Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 4
Hocus

9/11 TV fakery - No planes

432 posts in this topic

Those are cuts from a thermal lance. We can tell from the slag that has formed along the sides, and from the scalloped edge, which is formed as the lance is pushed through. You can see more slag towards the bottom, which indicates that the beams where likely secured from the top (by crane, usually) prior to being cut, so they wouldn't fall randomly and could be safely lowered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whats a thermal lance aquatus?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they were cut during cleanup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whats a thermal lance aquatus?

There are a couple of different types, but generally they are cutters that use a thermal reaction, usually with either aluminum or magnesium, and oxygen to create unbelievable amounts of heat to melt through practically anything.

The ones usually used in these sorts of situations (cutting massive, thick, walls of steel) are magnesium tubes with aluminum rods, with oxygen pumped through it. The tip is ignited and the rod is pushed and dragged through the steel, melting its way through.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whats a thermal lance aquatus?

Here's one in action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's one in action.

Yeah, that might have been used in the cleanup but it's beside the point. The building was not brought down by convential demolition. Normally, they kick the feet out from under the building and gravity brings it down. Not here. All 3 of these buildings fell at free fall. It was if they had been dropped from above, There was nothing under them. They were demolished as they were falling from the top down. Thats where all that metal flowing out of the windows came from. They had explosives in the lower basement all right, maybe a mini-nuke but most of the damage was done before they hit the ground, otherwise, they couldn't have fallen so fast. Getting that BS about a thermal lance in the conversation is just to confuse the issue. KennyB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry Hocus, but this is crap...i saw with my own eyes when the 2nd plane hit...i live in Brooklyn, my brother had the apartment above mine, thats where we both saw the plane...we can see the buildings in Manhattan from here...i always thought there were more to what happened that day, but there was a plane that hit...i have family members who were there when it happened and i saw it with my own eyes, not on tv or the computer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry Hocus, but this is crap...i saw with my own eyes when the 2nd plane hit...i live in Brooklyn, my brother had the apartment above mine, thats where we both saw the plane...we can see the buildings in Manhattan from here...i always thought there were more to what happened that day, but there was a plane that hit...i have family members who were there when it happened and i saw it with my own eyes, not on tv or the computer

Hocus means well and he is right. The whole thing stinks to high heaven. It is the biggest conpiracy ever played against the American people. The U.S. Govt and the Mossad murdered over 3000 people right in front of your eyes, blamed it on the Muslims and went and invaded 2 innocent countries for their oil. They got away with it, leaving nothing behind except a c*** and bull story. There probably were no planes hijacked. Those were CIA planes painted to look like the airline planes. They probably went to a secret base while the radio-controlled ones were used as bombs. No plane hit the Pentagon, the plane flew over it and landed. The last one was shot down or delibertly blown up in the air. All the passengers were killed and disposed of. There were not a great number of people that knew about it. The Mossad did most of the dirty work and went home. The CIA and FBI mostly cleaned up behind them. The govt has the edge. They can give any kind of fool excuse they please and you can believe it or not. What can you do about it? Then there's always some that take the govt side and help cover it up. KennyB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, that might have been used in the cleanup but it's beside the point. The building was not brought down by convential demolition. Normally, they kick the feet out from under the building and gravity brings it down. Not here. All 3 of these buildings fell at free fall. It was if they had been dropped from above, There was nothing under them. They were demolished as they were falling from the top down. Thats where all that metal flowing out of the windows came from. They had explosives in the lower basement all right, maybe a mini-nuke but most of the damage was done before they hit the ground, otherwise, they couldn't have fallen so fast. Getting that BS about a thermal lance in the conversation is just to confuse the issue. KennyB

*Dies laughing at the bolded*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At all 4 incident sites there is absolutely no evidence of a plane. None, apart from a few small scraps of metal, easily plantable by hand or truck.

What, you expected the planes to emerge completely unscathed? ~~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a load of BS (re post 1). No planes... pfffft

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What, you expected the planes to emerge completely unscathed? ~~

Don't worry about it. That is a form of fallacious argument called a redirection statement. The tactic is used (especially by 9/11 truthers) to try and both foist the burden of proof onto their opponents and to bring unanswered questions as solid evidence that supports their arguments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What, you expected the planes to emerge completely unscathed? ~~

No I don't...but both planes disappeared into the towers unscathed, didn't they. No engines or wings fell off. The nose never crumpled. Super plane!

I do expect debris at the pentagon and Pennsylvania...but none of any decent size were found. Pennsylvania was a joke..and anyone who genuinely believes a plane crashed there on that day needs their head checking out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, here's one.

If the CCTV footage confiscated by the FBI and CIA from hotels and gas stations over looking the pentagon, and some of the home footage seized from the people who filmed the second plane, showed what we were all told happened in the official 9/11 commission. Why the need to seize so much footage and keep it secret. I mean what's the big secret?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

No I don't...but both planes disappeared into the towers unscathed, didn't they. No engines or wings fell off. The nose never crumpled. Super plane!

I do expect debris at the pentagon and Pennsylvania...but none of any decent size were found. Pennsylvania was a joke..and anyone who genuinely believes a plane crashed there on that day needs their head checking out.

Planes are not made out of tin foil and when travelling at velocity can penetrate several metres of concrete.

