaps eventually there's a Final of some sort but I don't think it happens at the end of this life..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can definitely say with confidence that the PoV’s so far are very indicative of humans that are in tune with the world and what it means to be human.

When I ponder the ultimate power or force of nature I do not connect it to the idea of a God personified as such, I ponder it as an energy or frequency. Unfortunately the persona of a ‘God’ , regardless of culture, has become for me a lazy depiction. Where as the mind set one submits to in order to put faith in this persona, actually prevents one from seeing the intricacies of this force and thus never becoming in tune with it.

This nature force in my opinion is universal and Earth and all her inhabitants are but a small example of the wonders it has instigated. Our seemingly inescapable isolation in this universe has allowed us to become complacent where many think that humans are the universal standard.

As far as death is concerned I believe we still exist in this universal scheme of things. We develop an energy during our existence. This energy continues after death in what ever manner it did here, where as someone of a negative nature will continue as such, as with a positive person.

This positive/negative scheme of things exists in nature right down to the very atoms. I know we were spawned from the same force that spawned atoms, so logically I conclude that we follow the same pattern, in life and in death.

I have felt the good/positive energy in life, I’ve maintained this energy throughout my years hear, and I’m confident in knowing that I will continue in this positive/good energy state when I die. Therefore I accept death and anticipate the opportunity to maintain my positive energy in the natural scheme of things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

The viewpoints encompassed within the pantheistic community are necessarily diverse, but the central ideas of the universe being an all-encompassing unity, a common purpose, and the sanctity of both nature and its natural laws are found throughout.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism

Sounds to me Fenris, Falco Rex and Chauncy you all believe in some form of pantheism, is that correct?(and i dont mean the hindu kind)

Edited by Venomshocker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Nice addition to the question there Falco, that makes for a VERY big question (especialy given I'm going to answer both Chauncy and Venomshocker here also as, to me, the three questions are closely linked). So grab a coffee, this could get long and convoluted cool.gif

Firstly, Venomshocker. The answer to that is both yes and no! On one level ALL the gods from those of the first proto thologic caveman (Who tended to focus on natural events.... thunder became personified because they couldn't understand/explain it any other way and so on through an ever increacing pantheon) through Sumarian, Greek, Egyptian... right upto The Christian god, Allah ect... all exist, in that enough people have believed in them to create an archetype of that diety which has a form of existance in isolation. Any of these archetypes can be accessed and worked with by someone with an affinity for that particular one. I have worked with MANY such archetypes and accnowledge that they all do indeed come from the same source.... thats the yes bit!

However, I accnowledge them as constructs. Before there was sentient life that needed to impose such mechanisms onto the energy of the universe in an attempt to understand it (And to understand themselves) there was nothing that any of us could have called a god. Just the basic, non-sentient energy. It doesn't make them any less real to those interacting with them, but it does limit them... there is no such thing as omnipitence or omnipowerful and they are created by finite minds.... anything finite will always have some limits (Else it wouldn't be finite!)

So whilst I can access a pantheistic range of diety forms in my search for understanding, I am always aware that they are not the totality of the divine and that the true nature of the divine is just energy and whilst respected is not something to be 'worshiped'. You don't worship a hurricane or a bolt of lightning.... divine energy is just as natural as those.

Falco, as you no doubt see, part of the answer to you is in the above and don't worry about sounding silly. There is always going to be some folks that consider your PoV silly simply because it disagrees with theirs. Thats why I stated what I did in the initial post, this thread is examining OUR silly ideas.... they can take their silly idea's to another thread wink2.gif

But to elaborate. Whilst I acknowledge that the truth of divinity is nothing more than energy, energy is difficult to relate to, you can't ask it things and it can't respond..... So I do use the anthropomorphic archetypes and work with 'god/dess' forms. Not to 'worship' as stated its a bit pointless 'worshiping' energy. Mostly I use the forms meditationaly in examinig aspects of myself to better undertand me... Invoking an archetype which typifies the aspect of myself and trying to understand it.... basicaly useing the archetype to better communicate with my subconsious. No they don't manifest physicaly and good, can you imagine having to get the shovel out to clear up after a ganesha invokation (Ganesh - Indian Elephant headed diety) wink2.giftongue.gif But they can sometimes have a phyical effect. I've had several people that have been in the same building whilst I've been working claim to have felt the aspects presence.... some only generic 'something' but several have been able to identify the exact aspect I was working with at the time.

