Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 13
Hazzard

Best evidence for ET visitation - 3rd edition

6,154 posts in this topic

Nah, it is just that ET is "not yet born" so to speak. It would be more like abortion.

born? Like Jason Born?

Clean Shot to HEad ! That will get-em every time !

post-68971-0-82680300-1304476695_thumb.j

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skyeagle, until you start showing some numbers of your own, you do not have a horse in this race.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to rework your figures to reflect a 50-mile distance from the camera because, I have seen aircraft moving at velocties faster than an A-10 from 40 miles distance.at a ;slower movement rate than what you see in the video, and another reason why I have said those lights were nowhere near the BGR, and now, someone has been talking 77 miles away, which makes it more compelling that those lights were nowhere near the BGR. Also:

If you'd like to rework figures at a 50 mile distance, feel free. And while you're at it, explain why you selected a 50 mile distance in relation to the video evidence. On top of that, show us in your best estimation where the lights were. Take any Phoenix area map and put dots on it. Then explain in detail why you would place the lights there.

That shouldn't be too difficult for someone with your vast experience and knowledge, right?

Be sure to include a detailed explanation of your reasoning and any math that you can muster in support of that reasoning. Anything else (like silly proclamations about how it isn't possible, and you've seen the mountains, and you've been to Phoenix, and the Air Force is creating a cover-up, etc...) will either be ignored or appropriately ridiculed erm... hi-lighted as ridiculous eerrrm... unrelated? awww, screw it; Ridiculed is the best way to put it.

That is one of the reasons why I told you to use the side profile depiction. On another note, if you look at that Chicago photo, you will notice the word: copywrite, however, I see no problem with anyone doing their own comparison on their own computers as I have. Just make the proper alignments between the two photos.

I did use a side profile depiction. It even showed curvature (grossly exaggerated, but even with that exaggeration it clearly showed that the flares would be visible at the projected distance and altitude.) Did you miss that? Here you go again. It isn't perfect, but it is far better than anything you've brought to the table so far.

5669892789_659fea7630_b.jpg

But as far as your concern regarding copyright goes, here is a simple sidestep. Describe in great detail how you applied that linked (and copyrighted) photo. And then provide the other photo that you mention (you distinctly said "two photos", and forgive me if I missed it, but you do leave piles of twaddle that are difficult to wade through...) and describe how exactly they relate in support of your argument. I'm more than happy to do the comparison on my computer if you can adequately describe the methods and details of the comparison that you have done.

Please be sure to include as much detail as possible. But let me quantify that request... please be sure to include as much relevant detail a possible (and exclude all irrelevant details entirely).

Cheers sky, and welcome back from your trip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

A Clean Shot to the Head maybe ? "They Shoot Horses dont they?" :rolleyes:

Not on Pandora.

navi-horse-of-course.jpg

Edited by psyche101

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He will be waiting for you to do that so he can claim the work and victory. Of course one must also take into account that identifying flares from street lights means the Government is hiding ET!

LOL

Cheers Mate

Hey psyche,

That won't be happening. Everything is laid out here on UM for everyone to see, besides this was more or less a visual for everyone else to show how the video camera records point sources in the same way. I didn't expect the challenge to be taken, no, I knew it wouldn't be!

Still, the challenge is still valid and open... Still not holding my breath!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey quillius,

I see where you got that from the text however you can see the dial shows 14 calibrated atlitude values.

After looking at this a bit more I agree with you this would be preset before Flight when using an Aircraft mounted launcher.

Hey Ls, There is one other place I came across that stated the four settings, struggling to find it again now but will keep looking. I understand why you have said 14 settings even though the text contradicts it,I cant see a reason why they would mention just the four settings, it doesnt make sense. I would add that they are just drawings, however I have seen actual 'live' ones and they too contain the 14-15 settings, I would hasten to add that this still may not mean that they are all functioning. Could it be that the timer is a mould used for other flares that have more settings?? I think you are probably correct that it is 14 funtctioning, although like I said it would be good to confirm this.

SKY, with your contacts at the air force is this something you could find out and confirm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting, I might have a look at that idea myself. Let me know how you go with it.

By any chance has anyone presented him with James OBergs list of questions to ask an Alien?

Hey Psyche, food for thought isnt it? I will try and look into it but have yet to find the apporpriate time required. It will be quite some task to find out exactly what cases he was alluding too in the speach, this would have to be done to make the required comparisons.

