Still Waters Posted February 24, 2012 #1 Share Posted February 24, 2012 Does the existence of two-headed trout mean things are just fine in Southern Idaho's waterways?According to The New York Times, that's more or less the conclusion drawn by the J. R. Simplot mining company, which commissioned a study including photos of two-headed trout spawned from fish caught in Southern Idaho creeks. What's more, the report concludes that levels of the metal selenium should be allowed to reach higher levels than what laws currently permit. Read more... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goodnite Posted February 24, 2012 #2 Share Posted February 24, 2012 I wonder if they would be half as easy to catch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paracelse Posted February 24, 2012 #3 Share Posted February 24, 2012 I wonder if they would be half as easy to catch? Depends how suicidal they are! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Still Waters Posted February 24, 2012 Author #4 Share Posted February 24, 2012 I wonder if they would be half as easy to catch? Depends how suicidal they are! I wouldn't fancy eating them anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paracelse Posted February 24, 2012 #5 Share Posted February 24, 2012 I wouldn't fancy eating them anyway Totally agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verneph Posted February 24, 2012 #6 Share Posted February 24, 2012 Just because you've found a two-headed fish doesn't automatically mean the water is polluted. This type of mutation is seen quite often in many different species of animals from snakes to cats to even humans. The water should be tested, sure, but there's no need to raise a big stink about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Still Waters Posted February 24, 2012 Author #7 Share Posted February 24, 2012 Just because you've found a two-headed fish doesn't automatically mean the water is polluted. You're right of course. Still, you can eat them all then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angi chiesa Posted February 25, 2012 #8 Share Posted February 25, 2012 well I am more interested in fat chickens with four legs.I have never got round to eating a fish head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadishSpirit Posted February 25, 2012 #9 Share Posted February 25, 2012 One head trout with two body next please double the meat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Fluffs Posted February 25, 2012 #10 Share Posted February 25, 2012 I'm afraid of two headed fish... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbefumo Posted February 25, 2012 #11 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Wonder if the same factors are responsible for so many voters with no brains? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chainsawcam Posted February 27, 2012 #12 Share Posted February 27, 2012 #10 well said !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now