Your addition of "But do you believe it possible that we can use some of Gods' energy for ourselves personally?" Opens up another big can of worms.... that of magic or miricals.

and the basic answer is that yes we can, most of us do every day. Its natural and anyone can do it... in fact everyone DOES do it, even those who don't believe in magic. Before people start jumping on their high horse over this I best explain how I see it as working.

It involves the 'arrow of time' (CF Stephen Hawkins) Now is the point of action, the past is a single fixed line, the future splays out like a web, each set of possibilitys leading off from the now..... The point of now moves forward and as it reaches each set of possibilitys, one of the happens and is set into the line of the past as now moves forward again, the other possibilitys being lost..... 'Now' is the point where we open the box to find if the cat is alive!

Where magic comes in is in making certain of those possibilitys more or less likely to be the one realised. The universe itself is not sentient, it doesn't care if it rain now or if it waits the ten minutes whilst you walk home.... you care and you have WILL, your will, if focused, CAN make it more likely that you get the outcome you want (In that case, reaching home without getting soaked)

As you can see, magic would be just about impossible to 'proove' as ANY individual occurance COULD simply be co-incidence. All 'I' say is that I tried X, Y happened and that X and Y may or may not be related...... however, the reason for my belief is in the question "How many co-incidences does it take to stop being a co-incidence?". Apart from in one aspect of my health I am considered 'lucky', if I need something it usualy turns up.... short of money... sudden tax refund. Looking for something in particular.... find the last one in the shop misplaced and behind something else... quite often at a budget price.... all co-incidences thumbsup.gif

People around me, co-incidentaly, tend to recover from illness or operations rather quickly too...... none of this is proof, but it does lead to belief!

Thats all it takes, applied will. We all do that every day.... in the form of 'working magic', prayer or even simple hope... it all can have a bearing on which possibility is actualised.

Phew! Hope that rable made sense laugh.gif

Finaly to Chauncy. From reading what I've written so far it should be obvious that I don't believe in the existance of anything that COULD pass 'final judgement' unless you count passing judgement on yourself.

Falco, you touch on how you view "miraculous healing and such" as you put it but could you clarify a bit. You seem to believe you have something of the like at work in your life but wheren't clear on the matter.

As for the actual next question, I'm going to bounce of Chauncy's one and ask....

We are born, we live our life, we die..... In your theological PoV... what next (If anything)?

Edited by Fenris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow what a great thread......why wasn't I invited. crying.gif .....jjk

Oh and Chauncy....

This thread happened because I spotted a few things Falco said about his beliefs and thought he'd be an interesting person to discuss theology with, nothing stopping you approaching someone and starting a similar thread. I just find it workes best with two main protaganists (And the occassional peanut from the gallery besides) but would enjoy if several pairs of people started such threads in a similar constructive vein rather than the typical level of "But the bible says...." answered by "Your an idiot!". If such other threads do start then I'll enjoy reading and, where appropriate, will throw a few 'peanuts' myself cool.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I wanted Chauncy to post his view on God here. He asked me about a day before you did to start the same basic thread as we have. I was unsure at the time whether I wanted to put my views out there for everyone to see, but after some thought I was ready to do so and so accepted your challenge. Given that, I asked him to post his view here, since I didn't want to start a seperate thread with him going over the same things I'm saying here..

About 20 minutes after that, Snuffypuffer started his God thread and I felt very foolish..

