Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2
ExpandMyMind

Hawaii is not legally a state!

15 posts in this topic

i thought this may be an interesting one for some out there to read. not sure if it has much, or any merit though. the voice of reason will no doubt appear in the thread and explain.

It is easy to find the courage necessary to support a moral position if that position benefits oneself. True moral courage, however, is proven when one chooses to support that which is morally and ethically right even when such a position is to one's one detriment.

The people of the United States find themselves in such a position right now, forced to choose between a moral and ethical position that carries with it the potential for "inconvenience", or supporting the status quo and having to admit to themselves that they are not the champions of justice they imagine themselves to be. By the end of this article, you will know for yourself which one you are.

Most folks have heard that Hawaii is a state, one of the United States of America. Most people, including those who live in Hawaii, accept that statement as a fact.

But the reality is that in a world in which nations are as bound by the rule of laws as are the citizens of nations (if not more so), the truth is quite different!

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/HAWAII/hawaii.html

this was the part that caught my attention.

On November 23, 1993, President Clinton signed United States Public Law 103-150, which not only acknowledged the illegal actions committed by the United States in the overthrow of the legitimate government of Hawaii, but also that the Hawaiian people never surrendered their sovereignty. The latter is the most important part of United States Public Law 103-150 for it makes it quite clear that the Hawaiian people never legally ceased to be a sovereign separate independent nation. There is no argument that can change that fact.

United States Public Law 103-150, despite its polite language, is an official admission that the government of the United States illegally occupies the territory of the Hawaiian people.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hawaii would lose the massive and complex bureaucracy that connects Hawaii to the mainland, and Hawaii's citizens would be free of their shares of the $7 trillion dollar federal debt and its ruinous interest, but who would mourn the loss?

this is what this is all about. sounds to me like the rich in hawaii don't want to play the governments game no more. ie tax and spend.

as for alaska, it is an illegal state. at the time that it was made a state it didn't have the minimum number of citizens required by the united states constituiton.

as for the rest, when the king allowed/surrendered to american forces he surrendered unconditionlly at least from what i read.

Edited by danielost

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I remember US businessmen slowly took over the country as settlers began to outnumber the natives. The Queen tried to do something about it so those settlers called on the US to help them. The US military invaded and the settlers used their majority to vote Hawaii into the Union.

Of course we only talked about Hawaii in passing in my one class so I could very well be wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ROTFLMAO

Wow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought this may be an interesting one for some out there to read. not sure if it has much, or any merit though. the voice of reason will no doubt appear in the thread and explain.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/HAWAII/hawaii.html

this was the part that caught my attention.

On November 23, 1993, President Clinton signed United States Public Law 103-150, which not only acknowledged the illegal actions committed by the United States in the overthrow of the legitimate government of Hawaii, but also that the Hawaiian people never surrendered their sovereignty. The latter is the most important part of United States Public Law 103-150 for it makes it quite clear that the Hawaiian people never legally ceased to be a sovereign separate independent nation. There is no argument that can change that fact.

United States Public Law 103-150, despite its polite language, is an official admission that the government of the United States illegally occupies the territory of the Hawaiian people.

See what you've done? Now you going to riled up these Birthers into coming here and bring up the whole dead issue of Obamas BC again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting.

Have any similar apologies been issued to the indigenous inhabitants of other US states?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See what you've done? Now you going to riled up these Birthers into coming here and bring up the whole dead issue of Obamas BC again.

that wasn't my intention and if any do bring up the eligibility in this thread then i'll ask a mod to keep 'em in line. :)

i just find it interesting. i knew, and indeed still do know, very little about hawaii and to find out that, (possibly) technically, that the US could be considered to be illegaly occupying this state, caught my attention enough to post about it.

regardless of the legalities, something that is clear is that what i have learned about the US' seizure of this state is at the very least shocking.

Edited by expandmymind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that wasn't my intention and if any do bring up the eligibility in this thread then i'll ask a mod to keep 'em in line. :)

i just find it interesting. i knew, and indeed still do know, very little about hawaii and to find out that, (possibly) technically, that the US could be considered to be illegaly occupying this state, caught my attention enough to post about it.

regardless of the legalities, something that is clear is that what i have learned about the US' seizure of this state is at the very least shocking.

To me it seems Corp is right and this is a confusion between the Hawaiians and Hawaii as a territory. Historically most of the areas with indigenous population are annexed without asking for permission, and most of the modern countries are located on such lands. Indigenous population usually does not have a legal system, developed enough for them to claim land property and express their political will, this civilizational difference is often abused by more "civilized" nations. Moreover, this abuse legally does not contradict to the "laws" of the indigenous people, as technically they are not losing their lands physically, and actually do not have any laws in our sense. Primitive tribes do not know the land ownership and do not know the sales of the land, they simply live on this land, for many of them it is like air or water cannot belong to anyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe Guam is also part of the US too.

Correct me if i'm wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I learned about this first in class, most "history" teachers dont tell you the truth about the gov./america but mine dose!! and i am one of the people that knows the Gov. is evil, and tecnicaly since Hawaii isnt legaly a state Obama shouldent Legaly be a President!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See what you've done? Now you going to riled up these Birthers into coming here and bring up the whole dead issue of Obamas BC again.

But if what he is saying is true, then he certainly should be removed. No? :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Oh, so the fact that Europeans overthrew native Americans, means that America actually belongs only to the natives?

Or that Hawaii only belongs to it's natives?

BS.

That argument could be suggested for nearly EVERY CURRENT COUNTRY ON THE PLANET.

Yeah, let's just go back to the cavemen days before territory was acquired by occupation, treaty or force.

In doing so, that wipes-out 99% of all current country territorial clams.

This premise is just silly, IMHO.

EVERYONE BACK TO AFRICA. Blah...

Edited by pallidin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

heavens, just when you thought we'd seen the last of all the Birther nonsense, someone goes and digs up a three year old thread ... :rolleyes:

Edited by Colonel Rhuairidh
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alaska

I learned about this first in class, most "history" teachers dont tell you the truth about the gov./america but mine dose!! and i am one of the people that knows the Gov. is evil, and tecnicaly since Hawaii isnt legaly a state Obama shouldent Legaly be a President!

If I was a die hard Monarchy I would say America still belongs to Britain

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically 'Merica did what it does best.. Bully people and get what it wants.. What exactly is shocking here?

We've perfected the art of taking from others, don't just take my word for it.. Open history books.

They give you an option to sell/surrender, if you don't.. That is an act of war. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.