As an engineering graduate who has studied materials science in depth I can say there is no evidence to suggest planes didnt crash into the buildings or Pentagon. The Pentagon is not made out of normal concrete it is hardened against hostile attacks in times of warfare. It wont even be reinforced with normal steel either it will contain state of the art building materials the type of which battle armour on tanks is made from.

Also the logistical effort to stage 9/11 would of involved 1000's of people and strangly not one of them has coem forward to spill the beans.

Edited by Alien Being

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a couple of different types, but generally they are cutters that use a thermal reaction, usually with either aluminum or magnesium, and oxygen to create unbelievable amounts of heat to melt through practically anything.

The ones usually used in these sorts of situations (cutting massive, thick, walls of steel) are magnesium tubes with aluminum rods, with oxygen pumped through it. The tip is ignited and the rod is pushed and dragged through the steel, melting its way through.

Ok so we have established thay they were cut.... So what if, they were cut before the attack, not all of them mind you but just some key beams.... just to insure that the buildings would fall straight down after it was struck. I know, that does not nessisarly mean that our govern't was behind it, as it was pre-meditated by someone. Im just not so quick into buying into the offical story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok so we have established thay they were cut.... So what if, they were cut before the attack, not all of them mind you but just some key beams.... just to insure that the buildings would fall straight down after it was struck. I know, that does not nessisarly mean that our govern't was behind it, as it was pre-meditated by someone. Im just not so quick into buying into the offical story.

It would be somewhat redundant. A building that massive wouldn't need to have the beams cut in order to fall straight down. A building that large has no choice other than to fall straight down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so we have established thay they were cut.... So what if, they were cut before the attack, not all of them mind you but just some key beams.... just to insure that the buildings would fall straight down after it was struck. I know, that does not nessisarly mean that our govern't was behind it, as it was pre-meditated by someone. Im just not so quick into buying into the offical story.

The beam you posted was cut at the ground. Yet the initiation of collapse of both towers happened in the area of both plane impacts.

They didn't collapse from the bottom. This leads me to believe that that beam was cut after the fact, during cleanup. Think about it - all that debris had to get cut down to fit into trucks, right? So the huge chunks had to have been reduced before loading somehow. Torches had to be used.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No I don't...but both planes disappeared into the towers unscathed, didn't they. No engines or wings fell off. The nose never crumpled. Super plane!

Hocus, tell us what it should have looked like. Should the planes have just bounced off the buildings? Or crumpled up into little balls and fallen to the ground, leaving the buildings intact?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, that might have been used in the cleanup but it's beside the point.

Uhh....no, that's the whole point of this conversation.

All 3 of these buildings fell at free fall.

Prove it.

Getting that BS about a thermal lance in the conversation is just to confuse the issue. KennyB

Yes, we're clearly trying to steer the conversation away from the completely obvious mini-nuke which went off in the basement. I suppose you won't be providing any sort of evidence for this, as per SOP?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hocus means well and he is right. The whole thing stinks to high heaven. It is the biggest conpiracy ever played against the American people. The U.S. Govt and the Mossad murdered over 3000 people right in front of your eyes, blamed it on the Muslims and went and invaded 2 innocent countries for their oil. They got away with it, leaving nothing behind except a c*** and bull story. There probably were no planes hijacked. Those were CIA planes painted to look like the airline planes. They probably went to a secret base while the radio-controlled ones were used as bombs. No plane hit the Pentagon, the plane flew over it and landed. The last one was shot down or delibertly blown up in the air. All the passengers were killed and disposed of. There were not a great number of people that knew about it. The Mossad did most of the dirty work and went home. The CIA and FBI mostly cleaned up behind them. The govt has the edge. They can give any kind of fool excuse they please and you can believe it or not. What can you do about it? Then there's always some that take the govt side and help cover it up. KennyB

And, in keeping with the SOP, the inevitable attempt to take the conversation in 16 different directions instead of keeping it focused upon the issue at hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The beam you posted was cut at the ground. Yet the initiation of collapse of both towers happened in the area of both plane impacts.

They didn't collapse from the bottom. This leads me to believe that that beam was cut after the fact, during cleanup. Think about it - all that debris had to get cut down to fit into trucks, right? So the huge chunks had to have been reduced before loading somehow. Torches had to be used.

Yeah you and Aquatus are probally right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah you and Aquatus are probally right.

Probably. Not necessarily, but probably.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, here's one.

If the CCTV footage confiscated by the FBI and CIA from hotels and gas stations over looking the pentagon, and some of the home footage seized from the people who filmed the second plane, showed what we were all told happened in the official 9/11 commission. Why the need to seize so much footage and keep it secret. I mean what's the big secret?

I've seen interviews before where people have stated footage being seized and i admit i found that weird...i don't believe the story about PA, plus that video from the Pentagon just don't fly at all...that was like someone spitting on you and telling you its raining.

But again, i can vouch for the towers being hit with planes...i actually saw that, plus friends and family worked right there and saw it with their own eyes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen interviews before where people have stated footage being seized and i admit i found that weird.

I'm no forensics expert, but in a crime scene, I believe it's standard to confiscate all the evidence for analysis. I guess I don't see why it's so fishy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 4

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.