The fault was mine and I apologize to you Fenris if it went against what you wanted to see here..

So, in my next post, I'll get back to the business at hand and answer your questions, but what happens after Death is one of the most difficult questions ever, and it will take a few hours to think how to word my reply...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Falco and Fenris I posted some of my beliefs in the post above Venomshocker's.

I can and will elaborate more per any questions. I'm enjoying this thread very much. thumbsup.gif

I also took the oppurtunity to post on the newly formed God thread.

Have edited so below and see Im's that I have sent thumbsup.gif

Edited by Celti

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Chauncy and Venomshocker I have sent you both Im's about these last number of posts...

This is a debate.... not and flame war or an I did/ you didn't if you feel the need to talk about it start another thread...

Thanks for listening thumbsup.gif

Edited by Celti

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please let's not threadjack in the name of Semantics. It's not really the name of something that's important here. If the ideas expressed here resemble Pantheism in some form that's fine. I've never bothered to really put a name to what I believe myself..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Falco, no problems at all, I just found in the past that things run smoother with two MAIN participants and others adding bits from the sidelines, Chauncys contribution has been both welcome and constructive and I see no problem in continuing as we have been.

As for whatever was deleted, as I understand the term a Pantheist believes all gods are one god, whilst I believe all gods are constructs and the energy behind them does not conform to anything you could lable 'god' hope that clears up any confusion, If Venom wants to go into it further he is welcome to start another thread with his PoV and I will answer any relevant points there rather than break the flow of this current thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I stated in my previous post about my beliefs I have overcome the need to personify this natural energy of our universe. Rising above this personified notion is difficult for many since the only reference we have for understanding is that which we have become accustume to.

Falco had mentioned that he at times likes to meditate or concentrate on the nature of this energy. I too try to focus on this energy as an attempt to become more in tune with it. I essentially want to tap right into this very frequency. Its kind of neat that the more often you attempt this the more equipped you are to do it again.

I feel that you can do this concentration not only in a meditation sense but in everyday life. Whether it be figuring out a problem or trying to relate to another, I feel that being in tune with this energy will better equip us in any endeavor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Allright then, back on topic..

I believe that after you die your "soul" for lack of a better term splits into two parts. The first part, which is the basic life energy that everyone posesses, is reabsorbed by "God" or whatever you feel comfortable calling the Divine Force..

The second part, which consists of our memories and personalities and whatever makes each one of us uniquely us, travels to what some would term the Afterlife..

Just what the Afterlife is seems to vary with the individual, at least based on the Near Death Experiences I've heard about. Everyone seems to see what they expect..

That is why I suggested there may be multiple levels to the Afterlife. It seems unlikely to me that our minds can create an entire World after death, but I do think that our minds, recently freed from our bodies, may need time to adjust to a new state of being. Therefore maybe we create a dream afterlife of sorts until we've adjusted to the point where we're ready to take the next step into the world beyond.As to what that may be I can't even speculate at this point. Of course OBEs' may be merely dreams in the first place and we're merely absorbed into the Universe and that's it, but, if as you said, Your mere will can effect the physical world, it seems unlikely to me that something so strong would just cease to exist.

And yes I have had an incident where it seemed like I was miraculously healed. I don't know if that actually was the case as the Body can do some amazing things on it's own. But the change from severely injured to just about normal was so abrupt that it was shocking..

My next question for you is a bit of a light-weight, but I'm curious just the same..If you can work with your will to help cause physical effects, some might call that magic. Given that, is there really a light and dark side to that like some Wiccans have told me? If we're not judged by some Higher power, why would we be negatively ffected by using so-called Black Magic? It would seem that individual interpretation of what was positive and negative would be the most important thing in this case.