:tu:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Ls, There is one other place I came across that stated the four settings, struggling to find it again now but will keep looking. I understand why you have said 14 settings even though the text contradicts it,I cant see a reason why they would mention just the four settings, it doesnt make sense. I would add that they are just drawings, however I have seen actual 'live' ones and they too contain the 14-15 settings, I would hasten to add that this still may not mean that they are all functioning. Could it be that the timer is a mould used for other flares that have more settings?? I think you are probably correct that it is 14 funtctioning, although like I said it would be good to confirm this.

SKY, with your contacts at the air force is this something you could find out and confirm?

Hey quillius,

I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you say "text contradicts it"?

The text say's "Settings of 250, 500, and 1,000 to 11,000 feet can be selected". Note the word 'to' in bold suggests a range. The most literal interpretation of this text I can think of still does not imply only 'four' possible settings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Hey quillius,

I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you say "text contradicts it"?

The text say's "Settings of 250, 500, and 1,000 to 11,000 feet can be selected". Note the word 'to' in bold suggests a range. The most literal interpretation of this text I can think of still does not imply only 'four' possible settings.

Hey LS, you are correct the word 'to' does answer any questions and eliminates the contradiction I thought that was there. many thanks

edit: the other sites I was talking about also have the same wording so it was my error.

Edited by quillius

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has there been any change in the Idea that so many people can see somthing and It be somthing other than Flares?

To Have an Open Mind is Good, to Have Proof is even better. To Count out so many witnesses is Insane !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has there been any change in the Idea that so many people can see somthing and It be somthing other than Flares?

To Have an Open Mind is Good, to Have Proof is even better. To Count out so many witnesses is Insane !

As far as I've been following the Phoenix Lights, nobody that I am aware of is counting out witnesses D. Clearly, a lot of people saw something that night. The vast majority of those people were unable to identify what they saw. The portion of that mystery which happened at around 10 PM has been definitively cleared up, despite the arguments of a few. The earlier sightings are still debatable, though from the only footage of said event it seems likely to be aircraft in formation. MCROM posted this link in another thread, which includes that footage and a short interview with Terry, the person who recorded it.

He describes a very similar sighting to many of the other witnesses. From his footage it is clear that the configuration of lights changed shape, which would be indicative of multiple aircraft flying in formation instead of a single object. This, combined with Mitch Stanley's testimony after looking at the formation through his telescope is pretty weighty in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I've been following the Phoenix Lights, nobody that I am aware of is counting out witnesses D. Clearly, a lot of people saw something that night. The vast majority of those people were unable to identify what they saw. The portion of that mystery which happened at around 10 PM has been definitively cleared up, despite the arguments of a few. The earlier sightings are still debatable, though from the only footage of said event it seems likely to be aircraft in formation. MCROM posted this link in another thread, which includes that footage and a short interview with Terry, the person who recorded it.

He describes a very similar sighting to many of the other witnesses. From his footage it is clear that the configuration of lights changed shape, which would be indicative of multiple aircraft flying in formation instead of a single object. This, combined with Mitch Stanley's testimony after looking at the formation through his telescope is pretty weighty in my opinion.

All too true boony ! I know theres quite a few peeps in here that keep an Opne Mind and a few that Look the other way too.

We can all just keep Looking and asking questions and waiting for that day we get Some Actual Proof that will please all of Us !

Cant beleive that Its taking them So Long to Get that Landing clearance !

Look what Flew over my Shop Today ! An IFO

post-68971-0-00794900-1304531538_thumb.j

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ladies and gentlemen, let me see if I've summarized the Phoenix flares properly.

1. It's possible to calculate how high the flares were based on the angle of view and the distance of the mountains from the point where the flares were seen. We may not be able to be 100 percent precise, but at least we might get a minimum value for the height.

2. The flares' rate of descent will be constant, just as any other rate of descent is constant. (Roughly 9.8 meters per second squared for acceleration due to gravity.) This also makes it fairly easy to estimate how far they've fallen. (One problem with this might be deflection of the trajectory due to wind, if any.)

3. The Air Force wasn't aware that the group had dropped flares until some time after they'd given their initial statement.

4. The guy who dressed up as an ET for the press conference is an idiot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Ladies and gentlemen, let me see if I've summarized the Phoenix flares properly.