EDIT

I'm not trying to get us to discuss the nature of morality here either. I think we covered every possible angle of that on Snuffys' thread. I just mean, if your own morality allows for killing with no justification, and you could somehow work your will to make that happen, why would it come back to haunt you? Your perception of the act would be all that matters from a mystical sense, wouldn't it?

Edited by Falco Rex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe in death we do continue.

From the second we are born we start to absorb energies through experiences and interactions. Throughout our lives we continue to absorb these energies that ultimately become our own personal energy signature. When our bodies cease to work this energy is released.

From this point of release I believe we have many roads to choose from, just like in life. Sometimes as Falco pointed out it takes time to adapt to this new state of being, I believe that sometimes the attachement to our old existence is too strong and thus an individual may choose to stay amongst the non-released energies....almost as if they are in a stage of denial, or have not absorbed enough energy through out life to exist else where.

While we are living we can, and some people most definitely do, harness that energy we have absorbed. The harnessing of this energy and the application of it can be directed at a wounded body or heart or mind, thus occurences of healing. Some do this at will some do it unintentionally.

As far as this harnessing and directing of energy is concerned. It can be done in a negative way as well. Some people are subject to and absorb negative energy. Some of them can harness and direct this negative energy just the same as those can with positive energy.

These negative energy users are so because I believe that they were subject to negative force enough that they further choose to keep on absorbing it and seek it out. Now the danger I believe is when someone of this negative energy becomes aware and in tune with it, and then they are able to harness it just as effectively as their positive counter parts.

All the ancient works of magic and such whether they be for good use or bad, are simply instructions on how to harness and increase indeed maintain this energy and use it to its full potential. We choose how to direct this energy.

To elaborate a little, I also believe that there is ALSO a central energy woven through out the universe that is not designated positive or negative. To tap into this energy force one could use it to however they saw fit....positively or negatively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't a moral issue realy, but more one that borders on science. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction..... thats the scientific quote, but in dealing with energy/magic it seems to be a greater opposite reaction, at least thats what I've percieved.

Now I don't adhere to to the christian formed lables of 'good' and 'bad' actions with all the moralistic overtones, but rather positive (benificial) and negative (Harmful) with no moralistic conotations.

When your intent is negative, the way you effect the energy is similarly negative, so when the energys balance out and you get the 'opposite' reaction, your likely to experience a build up of negativity that will effect events around and to you in a negative way...... Of course if your using positive energys, it can work to your advantage with the opposite effect being a benificial one.

You may note a distinct simerlarity in effect as Karma and you'd be right!

HOWEVER, the very fact that whatever "Wiccans" you were talking to where using terms such as light and dark in relation to 'magic' makes me strongly doubt they are reliable sorces of information... rather what many of us refer to as 'fluffy bunnies'.

OK next question, a subject dear to many of this forums members......

Ghosts, poltergeists and things that go bump in the night.... from your PoV of the way the universe works, what are they and how do they occur?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To compleat the set I'll also answer my own question Re:Death as it certainly looks like an issue where, whilst there are again some points of simerlarity, there are significant diffrences.

We all seem to agree that part of what makes a living being is a portion of the divine energy, a divine spark if you will (I don't use the lable 'soul' as that carrys to much distracting baggage about the nature of that 'spark') but that isn't all we are, we have personality and memory.... those three aspects inhabit the body and voila you have a living being.....

The body is simply a shell, a vehical for the person. It is 'MY body' a posession and on death its served its perpouse and can decompose back into the food chain.

The divine spark, returns to source becomes once more part of the general energy of the divine nature of the universe (It may later be once more part of a person, but that is a new person and has no firm connection to the last one, the spark does not carry memory)

So we are left with the personality and memory.... Here I refer to the Kabbalistic Akashic records.... in essence this is our collective subconsious and it is this that the personality and memory become a part of when the spark leaves them behind to rejoin the main divine energy.

They no longer constitute a person, the spark of life has left, what is left is static and unchanging, like a file on a hard drive. It can be accessed by those with an affinity with that personality, giving rise to the likes of 'spirit mediums', spirit guides and past life memorys.