1. It's possible to calculate how high the flares were based on the angle of view and the distance of the mountains from the point where the flares were seen. We may not be able to be 100 percent precise, but at least we might get a minimum value for the height.

Yes...

2. The flares' rate of descent will be constant, just as any other rate of descent is constant. (Roughly 9.8 meters per second squared for acceleration due to gravity.) This also makes it fairly easy to estimate how far they've fallen. (One problem with this might be deflection of the trajectory due to wind, if any.)

Yes, but you have to also take into account that the flares are not in a free-fall. They have parachutes attached which allow them to fall at a fairly consistent rate, however, it has also been noted that the heat from the flares themselves will create what is essentially an "updraft" which will slow their descent rate further. Also, the parachutes will be effected to a greater extent by any prevailing winds than the flares would on their own with no parachute.

3. The Air Force wasn't aware that the group had dropped flares until some time after they'd given their initial statement.

Technically, yes, but take the following into consideration:

- The person contacted was the public relations officer and wouldn't have necessarily been informed of the detailed activities of the flight of A-10's.

- The flight of A-10's involved weren't stationed at the air base, but were visiting as part of training exercises, so when asked if there were any operations being run by the air base, or if any of the base's A-10's were in the air at the time, the answer of "No" is technically correct.

4. The guy who dressed up as an ET for the press conference is an idiot.

Yep, pretty much... :)

Cz

Edited by Czero 101

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

All too true boony ! I know theres quite a few peeps in here that keep an Opne Mind and a few that Look the other way too.

We can all just keep Looking and asking questions and waiting for that day we get Some Actual Proof that will please all of Us !

Cant beleive that Its taking them So Long to Get that Landing clearance !

Look what Flew over my Shop Today ! An IFO

Slight BooBoo!B-29 Not a B-36 Didnt anyone notice?

Gotta get my eyes ck!

post-68971-0-15524100-1304540004_thumb.j

Edited by DONTEATUS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has there been any change in the Idea that so many people can see somthing and It be somthing other than Flares?

To Have an Open Mind is Good, to Have Proof is even better. To Count out so many witnesses is Insane !

Yes, as far as I know there were several events, some attributed to planes as per Mitch Stanleys statement that says he saw planes through a telescope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, as far as I know there were several events, some attributed to planes as per Mitch Stanleys statement that says he saw planes through a telescope.

Planes Trains and Insane`s Flares,Glares,Stares. WHeres the UFO`s ? mostly in the minds of the Beholders.nuff said . :rolleyes:

p.s. Come back Badeskov`s We need you back !

put down that Laser thing-a-magiggie !

post-68971-0-03200400-1304558257_thumb.j

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

As far as I've been following the Phoenix Lights, nobody that I am aware of is counting out witnesses D. Clearly, a lot of people saw something that night. The vast majority of those people were unable to identify what they saw. The portion of that mystery which happened at around 10 PM has been definitively cleared up, despite the arguments of a few. The earlier sightings are still debatable, though from the only footage of said event it seems likely to be aircraft in formation. MCROM posted this link in another thread, which includes that footage and a short interview with Terry, the person who recorded it.

He describes a very similar sighting to many of the other witnesses. From his footage it is clear that the configuration of lights changed shape, which would be indicative of multiple aircraft flying in formation instead of a single object. This, combined with Mitch Stanley's testimony after looking at the formation through his telescope is pretty weighty in my opinion.

I have to disagree with that as well. The 'Phoenix, Lights" were not aircraft either, and as I looked at the mountains near Phoenix from the airport last Sunday, , it was very clear that there was no way those lights were flares over the BGR.

In addition, the people of Phoenix made it very clear the lights were neither flares nor aircraft. One of the witnesses has said that the lights in March were the same as those in January and they were not flares.

Looking back into history, similar lights were also seen in other parts of the world and the United States.

Edited by skyeagle409

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Yes, as far as I know there were several events, some attributed to planes as per Mitch Stanleys statement that says he saw planes through a telescope.

And now, it's airplanes. Airplanes were not involved in the 'Phoenix Lights' sightings either, otherwise, they would have been tracked on radar to their landing areas and the pilots grounded for airspace violations.

Edited by skyeagle409

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

If you'd like to rework figures at a 50 mile distance, feel free. And while you're at it, explain why you selected a 50 mile distance in relation to the video evidence. On top of that, show us in your best estimation where the lights were. Take any Phoenix area map and put dots on it. Then explain in detail why you would place the lights there.