I do find it interesting that both Falco and myself have indipendently formulated a splitting off effect of the divine aspect cool.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fenris,

I like your way of thinking. Let me ask a question though so I can kind of dumb it down to my level laugh.gif. You believe in an energy force that has no personality, no wants, no needs, no feelings, etc? And if that's correct, you believe in evolution?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fenris,

I like your way of thinking. Let me ask a question though so I can kind of dumb it down to my level laugh.gif. You believe in an energy force that has no personality, no wants, no needs, no feelings, etc? And if that's correct, you believe in evolution?

Correct. Whilst the energy does follow certain 'rules' it is not sentient, has no will, no personality, simply a force of nature (Or I suppose 'supernature' in that it is beyod current sciences ability to test it to work out its 'rules')

As for evolution, absolutely you CAN'T justifiably claim even a passing aquaintance with science and NOT believe in evolution! cool.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

do find it interesting that both Falco and myself have indipendently formulated a splitting off effect of the divine aspect.

Thats interesting you guys came to that conclusion. There seems to be evidence of this across all world religons. I find this idea fascinating, and heres some more info on it from this guys PoV.

http://www.divisiontheory.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link Venomshocker. I once read a quote that said the problem with Philosophy is that whenever you think you've discovered something profound, you find out the Greeks already thought of it 3000 years ago. This seems to be the case with Religion too.. wink2.gif

Now, Ghosts and Spirits! At last some light mental exercise. As several of these types of phenomenon seem to differ, I'll deal with them individually..

1. Poltergeists- I think poltergeists are not spirits at all. They appear to be a form of destructive energy that centers around a person. The fact that they manifest almost exclusively around teenagers and people prone to high emotional states leads me to believe that it is these people themselves generating this force subconciously. Or perhaps they are merely tapping into the Divine Well as it were..

2. Playbacks- The famous sightings of ghosts that always do the same thing or follow a set path of travel have often been explained as a moment caught in time replaying itself. It seems that for whatever reasons that some things are "Recorded" somehow, and are played back years later like a ghostly movie. I have no idea how to explain this in regards to physics, but I'm sure it can be done by someone more knowledgable than myself. The fact that these "Ghosts" have no intelligence and no purpose other than to repeat the same act over and over makes me think that they also are not spirits in the traditional sense.

3. Most other Ghosts including Dead Relatives, House haunters, Historical Ghosts,et al...

- I believe that almost every one of these can be explained by a number of things. Wishful thinking, sleep paralysis, paranoia or fear, the power of suggestion, hallucination and mental illness to name just a few...

And finally we come to the final type that doesn't seem to fit any of these categories..

4. Thought Forms- I remember reading once about how some Tibetan and Nepalese Lamas are able to create semi-physical beings purely from thought. These beings had only rudimentary intelligence but had thier own will. The Lamas controlled thier actions as a meditation exercise for themselves. If they lost control of the spirit they had made it was free to act however they pleased, and those actions were not necessarily good and could sometimes be mischievious or downright evil. However, invariably these beings only existed temporarily and disappeared when whatever energy they had been invested with was used up. To me, an unconsciously created thought that wasn't bound to anyone that had the ability to control it could explain any number of so-called "Ghosts."

I find it interesting, now that I think about it, that Tibetan thought forms sound much like the Aspects of different Gods Fenris reffered to. I wonder if that's working along the same lines?

So, as you see, superstition and things that go bump in the night don't play a large role in my version of Theology, as most of it can be explained by Physics or Psychology and what can't seems to be a product of our own energies..

You mentioned previously that your Theology incorporated Wicca, Shamanism and the Qabbala. What aspects of each have you taken for your own? Or have you incorporated all three belief systems in thier entirety?

That's probably a short answer question. If it is feel free to expound on a subject of your choice if you feel your post will be too short..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.