That shouldn't be too difficult for someone with your vast experience and knowledge, right?

Be sure to include a detailed explanation of your reasoning and any math that you can muster in support of that reasoning. Anything else (like silly proclamations about how it isn't possible, and you've seen the mountains, and you've been to Phoenix, and the Air Force is creating a cover-up, etc...) will either be ignored or appropriately ridiculed erm... hi-lighted as ridiculous eerrrm... unrelated? awww, screw it; Ridiculed is the best way to put it.

I did use a side profile depiction. It even showed curvature (grossly exaggerated, but even with that exaggeration it clearly showed that the flares would be visible at the projected distance and altitude.) Did you miss that? Here you go again. It isn't perfect, but it is far better than anything you've brought to the table so far.

5669892789_659fea7630_b.jpg

But as far as your concern regarding copyright goes, here is a simple sidestep. Describe in great detail how you applied that linked (and copyrighted) photo. And then provide the other photo that you mention (you distinctly said "two photos", and forgive me if I missed it, but you do leave piles of twaddle that are difficult to wade through...) and describe how exactly they relate in support of your argument. I'm more than happy to do the comparison on my computer if you can adequately describe the methods and details of the comparison that you have done.

Please be sure to include as much detail as possible. But let me quantify that request... please be sure to include as much relevant detail a possible (and exclude all irrelevant details entirely).

Cheers sky, and welcome back from your trip.

Thanks.

I didn't want to take a chance and post that photo here since it was copyrighted, and corrected from 'copywrited, (drat, and double drat) 'because I got hit before by the Mods for doing so in the past. Looking down in the valley from the video, and closer to the mountains, we must remember that people down there and closer to those mountains, also watched the lights as well, so now, the viewing angle is going to increase.

I was down in the valley and closer to the mountains near Phoenix last Sunday, and I noted that the angle over the mountain crestline had indeed, increased from where the lights were originally recorded further away. The folks of Phoenix have said that the lights were not flares and that the lights were definitely uniformed in shape, like a lamp shade.

One of the witnesses I spoke with confirmed the object came in from Nevada. He was a former machinist who had done work for NASA.

Phoenix Lights Trailer:

.

Edited by skyeagle409

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And now, it's airplanes. Airplanes were not involved in the 'Phoenix Lights' sightings either, otherwise, they would have been tracked on radar to their landing areas and the pilots grounded for airspace violations.

Have you forgotten Mitch Stanley and his Dobsonian Telescope already? My my......

There were many events, not a single one, and this was earlier in the evening 8-9PM. And yes, commercial aircraft were in the air. Later in the evening around 10PM the flare drop made this seem more mysterious than it is.

Now that I have brought you up to speed a little, you can see that nobody claimed that the 7-8PM sighting was flares.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Thanks.

I didn't want to take a chance and post that photo here since it was copyrighted, and corrected from 'copywrited, (drat, and double drat) 'because I got hit before by the Mods for doing so in the past. Looking down in the valley from the video, and closer to the mountains, we must remember that people down there and closer to those mountains, also watched the lights as well, so now, the viewing angle is going to increase.

I was down in the valley and closer to the mountains near Phoenix last Sunday, and I noted that the angle over the mountain crestline had indeed, increased from where the lights were originally recorded further away. The folks of Phoenix have said that the lights were not flares and that the lights were definitely uniformed in shape.

So you have photos that you took and are not copywrited to post?

And you have some calcs to prove your version of events?

I will stay with facts over zealous opinion thanks. I am sure the residents you spoke to agreed with you, or you would not be taling to them in the first place.

Edited by psyche101

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Planes Trains and Insane`s Flares,Glares,Stares. WHeres the UFO`s ? mostly in the minds of the Beholders.nuff said . :rolleyes:

Don't forget automobiles.

Nah, the UFO's are around, ET is the mind thing. I do not know a single person who has met ET, so I do not understand how the identification is made as ET.

p.s. Come back Badeskov`s We need you back !

put down that Laser thing-a-magiggie !

Yes indeed, Bade is always missed. Very busy I believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A Clean Shot to the Head maybe ? "They Shoot Horses dont they?" :rolleyes:

Not sure they shoot them but some do seem to flog the dead ones quite a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 13

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.